Beiträge von Eldorado

Front-Page News

By Chris Mayer

The global water crisis is not a front page story...yet.

But over the coming months, I expect this "middle-page"
story to make its way to the front of newspapers worldwide.
Already, "Water crisis" articles are appearing with
increasing frequency...

"Shortages of water are growing faster than expected," the
August 22nd edition of the Financial Times warned.
"Scientists had forecast in 2000 that one in three people
would face water shortages by 2025, but water experts have
been shocked to find that this threshold has already been
crossed."

Think of it; a forecast of an event that was not supposed
to happen until 2025. Yet, here we are in 2006 and that
forecast is already a reality. The idea of investing in
water-themed stocks has been kicking around the fringes of
the investment world for decades, but these stocks are
anything but fringy now. I believe we'll look back on the
current decade as the one that launched the most serious
natural resource crisis of the 21st century.

The water crisis that is now underway is both a physical
and an economic phenomenon.

On the physical side, much of the world's population
resides in locales where water is naturally scarce. Too
often, however, the supplies of fresh water become UN-
naturally scarce, due to reckless industrialization,
breakneck urbanization and chronic mismanagement.

Water is naturally scarce throughout Egypt, Australia and
the American Southwest. Even so, the Southwest hosts one of
the fastest growing populations in the country. Obviously,
when rapid population growth confronts a lean supply of
water, problems ensue. So it should be no surprise that the
U.S. is having increasing disputes with Mexico over sinking
levels of water in the Colorado River. Elsewhere in the
West and Southwest, cities and small towns are tussling
with one another over water rights and restrictions on
water use.

How bad can it get? Here's an interesting little tidbit: In
1944, Governor Benjamin Moeur sent the Arizona National
Guard during the construction of Parker Dam to prevent
California from stealing Arizona's water. When the unit of
about 100 men, with machine guns mounted on trucks,
arrived, construction stopped, as you might have guessed.
This issue was later resolved in the Supreme Court. Could
such standoffs happen again?

In Australia, water plays a big part in political
elections, where they are debating the reclamation of
sewage water and turning it into drinking water. "As
campaign promises, these are hardly pleasing," notes the
typically understated Economist. "Yet it illustrates the
increasing prominence of water, or the lack of it, in
Australian politics." According to the magazine, Australia
faces a water shortage unlike anything experienced in the
200 years since Europeans arrived.

The Economist quotes an Australian agricultural scientist,
Peter Cullen, who says, "People are frightened of running
out of water."

But clean water is not only in short supply where rainfall
levels are low; it is also in short supply where financial
resources are low. In other words, today's water crisis is
as much an economic problem as a physical one, perhaps more
so.

Although more than one billion people face physical water
shortages, the Financial Times notes, "a further one
billion people face economic water shortages because they
lack the necessary infrastructure to take water from rivers
and aquifers." The "economic shortages" also result from
inadequate or non-existent waste treatment. Throughout many
parts of the Developing World, wastewater receives minimal
– or no – treatment before flowing into lakes, rivers and
seas.

Then there is China, which no water enthusiast can ignore.
"China's Water Problems Set to Worsen" reads one headline.
The Chinese have found that despite massive investment in
water infrastructure over the last few years, water
pollution is actually worsening. Qiu Baoxing, minister of
Construction in China, said: "This is a critical point in
time – we are at a crossroads."

Indeed they are. Water is a major health issue in China – a
country that leads the world in incidences of stomach and
liver cancer, both traced to exposure to polluted water.

In my recently published water report, I examine the main
threads of the global crisis. But if there are still any
lingering doubts whether this crisis is real, consider this
alarming fact from my report:

"Contaminated water is deadlier than any other evil on
earth; deadlier than AIDS; deadlier than cancer; deadlier
than contagious diseases; deadlier even than World Wars.
During the Second World War, one soldier died every 8
seconds. Today, one human being dies every 6 seconds from
drinking contaminated water. The scale of this ongoing
international tragedy boggles the mind."

