Beiträge von Tschonko

    Nugget,
    Bandera kriegt man nun zu PP Kursen.
    Ich hab zwar ein bisserl teurer gekauft, aber was soll´s.


    @eldo,
    ich hab grad mal 3% cash..... :D
    Mehr brauch ich nicht sagen und aktuell 3 Hänger...... :D
    Vor allem die Victoria, die verschleierte Schl...


    FR kann man kaufen, vor allem nach diesem Bericht.


    http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070528/0258354.html


    First Majestic Silver Corp.: San Martin Silver Mine Update and New NI 43-101 Resource


    Die Ex First Silver Mine San Martin.
    Am letzten Bericht von First Silver und dem jetzigen von Fr kann man sehen, dass die wirklich die mine "verkommen" ließen.
    Was für eine Entwicklung in 9 monaten.


    Das wird ja noch ne richtig schöne Mine.


    Beim ersten Lesen war ich enttäuscht.
    Nach dem 3. mal bin ich erfreut und ich hab es mir wahrlich nicht schön gelesen. :D


    Ein paar Beispiele:
    The Company has also initiated exploration at the old Rosario mine and completed 1,762 metres of diamond drilling over 34 holes (28 underground and 6 from surface). None of this new work since January 1st,, 2007 is included in the new NI 43-101 resource calculation below.


    3 drill rigs sind am Laufen.


    Die Ausmaße der Mine sind viel größer als gedacht und überall Mineralisation.


    La parilla arbeitet auf Volldampf, San Martin auch auf hohem Niveau.
    Da weiß man dann auch, wozu das geld vom letzten großen PP gebraucht wird.


    Strategie klar: eher egal, ob 5 Mille oz gefördert werden heuer.
    Aber es wird eine gewaltige Resourcenausweitung geben..... :D


    Für den Kurs ist das zwar nicht so gut, aber wenn alles so ungefähr normal läuft, schaut´s in 9 Monaten sehrrr, sehrr gut aus.
    Dann plärrt das Baby.... :D


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    @edel,
    beides macht sich gut in Präsentationen, mehr nicht..... :D
    Wie sagt man da, Kraut mit Rüben vergleichen.


    Hab Freitag vor einer Woche die 3,04€ Position (ein Sechstel!) von FR.V zu 3,14 verkauft. Jetzt ist dir teuerste die 2,84€ Position.
    Reine Vorsichtsmaßnahme!


    Dafür stark unvorsichtig: innerhalb einiger Wochen zum 3. male EXM.V
    Ist ja blöd, so schnell hintereinander........... :rolleyes:
    Diesmal zu 0,5C$.


    Noch mal die einzelnen Links zu Exmin:
    Hier gab´s noch andere Bieter! (Penoles und ein GG Anhängsel!!)


    http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070524/0257479.html


    EXMIN Acquires Additional Project in the Batopilas Region, Chihuahua, Mexico
    Thursday May 24, 10:41 am ET


    VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(MARKET WIRE)--May 24, 2007 -- EXMIN Resources Inc. (EXMIN) (CDNX:EXM.V - News) is pleased to announce that it has acquired an additional project in the Sierra Madre Occidental of Chihuahua, Mexico. The project consists of one concession covering 100 hectares and is located in the region south of the Reyna de Oro project and southwest of the Batopilas project. The project area was declared free by the Mexican government and EXMIN was awarded the concession after winning a drawing that resulted from simultaneous applications. Participants in the drawing were EXMIN and subsidiaries of Chesapeake Gold Corp. and Industrias Penoles. The project is surrounded by concessions controlled by these companies as well as by a subsidiary of Kennecott Exploration. EXMIN's application for 100 hectares cost a total of about US$ 4,000 dollars.


    Craig Gibson, Vice President of Exploration of EXMIN, stated, "We were able to step in and beat out some strong players this time. Our continuing regional exploration program, based on site visits to areas with past mining activity, had previously identified this area as a prime acquisition target. We were investigating the ownership of the concessions when they were declared free for staking, and we were fortunate to be able to win this one. EXMIN's ongoing generative exploration program has been very selective over the last six months and has focused on evaluating areas of known mineralization and past mining in order to develop future drill targets."


    THE TARGET


    The target area, called Cascurrichi, consists of a large scale structure with gold mineralization that has been traced and sampled over more than 1.2 kilometres of strike length. The concession staked by EXMIN covers the core part of the known mineralization extending for about 750 metres along strike and where the structure ranges up to 29 metres in width. Preliminary surface sampling has indicated that the mineralized widths vary from 6 metres with 5.8 grams per metric tonne (g/t) gold to 13.5 metres with 0.77 g/t gold. Individual assays of as much as 11.9 grams per metric tonne (g/t) gold were obtained, and 14 of 27 samples (52%) assayed more than 0.3 g/t gold (see table of assay results below). Six samples (22%) assayed more than 2.5 g/t gold.


    EXMIN plans to add this property to the pipeline of projects that will be explored in the next several months and into next year.





    http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070525/0258010.html
    EXMIN Acquires Additional Concessions at the Moris Exploration Project, Chihuahua, Mexico
    Friday May 25, 1:19 pm ET


    VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(MARKET WIRE)--May 25, 2007 -- EXMIN Resources Inc. (EXMIN) (CDNX:EXM.V - News) is pleased to announce that it has optioned three additional concessions in the Moris district and has finalized an option agreement to acquire five other concessions in the area. EXMIN has proposed to include all of these concessions in the Moris Exploration Joint Venture with Hochschild Mining Group (Hochschild) (see News Release of March 22, 2006). The earn-in joint venture agreement with Hochschild is separate from the EXMIN-Hochschild Moris Mine acquisition and production joint venture described in EXMIN's News Releases dated July 19, 2006, and Jan 18, 2007. Also, an additional concession was staked by the exploration joint venture.


    The four new concessions cover strategic ground in all three of the principal target areas being explored by the joint venture, Tecolote, El Pilar and La Cienega. Two concessions, the Pedregosa and Juana Inez, cover approximately 23 hectares and include two of the most important historical, past producing mines and several vein structures in the El Pilar target area. The Relampago concession covers 33 hectares and includes one of the principal past producing mines in the La Cienega target area.


