hier einmal das datenblatt ARMZ Uranium Holding Co., Russia für das elkon deposit
01_79_Boytsov_Russia.pdf
sowie
SRKnews39-letter20200302223718549.pdf
von srk consulting, das pdf ist generell interresant
Trekkopje, Napperby Project, Mineralogy Matters, Developing Uranium Processing Expertise, In-Situ Recovery etc
alles nicht ganz neu, aber teilweise nochmals nett zum überfliegen.
ich poste hier da teile allgemein zum thema sind, sowie das asset leider nicht börsennotiert ist.
bg bh
Ich möchte Niemand zu nahe treten,
tust du nicht, zumindest mir nicht, ich bin hier auch kein admin
aber wer innerhalb eines Tages so viele Mails bzw. Hinweise meistens ohne Kommentar und Einschätzung verfasst und dazu noch „bunte Bilder versendet“ - müllt den Thread zu und entwertet die anderen Beiträge!
ja und nein, die eine oder andere information könnte doch interresant sein?
und da sei mir die frage erlaubt, wie viele dieser beiträge, die entwertet werden können sind von dir?
für mich ist alles ok, was die moderation möchte, ich hatte heute nur im anderen thread einen möglichen lösungsvorschlag präsentiert, den ich generell begrüssen würde(eine etwas genauere untergliederung des rohstoff forums).
angemeldet bist du seit 10.10.2016 - also salopp gesagt zwei jahre länger als ich, aber mehrwert durch deine beiträge? ich bin jetzt zu faul, mal die anderen 72 deiner beiträge durchzusehen. für mich bist du ein ro - read only, der einfach nur dankbar sein sollte, aus dem forum mit guter information von vielen, vielen nutzern versorgt zu werden, ohne "allzuviel" selbst beizutragen.
so, das musste ich loswerden, jetzt kann mich steinigen wer will
bg bh
https://www.ft.com/content/b3a…03-4bc5-b1c6-6b39202f7b48
EDF says it would shut Taishan reactor if it were in France
French nuclear operator says fuel-rod issues at China plant would lead it to close for maintenance
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of
FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/b3a…03-4bc5-b1c6-6b39202f7b48
“On the basis of the analyses carried out, EDF’s operating procedures for the French nuclear fleet would lead EDF, in France, to shut down the reactor in order to accurately assess the situation in progress and stop its development,” EDF said in a statement following the meeting
“In Taishan, the corresponding decisions belong to TNPJVC [Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co].”
It is not too good to be true, it is the economic reality that lies ahead of us. The energy transition facing us in the coming decades is an affordable one. In fact, the future energy system is not only affordable, it is cheaper than the energy system we have today. And this creates an opportunity to invest more to achieve the future we want.
selten so gelacht, totaler humbug, dazu reichen die erntefaktoren von wind und solar nicht aus.
nicht umsonst müssen in deutschland 100% der "erneuerbaren" energikapazitäten mit kohle, gas, nuclear hinterlegt sein. schau mal auf die strom importe im letzten winter.
gruß bh
wie wäre es denn mit "popeyes allgemeiner minenfaden" und dort die threads der company`s einstellen?
alternativ vllt unter den rohstoffen weiter zu selektieren und die themen uran kupfer etc dort nochmals aufzugliedern um den überblick zu behalten. die anderen threads findet man derzeit ja nur über die forensuche 
wir haben ja noch nichtmal zu allen uranern eigene threads und zustimmen tue ich bei quantität ersetzt keine qualität. allerdings ist input in quantität nie schlecht um qualität zu finden, hat man denn die zeit das alles zu recherchieren.
bg bh
es hat sich ja seit einem jahr wieder viel getan, wer sich interresiert hier der link zur aktuellen präsentation
https://9e85a0b0-3dc8-4094-b8d…24206a70591cca873d8c9.pdf
bg bh
gestern wohl schon wieder ein absacker in der netzfrequenz auf 49,87hz. ununterbrochene redispatchmaßnahmen...
warum "[Blockierte Grafik: https://www.goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/cursing.png][Blockierte Grafik: https://www.goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/cursing.png][Blockierte Grafik: https://www.goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/cursing.png]" ?
hi popeye
das hatte ich gelesen, sehe aber "leider" dadurch keinen einfluss auf "zeitnahe" stärkere nachfrage
aber wen eppp(external pulsed plasma propulsion) verstärkt interresiert
https://www.nasa.gov/directora…get-humans-to-mars-faster
https://www.space.com/nasa-doe…space-propulsion-concepts
bg bh
Japan 2021
Energy Policy Review
unter anderem:
Japan’s general energy policy strategy - seite 26
Japan’s envisioned energy mix to 2030 - seite 27
https://iea.blob.core.windows.…21_EnergyPolicyReview.pdf
bg bh
6. japan`s muss die reactoren wieder hochfahren und sogar neue bauen wenn sie die pariser klimaschutzziele erreichen wollen bis 2030(soweit ich gelesen habe rangiert die zahl zwischen 25 bis 35 reaktoren)
...