Fortunately, a growing water crisis is not a foregone
conclusion. But the effort to combat the crisis will
require an enormous commitment of planning, effort
and...yes...money. As the campaign against the water crisis
progress, hundreds of billions of dollars will flow into
the coffers of water-treatment and water infrastructure
companies.

Therefore, the long-term efforts to clean up and transport
the world's water supplies will provide extraordinary
investment opportunities for forward-thinking investors.

But mainstream newspapers are just starting to cover the
story. "Declining water supply brings a deluge of ideas,"
declares one headline from the Financial Times. "Global
shortages are giving companies a chance to develop
initiatives in infrastructure, filtration and irrigation."

Few people realize how much water agriculture and
manufacturing use up. There is this concept called
"embedded water" where analysts figure out how much water
it takes to make food and consumer goods.

For example it takes 200 liters of water to make one
kilogram of rice; 500 liters for 1 kilogram of potatoes.
That might seem like a lot of water until you consider that
producing one kilogram of beef requires a whopping 100,000
liters of water. (The "typical" American lunch - hamburger,
fries, and a soft drink - takes more than 5,000 liters of
water to produce). It takes 200,000 liters for a kilogram
of cotton. And perhaps most surprisingly, it takes about
150,000 liters of water for Ford Motor to produce a single
Transit van.

These facts are butting up against the reality of rising
water demand and falling supplies. In India, analysts
project water demand from industry alone will more than
triple over the next 20 years. Every industry from textiles
to electronics will have to consider risks in water supply.

"This explains why a company such as Unilever has
initiatives ranging from a detergent that requires less
rinsing for the Indian market to support for tomato farmers
in Brazil to introduce drip irrigation, which cuts water
use by 30 to 70 percent," the FT reports.

Developed countries could spend over a trillion dollars
upgrading water and wastewater systems over the next two
decades. That's a tremendous opportunity for companies
providing the skeletal basics of water systems – things
like pumps, pipes and filtration technology.

It's a huge topic, and I've only scratched the surface. In
the last few months I've recommended a number of water-
related companies: a water pump company, an irrigation
equipment company, a water pipe company and more. Several
of these recommendations are up over 20% already. But we
are in the very early stages of a water-infrastructure
boom.

James Cameron, vice chairman of a U.K. bank focused on this
area, says, "Managing water will be a premium business to
be in." It already is.

Now's the time to explore for attractive water-focused
investments...before the water crisis becomes front-page
news.

[Joel's Note: Come all ye contrarian investors! Unlike
other natural resources there are not going to be any new
water discoveries. There will not be any "water
alternatives." There will be no abating of thirst for this
increasingly precious commodity.

Already water restrictions are encroaching on the thirst of
first world countries...and this is just the beginning.
Predictably, companies are scrambling to get in first with
innovations in piping, filtration, membrane technology,
purification...the list goes on.

Front-Page News

By Chris Mayer

The global water crisis is not a front page story...yet.

But over the coming months, I expect this "middle-page"
story to make its way to the front of newspapers worldwide.
Already, "Water crisis" articles are appearing with
increasing frequency...

"Shortages of water are growing faster than expected," the
August 22nd edition of the Financial Times warned.
"Scientists had forecast in 2000 that one in three people
would face water shortages by 2025, but water experts have
been shocked to find that this threshold has already been
crossed."

Think of it; a forecast of an event that was not supposed
to happen until 2025. Yet, here we are in 2006 and that
forecast is already a reality. The idea of investing in
water-themed stocks has been kicking around the fringes of
the investment world for decades, but these stocks are
anything but fringy now. I believe we'll look back on the
current decade as the one that launched the most serious
natural resource crisis of the 21st century.

The water crisis that is now underway is both a physical
and an economic phenomenon.

On the physical side, much of the world's population
resides in locales where water is naturally scarce. Too
often, however, the supplies of fresh water become UN-
naturally scarce, due to reckless industrialization,
breakneck urbanization and chronic mismanagement.

