Und zum aktuellen Boulevard mit Bond und Moriarty gibts natürlich bei goldismoney auch schon eine Quelle
Dieses Posting fand ich darin z.B. recht gut:
ZitatAlles anzeigenerichops
(...)
Sterling isn't perfect......never has been, I never said they were.....Mr. Moriarty analysis might be right on or it might not.
But, the bottom line is that Mr. Moriarty's article has nothing to do with flooded mines. He just believes that Demotte has squandered his opportunities and made some bad decisions.
Sorry, Joe, but that in no way vindicates what Mr. Maund did. Mr. Moriarty is not god........he is small time precious metals commentator who runs a website. His resume does not even seem to be that impressive. Just because he said it, does not mean it is categorically true......I thought you would have learned that from what happened with Mr. Maund..............you need to do your due diligence on the analysts and commentators....that will go a long ways towards ferreting out their bias'.
I have no idea, but obviously something got under Mr. Moriarty's skin about Sterling, maybe DeMotte hit on his wife at the last big commodity show or something......or maybe he truly believes that something is amiss at Sterling. But, obviously you did not do any due diligence on Mr. Moriaty's comments, as they just came out today........do you know what his angle is???
What Mr. Moriarty has written is not earth shattering news anyway; if you had been paying attention, in the last year there was several large shareholders that filed lawsuits against Demotte, tried to take over Sterlings management., accused it of mismanagement, started their own website, etc. So, this is an ongoing saga at Sterling.
Joe, something you need to learn is that websites like these, and small time analysts, website operators, and newsletter writers are not gods......and are a very small part of doing you due diligenece on companies. A BIG NEWSFLASH for you: MOST STOCK ANALYSTS DO NOT GET IT RIGHT OVER THE LONG RUN........you could throw a bunch of darts at a wall full of silver companies and probably do better than following all of these analysts.
Like I told you last year, I live very close to the Silver Valley Idaho; I have relatives that worked in the old Sunshine Mine; I know the area and the primary players up there pretty well. Demotte isnt perfect; but the value in sterling is the fact that they, and nobody else, have the rights to the sunshine mine. Demotte has put some very credible people in charge of things up there, even if his credibility is not so great.
You are going to have to do better than that Joe.......
Und das da hat derselbe Autor auch in meinem Sinne geschrieben.
Moriarty hat 2 mal übertrieben. Erst pro SRLM und dann Contra SRLM.
Das macht ihn als ernstzunehmenden Autor jedenfalls nicht besser.
ZitatAlles anzeigen
(...)
All you have to do is read Moriarty's own "due diligence" on SRLM to judge his credibility. He gets in his truck that he bought at an auction in Alaska, and on his way back to the US, gets a "tip" from that esteemed precious metals analyst "Barbara" (who just happens to be his wife) that he should stop and check out Sterling Mining on his way home.
He goes and has dinner with Demotte, and soon enough, he is gushing all over his internet site about how great Sterling. Hardly the halmarks of good due diligence....Sorry, but that is not due diligence........he overhyped Sterling the first time and now he is embarrased by it and is trying to fix it. Sterling hasn't performed very well in doing what they said they were going to do. But, Sterling is hardly the first penny stock to have execution problems. Moriarty overhyped Sterling the first time and is underhyping it this time because management let him down. You have to understand that the value in Sterling is not management, it never has been, Demotte is not some highly thought of mine CEO, never has been. It is the fact that Sterling has a hole in the ground, large amounts of silver reserves and has signed agreements with many of teh neighboring mineral rights holders. That is why the flooded mine issue was so serious, because it undercut the whole story. It was not because Demotte didn't answer the rumours, the company didnt even know those rumours were going around. It was the rumours themselves. Demotte didnt have a pristine record when Moriarty met him, if Moriarty had done a little due diligence on Demotte, he would have found that out. The fact is that he met with Demotte just when the silver story was breaking.......and STerling had a whopper of story, picking up the mine that cheap, with all those reserves......and guess what??? Whopper stories make your website look better and your editorials look smarter......
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what Sterling is doing. They have never intended to take the mine all the way to production themselves. They are going to clean it up, do some work on it, prove that it is functionaal and can produce silver at a profit, tie up the land around Sterling, and sell it. Demotte and the initial investors cash out, and go retire in Hawaii. But, if they can pull it off, all the shareholders will benefit, tremendously.
For your information, I did indeed subscribe to Maunds newsletter after he put that out, and read the "subscriber" version as you stated. He most certainly did not equate SRLM's share price breakdown to SRLM's failure to respond to the rumour. All he indicated was that SRLM was breaking down badly and the chart did not look good for SRLM. He indicated that he did not know why this was the case, but said that there were rumours that the mines were flooded and maybe this was the reason.
He at no point indicated the falling share price was because of management not addressing the rumour. His TA at that time on SRLM was completely wrong, as the stock shot up tremendously after the Bond dispelled the rumours. The stock was falling because of the rumours; not because of managment not dispelling the rumours.
joe, you need to stop putting so much faith in simpleton stock chat rooms and people like Moriarty and Maund who magically popped up in the early 2000's, just when the commodities boom was starting to take off. These people have biases, financial incentives, and personal incentives to push one stock or another, and dismiss one stock or another. These guys are nothings in the precious metals world....
Moriarty and Maund are no experts....they are just guys trying to use the internet and a commodities boom to make a buck. You need to take what they say with a grain of salt and dig much deeper on these types of companies.......I suppose you think Hommel is a straight up guy also......
here is a quote, who do you think it came from...at least he is honest:
"It's just my opinion and I am biased in the matter..........
So kann man das sehen! Und überlegenswert finde ich auch die Äusserungen bezgl. eines möglichen Weiterverkaufs der SRLM, hatte ich oben ja schon mal angedeutet: Was wäre, wenn SRLM am Ende an eine Firma wie SLW bzw. an ein Ihnen nahe stehendes Management gehen würde ( CA:SNS vielleicht 
)?
Zumindest auch eine der Möglichkeiten, dann braucht De Motte das gar nicht selber zu Ende zu bringen.
Man wird sehen. 
Gruss,
gutso
) ja solch ein Abenteuer geworden, wer weiss ... . Diese Mine müsste ja (mit Kosten verbunden) vorerst vor dem weiteren Verfall bewahrt werden. Egal ob man erst später abbauen wollen würde.
![:]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/pleased.gif "Freude"){kind=small}
)
So ist das halt, - am Ende muss ein + stehen, der Rest ist Reibungsverlust.