The John Brimelow Report
India & Gartman too!
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $6.96, PM $5.27, with world gold at $419.55 and $423.45. Ample, and adequate for legal imports. Impressively resilient, considering the sharp increase in world gold. The rupee strengthened further to a 3-month high today.
TOCOM activity slumped, the firmer yen probably suppressing any interest in gold futures. Volume fell 44% to only equal 11,480 Comex lots; world gold was essentially static (up 10c from the NY close); the active contract closed up 5 yen. (NY yesterday traded 45,130 contracts; open interest rose another 2,979 lots to 305,225, getting close again to the all time high.)
Refco Research guessed last night that open interest would fall in the wake of the palpable defeat of the bear raid early yesterday: instead it rose. Quite possibly tomorrow will see a record: estimated volume was 50,000, with a tell-tale acceleration at the close.
Institutional Analyst/groupie Dennis Gartman, finally becoming concerned about the dollar, asks the key question about gold (written very early today):
"Turning then to gold, we note that once again the $420-422/oz. level is material resistance, and it has been for the past several sessions…One might reasonably ask who the sellers are that are keeping prices from rising…What is important is that the price of gold is clearly trending upward; the sellers find their offers rather readily taken; support seems to come in at progressively higher prices and resistance is steadily chipped at."
Since Gartman has a fine sense about what his clients are willing to hear, gold’s friends should be grateful that he raises the (unanswered) question: any interest in the sector from this quarter is significant.
JB
CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH
The December 30-year bond closed at 114 1/32 up 21/32. This is at its highest levels for the move, hardly a ringing endorsement of the US economy. I’ll hang with my analysis of the past many months, one that seems so obvious. The maneuvers by the Fed and Bush Administration to prop up the economy have run their course. What lies ahead for our economy and stock markets appears ominous.
Long bond:
http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/TR/C4
The PPT is like the football teams of yesteryear that would run off tackle over and over again until it did not work any more. Only, in this case, it is their patented "Hail Mary" play used to rescue the DOW which they use over and over. The DOW was down over 90 in the early going. No matter, by the close it came back to 9986, down 11. The DOG gained 11 to 1933.
S&P:
http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/SP/C4
The oil inventory news was super bullish:
10:31 DOE reports crude oil inventories +1.2M barrels vs. expectations +1.8M barrels
Gasoline inventories reported (700K) barrels vs. consensus +400K barrels. Distillate inventories reported (1.9M) barrels vs. consensus (1.0M) barrels. November crude is trading higher to $53.80/barrel in reaction to the data.
* * * * *
10:33 API reports crude oil inventories (972K) barrels
Distillate inventories reported (1.2M) barrels, while gasoline inventories (2.4M) barrels. Nov. WTI crude continues to trade higher, post-data, quoted last at $53.90/barrel.
* * * * *
Gold Cartel crowd rats beginning to leave a sinking ship?
18:13 C reports departure of three senior officials -- Reuters (43.59)
Citing an internal memo, Reuters reports Thomas Jones, CEO of Citigroup Asset Mgmt., Deryck Maughan, chairman of Citigroup Int'l, and Peter Scaturro, CEO of Citigroup Private Bank, will be leaving. Effective immediately, Citigroup Asset, Citigroup Private Bank and Travelers Life & Annuity will report to C COO Bob Willumstad.
* * * * *
Alan Greenspan and Wall Street have been dissing the real US inflation situation and soaring oil prices for months. Mainstream is reporting reality:
Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Whirlpool Corp., the world's second- largest home-appliance maker, cut its full-year profit forecast, citing higher steel and oil costs.
Profit will be $5.85 to $5.95 a share, the company said in a statement distributed by PR Newswire. Whirlpool had said it would earn $6.20 to $6.35.
STOCKHOLM, Oct 20 (Reuters) - Electrolux, the world's biggest home-appliance maker, cut its 2004 profit outlook in the face of fierce competition and high steel prices as it posted third-quarter profits in line with expectations.