Since Japan pledged in October to become carbon neutral by 2050, many among the advisory group have reached the same conclusion. To meet its global climate commitments, the country will need to restart almost every nuclear reactor it shuttered in the aftermath of the 2011 meltdowns, and then build more.
“We had better hurry and rebuild trust in nuclear power,” said Masakazu Toyoda, a member of the 24-strong government panel that’s devising new policies. “This is a matter of energy security.”
Japan must have 27 of its remaining 36 reactors online by 2030 to hit its obligations under the Paris climate accord, according to Toyoda. Other estimates put that figure at closer to 30. So far, only 9 units have been fired back up since a program of restarts began in 2015.
Nuclear now accounts for about 6% of Japan’s energy mix, down from roughly 30% of the Fukushima disaster. In the immediate aftermath, Japan closed all its 54 reactors, around a third of which were permanently scrapped.
Yet some 39% of Japanese people want all nuclear plants closed, according to a February survey. Many local, prefecture-level governments—which must sign off on reactor restart plans—have been reluctant to wave through approvals, while courts have supported requests to temporarily shut some operating reactors.
That opposition is problematic for a Japanese government that’s promised to lower emissions 26% by 2030 from 2013 levels under its Paris commitments, and is slated to review those targets this year and potentially make them stricter. “Japan will change its attitude toward nuclear builds somewhere on the road toward net-zero emissions,” said Frank Yu, an analyst at Wood Mackenzie.
Meeting the Paris goals alone will need Japan, the world’s fifth-largest greenhouse gas emitter, to hit an existing target for nuclear power to make up 20% to 22% of its energy mix by 2030. The more ambitious pledge for 2050 may require atomic power to claim an even greater share.
“Utilizing a certain amount of nuclear will be necessary for Japan to become carbon neutral,” Tomoaki Kobayakawa, president of Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings Inc., owner of the crippled Fukushima plant, said in an interview.
“No one believes the 2030 goal is attainable,” said Takeo Kikkawa, a professor at International University of Japan and a member of the panel who’s skeptical on the prospects for nuclear energy. “The industry doesn’t believe it is possible, but they won’t admit it.” Nuclear is likely to account for 15% of Japan’s energy, at most, in 2030, he says.
So far, utilities have applied to restart 27 reactors—25 of which are operable, while 2 are currently under construction. Toyoda says that, at the very least, those 27 units must be online if there is a chance to hit the 2030 goal.
In December, the economy ministry said nuclear energy and thermal facilities with carbon capture and storage technology may represent 30% to 40% of combined power generation in 2050, without offering specific details.
bg bh
japan
The revised energy plan is in line with Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga’s pledge to hit net-zero emissions by 2050. It’s also become increasingly cost effective to shift to cleaner sources of energy, with the share of renewable power in Japan nearly doubling over the last decade due to strong government support for solar and a steeper-than-expected decline in costs.
However, it isn’t clear whether the island nation-- the world’s fifth-biggest polluter -- will be able to meet the new targets. Under the new plan, Japan will need to install solar panels on millions of buildings, shut dozens of coal-fired power plants and restart nearly all of its existing nuclear reactors.
Here is Japan’s revised energy mix, according to the draft from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry:
EnergyFY2030 (Revised)FY2030 (Previous)FY2019
| Renewables | 36%-38% | 22%-24% | 18% |
| LNG | 20% | 27% | 37% |
| Coal | 19% | 26% | 32% |
| Oil | 2% | 3% | 7% |
| Nuclear | 20%-22% | 20%-22% | 6% |
| Hydrogen/Ammonia | 1% | 0% | 0% |
Earlier this year, Japan strengthened its 2030 Paris Agreement goals, raising its target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 46% by 2030 from 2013 levels, up from its previous aim of 26%.
The shift will mean that Japan, the world’s top LNG importer that pioneered the industry from the 1960s, will require far less fuel in 2030 than its previous plan, posing a potential dilemma for its suppliers from Qatar to Australia to the U.S.
The amount of energy produced from nuclear power is set to remain unchanged from the previous plan. Japan will require 27 of its remaining 36 reactors to resume operations. Only 10 units have started so far under safety rules enacted after the 2011 Fukushima disaster and ensuing public opposition.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news…l-fuel-raising-renewables
____
ich bleibe bei einem meiner vorherigen posts, wenn japan das net zero als industrienation stemmen will, langen die restarts nicht aus, dann müssen sie auch neubauten bis 2050 ins auge fassen.
politisch ist es natürlich der weg des geringesten wiederstandes erstmeinmal die alten kraftwerke zu reaktivieren.
bg bh
UK:
Policy paper Nuclear Sector Deal
A Sector Deal between government and the nuclear industry.