Water is naturally scarce throughout Egypt, Australia and
the American Southwest. Even so, the Southwest hosts one of
the fastest growing populations in the country. Obviously,
when rapid population growth confronts a lean supply of
water, problems ensue. So it should be no surprise that the
U.S. is having increasing disputes with Mexico over sinking
levels of water in the Colorado River. Elsewhere in the
West and Southwest, cities and small towns are tussling
with one another over water rights and restrictions on
water use.

How bad can it get? Here's an interesting little tidbit: In
1944, Governor Benjamin Moeur sent the Arizona National
Guard during the construction of Parker Dam to prevent
California from stealing Arizona's water. When the unit of
about 100 men, with machine guns mounted on trucks,
arrived, construction stopped, as you might have guessed.
This issue was later resolved in the Supreme Court. Could
such standoffs happen again?

In Australia, water plays a big part in political
elections, where they are debating the reclamation of
sewage water and turning it into drinking water. "As
campaign promises, these are hardly pleasing," notes the
typically understated Economist. "Yet it illustrates the
increasing prominence of water, or the lack of it, in
Australian politics." According to the magazine, Australia
faces a water shortage unlike anything experienced in the
200 years since Europeans arrived.

The Economist quotes an Australian agricultural scientist,
Peter Cullen, who says, "People are frightened of running
out of water."

But clean water is not only in short supply where rainfall
levels are low; it is also in short supply where financial
resources are low. In other words, today's water crisis is
as much an economic problem as a physical one, perhaps more
so.

Although more than one billion people face physical water
shortages, the Financial Times notes, "a further one
billion people face economic water shortages because they
lack the necessary infrastructure to take water from rivers
and aquifers." The "economic shortages" also result from
inadequate or non-existent waste treatment. Throughout many
parts of the Developing World, wastewater receives minimal
– or no – treatment before flowing into lakes, rivers and
seas.

Then there is China, which no water enthusiast can ignore.
"China's Water Problems Set to Worsen" reads one headline.
The Chinese have found that despite massive investment in
water infrastructure over the last few years, water
pollution is actually worsening. Qiu Baoxing, minister of
Construction in China, said: "This is a critical point in
time – we are at a crossroads."

Indeed they are. Water is a major health issue in China – a
country that leads the world in incidences of stomach and
liver cancer, both traced to exposure to polluted water.

In my recently published water report, I examine the main
threads of the global crisis. But if there are still any
lingering doubts whether this crisis is real, consider this
alarming fact from my report:

"Contaminated water is deadlier than any other evil on
earth; deadlier than AIDS; deadlier than cancer; deadlier
than contagious diseases; deadlier even than World Wars.
During the Second World War, one soldier died every 8
seconds. Today, one human being dies every 6 seconds from
drinking contaminated water. The scale of this ongoing
international tragedy boggles the mind."

Fortunately, a growing water crisis is not a foregone
conclusion. But the effort to combat the crisis will
require an enormous commitment of planning, effort
and...yes...money. As the campaign against the water crisis
progress, hundreds of billions of dollars will flow into
the coffers of water-treatment and water infrastructure
companies.

Therefore, the long-term efforts to clean up and transport
the world's water supplies will provide extraordinary
investment opportunities for forward-thinking investors.

But mainstream newspapers are just starting to cover the
story. "Declining water supply brings a deluge of ideas,"
declares one headline from the Financial Times. "Global
shortages are giving companies a chance to develop
initiatives in infrastructure, filtration and irrigation."

Few people realize how much water agriculture and
manufacturing use up. There is this concept called
"embedded water" where analysts figure out how much water
it takes to make food and consumer goods.