    The fourth concession, Mi Fortuna, covers 60 hectares in the Tecolote area and was staked recently after the original concession was cancelled and declared open for staking.


    The company also has finalized an option agreement that covers 170 hectares in the Pilar target, as was previously announced as a letter of intent (see News Release of February 22, 2006, Acquisition #3)............


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    INTERVIEW WITH MANAGING DIRECTOR


    Malachite Resources NL (ASX: MAR) advises that the Company’s Managing Director, Garry Lowder, has participated in an interview with Finance News Network journalist David Taylor
    .
    The interview is available for viewing over the Internet by accessing the following link:
    Video
    http://www.finnewsnetwork.com/…mv&content_type=INTERVIEW
    Audio
    http://www.finnewsnetwork.com/…ma&content_type=INTERVIEW


    The interview focuses on the good results being achieved in current drilling at Malachite’s Conrad Silver Project. The discussion also covers progress towards definition of a polymetallic silver resource at Conrad and the potential to move on to a feasibility study and development in 2008.
    About Conrad – Malachite has made a significant silver and base metal discovery at the old Conrad Mine, near Inverell in northern New South Wales. The Company has a 100% interest in the project and controls tenements totalling approximately 170 km2 in area.
    Two styles of mineralisation have been identified, comprising high grade, narrow lodes, like those mined historically, and a broad low grade body that offers potential for open pit development. Drilling is currently
    underway and will continue for much of this year. Results are being released progressively as they come to hand.


    The mine last operated in 1957 and produced silver, together with lead, zinc, copper and tin. Historic mining grades averaged 600g/t Ag, 8% Pb, 4% Zn, 1.5% Cu and 1.5% Sn. Malachite’s drilling has intersected grades consistent with these values and the Company is now targeting an initial resource
    containing 20 million ounces of silver, or 50 million ounces of silver equivalent, taking into account the value contributed by the associated base metals.
    There is excellent potential for additional mineralisation along strike from the current target and also in parallel structures that have been identified from aeromagnetic imagery.


    For further information please contact the Company on (02) 9411 6033.

    Hallo,
    bin noch erledigt von so viel sauberer Höhlenluft und Luftfeuchte in Flussnähe.
    Dazu das unverschämt gute Wetter.


    Hat sich ja nicht allzuviel getan........
    Kanadische Durchlässigkeit: ärger wie die Kalkalpen bei wasser...
    Diesmal bei Carpathian gold.
    2 Tage vor der Meldung beginnt die Aktie rasant zu steigen.
    am Tag der Meldung geht es dann etwas retour.


    War positiv genau wie FCO.TO. Wann wird da das 52 Wochen Hoch geknackt?


    Exmin hat 2 neue properties erworben.
    Wichtiger erscheint mir die heutige Meldung.
    Auch die Kosten schön aufgestellt.


    http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EXM.V



    @edel,
    Orko hat noch nie und will auch nie.
    Darum nicht in der Liste.
    Da sind nur Producer aufgeführt.


    Was ist bloss bei UC.V los?



    Grüße
    Tschonko

    So, das Kolloid ist nun doch braun geworden. :D
    Eher nicht zum Einnehmen!



    Ansprechende Ergebnisse von Soho SOH.V


    http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070507/0249396.html


    http://www.sohoresources.ca



    Eine interessante Company mit 3 past producer Projekten in Mexico u. Texas.


    http://www.mexicansilvermines.com


    Letzte Meldung, die zu einem Kurssprung führte:
    http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/070516/200705160391233001.html?.v=1


    Mexican Silver Mines Ltd. Completes Trenching Program at La Blanca
    Wednesday May 16, 1:11 pm ET


    CALGARY, ALBERTA--(CCNMatthews - May 16, 2007) - Mexican Silver Mines Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:MSM - News) is pleased to announce that the trenching program at its 100 percent owned La Blanca silver-lead-zinc project in the State of Nuevo Leon has now been completed. This project is located half way between the cities of Monterrey, Mexico and Laredo, Texas on the company's Providencia concession. A total of five trenches were cut with a bulldozer with a plan to expose the trace of the structure observed at the historic La Blanca mine workings. Four of the five trenches exposed mineralized material along the strike of the La Blanca structure. The fifth trench, the only one located north of the historic mine workings and south of the nearby lake, had to be abandoned before reaching bedrock due to water. La Blanca has been the site of sporadic small scale underground and surface mining for high grade silver ores but this is the first modern exploration completed.


    A high angle mineralized structure within the Upsom Formation claystone was observed in all four trenches south of the mine workings. The mineralization in this structure, as observed in both the historic workings and current trenches, consists of coarse calcite, sphalerite and galena. A number of large masses of high grade galena from the vein were observed in the trenches and weighed more than 100 kilograms each. This high grade galena mineralization was up to a half meter wide and a meter in length.


    The trenching was successful in locating the strike extent of the mineralized structure. The interpretation of this structure, which was exposed in the trenching program and is defined by various small pits on the property where silver-rich galena was extracted, may represent 'leakage' from a potentially larger and deeper source of silver-lead-zinc mineralization. The Upsom claystone is a plastic and relatively impervious claystone unit which could act as a barrier to deeper underlying mineralization. While no previous drilling has been conducted on the property, it is believed that a massive limestone formation is present beneath the claystone. This deeper limestone formation presents a more receptive host for manto-type or replacement silver mineralization. A large shallow lake, located nearby and to the north of the La Blanca workings, may represent a large collapse feature resulting from dissolution within the underlying limestone. This represents a potentially significant target for the company to explore in the future.


    Samples have been collected from the trenches and have been shipped to ALS-Chemex in Vancouver for analysis. Results from this sampling will be announced as soon as available.


    Mr. William Dynes, P. Geol. is the Qualified Person, as defined in NI 43-101, who has reviewed and verified the scientific and technical mining disclosure contained in this news release.


    Additional information on the La Blanca project with images of the trenching program may be viewed at: http://www.mexicansilvermines.com.


    About Mexican Silver Mines


    Mexican Silver Mines (TSX VENTURE:MSM - News) is a silver focused junior resource company developing three former silver producing properties in northeastern Mexico.