"Operating income for the full year 2004 is expected to be significantly lower than in 2003, excluding items affecting comparability," the company said in a statement on Wednesday.
-END-
A big miss and another chink in the cabal’s armor:
Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co., the second- biggest U.S. bank, said quarterly profit fell 13 percent because of costs related to the July purchase of Bank One Corp. and a slump in fixed-income trading.
Third-quarter net income declined to $1.42 billion, or 39 cents a share, from $1.63 billion, or 78 cents, the New York- based company said in a statement. Excluding acquisition costs, JPMorgan would have earned $2.2 billion, or 60 cents a share. The average estimate of 14 analysts was 74 cents, according to Thomson Financial. –END-
Edgar Bergen must be rolling over in his grave with Treasury Secretary’s Snow's continued Charlie McCarthy puppet routine. It is beyond inane:
12:52 US Treasury's Snow repeats support for strong dollar policy --- Reuters
The US dollar is trading notably lower against the euro and the yen, with gold trading sharply higher. Snow declines to comment on the latest drop in the dollar
* * * * *
More bad news for stock market bulls:
Market Intelligence
10/20
The bulls jumped almost 5%, all the way up to 58.9%, while the bears fell to 22.1%, a drop of 1.4%. Historically, these levels have proved very negative for equities. It is hard pinpoint a single reason for this increased enthusiasm, with averages flat, or within 4%, of where they started the year, but virtually all newsletters do look for a break in the high crude prices.
There were just 19.0% in the correction camp. They are short term bearish but longer term bullish, viewing an expected pullback to be a buying opportunity.
We consider "normal" readings to be 45% for the bulls and 35% for the bears. The bulls had been well below that level mid-August, and markets rallied. The sentiment readings are used on a contrary basis.
The spread between the bulls and bears expanded to 36.8%, moving into the 35-40% range most often seen at the levels of index tops.
-END-
The real CPI story:
The King Report
M. Ramsey King Securities, Inc.
Wednesday Oct. 20, 2004 – Issue 3020 "Independent View of the News"
From the BLS on CPI: "Energy costs declined for the third consecutive month--
From the BLS on CPI: "Energy costs declined for the third consecutive month--down 0.4 percent in September--after advancing sharply in the first half of the year. Within energy, the index for household fuels decreased 0.9 percent, while the index for motor fuel rose 0.1 percent. The index for food was unchanged in September, as a 0.2 percent decline in the index for food at home was offset by a 0.3 percent increase in the index for food away from home." http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm Please reread the BLS line about energy prices declining for the 3rd consecutive month. Who possibly could believe this crap? Yet we know many, particularly Wall Street shills and permabulls, do. You cannot make up stuff like this; it’s tantamount to Orwell’s "1984".
Here is more altered reality foisted on the uninformed and gullible. BLS has energy prices +6.7% y/y. On 9/30/03 oil was $29ish; on 9/30/04 it was $49ish, +69% y/y…And Fed clowns keep trying to sell the notion that inflation is tame. The way CPI is compiled, there can never be meaningful inflation.
Wait, the assault on one’s intelligence is worse than above. For the past three months, BLS has its CPI energy component DOWN 9.8%!!! (Check the table at above link to BLS) Thank you sir, may I have another! We’d love to administer a test to anyone involved in financial decision making that asks them that given the evidence of the past 3 to 4 months do they believe the BLS’s CPI, and in particular the energy component…BLS has the CPI energy component up only 18.6% for 2004.
In our letter on Monday, we noted the following increases over the past 3.5 months: "Oil is +50%; heating oil is +54%; gasoline is +24% and natural gas is +6.5%. But the increases have not shown up in PPI or CPI." So either this month’s CPI energy index must soar or the incorruptible BLS is full of it.
BLS has used vehicle prices down 1.8% y/y. Mannheim, which doesn’t sample but counts all transactions, has them +0.4%. But Mannheim does not employ hedonic adjustments. Mannheim explains the problem with BLS’s used vehicle methodology at: http://manheimvalueindex.com/c…4m3r1c4/comparisonCPI.php
There is more hilarity in other categories of the CPI release and tables, but we don’t feel the need to delve further to prove the obvious.
