Beiträge von Aladin

    CARLOS & Valueman


    Ich vertraue einer Goldmuenze oder Barren in der Hand mehr als einer Versicherung wenn es darauf ankommt. Sicher sind Versicherungen oft notwendig im Leben aber mit Erfahrung habe ich gelernt die straeuben sich gerne wenn es ums zahlen geht und die Gefahr besteht immer das sie pleite gehen.
    Mit 10 Krueger Rand jetzt schon alleine fuer mich pro Monat bis 80 Jahren Lebenserwartung schlafe ich besser.
    Es werden sicher aber mehr das auch die Kinder versorgt sind ebenso fuer die naechsten 30 Jahre.


    Eine eigene Immobilie zu haben ist auch gut dabei, dann kann man mich nicht rausgeschmissen werden aber hat jedoch den Nachteil man ist nicht mobil und haengt oft fest damit. Mieten ist bessser, am besten alles ! :D


    Dann kann ich umziehen wann ich will wenn ein Kanake oder Denunziant sagen wir gleich ein A, neben mir wohnt und ich muss ihn taeglich anschaun. X(


    Die ganzen Sachen die ich nicht habe kann ich mir kaufen wenn Gold bei 1000 Dollar ist. :D


    Und dann werden auch die Immobilien guenstiger sein als jetzt, schaetze ich mal.


    Schoenen Tag noch, .....Go Gold go !



    XAX

    Canadian Zinc News: Hier gehts um den Umweltschutz.


    Office of Nick Sibbeston


    Senator for the Northwest Territories


    Senator Nick Sibbeston calls for reasonable balance between environment and development in Deh Cho region


    Speaking today in Yellowknife, Senator Nick Sibbeston said that the proposed expansion of the Nahanni Park Reserve must be reasonable and must balance the desire for environmental protection with the need for economic development. "The present park reserve of 4700 square kilometres may be insufficient but the proposal to expand it seven-fold to nearly 34000 square kilometres is outrageous. This would encompass nearly one-sixth of all the land in the Deh Cho including two existing mines. It would shut off a huge portion of the southwestern Northwest Territories to meaningful economic development forever."



    Although Sibbeston indicated he does support the eventual creation of the Nahanni National Park, after the Deh Cho land claim is settled, as well as a modest increase in its size, he expressed concern that the proposed expansion being promoted by southern environmental groups and Parks Canada officials would compromise the economic future of the region and its people. "This land grab will mainly serve the very narrow interests of parks officials who often operate parks like private fiefdoms with little concern for the well-being of local people. Once Park boundaries are established, it is very difficult ever to change them"


    Sibbeston cited the example of Tuktut Nogait National Park created in 1989. After the boundaries were drawn but before the park was established, a potential mine was discovered in one corner of the proposed park. The local people in Paulatuk and the Inuvialuit Regional Council wanted the park boundary redrawn so they might benefit from this rare economic opportunity but it proved impossible.


    "The Deh Cho has a rapidly growing population. Many young people now in school or training will want and need jobs. Any future Deh Cho Aboriginal government will need economic development to generate revenues for their services and programs. Parks have many benefits but they do not have a history of creating large numbers of jobs and business opportunities for local people. Nor will an expanded Nahanni park provide significant revenues to a Deh Cho government."


    Sibbeston went on to call for changes in the way national parks in the North operate to ensure more local benefits. A comprehensive Mineral and Energy Resources Assessment needs to be completed as well. "There is undoubtedly gold - and maybe diamonds - in them there hills but the necessary research hasn't been done," he said. Once the assessment is done, the results must be fully communicated to the people of the region at the community level so that effective consultation can lead to a rational decision on the appropriate size of the Nahanni National Park. "To preempt that process would be fundamentally undemocratic. Our children do not want a hasty decision; they want a correct one. - one we can all live with, forever."

    So eine Sch.... jetzt liefern die Kaffer auch kein Wasser mehr seit 6 Stunden, es wird immer mehr nach Camping Urlaub. X(


    Bringt am besten Eurer Wasser mit 2010 bei der Fussball WM. :D

    Faengt ja schon gut an....SAVE THE SUNSHINE


    Raymond De Motte - According to his resume, he has an accounting and finance background. Business qualifications are not apparent. No mining experience. Not independent as he is also President of Sterling. Defendant in federal lawsuit alleging fraud, securities violations, racketeering and other misconduct. 8o



    Kevin Shiell - Extensive mining experience, no apparent financial experience. Not independent as he is also Executive Vice President of Sterling and President of Kimberly Gold Mines subsidiary. Mr. Shiell is employed full time as mine superintendent at the Stillwater Mine in Montana, several hundred miles east of the Silver Valley.


    Terry Rice - Mining experience, no apparent financial experience. Not independent as he is also VP Mexico.


    Dave Waisman - Mining experience, no apparent financial experience. Possibly independent.


    Carol Stephan - No mining experience, no apparent financial experience. Not independent as she is Assistant Secretary of Sterling and serves in various capacities and co-invests with Mr. De Motte in a vast number of other enterprises. Defendant in federal lawsuit alleging fraud, securities violations, racketeering and other misconduct.