    Hallo lucky,
    mit dem Mistviech, vorher UNICO, ein Hommelzwerg, hab ich schon viel Geld verspielt. :D
    So um die 98, 99% Verlust!
    Bereue das Unico Seminar nicht, war ein .OB, .PK Kurs.
    Und die sind bekanntlich alle teuer. :D


    Stehen jetzt ja kursmäßig wieder da wie vor dem reversesplit.
    1:1000 war der. :D


    Aber nichtsdestotrotz reizt es mich, mir da, genau in dem spez. Fall, mein geld wieder iregendwie zu holen.


    Das Sichwiederholenwollen hab ich schon vor Jahren aufgegeben nach einigen diesbezüglichen Erfahrungen.
    Funktioniert nur in den seltensten Fällen.
    UCOI könnte so ein Fall sein.


    Sie geben ziemlich viel Geld für PR aus.
    Die Insiderkäufe, die aktuellen kenn ich nicht, waren immer eine spezielle Lachnummer für sich.
    Mann, haben die zugeschlagen, da hatte ich ja mehr. :D


    Bin ab Morgen eine Woche weg, dann erwartet dich mal ne PN bezüglich Fragen zu deiner Mexicoreise.


    Grüße
    Tschonko



    Russen und Kolloide!
    Bezüglich Silberverbrauch kann man ja die Kolloidgeschichten vergessen. Äußerst gering.


    Apropos vergessen: ich mach soeben Kolloid und hab darauf vergessen.
    So ein Schmarrn! :D
    Bräunlich mag ich es nämlich nicht!


    http://de.rian.ru/science/20070517/65628565.html


    Wissenschaft und Technik in Russland
    17/ 05/ 2007

    Druckversion


    Antibiotika sollen durch Silber ersetzt werden/Tomograph für Erkundung der Erde/Wassertropfen für Löschen von Bränden/Wer hat mehr Gastfreundschaft, die Russen oder die Deutschen?


    MOSKAU, 17. Mai (RIA Novosti)


    Antibiotika sollen durch Silber ersetzt werden


    Sibirische Wissenschaftler haben die seit uralten Zeiten bekannten heilenden Eigenschaften von Silber mit jüngsten nanotechnologischen Errungenschaften kombiniert. Die neue Methode wurde von einer Gruppe von Wissenschaftlern im staatlichen Forschungszentrum für Virusologie und Biotechnologie "Vektor" und in einigen anderen sibirischen Forschungseinrichtungen im Kontakt mit Fachleuten der Nationalen Mexikanischen Universität erfunden.


    Nanoteilchen von Silber brechen die Membrane von Krankheitserregern buchstäblich auf. Dabei sind schwindend kleine Silberdosen für Bakterien und Viren tödlich, stellen für den Menschen aber keine Gefahr dar. Aber das ist nicht das Wichtigste. Bekanntlich müssen die Mediziner immer neue Antibiotika zur Bekämpfung der Erreger entwickeln, weil diese sich immer wieder anpassen und Immunität gegen alte Präparate entwickeln. Aber die Mikroorganismen können nicht gegen Silber immun werden.


    Zu ihrem Ziel wird die "silberne Kugel" durch Immunglobuline befördert. Bei den Immunglobulinen handelt es sich um Antikörper, die in der Lage sind, fremde Agenten im Organismus ausfindig zu machen und sie anzugreifen. Die Infektion kann diesem Tandem nicht standhalten.


    Bislang wurden in Sibirien silberhaltige Nanopräparate für die Veterinärmedizin entwickelt. Nach Worten des Chefchirurgen des Gebietes Nowosibirsk, Professor Jewgeni Blagitko, wurden silberhaltige Salben und Gele bei der Behandlung von trophischen Geschwüren und Eiterwunden erfolgreich erprobt, die nicht mit anderen Methoden geheilt werden können.

    Danke Extrel für die Rechnung.
    Sollte man das nicht erst nach den cost´s rechnen?


    Schaut im übrigen bei allen kleineren Silberminen so aus,
    weil alle sehr hohe Ausgaben haben.


    Bei FR gibt´s da auch immer so Mondrechnungen.


    EDR hat kaum Probleme zur zeit und alles läuft sehr gut.


    Die Quartalszahlen hab ich allerdings noch nicht gelesen. :D


    Grüße
    tschonko

    "Raising the bar" heißt die Präsentation von EXN.V. Mai 2007.


    http://www.excellonresources.c…orporate_Presentation.pdf
    Hab mir das angeschaut und bin zufrieden.


    "Mexico’s highest grade silver producer
    Test-mine in production, profitable and cash flow positive


    Own large, 149 sq. km property package on prolific silver district in Mexico
    Only 10% fully explored


    Aggressive $6M exploration program underway Excellent potential to increase resource and production"


    Von Platosa wird das gestein zu max. 50 km entfernten Penoles Smelter gebracht..


    Unklarheiten: wann wird die 350 Mill fertig.
    Wann endet das silberdebenture wirklich?
    Am 10. Mai waren 1,5 von 1,8 Mill oz. bezahlt.


    13 Mille Cash, davon heuer 5 Mille für Exploration verplant.
    Die Mill wird auch was kosten.
    Also wichtig, dass es beim debenture keine Verzögerung gibt.


    EXN werden immer wenig Resourcen nachgesagt. Man sehe sich die Tafeln 15-22 genauer an. Vor allem 15
    und
    Seite 14: Prod. highlights.


    Seite 17: "Comparison with related carbonate replacement deposits
    (CRDs) indicates larger-scale mineralization lies nearby in system"


    Seite 18 sind dann andere CRD´s angeführt.


    Spricht für sich, was ich als angenehm empfinde.
    Brauch nichts sagen. :D


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    Bei AMC.V, Alexis scheint was am Laufen zu sein. Steigt schön.


    Dafür kackt die Victoria VIT.V weiter ab. Da hab ich definitiv zu bald nachgekauft.
    Stört meine Großwetterlage gewaltig! :D
    Weiß nicht recht, was sich hier tut.
    Jedenfalls wird sich hier heuer noch einiges tun.
    Ein Mysterium! :D


    Ebenfalls zu bald nachgekauft EXM.V. Das stört mich kaum, weil das Spielchen einsichtig ist.


    BGL.V wurde auch heute bei geringem Volumen heruntergeschüttelt.


