The John Brimelow Report
Gartman well informed! - but liable to be pecked
Monday January 3, 2005
Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $9.87, PM $8.79, with world gold at $433.35 and $435.40. Very high: lavish for legal imports. India is a major support to world gold at these prices. The Bombay Stock Exchange closed at another record high today, implying that further rupee-bolstering inflows are likely.
Today’s most dramatic physical news comes from Turkey. The Istanbul Gold Exchange has posted Turkey’s December gold imports: 24.65 tonnes, 84% up on Ramadan-disrupted November and 129% above December ’03. Imports for the whole year were 250.93 tonnes, 17% above 2003 (which was a record) and, amazingly, more than ’01 &’02 added together. This was despite $US weighted average prices being unchanged from November ($443.33 vs. $444.16 -Turkish currency prices were 2.2% lower.) November and December prices were of course easily the highest in the data matrix the Exchange offers. See
http://www.iab.gov.tr/english/data03.php
and
http://www.iab.gov.tr/english/data02.php
Turkey’s ability to import gold in December at virtually a 300 tonne annual rate despite the extremely high average price is staggering. November imports, it might be remembered, were close to triple November ’03.
Obvious inferences
The demand schedule for gold in the Middle East – where much of this metal is thought to be going – has shifted positively in a massive way.
2) Contrary to popular commentary, this has little to do with the short term oil price. Oil was down both in November and December. Geo-political concerns are the obvious explanation. These are not going away.
3) While last week’s sell-off – and this morning’s - have the aroma of a bear raid, the resistance above $440 seen throughout December is probably Official. Who else could provide this much physical? Without moving lease rates?
3) Eventually the seller will have to retreat. This sort of physical offtake and premiums speak of lows, not highs.
NY on Thursday traded 34,862 contracts (52% more than estimated). The active contract rose $1.40 and open interest slumped by 8,525 lots. This suggests that the view expressed here last week - that a good deal of Wednesday’s selling was short - was correct.
The utility of following The Gartman Letter’s insight (or reflection) of Hedge Fund thinking seems to be proving out. On Thursday Gartman ruminated
"precious metals have acted so terribly. Gold plunged; silver plunged... and the technical aspects of the precious metals markets have become rather overtly bearish…. we said that we'd likely not become bullish of gold again until spot traded back to
$400/oz. We may get our wish, and we'll remain upon the sidelines awaiting that opportunity. However, if there are some who might chose to venture bearishly of gold, we'd not argue with them too strongly at this point…"
Envisaging Gartman, as one does, as a fairly high component of the Hedge Fund information food chain rather than an analyst, this suggests the inclination to short gold was still present in this fraternity. Monday’s abrupt collapse in NY – down 2.2% versus the only 0.75% the Dollar Index action would have suggested – indicates that he was well informed.
But given the ignored but crucial physical market, probably wrong.
JB