    Based on this overview, we find that 3 of the 5 directors have mining experience, which obviously qualifies as relevant business experience for a mining company. The other 2 directors may have some relevant business experience in other fields or through administrative duties at mining companies. But what about the other requirements of independence and financial experience? In fact, we find that only 1 of the 5 directors has any apparent finance experience or an accounting/legal background and another 1 of the 5 directors is possibly independent. Finally, we need to mention for the sake of full disclosure that 2 of the 5 directors are defendants in a federal lawsuit that alleges they engaged in fraud, securities violations, racketeering and other misconduct in their dealings with several major Sterling shareholders, including Silver Valley Partners, LLC and its manager James D. Christianson.


    That, fellow shareholders, is a very poor score. Frankly not one of these people is board of directors material. And yet they comprise the entire membership of Sterling's board. No wonder Mr. De Motte is supposedly able to steamroll meetings at will.


    If this wasn't enough, the composition of Sterling's board of directors at any particular point in time seems more enigmatic than a Stanley Kubrick flick.


    Is Kevin Shiell still a director? Rumor has it that he resigned but Mr. De Motte refused to acknowledge it.


    Look, a company with a history of reliable operations, highly credible management and proper and timely disclosures does not need this type of scrutiny. Unfortunately, Sterling isn't one of those companies and a tiny amount of research and analysis should bring you to that conclusion. Actually, one item alone should be sufficient to convince you: David Morgan's reason for dropping Sterling from his "Model Portfolio" at silver-investor.com. He basically stated that Sterling management lied to him about the company's plans for filing registration statements with the SEC. Mr. Morgan sugar-coated it a little bit, but that was the basic reason.

    Wie heisst es so schoen, buy on rumors, sell on facts.


    Spaetestens Ende December sollte sich klarheit bilden.
    Olav schickt nix bis jetzt.... also darum gehts...nochmals...
    Wenn der Haeuptling dann feststeht und die das Amex listing durchkriegen dann geht die Post ab IMO.


    Sterling Mining Announces Cancelled November 2 Special Meeting


    Re-Scheduled for December 21, 2005


    WALLACE, Idaho--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 4, 2005--Sterling Mining Company (OTC:SRLM - News) announced today that the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Idaho ordered on November 1 that the Special Shareholders Meeting scheduled for November 2 be cancelled. A dissident stockholder contended that the company did not provide a shareholder list within the time limits required by state law in order that the shareholder could engage in a "Proxy Battle." The judge in comments from the Bench at the conclusion of the hearing indicated that, while he felt that the dissident shareholder's methods amounted to "self-inflicted injury," he would rule "out of an abundance of caution" for the shareholder in order to be absolutely sure that no damage could possibly come to the shareholder's rights. While the Company respectfully disagrees with the ruling, we will, of course, comply with the ruling.




    The Company believes that this action is a continuation of this shareholder's attempt to gain control of the Sunshine Mine property for his own self-serving desires. In April of this year this same shareholder attempted, through another company with which he is affiliated, to acquire 65% ownership and operational control of the mine under terms very unfavorable to the stockholders of Sterling. The proposal was completely unsatisfactory for many reasons and the Company was compelled to reject the offer. The shareholder later, through other companies he is involved with, brought a personal suit against the President of Sterling, Ray DeMotte. These sorts of actions damage the Company by hampering fund raising, distracting management from their operational duties, and can depress the stock price.


    The cancelled November 2, 2005, special meeting will cost the company (and its shareholders) around $10,000. The Company does not intend to waste its resources battling the dissident in the media.


    Special Meeting Re-Scheduled for December 21, 2005


    Sterling Mining Company has re-scheduled the Special Meeting for December 21, 2005. The matters on the agenda still must be voted on.


    Auditors must be appointed for 2005 financial statements.


    The Company is nearing the current capitalization limit of 20 million shares. To meet our objectives for 2006 and beyond, we must increase the capitalization to facilitate funding options. Management intends to judiciously issue shares to achieve our operational goals.... tropf tropft.. X(


    President Ray DeMotte said: "Since 2003, we have followed a systematic and methodical plan to return the Sunshine Mine to long-term sustainable production. Maintenance, ongoing rehabilitation, exploration, and development of a mine plan have progressed on schedule. We have staffed our operations with highly experienced and qualified professionals at all levels."


    Annual Meeting Scheduled for February 18, 2006


    In compliance with the corporate by-laws, and state law, an Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for February 18, 2006, the third Saturday of February. The proxy statement relating to the annual shareholders' meeting will be mailed to investors in December.

    Hpopth war so schlau und hat sich vor paar Tagen Oremex geschnappt.
    Gute Entwicklung in drei Tagen, ich hab den Stall voll damit.
    Immer noch leicht im minus bei 70 cents Schnitt, des macht aber nix. ;)

    Der Anhang ist von der Website vom 25th October ueber die Restaurierung von Sunshine.
    Ich habe geantwortet und bedankt mit bitte fuer den link zur propaganda webseite die ich nicht kenne.