    Bei SEG.TO sind wir nun bei einer sehr wichtigen Marke.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SEG.TO


    Impact hatten wir heute schon im Bericht von Hansen.
    Bei seinen 4 Werten haben FR und GPR Probleme im Moment, was sich dann auch im Kurs ausdrückt.
    Sehr stark ist EDR im Moment, da gibt´s Zahlen heute oder morgen.


    Mehr als Kosmetik im Depot hat zur Zeit wenig Sinn.


    Ah ja, Seite 1 hier auch wieder ein bissal bearbeitet! :D


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    Hallo Lucky, Emo,
    Verkäufe des clay würden der Bilanz guttun.
    Da geht nicht viel weiter. Gab auch Probleme wegen Verunreinigungen.


    Vor allem, weil Atlas Faulsett jetzt weniger Fremdaufträge annimmt und da wieder eine Lücke entsteht.


    Dept ist auch da und das läuft dann wieder auf PP raus.
    Brauch ich nicht unbedingt jetzt.


    Diesen Clay gibt es sonst weltweit nur noch in Neuseeland.


    Zuversichtlich eben mit Einschränkungen. :D


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    Der 4. Teil von Don Hansen nach EDR, FR und GPR!


    Tabelle besser hier anschauen.
    http://www.silveraxis.com/opps/051407_dh_valuestrategy.html



    A Value Strategy for Investing in Silver Mining Shares - Part 4


    May 14, 2007


    By: Don Hansen -SILVERAXIS.com


    In this, my fourth article on the Value Strategy for Investing in Silver Mining Shares, I will present my assessment of Impact Silver (IPT in Vancouver, ISVLF on Pink Sheets). Impact Silver is also, like my first three companies – Endeavour Silver, Great Panther and First Majestic, a Canadian company operating primarily in Mexico. I say primarily because Impact also has property in the Dominican Republic, but I will be focusing here only on what the company is currently doing in Mexico.



    Impact Silver


    Consistent with my strategy criteria, Impact is in production, has positive cash flow, and was profitable on a full cost basis in 2006. The latter feature is true of very few of the recently producing miners in Mexico one would consider its peers.



    Impact has three properties, each of which has excellent potential for developing large high grade resources. I believe this to be true because the most likely places to find valuable ore bodies is in areas where they have already been found, and recent drilling confirms their presence on Impact's properties.


    Impact's primary Mexican properties are the following:


    1. Zacualpan property with 500 TPD mill.


    2. Zacatecas property with 200 TPD mill.


    3. Mamatla property adjacent to the Zacualpan property on one side, and Farallon's Campo Morado project on the other side.


    In the case of the Zacualpan and Zacatecas properties, they contain many current and past producing small mines. The past owners did nothing akin to modern resource exploration, and what Impact has already done indicates considerable potential in both areas.



    With the recently acquired Mamatla property, very recent drill results indicate very good ore grades, especially for gold. This property was extensively drilled by previous owners, but abandoned when resource prices were low in the 1990's. Impact's geologists believe this property contains extensions of what is already known to exist on their adjacent Zacualpan property, and the adjacent Farallon project which will have an operating mill up and running in 2008.


    Past exploration data for Mamatla was included in the purchase, and gives a great deal of information about where to drill next. I have been told that previous owners spent about US$20 million exploring Mamatla about 20 years ago, so they obviously believed that there was valuable ore present there. It is no surprise then that Impact's early drill results were very promising.


    Speaking of drilling, Impact has two unique characteristics in this regard. First, in this era of very high exploration activity where many companies are finding it difficult to get drills rigs when and where they need them, Impact has no such problem. This is because Impact has a sister company named Energold Drilling, which is a very profitable driller and a potentially excellent investment in its own right, but I will not go into that here. Also, Energold owns about 15% of Impact's shares.



    Second, CEO Fred Davidson has an uncommon view of developing NI43-101 compliant resource numbers. He claims it costs way too much to do this and that shareholder money can be better spent acquiring more properties and/or doing new exploratory drilling. Fred is not interested in drilling extra holes to achieve NI43-101 compliance when the only purpose would be to impress the market and pump up the share price in the short term.


    Okay, so what kind of profits can we expect from Impact? Alas, the company is more conservative than most others and therefore I was unable to obtain forecasts of sales and profits. But, Impact did give me enough detail about their future plans to make it possible to guesstimate its revenues for 2007 and 2008, and I present them below. I made my own assumption for operating expenses for 2007 and 2008 as noted below since management was uncomfortable providing their own. All dollar amounts are in US$ millions unless otherwise noted.




    ........................................ ....................... 2006 ...... 2007 ..... 2008


    Production Rate....................................200tpd......350tpd......700tpd


    Silver Equiv. Production (million oz.).....0.8.............1.5..........3.0


    Revenue (Silver = $12/oz. for '07 & 0cool ..$7.........$18..........$36


    Silver As % of Revenue..................... .....80%.........



    Operating Expenses ($5/oz for '07 & 0cool ..$4.6....$7.5......$15


    Mine Operating Profit...............................$2.4.........$10.5......$21


    Market Multiple (15x)................................$36...........$158.....$315


    Shares Outstanding (millions)............ ..41.............47.........47


    Options/Warrant (millions).....................8...............2..............2


    Cap. Expenditure Plan (estimate).........$2............$3...........


    Cash in Bank (3-31-07)..........................$4


    Possible Market Value May 2008.............$240*


    Possible Share Price May 2008...............US$5/share


    Share Price 5-11-07...............................US$1.55/share




    *Calculated as the mid-point between the Market Multiple for 2007 and 2008 for reasons explained in previous installments of the Value Strategy series.



    I believe that Impact is an excellent investment opportunity at current prices. Impact's market cap is low compared to that of its peers, and the properties the company is developing present as high a probability of success as any you will find in this business in my opinion. Yes, the management is conservative, and this may have held back the share price. They also spend very little on marketing and promotion compared to their peers – only about 20% as much by one estimate. However, this conservative management may in the long run produce greater success with less risk for the investor. And, Fred Davidson has a long history of success in the mining business. I believe there is significant unrealized value in this company. It may take a bit longer to present itself, but it should more than justify the investor's patience.