For example it takes 200 liters of water to make one
kilogram of rice; 500 liters for 1 kilogram of potatoes.
That might seem like a lot of water until you consider that
producing one kilogram of beef requires a whopping 100,000
liters of water. (The "typical" American lunch - hamburger,
fries, and a soft drink - takes more than 5,000 liters of
water to produce). It takes 200,000 liters for a kilogram
of cotton. And perhaps most surprisingly, it takes about
150,000 liters of water for Ford Motor to produce a single
Transit van.

These facts are butting up against the reality of rising
water demand and falling supplies. In India, analysts
project water demand from industry alone will more than
triple over the next 20 years. Every industry from textiles
to electronics will have to consider risks in water supply.

"This explains why a company such as Unilever has
initiatives ranging from a detergent that requires less
rinsing for the Indian market to support for tomato farmers
in Brazil to introduce drip irrigation, which cuts water
use by 30 to 70 percent," the FT reports.

Developed countries could spend over a trillion dollars
upgrading water and wastewater systems over the next two
decades. That's a tremendous opportunity for companies
providing the skeletal basics of water systems – things
like pumps, pipes and filtration technology.

It's a huge topic, and I've only scratched the surface. In
the last few months I've recommended a number of water-
related companies: a water pump company, an irrigation
equipment company, a water pipe company and more. Several
of these recommendations are up over 20% already. But we
are in the very early stages of a water-infrastructure
boom.

James Cameron, vice chairman of a U.K. bank focused on this
area, says, "Managing water will be a premium business to
be in." It already is.

Now's the time to explore for attractive water-focused
investments...before the water crisis becomes front-page
news.

[Joel's Note: Come all ye contrarian investors! Unlike
other natural resources there are not going to be any new
water discoveries. There will not be any "water
alternatives." There will be no abating of thirst for this
increasingly precious commodity.

Already water restrictions are encroaching on the thirst of
first world countries...and this is just the beginning.
Predictably, companies are scrambling to get in first with
innovations in piping, filtration, membrane technology,
purification...the list goes on.

Gutso !

""Was ich übrigens bisher noch nie gemacht habe, ist per Puts auf PM´s zu hedgen.Das fänd ich irgendwie traurig. ...
Da ziehe ich lieber selber die Reissleinen, wenns purzelt.""

Ich machs genauso :D.. btw. heute kommen die Inflationsdaten aus USA man will dann sehen ob Bernake einen guten Job macht.
Das timing passt ja wieder...

Edel, da ist halt immer der Reiz das Goldaktien 2-3 fach steigen koennen im Schnitt im Vergleich zum PoG sowie Dividenden.
Ganz wenig Goldzertifikate ist ok, ich habe nun selber Gold Calls und ETF's in der Region von 5%.
Der Handel mit ETF's oder Futures/Minenaktien wenn es hart auf hart geht kann verboten werden.
Dann kann ich auch eventuell meine Goldmuenzen bei der Bank gegen Fiat abliefern oder nur am Schwarzmarkt damit handeln.
Also 100% sicher ist gar nichts wenn der Staat solche Massnahmen macht.
Nehmen wir mal an die behaupten das die Terroristen Gold verschieben und jeder muss nun alles Gold bei der Bank deklarieren wo das Geld herkam und wird dann noch besteuert das er es hat. Denen wird noch viel einfallen in der Richtung um uns das Gold abzunehmen.
Mit dem Wort Terrorismus kann man heutzutage alles machen.
Am besten bringt man das Gold in ein Land wo der Handel nie verboten wird, die USA und EU Laender sind gefaehrlich, wie sicher Schweiz bleibt weiss ich nicht.

Aber soweit sind wir Gottseidank noch nicht.

Cheers

Eldo

Ulfur

Hier bist wieder, mit Todesnachrichten.
Naja wenigsten bist wieder da.
Mir haben uns schone Sorgen gemacht wo du bist.

Have a nice day

XEX

..Tschonko ist nicht der einzige..

Wer es nicht kann der hoert die CD von den Wiener Philharmoniker an.

Tschonko der Kommentar passt ja gut ins Bild.

