[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]
http://www.lemetropolecafe.com
The John Brimelow Report
Is Big Brother watching us?
Monday, August 23, 2004
Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $5.74, PM $6.88, with world gold at $410.90 and $409.60. Adequate, and ample, for legal imports. Impressively resilient performance: very bad news for Bears.
India’s credit rating was raised by S&P today, and UBS has published a report linking the country with China in a forecast for stupendous growth in consumer spending over the next generation. After an initial flurry in the early 90s, Chinese economic growth has meant disappointingly little for gold (in contrast to platinum); India, on the other hand, has been excellent. The concept that India should be compared with China must ultimately improve sentiment towards gold via comprehension of the Venerosian "wealth effect" idea.
Wealth growth is the reason advanced for the double- digit surge in gold demand (by weight) in the Gulf in Q2 ’04 compared to ’03, which is reported in several Gulf Newspapers today. (See the eccentrically headlined
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/Di…st/business_august398.xml story.)
Considering the gold price, this is indeed a remarkable event: geopolitical factors must surely be involved as well. Needless to say, the latter is not going away.
With the active contract up 16 yen at the close, liquidation on TOCOM has clearly resumed. On comparatively heavy volume equal to 36,631 Comex lots (127% above Friday), open interest slipped another 544 Comex equivalent to equal only 93,493 Comex contracts. This is quite low for TOCOM. World gold was $1.95 below NY’s close at the end of trading. (NY on Friday traded 86,343 contracts. Open interest leapt a staggering 19,062 lots, (59.3 tonnes!) to 257,077.)
Observers generally seem to have some difficulty accounting for gold’s behavior last week. It emancipated itself from the dollar of course. UBS is also puzzled by what they consider to be a low build up in spec longs:
"The COTR for gold showed a smaller than expected increase in the net long position in gold in the week to 17 August. As we stated on Friday, based on the move in the gold price over the preceding week, we expected an increase of 2-3 million ounces. The one million ounce addition… probably indicates that OTC rather than Comex buying has been driving the metal. Subsequent changes in open interest suggest that the net long position has increased by around another 1-2 million ounces since then, again a rather small move… OTC funds have been largely absent from the gold market since the May sell-off and the fact that they may be returning to the gold market could herald a move back to the highs of earlier in the year"
The obvious explanation, that the gold move last week was rooted in the Middle East and Indian physical market (which is what the premiums have been saying), is surprisingly overlooked. There is, of course, a real question as to how close an upscale outfit like UBS is to the grubby business of shipping many small parcels of metal to the Arabs and Indians.
Commentaries are probably more justified in attributing Friday’s action to Funds – although UBS interestingly reports heavy activity on the PM fix (which was $410.55), suggesting there was physical appetite as well. What is not discussed, and on the basis of past experience will not be discussed, is what kind of seller stands from 11am to the close on an August Friday, pouring huge volume into the market, and holding the price static (at around $413 spot). This after the gold price had triumphantly vaulted just about every technical obstacle recently popular.
Mike Bolser, who believes gold is under constant management on the basis of the 200-day moving average of the Dollar Index price, has begun considering if the effort to keep this parameter flat (which he detected early in the summer) has been abandoned. What can be said on the basis of the physical premiums is that the hero seller is likely to be needed again.
JB