    By way of disclosure, I own shares of all the companies featured in this Value Strategy series. Also, no one has asked or paid me to write these articles.


    Don Hansen is a retired entrepreneur who has been investing in silver mining stocks since 2001.


    Disclaimer: We hope others will find this approach interesting and useful in making their investment decisions but we caution all investors that this is not an investment recommendation and that each investor must consider his or her own investment criteria, horizon, suitability and other factors before making an investment in these or any other stocks. Inexperienced investors should consult with a registered investment advisor. Information contained herein is believed to be accurate but we make no guarantees to that effect. We are under no obligation to correct errors or update any information, which is only timely as of the date of publication. Forward-looking statements and estimates are the author's own opinion only and any information obtained directly or indirectly from the company is protected by safe harbor laws. Furthermore, all viewpoints expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of http://www.silveraxis.com. The author and persons associated with http://www.silveraxis.com own shares in all of the companies mentioned and therefore are biased in their favor. No compensation was received from the companies mentioned nor was the author asked by anyone to produce this commentary.

    Aktueller Bericht von Don Hansen.
    Tabelle besser hier anschauen.
    http://www.silveraxis.com/opps/051407_dh_valuestrategy.html



    A Value Strategy for Investing in Silver Mining Shares - Part 4


    May 14, 2007


    By: Don Hansen -SILVERAXIS.com



    In this, my fourth article on the Value Strategy for Investing in Silver Mining Shares, I will present my assessment of Impact Silver (IPT in Vancouver, ISVLF on Pink Sheets). Impact Silver is also, like my first three companies – Endeavour Silver, Great Panther and First Majestic, a Canadian company operating primarily in Mexico. I say primarily because Impact also has property in the Dominican Republic, but I will be focusing here only on what the company is currently doing in Mexico.



    Impact Silver


    Consistent with my strategy criteria, Impact is in production, has positive cash flow, and was profitable on a full cost basis in 2006. The latter feature is true of very few of the recently producing miners in Mexico one would consider its peers.



    Impact has three properties, each of which has excellent potential for developing large high grade resources. I believe this to be true because the most likely places to find valuable ore bodies is in areas where they have already been found, and recent drilling confirms their presence on Impact's properties.


    Impact's primary Mexican properties are the following:


    1. Zacualpan property with 500 TPD mill.


    2. Zacatecas property with 200 TPD mill.


    3. Mamatla property adjacent to the Zacualpan property on one side, and Farallon's Campo Morado project on the other side.


    In the case of the Zacualpan and Zacatecas properties, they contain many current and past producing small mines. The past owners did nothing akin to modern resource exploration, and what Impact has already done indicates considerable potential in both areas.



    With the recently acquired Mamatla property, very recent drill results indicate very good ore grades, especially for gold. This property was extensively drilled by previous owners, but abandoned when resource prices were low in the 1990's. Impact's geologists believe this property contains extensions of what is already known to exist on their adjacent Zacualpan property, and the adjacent Farallon project which will have an operating mill up and running in 2008.


    Past exploration data for Mamatla was included in the purchase, and gives a great deal of information about where to drill next. I have been told that previous owners spent about US$20 million exploring Mamatla about 20 years ago, so they obviously believed that there was valuable ore present there. It is no surprise then that Impact's early drill results were very promising.


    Speaking of drilling, Impact has two unique characteristics in this regard. First, in this era of very high exploration activity where many companies are finding it difficult to get drills rigs when and where they need them, Impact has no such problem. This is because Impact has a sister company named Energold Drilling, which is a very profitable driller and a potentially excellent investment in its own right, but I will not go into that here. Also, Energold owns about 15% of Impact's shares.



    Second, CEO Fred Davidson has an uncommon view of developing NI43-101 compliant resource numbers. He claims it costs way too much to do this and that shareholder money can be better spent acquiring more properties and/or doing new exploratory drilling. Fred is not interested in drilling extra holes to achieve NI43-101 compliance when the only purpose would be to impress the market and pump up the share price in the short term.


    Okay, so what kind of profits can we expect from Impact? Alas, the company is more conservative than most others and therefore I was unable to obtain forecasts of sales and profits. But, Impact did give me enough detail about their future plans to make it possible to guesstimate its revenues for 2007 and 2008, and I present them below. I made my own assumption for operating expenses for 2007 and 2008 as noted below since management was uncomfortable providing their own. All dollar amounts are in US$ millions unless otherwise noted.



    ........................................ ....................... 2006 ...... 2007 ..... 2008


    Production Rate....................................200tpd......350tpd......700tpd


    Silver Equiv. Production (million oz.).....0.8.............1.5..........3.0


    Revenue (Silver = $12/oz. for '07 & 08)..$7.........$18..........$36


    Silver As % of Revenue..................... .....80%.........


    Operating Expenses ($5/oz for '07 & 08)..$4.6....$7.5......$15


    Mine Operating Profit...............................$2.4.........$10.5......$21


    Market Multiple (15x)................................$36...........$158.....$315


    Shares Outstanding (millions)............ ..41.............47.........47


    Options/Warrant (millions).....................8...............2..............2


    Cap. Expenditure Plan (estimate).........$2............$3...........


    Cash in Bank (3-31-07)..........................$4

    Possible Market Value May 2008.............$240*


    Possible Share Price May 2008...............US$5/share

    Share Price 5-11-07...............................US$1.55/share



    *Calculated as the mid-point between the Market Multiple for 2007 and 2008 for reasons explained in previous installments of the Value Strategy series.



    I believe that Impact is an excellent investment opportunity at current prices. Impact's market cap is low compared to that of its peers, and the properties the company is developing present as high a probability of success as any you will find in this business in my opinion. Yes, the management is conservative, and this may have held back the share price. They also spend very little on marketing and promotion compared to their peers – only about 20% as much by one estimate. However, this conservative management may in the long run produce greater success with less risk for the investor. And, Fred Davidson has a long history of success in the mining business. I believe there is significant unrealized value in this company. It may take a bit longer to present itself, but it should more than justify the investor's patience.


    By way of disclosure, I own shares of all the companies featured in this Value Strategy series. Also, no one has asked or paid me to write these articles.


    Don Hansen is a retired entrepreneur who has been investing in silver mining stocks since 2001.