This Sector Deal builds on the government’s historical partnership with the UK nuclear sector.
It ensure that the UK’s nuclear sector remains cost competitive with other forms of low-carbon technologies to support our Clean Growth Strategy and Grand Challenge. Through adopting new construction techniques and innovative approaches to manufacturing, the deal will reduce the costs of building new reactors in a way that builds domestic supply chain capability and skills.
https://assets.publishing.serv…rsion_BEIS_Nuclear_SD.PDF
https://www.gov.uk/government/…ons/clean-growth-strategy
uk energy system modelling:
net zero 2050
nuclear deployement scenarios to support assessment of future furl cycles
https://www.nnl.co.uk/wp-conte…odelling-for-Net-Zero.pdf
1.2. Nuclear deployment scenarios
The four nuclear deployment scenarios, plus a reference scenario of no nuclear, are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1 to Figure 4 show further detail on the scenarios including deployment profiles between 2020
and 2050. These scenarios show that there is a potential role for nuclear in meeting UK Net Zero
requirements, ranging from 14 GWe to over 60 GWe installed capacity with a range of applications
and nuclear technologies. It is therefore essential to consider the fuel cycle implications associated
with the deployment of Gen III+, LWSMR and Gen IV (AMR) reactor systems. In addition, the potential
for over 60 GWe deployment necessitates the requirement to consider sustainable advanced fuel
cycles ensuring best use of valuable material and considering impacts on repository designs.
In addition, based on the projected demand for low-cost hydrogen and clean synthetic fuels
further ESME modelling was performed on a future hydrogen market and a cost sensitivity analysis
performed. This included a ‘gigafactory’ concept to produce high-volume low-cost hydrogen, a
scenario based on this low-cost hydrogen supply is called Greater Nuclear Ambition; again, if such
a concept were to be deployed in the UK the associated fuel cycle would need to be carefully
considered given the significant scale of deployment. Table 2 sets out some initial assumptions and
open questions around the fuel types and fuel cycle for three scenarios.
bg bh
Chat logs introduced as evidence by prosecutors at the Chicago spoofing trial of two former precious metals traders for Bank of America’s Merrill Lynch unit shows one of them, Edward Bases, bragging about how easy it is to manipulate prices.
On January 28, 2009, when Bases was working at Deutsche Bank AG, he put out bids to buy 2,740 gold futures contracts valued at around $244 million over the course of four-and-a-half minutes, according to Maria Garibotti, a vice president at Analysis Group who studied exchange and trading data for prosecutors. More than 98% were canceled without being filled, she said.
Sign Up for the Precious Metals Digest
On the opposite side of the market, a fellow Deutsche Bank trader Bases coordinated with sold his 170 contracts worth $15,172,500 as the price rose, Garibotti told jurors on Wednesday.
Bases and fellow Merrill Lynch trader John Pacilio face federal fraud charges for allegedly spoofing the futures market from 2008 to 2014
[/quote]
“That does show u how easy it is to manipulate it sometimes,” Bases wrote minutes after the trading in a chat message sent to the other Deutsche Bank trader, Cedric Chanu, according to Garibotti. Chanu and another Deutsche Bank Trader, James Vorley, were sentenced last month to a year in prison each for their convictions in 2020 on spoofing charges at a separate trial.
“I f..k the mkt around a lot,” Bases said in another message.
Bases and fellow Merrill Lynch trader John Pacilio face federal fraud charges for allegedly spoofing the futures market from 2008 to 2014.
Another episode described by Garibotti involved trades by Bases and Pacilio on Aug. 9, 2010, when both were working at Merrill Lynch.
That day, Bases placed an iceberg order to buy 10 contracts of platinum, with six being filled at placement, she said. Less than 10 seconds after Bases placed that buy order, Pacilio placed an order to sell 205 contracts for $15,856,750, which was almost 90% of what was visible on the exchange order book, Garibotti said. The price went down, and the rest of Bases’ order was filled, she said. Less than a second later, Pacilio’s sell order was canceled, she said.
The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Japan's Niigata Prefecture will not be restarted until fiscal 2022 (ending March 2023) at the earliest, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) said in a revised business plan. The company submitted the plan yesterday to the government for approval. Tepco is awaiting regulatory approval to restart units 6 and 7 at the plant.
Tepco's revised business plan also says the company will aim to resume construction of the Higashidori nuclear power plant - comprising two 1385 MWe Advanced Boiling Water Reactors - in Aomori prefecture.