"""Sacasm from a Friend"""

Habt ihr auch an McDonalds Aktien gedacht, die stehen ganz gut.

Guten Morgen

Ich habe die Kommentare ueber Martin Siegel angeschaut, ich finde es nicht fair ihm irgendeine Schuld zu geben und ihn schlecht zu machen.
Wie Bob schon sagte, The biggest blame is if you blame somebody else.
Wenn er genau den Trend wuesste dann waere er schon laengst multi-millionaer und wuerde auf seiner Yacht sitzen.
Wir wissen das immer Korrekturen kommen, uber die Heftigkeit wissen wir wenig.
Bei dieser spielen alle boesen Buben mit und man versucht mit allen Mitteln die Gold und Silberbugs zu demoralisien und zur Kapitulation zu treiben bevor es wieder raufgeht.
Da braucht man starke Nerven und Sitzfleisch sonst ist es aus.
Dieses Jahr hatte wir zwei grosse Auswaschmanoever vom PPT der im Mai/Juni und der jetzt. Ich bin mir sicher dass nach dem hier Gold wieder 700 USD bis Weihnachten steigt und der naechste washout wieder im Fruehjahr 2007. Man sollte immer einen Puffer/Kissen einbauen von ca. 30% die man kurzfristig an Papierverlust bekommen kann.

Fast 20% hat der Goldpreis nachgegeben von 730 USD, manche Aktien haben mehr verloren.

Was soll ich sagen ?, auch dieser Anschlag geht vorbei, es ist nun die letzte Gelegenheit in 2006 um guenstig EM Aktien oder physisch zu kaufen oder man haltet durch und verkauft keine Aktien.

Falls Gold bei der closing bell in NYSE ueber 587 USD steht kann man davon ausgehen die grossen Auswaschtage sind vorbei. Irgendwann sind fast keine Verkaeufer da dann erst werden die Funds auf long gehen.

Lassen wir uns ueberraschen welche Tendenz heute ist.
Gerade hoere ich das spaetestens Ende des Jahres die Leute von T-Bonds wieder auf Gold umsteigen sobald die ersten Anzeichen von Dollarschwaeche wieder hier sind.

Irgendwann wird das Kartenhaus vom PPT zusammenfallen die Geduld muss jeder haben bevor er in Gold und Silber investiert.

@Linar...sicher in den alten tread sind gute Infos drin, wer sie wissen will der muss suchen, jetzt sieht es so aus das die postings besser durchgehen was schon zumindest ein Fortschritt ist.
Ich bin mir sicher das der thread mit neuen postings von uns allen ebenso interessant sein wird.

Have a nice day, there is sun after the rain.

Le Metropole Members,

Midas du Metropole has served commentary at The James
Joyce Table titled, "Paulson's Orchestrated Gold Nightmare Playing Out."

GO GATA!

So little to present yesterday and so much to bring your way today. What a difference a day makes … not so much for any new insight I may have personally, but there is a great deal of relevant news.

Summer is not officially over yet … nor are the new Dog Days in the gold market. The AM Fixes were very firm in both gold and silver at $593.40 and $11.35 respectively. Gold made it up to the $595 area and that was all she wrote again.

After Labor Day, The Gold Cartel allowed gold to soar, which attracted a fair amount of trapped buyers. It was like what the Indians did to Custer and his men … luring them into a trap for the slaughter. Same as this morning, on a smaller scale. Gold was trading on the Comex ABOVE its 200 day moving average at the $591 level … buying came in, and then WHACK!

Who dunnit? The Gold Cartel and funds.

Something positive to bring your way. A highly regarded CTA and a big player in the gold and silver pits told our floor sources that this massive selling is coming from the central banks (including JAPAN) and the funds, like Millenium, which was a huge seller today. This trader (received this input with gold down $5) has decided to take them on and is going long at these levels.