How come in BLS substitution policy, there is never upward substitution if prices fall? If steak prices soar, the BLS assumes people will ‘substitute’ ground beef; and then there is no CPI increase. But what if beef prices fall? Does the BLS assume people will substitute ground sirloin for hamburger? It’s just like hedonics – there never is an adjustment for worse service or anything that might raise the CPI.
Yesterday’s WSJ had some analyst downplaying hedonic adjustments. We love analysts and reporters that suddenly have to address issues like hedonic adjustments and the Biz B/D Rate when they have ignored or were not aware of it for years. Most Wall Street analysts loathe ‘doing the work’, so they ignore troubling details. If economists and analysts acknowledge the problems, they must ‘do some work’ instead of just plugging dubious data into their ‘models’ and/or making specious forecasts on spurious data…As we annually note, Q3 (July to August) CPI is one of the most massaged numbers because it is the basis of COLAs. And we are pleased that others now report that fact…We’d love to hear the WSJ’s reporter and his featured analyst’s explanation for energy in the CPI.
The Social Security Administration announced a 2.7% COLA for its more than 47m recipients yesterday. This is about $25/month for the average recipient. Higher Medicare premiums will cost $11.60/month. Ergo, the US government on the paying hand (BLS) says healthcare costs are up only 4.4% y/y, but on the taking hand it exacts a higher toll…Congress is complicit in swindling the elderly - by deed or ignorance
-END-
With the false/gimmickry reporting we are getting from the establishment and the present administration in Washington, along with the blatant rigging of the price of gold to calm down inflation talk, one can’t help but reflect on two of my favorite movies: The Matrix and The Stepford Wives.
The latest from Dennis Gartman. While, he still doesn’t get IT, DG deserves credit for at least acknowledging our camp, unlike the gold industry, whose disdain for us and negligent silence towards our evidence of price manipulation is inexcusable.
"Turning then to gold, we note that once again the $420-422/oz. level is material resistance, and it has been for the past several sessions. Gold has tried vainly to push upward through that resistance, but thus far has been unable to do so. It shall likely require a move by the EUR upward through 1.2550, which shall set up any number of stops there to push gold upward through that resistance, but at this point both seem reasonably likely. We note also that the "attack" upon that resistance level in gold is being done from a higher price than previously. Driving through resistance at $420-422 when the 'attack" is begun from a base at or near to $417-419 is far easier than when the attack is begun from $410-412.
"One might reasonably ask who the sellers are that are keeping prices from rising, and the conspiratorialists among us will readily say that it is a cabal of Wall Street firms who hope to defend short positions they have inherited over the years. We have listened to the conspiratorialists for years, and we actually find their "enthusiasm" refreshing even if their thesis ill-advised. What is important is that the price of gold is clearly trending upward; the sellers find their offers rather readily taken; support seems to come in at progressively higher prices and resistance is steadily material portion of that crude to the US."
Ill advised? Nothing in market history has ever been this obvious! Especially today. Gold opens $3 higher. From there on in the dollar fails to rally, oil goes berserk, silver closes not far off its highs, world stock markets have closed lower and the US market tanks early on. You call that normal market action with massive floor short-covering early as the DEC contract took out fierce $423 resistance on the opening? They have you on CNBC all the time to talk about gold. You would serve them better by expounding on Tiddlywinks.
This is more like it:
Dear Goldman Sachs, I have a question. I have been following the gold market now for a couple of years. I have noticed that on days when the gold price declines, there is virtually no limit as to how far it falls...$6, $10, even as much as $16 in a single day it will fall. This has happened many times in the past 2 years. This usually takes place on days when the dollar is rallying modestly to greatly. However, on days when the US dollar is in steep decline, gold will almost never rally more then $4-$6. Only twice in 2 years has this happened and on the day following these events gold went into a free fall.