    Disclaimer: We hope others will find this approach interesting and useful in making their investment decisions but we caution all investors that this is not an investment recommendation and that each investor must consider his or her own investment criteria, horizon, suitability and other factors before making an investment in these or any other stocks. Inexperienced investors should consult with a registered investment advisor. Information contained herein is believed to be accurate but we make no guarantees to that effect. We are under no obligation to correct errors or update any information, which is only timely as of the date of publication. Forward-looking statements and estimates are the author's own opinion only and any information obtained directly or indirectly from the company is protected by safe harbor laws. Furthermore, all viewpoints expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of http://www.silveraxis.com. The author and persons associated with http://www.silveraxis.com own shares in all of the companies mentioned and therefore are biased in their favor. No compensation was received from the companies mentioned nor was the author asked by anyone to produce this commentary.

    Noch kurz 2 Sachen:


    FR.V wird zur zeit mal wieder kräftig durchgeshortet.....


    Short Summary
    Short Volume As Of
    1,896,319 30/Apr/2007
    1,752,219 15/Apr/2007
    1,466,419 31/Mar/2007

    Schätze, das war in den letzten tagen noch höher! :D



    Mexico Mike at his best:
    betrifft auch die heute gebeutelten Garibaldi.
    Hab ich da nicht vor kurzem von 0,65 gefaselt????
    Also landpackages beachten uund vor allem die Lage und möglicher infrastruktur


    I notice today that Canarc Resources became the latest junior to acquire property holdings in western Chihuahua:


    http://www.stockhouse.ca/pfoli.....fromalert=


    I do not own any CCM and have no plans to buy any, but it is worth pointing out because they agreed to pay $2 million for what amounts to a grass roots exploration project.


    EXM owns property in the same immediate area, and they acquired 50,000 hectares through staking and probably spent less than $100K to grab it, with no underlying royalty. They then acquired a further 600 hectares nearby a past producing mine in the area for only $520K, and with no underlying royalties.


    http://www.exmin.com/press/NR_.....5Oct06.pdf


    Consider the difference in what EXM paid for their holdings, and what they are now worth in relation to what other companies are paying. Also, consider what these projects may represent if EXM does enough exploration successfully to advance them beyond the grass-roots level.


    Craig Gibson told me a funny story earlier this year. He said that he was in discussion with a property vendor that had a very interesting project to sell. The vendor wanted $1 million. Craig offerred him $10,000. I think that says it all.


    The property sweepstakes is only just getting started. As this cycle gains momentum, and as other players start to report new discoveries, the value of the suite of projects controlled by EXM will also increase rapidly. This is something to think about for a company trading at 50 cents that already owns an interest in a mine soon to be producing.


    cheers!


    mike

    Nun noch ein Riesen PP:
    wozu das viele Geld?, frag ich mich.
    Gut 33 Mille Cash plus die Beteiligungen.


    Vielleicht doch die restlichen 50% bei einer der beiden Drillingfirmen erwerben? (siehe fett!)
    Es ist zwar Unsinn pur, aber mir fällt da immer wieder auch CABO ein.



    Tue May 15, 2007
    Energold Completes $15 Million Bought Deal Private Placement
    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES


    VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(CCNMatthews -- May 15, 2007) - Energold Drilling Corp. (the "Company") (TSX VENTURE: EGD; FRANKFURT: X9X) is pleased to announce that it has completed its previously announced private placement financing (the "Offering"). A total of 6,830,000 units (the "Units") of the Company were issued pursuant to an underwriting agreement between the Company and Clarus Securities Inc. ("Clarus") at a price of $2.20 per Unit for aggregate gross proceeds of $15,026,000, including 1,370,000 Units that were issued pursuant to the exercise in full by Clarus of an underwriter's option.


    Each Unit consists of one common share (each, a "Common Share") of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "Warrant"). Each Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to acquire an additional Common Share at a price of $2.85 per Common Share for a period of 12 months following the closing of the Offering. All securities issued under the Offering are subject to a four month hold period.


    Clarus was paid a cash commission equal to 7.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds of the Offering. Clarus was also granted 478,100 compensation options (the "Compensation Options"), equal to 7.0% of the Units sold pursuant to the Offering. Each Compensation Option entitles Clarus to acquire one Unit at an exercise price of $2.20 during the 12 month period following the closing of the Offering.


    The net proceeds of the Offering are intended to be used by the Company for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company now has 29,805,352 shares issued and outstanding following completion of the private placement.


    Energold Drilling Corp. is an environmentally and socially sensitive diamond drilling company that services the mining industry. The Company fully consolidates its wholly owned subsidiaries and the operations of its 50.01%-owned Pac Rim Drilling S.A.C. and 50%-owned subsidiary Kluane International Drilling and its affiliates. Energold also holds 6.6 million shares representing over a 16 percent interest in silver producer IMPACT Silver Corp.


    On behalf of the Directors of Energold Drilling Corp.


    "Frederick W. Davidson"
    President, CEO

    Zitat

    Original von Eldorado
    Was muss das fuer eine Welt sein bei dem Traumpreis den Hommel angibt ?
    Eldo


    Hi eldo, genial auf den punkt gebracht......


    Nugget,
    das sind Bandera Grundlagen. Aktuelleres war hier zu lesen.
    Beste Aussichten.


    Zu EGD:
    wozu das viele Geld?, frag ich mich.
    Gut 30 Mille Cash + die Beteiligungen.
    Vielleicht doch die restlichen 50% bei einer der beiden Drillingfirmen erwerben?
    Es ist zwar Unsinn pur, aber mir fällt da immer wieder auch CABO ein.


    Ja zwyss, was tun?
    Ich weiß es nicht, tu deshalb nicht viel.
    Grundsätzlich hat sich nullo verändert.
    Geduldsstrapazen kommen halt hinzu.
    Mistkröten od. extra geshortete kann man auch raushauen, ebenso gehypte.
    Aber dazu ist es nun schon etwas spät.


    Könnt ja auch sein, dass es noch diese Woche dreht.


    Schnäppchen gibt´s immer, hab vorgestern einige aufgezählt.
    Nugget gestern auch eine SEG.TO.



    heron,
    die pershimco PRO.V ist ein interessantes Ding.
    Hier noch mal der link: Lesen!
    http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=31786


    Grüße
    Tschonko

    Da geht kaum was weiter beim Clay und der wäre der definitive Geldbringer...