____
Italians do not rule out future use of nuclear energy
One-third of Italians are in favour of reconsidering the use of nuclear energy in the country, according to the results of a public opinion poll conducted on behalf of Comitato Nucleare e Ragione. More than half of respondents said they would not exclude the future use of new advanced nuclear technologies.
The survey, conducted by polling firm SWG, questioned 800 adults between 16 and 18 June.
According to the results, 33% of respondents said they supported the use of nuclear energy in Italy, a similar proportion to a survey conducted in 2011. Men and young people were found to be most in favour.
"This is, after all, a remarkable result, given that the issue has been completely excluded from the political debate in recent years," said Comitato Nucleare e Ragione.
The main reasons given for supporting nuclear energy include: improved safety of new technologies; potential contribution to Italy's energy security; and low carbon emissions. Those opposing nuclear power mainly had concerns about radioactive waste management and the possibility of accidents at nuclear plants.
When asked about the use of new reactor designs, 56% of respondents said they would not exclude the use of new nuclear technologies, with 7% saying they are "absolutely necessary" and 22% saying they are "promising and should be considered." 28% of respondents said new technologies should be rejected.
More than half (53%) of respondents did not favour the European Commission including nuclear energy in the sustainable finance taxonomy, with 30% supporting its inclusion.
In response to being asked how informed they were about nuclear energy, only 6% of respondents said they were well-informed, with 35% saying they had sufficient knowledge. The remainder said they were little or not at all informed.
___
US-based nuclear technology developer NuScale Power announced on Thursday that South Korea’s Samsung C&T Corporation has committed to make an equity investment in NuScale to support deployment of its small modular reactor.
Samsung C&T and NuScale’s lead engineering, construction and procurement partner, Fluor Corporation, are also developing a business collaboration agreement to expand capabilities for future deployment of NuScale projects.
Under its agreements with NuScale and Fluor, Samsung C&T will draw upon its nuclear construction experience with the Barakah nuclear station in the United Arab Emirates and the Uljin station in South Korea, where it worked on Units 5 and 6, to serve as a partner to Fluor and other potential project participants.
John Hopkins, NuScale Power chairman and chief executive officer, said Samsung C&T’s expertise and investment in NuScale will be invaluable “as we seek to bring this revolutionary clean energy technology to market”.
Earlier this month, South Korea’s Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction signed an agreement with NuScale Power to invest an additional $60m to continue to support deployment of NuScale’s SMR. The investment followed a $44m investment in NuScale Power in 2019 for a total investment of $104m. IHI Corporation of Japan is also investing $20m into NuScale.
In August 2020, NuScale made history as the first and only SMR to receive design approval from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The first project NuScale Power project is expected to be the development and construction of NuScale SMRs at the Department of Energy’s 2,300 sq km site in eastern Idaho that includes the Idaho National Laboratory.
Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS), the Utah cooperative for which the plants are being built, is scheduled to submit a construction licence application in 2023, and is aiming to start commercial operation of the first module in 2029.
NuScale’s SMR has a maximum of 12 modules of 77 MW each. After building its first unit in the US, NuScale Power plans to sell the technology in North America, Europe and Asia.
Du meinst es entsteht nur Giralgeld (us - $ = currency / währung) aber keine Baumwolllappen (us - $ != geld?
Sorry, ist bestimmt schon einmal erklärt worden, aber ich lese nicht durchgängig mit.
PS: Bitte einfach den alten Beitrag verlinken falls möglich
was sind denn die unterschiede von geld vs währung/currency
geld:
wertspeicherfunktionalität
tauschmittel
rechnungseinheit
transportierbar
haltbar
teilbar
fungibilität
währungen hingegen fehlt die wertspeicherfunktion:
tauschmittel
rechnungseinheit
transportierbar
haltbar
teilbar
fungibilität
zusätzlich ist geld ein gut, welches gehandelt wurde(sachgeld) das sich am markt durch seine begehrtheit und eigenschaften, als geld durchgesetzt hat.
also egal ob baumwoll-lappen oder giralgeld, der us-Dollar ist seit spätestens 1971 kein geld mehr, sondern währung. es geht mir also nur um die verwendung der richtigen bezeichnung... da "fiat money" anhand der funktionsweise die wertspeicherfunktionalität nicht erfüllt - also kein "money" ist.
![[smilie_blume]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/smilie_blume1.gif "smilie_blume"){kind=small}
bg bh
@Smithm du unterscheidest hier aber nicht geld und curreny.
us - $ != geld
us - $ = currency / währung
€ != geld
€ = currency
es entsteht kein geld in der bilanzverlängerung, es entsteht currency/währung.
die definitionen der bezeichnungen ist hier von extremer wichtigkeit.
bg bh
?