His reasoning is that EVERYONE has turned seller, leaving few others to turn sellers. Soon after that comment came my way, Morgan Stanley, a seller of size a few days ago, turned a big buyer and gold lifted. This CTA is looking for a huge rally through October.

This sort of price action after a smashdown like we just saw is typical. The only time I saw gold reverse course and go right back up was when gold rose above $500 for the first time, then was sent back some $50 to take it out on the downside again. It only took a couple of days and gold was flying again. Of course, Paulson was not at the helm back then.

The following from a fellow Café member is an indication of the sort of resignation which has crept into the gold/silver investing arena thanks to the forced takedown of the precious metals by The Gold Cartel:

"my buddy, a long time gold bull but one whom can't grasp the concept of the cartel, just sold all his gold and gold stocks over the past two days.
he says he thinks gold is leading the market, signaling an imminent global deflationary collapse. of course, when i ask him what the upside breakout of the stock market is signaling, he has no answer.
so, so pathetic"

At DailyWealth, we believe the commodity price boom is still underway.

We believe that - even though commodity prices have risen significantly - Mom and Pop America still have not invested in commodities. And big investors (like pension funds) are just getting around to allocating money to commodities. This thing won't be over until everyone is on board.

Goldman Sachs was the first Wall Street firm to stick its neck out and talk about a commodity boom. I believe Goldman predicted oil could hit $100 a barrel, when it was trading for less than $50.

Today, Goldman's senior commodities economist in London, James Gutman, says: "We're certainly not at the end of the long-term bull market… If there are any near-term corrections, I'd view them as a buying opportunity."

Commodity prices will be extremely volatile, no doubt… I'd like to remind you, the price of gold fell from about $200 an ounce to about $100 an ounce in the mid-70s. It then soared to a peak of $850 in January 1980. Those who got scared out their position missed the move.

The Goldman Sachs analysts were bold - and right - about this bull market in commodities early on. We share Goldman's opinion today…

We believe that commodity prices are in a secular bull market.

There will be corrections along the way, but we have many years to go before this thing is over. We expect commodity prices could be substantially higher once this bull market has finally run its course.

Good Investing,

Steve

http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/sjuggerud091306.html

Oil Shortages?

It’s Happened Before. And It Will Happen Again.

http://www.321energy.com/editorials/cooke/cooke091506.html

Conclusion :

There are four concepts that thread their way through all five of these oil shortages.

There was plenty of oil in the ground. These oil shortages had nothing to do with world oil reserves or potential production. They happened anyway.
All five oil shortages were related, or directly caused, by cultural conflict. A world war. Two regional wars. Cold war isolation. Internal political and labor strife. Above ground factors caused a decline in oil production.
All five oil shortages had a chaotic impact on the affected national economies. All had higher rates of inflation. With the exception of WW2, all produced higher rates of unemployment. Real GDP growth was erratic.
Government could not avert the economic or cultural impact of an oil shortage. People had to fend for themselves. Solve their own problems. Adjust their own lifestyles. We had to solve our personal transportation problems, find new jobs, scramble for food resources, learn to conserve fuels, improve energy efficiency, and so on. Government regulation and welfare could only provide a minimum of support.
On the other hand, we have to be impressed by the resiliency of the human spirit. In every case, we did adjust, we did innovate, we did take the initiative, and we did survive.

So. Here we are.

del

Ok, Edel ich habs gemacht, es liegt nun an euch moderatoren ob ihr ein vorhangsschloss an den alten haengt.
Sonst taucht er wieder auf..

Gnight

XEX

Ich erlaube mir den Thread Thai Guru mit diesen neuen fortzusetzen da technischer Probleme in den alten auftraten.
Ich bedanke mich nochmals bei Thai Guru der uns schon lange nicht mehr besucht hat fuer seine postings.
Jeder der hier neu im Forum ist empfehle ich die Guru threads durchzublaettern und sich erstmal selber fuendig machen bei Fragen die schon oft diskutiert wurden. Es lo(e)hnt sich dort zu lesen !
Also was die meisten wissen ist das die Preise von Edelmetallen manipuliert sind aber es ist in unseren System eben schwer zu beweisen.
Entschuldigt aber der thread ist oft in englischer Schrift.