Now my question is this, on the COT reports, I have noticed that on days when gold rallies on bad US economic news, when gold gets to this $4 to $6 rally, it is almost ALWAYS Goldman Sachs who becomes a huge seller instead of a buyer like nearly everyone else. Why do you sell so enormously on days when others are buying? In my mind, it makes no sense. Would you be able to answer this question for me. I would really appreciate it.
Wendell Leytham
Hi
We can't comment on our trading strategies, or anyone else's. But it is important to recognize that the vast majority of trading which is reported under the rubric of Goldman, Sachs & Co., our broker dealer, is in fact undertaken on behalf of clients, i.e where we act as a dealer for someone else's trade. Only that institution could explain why they are trading in a particular way.
Regards
GS Investor Relations
gs-investorrelations@gs.com
Those clients being The Gold Cartel and allies, of course.
Anecdotal gold supply input from Canada:
Talked to a bullion seller today who said a customer informed him there was a 3 week wait for receipt of Maple Leafs from Bank of Nova Scotia in Vancouver (Canada’s primary retail gold supply bank). The Bank claims they have to wait for delivery from Toronto. This type of wait sounds too long for just shipment. Maybe some of your other readers can confirm possibility of tightness for ML’s.
Cheers,
Dave
On Indian gold demand, which John Brimelow has so ably reported on over the years. His work blows away that of everyone else in the mainstream gold world:
[Business India]: New Delhi, Oct 20 : MMTC Ltd, India's largest bullion trader, has been witnessing robust growth in its gold handling business since rules were eased in February allowing bullion traders to directly import.
Prior to February, the government allowed import of gold only through 17 designated agencies, apart from exporters who could source the yellow metal for value addition and overseas trade.
"Despite expectations that the bullion traders would opt to source gold on their own, MMTC continues to play a big role in import of the precious metal. We currently have 25 percent market share in India," said Sanjiv Batra, director of marketing in MMTC Ltd.
"As against 82 tonnes of gold imported by us in 2003-04, this year from April to September we have sourced 81 tonnes of gold. We expect to double this during the fiscal," Batra told IANS on the sidelines of a week-long Festival of Gold hosted by MMTC.
The largest consumer of gold, India's overall imports during the last six months has been 330 tonnes…..
"Instead of investing in bank saving, people are again investing in gold for better investment returns. This is also seeing an increase in demand for gold," said Batra.
In fact, the imports have risen from 418 tonnes in 2002-03 to 569 tonnes in 2003-04 and it is expected to be much more this year, considering that in the first six months the imports have been 330 tonnes.
-END-
Some thoughts from Down Under:
G’Day Bill,
There appears to have beena "fundamental" change in the Markets last night/yesterday, "Times are a changing"??!!
Strong move in commodities last night, with the US$ Index , Dow etc showing extreme weakness.
Web links:
http://quotes.ino.com/
http://www.goldsheetlinks.com/kitco.htm
http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_04/ackerman101904.html
The critical support level for the US$ Index is 84.8, and the Dow at 9840 and 9600.
The critical resistance for Gold is US$ 434.
If and when either of these indices breaks, then "it" might be "on" for one and all. (Pigs can also fly??!!)
The other commodities are in a stage of consolidation, and therefore Gold should take priority in terms of project identification and pegging documentation.
Och baye,
Haggis
At least the gold shares closed on an upbeat note, finishing on their highs. The XAU closed at 101.82, up 2.87, while the HUI jumped 8 to 229.46. A move above 230 should send this index off to the races.
HUI
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.c…&o_symb=hui&freq=1&time=8
This is the third time gold has traded up towards $430 over the past year. The other two times, the price was pounded lower as The Gold Cartel held the fort by capping those rallies and then mounted a vicious counter-attack. Until they are sent to the cleaners with $430 taken out decisively, we will not be out of harm’s way. They must be buried. Let’s hear it for Murphy’s Law.
GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!
MIDAS