    Jetzt drillen sie mit der eigenen Firma ihre eigenen Gebiete.
    Auch Ausfälle beim Einkommen.


    Vielleicht ist schon wieder wo timber nachgewachsen.... :D


    Form 10QSB for ATLAS MINING CO


    15-May-2007


    Quarterly Report



    Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS


    We are a natural resources company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of our resource properties in the states of Idaho and Utah and in New Foundland, Canada. We also provide contract mining services and specialized civil construction services for mine operators, exploration companies and the construction and natural resource industries through our trade name "Atlas Fausett Contracting."


    Our primary source of revenue is generated by our Atlas Fausett Contracting operations. However, we also have exploration targets and timber. As a result, we are providing Management's discussion on our plan of operation.


    Contract Mining


    Our contract mining generates more than 99% of our revenues. This may decrease as we are able to increase operations on our owned properties, and we will adjust our resources accordingly. At this time, we anticipate that our contracting will remain a significant portion of our business.


    Property Exploration


    We intend to continue our exploration activities for halloysite clay and other minerals, and intend to acquire commercially feasible properties that can be put into production with minimal environmental problems and with limited financial resources. We do not intend to seek out and acquire other properties unless they fit into the parameters we have set. Further, we will limit our acquisitions based on our ability to conduct our feasibility surveys and other exploration work on these properties, and until we have been able to bring our existing acquisitions into a income generating stage.


    In August 2001, we acquired the Dragon Mine in Juab, Utah and began our clay exploration. Our exploration and development expenses for the period ending March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $481,868 and $610,767 respectively on the halloysite clay project.


    The halloysite clay is considered a non-toxic material, and we feel we can produce a sellable product with minimal environmental consequences using proper containment and processing techniques. The intended processing will be the crushing, drying, and packaging of the product for shipment. In 2003 and 2006 we completed diamond drilling programs to verify location of clay beds at the Dragon Mine. With that information we have been able to formulate development and mining plans.
    During 2005 we worked to develop and bring the Dragon Mine into the production stage.


    Our halloysite clay marketing efforts include contacting potential customers and distributors, which we have done. Each buyer may have a different use for the product and the price and quantity will vary as a result. The sale of product cannot be formalized until we have verified our ability to provide the quality and quantities as required by the potential buyers. From results of the product samples distributed we have numerous potential buyers. In March 2006 we activated Nano Clay and Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary, and hired Dr. Ron Price as its President and Chief Executive Officer, to pursue these activities.


    Until the Dragon mine is producing in a profitable manner we are not aggressively trying to develop other properties. However it is our intent to look for other properties that can be acquired, developed and mined with minimal costs, and environmental problems.


    We have a mining plan and reclamation bond approved by the proper state authorities, have filed and received Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) registration, and County permitting where applicable. In the future, we may pursue additional acquisitions and exploration of other properties for metals and industrial minerals, development of which will require submission of new mining and reclamation plans to the proper state and federal authorities.


    Timber


    We will continue to harvest timber on our property. Timber harvesting will be dependent upon lumber prices and weather. We normally do not log much in the winter months.


    RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


    Revenues for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 were $2,002,270 and $334,710 for the same period ending March 31, 2006, or an increase of 498%. The difference was caused by the increase in contracting revenues of $1,667,560 for this period compared to the previous year.


    Gross profit (loss) for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 was $910,267 compared to $160,429 for the same period ending March 31, 2006, a difference of $749,838. This was due to increased contracting revenues for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 over the same period ended March 31, 2006.


    Total operating expenses for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 was $999,427 compared to $1,096,389 for the same period ending March 31, 2006 or a decrease of 9%. Although the company recognized less administrative costs and exploration and development costs in the period ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period ended March 31, 2006, more mining production costs were incurred.


    Our net profit (loss) for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 was $(65,612) compared to $(928,603) for the same period ending March 31, 2006, or a decrease of 93%. As previously mentioned, the company experienced significant increases in contracting revenues during the first quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period ending March 31, 2006.


    LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


    To date our activities have been financed primarily through the sale of equity securities, borrowings, and revenues from Atlas Fausett Contracting. We intend to continue pursuing contract mining work and logging of our timber properties to help pay for our operations. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 contract mining accounted for 100% of the revenue. Our current asset and debt structure is explained below.


    Our total assets as of March 31, 2007 were $6,673,536 compared to $4,309,881 as of December 31, 2006, or an increase of $2,363,655. For the three month period ended March 31, 2007 the company has increased its current assets by $1,951,396, and its fixed assets by $442,468 through acquisitions of additional equipment for mining and milling operations.


    Total liabilities were $1,045,874 as of March 31, 2007, compared to $907,376 as of December 31, 2006. The following debts are still outstanding;


    º We have a note payable to a leasing company for a piece of equipment with a $26,233 balance with payments of $2,135 per month at 9.75% interest and maturing in March 2008.
    º We have a note payable to a leasing company for equipment with a $40,718 balance with monthly installments of $1,605 at 5.41% interest and maturing in May 2009.
    º We have a note payable to a leasing company for the acquisition of equipment with a $10,073 balance and monthly payments of $676 at 1.35% interest, maturing in June 2008.
    º We have a note payable to a leasing company for the acquisition of equipment with a $61,225 balance and monthly payments of $15,573 at 5% interest and maturing in August 11.
    º We have a note payable to a lending company for the acquisition of equipment with a $14,383 balance and monthly payments of $479 at 0% interest and maturing in December 2008.
    º We have a note payable to a lending company for the acquisition of equipment with a $22,146 balance and monthly payments of $688 at 7.59% interest and maturing in March 2010.
    º We have a note payable to a private party with a $100,677 balance due in annual installments of between $15,000 to $54,000 with an interest rate of 0%. The note matures in April 2009.
    º We have a note payable to a company with a $124,526 balance due in monthly installments of $3,518 at 22.66% interest and maturing in February 2012.
    º We have a note payable to a company with a $38,713 balance due in monthly installments of $1,075 at 0% interest and maturing in March 2010.
    º We have a note payable to an insurance company with a $35,115 balance due in monthly installments of $12,767 at 8.85% interest and maturing in July 2007.