Ok... here we go...ready for the rollercoasters ?

Fangen wir gleich mit den Spottpreisen an.

Edel als Federfuehrer fuehle ich mich nicht, ich habe den nur von Thai Guru uebernommen als er keinen Bock mehr hatte.

Hier sind sehr wertvolle Informationen die jeder man anschaun sollte.

Immer wieder alles durchkauen macht keinen Spass, man kann das Camel zum Fluss fuehren aber nicht den Fluss zum Camel.

Mir solls egal sein, wenn dann die postings einfacher sind dann ja.

Da machen wir einen neuen auf, lassen wir dann den Guru raus und nennen ihn was nach Thai Guru kommt.

Gold und Silber aktuelle Informationen und Vermutungen Teil 3

Fuer alle neuen Mitglieder verweisen ich gleich am Anfang das sie Thai Guru 1 und 2 lesen sollten. :D... bevor sie uns Loecher in den Bauch fragen.

Wie waers damit ??

Was haelt ihr davon ?

...aber das ist momentan eh eine nebensache.

Gnight

XEX

scheiss doubles X(...del

Lucky, thanx for your though.

Ich hoerte mir gerade den Bob Hopper von Bunker Hill(siehe unten) im Radio an.

Er sagte neben das in Montana grosse Waldbraende sind und das Citi Group bis jetzt 5 billion Dollar an Settlements und Rechtstreiterei ausgegeben hat und vor kurzen wieder eine Strafe von 500 mill. USD zahlen musste weil sie wieder mal einen Haendler erwischt hatten der am Tag max. 10 m USD handeln durfte mit max. 5m fuer einen deal. Der hatte aber unbeachtet von seinen Vorgesetzten in kuerze 377 m USD ausgegeben hat um Commodities ud Gold/Silber zu shorten. Sie sind nicht die einzigen Banken die das machen, Goldman, JPM und das PPT wie wir wissen.
Die zahlen lieber die Kosten/Settlements und machen trotzdem eiskalt weiter selbst nach solchen Nachrichten.
Die IMF sagte das ein unkontrollierter Fall vom USD eine grosse Gefahr fuer alle Finanzmaerkte ist und das Assets fallen.

BOJ , BOE, EZB und die Feds kamen sofort zur Hilfe, darum ist es so heftig.IMO

Er sagte , welche Assets ???

Er empfehlte: Hold on, buy if you can, ..they may manipulate possible even for months.

Jetzt heisst es aussitzen und nicht verkaufen wenn man unter Druck ist.
Wer Cash hat der kann sich freuen, Saccard verkauf nun alle deine T-Bonds und kauf Gold wennst aufpasst hast.

Mir bleibt nichts anders uebrig und hoffe es dauert nicht zu lange.
Ich erhoffe morgen einen rebound von diesen PoG und HUI, das heute war zu heftig.
Wenn ich auf der Wiesn bin nach dem 25 September, moechte ich drauf gelassen eine Mass trinken.

Lucky, meine EM/Minen Aktien fielen ein drittel weniger als der HUI was eine gute Mischung an Aktien ebenso mit Juniors sein sollte.

Well, the chips are on the table...nichts geht mehr.

Gnight, tomorrow I switch off, its time for a break or time out.

XEX

Sage ich doch immer die Franzoesische Regierung ist Schuld !!
Alle die mit den Amis im Bett sind.
Und G W Bush gehoert mal eine Tracht Pruegel..
Ich trink nun einen doppelten Scotch, der Tag ist gelaufen.
A so a Schaas ... X(..trotzdem, schlafts gut.

Erstmal kommen die Drucker dran wie Ben Bernanke lieber Saccard.
Was bei Euch in D passiert dafuer bin ich nicht verantwortlich.