    Accounts payable and accrued expenses due as of March 31, 2007 were $448,404 and are the result of daily operations and accrued taxes. We also carry a liability of $52,289 to the minority interest in a subsidiary.


    If we do not reduce our debts, we would be obligated to pay an average of $60,386 per month or $672,348 for the next fiscal year.


    Our principal sources of cash flow during the first quarter 2007 was from contracting activities which provided an average of $667,423 per month for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, and averaged $111,570 per month for the same period in 2006. In addition, we rely on our credit facilities and any public or private sales of equity for additional cash flow.


    Cash flow from financing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 was $2,200,480 compared to $93,258 for the same period in 2006, a difference of $2,107,222. The major factor for the difference was receipt of proceeds from issuance of common stock in 2007.


    The Company used $537,094 from investing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to using $210,321 in the same period in 2006, a difference of $326,773. This was attributed to purchases of more equipment in the period ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.


    Cash flow used by operating activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, was ($62,216) compared to ($902,913) for the same period in 2006, a difference of $840,697. In the three month period in 2007 net losses was markedly lower than the same period in 2006.

    gogh,
    mm war das gestern ein guter preis.


    Hab ja von den 14+ plus gesprochen ohne zu wissen, dass 14,65 von einem Analzysten schon angegeben wurden.
    Da ging´s dann noch ein bisserl drunter.


    Vom gebiet her ähnlich und auch mit großer Sandgrube sind die SNN.TO.



    Canaccord Cuts Rating, Target After Gammon Lake Resources Misses Its Own Guidance
    Monday May 14, 4:07 pm ET


    FP Trading Desk submits: What do you do when a company issues guidance for a quarter that has just ended, then roughly five weeks later reports results that are way off?


    A good place to start would be to focus entirely on the company’s actual results, as opposed to what management is saying.


    That’s what Canaccord Adams analyst Wendell Zerb has done after Gammon Lake Resources Inc. (AMEX: GRS - News) missed its own mark in the first quarter, despite issuing guidance as recently as its fiscal 2006 conference call on April 3.


    The gold and silver miner said it produced 65,844 ounces of gold equivalent that was sold, compared to 75,000 expected by Mr. Zerb.


    He called the misguidance “disturbing” in a note to clients, particularly because it came after the first quarter had come to an end.


    Mr. Zerb also pointed out that Gammon Lake’s cash operating costs were US$575 per ounce of gold equivalent in the quarter, versus his expectation of less than US$270 for the company’s Ocampo and El Cubo projects in Mexico.


    He expects it will take several solid quarters for Gammon Lake to achieve operating costs below US$300 per ounce.


    Perhaps the company’s new CEO and CFO will help resolve some of these issues.


    Mr. Zerb reduced his rating on the stock to “sell” from “hold,” while his price target was lowered to C$14.65 from C$22.15.

    Sommerschlussverkauf hat begonnen.
    Gibt´s schon nette Offerte:
    EXM, EXN, SNN.TO, CBE.V, GAM.TO, Mexivada ist auch interessant, aber Offert?
    und, und....


    Wer holt den Hommel mit dem Lasso herunter?


    Why Silver will Soar above $230/oz.
    Silver Stock Report
    by Jason Hommel, May 14, 2007



    "The CPM Silver Yearbook 2007" was released today.
    http://www.cpmgroup.com/


    To summarize CPM's press release:


    They conclude that net silver investment demand was about 60 million ounces for 2006, up from 2005, and expected to continue to rise into 2007.


    Investor demand is from India, the Middle East, and the West, as a part of protection from inflation, and a participation in the commodity boom.


    Silver mine supply is expected to increase slightly, 3%, to 520 million ounces.


    India's central bank selling of about 60 million ounces of silver over a few years is now finished.


    Warren Buffet sold his 130 million ounces prior to the introduction of the Silver ETF's purchase of about 130 million ounces, so those investment moves tended to balance each other out.


    It was pointed out that new investor demand is a significant change and is helping to explain the dramatic increases in the silver price.


    My thoughts on this:


    The amount of money in U.S. banks, M3, is about $12 trillion. Net silver demand was 60 million ounces at about $11/oz., or $660 million dollars. So, the money that is going into silver to protect itself from inflation is equivalent to 0.00005% ($660 million out of $12,000,000 million!) of what could be spent on silver, in the U.S. alone.


    So, I think a ridiculously tiny amount of paper dollars has shifted into silver, so far.


    If 1% of U.S. money supply, M3, attempts to buy silver to protect itself from inflation, that would be $120 billion dollars.


    All the silver expected to be mined in the world for 2007, is 520 million ounces. At $14/oz., that's $7 billion dollars.


    If 520 million ounces of silver were allocated to $120 billion dollars of investment demand, with no silver left over for any industrial demand, then silver would cost $230/oz. ($120,000 million/520 million oz.)


    The current rate of inflation is a 10% increase of M3 per year. Therefore, a future of 1% of money going towards investment demand for silver would still only be the beginning of the rise in the price of silver.


    The Federal Reserve, and Ben Bernanke, are desperate to control people's expectations of inflation. Look what Bernanke said last year (see the second to last paragraph, at this link):
    http://www.federalreserve.gov/…2006/20060605/default.htm


    "The best way to prevent increases in energy and commodity prices from leading to persistently higher rates of inflation is by anchoring the public’s long-term inflation expectations."


    In other words, Bernanke said, "The best way to prevent inflation from getting out of control, is to control everyone's thoughts about inflation."


    Inflation expectations will lead people to buy silver. If people buy silver, the price of silver will go up. As silver goes up, inflation will get worse. As inflation gets worse, people will buy more silver. What will stop it? Mind control?


    As I explained yesterday, I have a well-researched religious belief that the world will return to using gold and silver as money, before Jesus returns at the rapture before the tribulation.
    http://bibleprophesy.org/summary.html


    I know that some of the vocal minority think that anything the Bible says is fantasy. Excuse me. Paper money is the fantasy.


    The reality of the situation is that today in the real world, there is not enough silver, and way too much paper money. Paper money will fail. Silver will not. Holders of real silver will become wealthy beyond what we can even imagine.