Beiträge von Aladin

    valueman


    Solange Tschonko Urlaub macht kann ich da bleiben, es reicht wenn einer von uns auf Urlaub ist.
    Tschonko hatte aber aber Recht das Gold runter geht aber er vergessen das nach drei Tagen Urlaub es wieder ansteigt. :D
    Es ist momentan zu schoen um wahr zu sein,wichtig ist das die Huerde von 450 endgueltig faellt und bleibt als neuer Boden.Bis ca mitte September sollte das Hoch anhalten dann kommt wieder der Vollmond.
    Meistens ist es so das ca.2-3 Tagen vor Neumond Gold und Silber steigt.
    Aber sich 100% darauf verlassen kann man sich auch nicht.


    Mfg


    XAX

    The reason the price of gold is hundreds of dollars per ounce below where it should be is because The Gold Cartel has clandestinely lent out more than 16,000 tonnes of gold from the coffers of the central banks to keep the price from rising. This means the central banks have less than half the gold they say they have in their vaults. The total gold loans/swaps (including central bank gold sales in recent years) could now even be as high as 20,000 tonnes.


    How can GATA make this claim and how do we support our revelations?


    For me it all goes back to a year I spent working with Frank Veneroso when he compiled the gold loan numbers. I saw how he did it, who he talked to, etc. Back in 1998 Frank thought the gold loans could be as high as 10,000 tonnes. The annual supply/demand deficit is 1500+ tonnes per year. Without going into all the detail, it is easy to surmise how GATA could come up with a total gold loan number exceeding 16,000 tonnes.


    Using two completely different methodologies a few years ago, Reg Howe and James Turk came up with guesstimates that supported Frank’s findings. Reg used BIS derivatives numbers and James used Bank of England statistics.


    The BIS derivatives numbers are a smoking gun. As long as GATA has been in existence, the World Gold Council and Gold Fields Mineral Services have linked the huge gold derivatives on the books of the BIS to what the gold producers were up to. Yet, when the hedgers reduced their positions by around 2500 tonnes, and the gold derivatives stayed the same, or went up, they went totally silent, refusing to respond to GATA’s charges that these huge derivatives numbers were linked to a clandestine Gold Cartel lending operation.


    How could this have happened without creating a fuss? Simple, the IMF instructed the central banks to lie about the true disposition of their gold reserves, which I brought to your attention yesterday. The IMF has central banks accounting for their gold loans as gold reserves in their vaults. Ironically, these central banks now have a major problem. Because of the size of the annual supply/demand deficit, they cannot get this gold back without driving the price to the moon. :D

    Dear Members,
    Things are not happening way I PREDICTED during this week. I was suppose to give buying single IN GOLD during next week but gold is up $11.00 and dollar index collapsed by $0.85.

    Crude Oil is little bit down and strange stock market is down that is confirming that market is in horror territory.

    MY ADVISE:


    I think one should buy Dollar index. I still hold my prediction to touch dollar index 94.10 and than 98.00 IN NEXT SIX WEEK, today hard to believe to TIME WILL tell. :rolleyes:


    THIS ALL TAKING PLACE ONLY BECAUSE HORROR IMPACT OF KATRINA. THIS IMPACT HAS TO REMAIN IN EVERY MIND BECAUSE IT IS IMPACT ON USA ECONOMY AND PEOPLE.

    I AM WRONG ON DOLLAR SINCE LAST 72 HOURS AND I HAVE TO ACCEPT IT. :D

    Mist, die FVI.V und USGL.OB konnte ich nicht schnappen so schnell ging der Zug ab. :(
    Nicht mal die MAD.V, bei der wars auch so.

    C'est la vie , next time I get it right Cowboys.



    XAX

    Fortuna glaenzt heute.... :)), nur schade das sie nicht in meinen Depo rechtzeitig reinkam, danach Report von Bob Moriarty, die glaenzt noch weiter so wie es sehe. Wenn nicht dann wird sie eben poliert. :D


    FVI.V
    Last Trade: 1.11
    Trade Time: 9:36AM ET
    Change: 0.16 (+16.84%)
    Prev Close: 0.95
    Open: 1.08
    Bid: 1.11
    Ask: 1.12
    1y Target Est: N/A

    Day's Range: 1.08 - 1.11
    52wk Range: N/A
    Volume: 144,500

    Mal was anders zur Abwechslung, wenn ich es hier reinlegen darf.
    Its a crazy world today.



    August 31, 2005


    How New Orleans Was Lost


    By Paul Craig Roberts


    Chalk up the city of New Orleans as a cost of Bush’s Iraq war.


    There were not enough helicopters to repair the breeched levees and rescue people trapped by rising water. Nor are there enough Louisiana National Guards available to help with rescue efforts and to patrol against looting.


    The situation is the same in Mississippi.


    The National Guard and helicopters are off on a fool's mission in Iraq.


    The National Guard is in Iraq because fanatical neoconservatives in the Bush administration were determined to invade the Middle East and because the incompetent Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld refused to listen to the generals, who told him there were not enough regular troops available to do the job.


    After the invasion, the arrogant Rumsfeld found out that the generals were right. The National Guard was called up to fill in the gaping gaps.


    Now the Guardsmen, trapped in the Iraqi quagmire, are watching on TV the families they left behind trapped by rising waters and wondering if the floating bodies are family members. None know where their dislocated families are, but, shades of Fallujah, they do see their destroyed homes.


    The mayor of New Orleans was counting on helicopters to put in place massive sandbags to repair the levee. However, someone called the few helicopters away to rescue people from rooftops. The rising water overwhelmed the massive pumping stations, and New Orleans disappeared under deep water.


    What a terrible casualty of the Iraqi war—one of our oldest and most beautiful cities, a famous city, a historic city. The World Trade Towers count as little compared to the loss of New Orleans.


    Distracted by its phony war on terrorism, the US government had made no preparations in the event Hurricane Katarina brought catastrophe to New Orleans. No contingency plan existed. Only now after the disaster are FEMA and the Corp of Engineers trying to assemble the material and equipment to save New Orleans from the fate of Atlantis.


    Even worse, articles in the New Orleans Times-Picayune and public statements by emergency management chiefs in New Orleans make it clear that the Bush administration slashed the funding for the Corp of Engineers’ projects to strengthen and raise the New Orleans levees and diverted the money to the Iraq war.


    Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, told the New Orleans Times-Picayune (June 8, 2004): "It appears that the money has been moved in the president’s budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that’s the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can’t be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."


    Why can’t the US government focus on America’s needs and leave other countries alone? Why are American troops in Iraq instead of protecting our own borders from a mass invasion by illegal immigrants? Why are American helicopters blowing up Iraqi homes instead of saving American homes in New Orleans?


    How can the Bush administration be so incompetent as to expose Americans at home to dire risks by exhausting American resources in foolish foreign adventures? What kind of "homeland security" is this?


    All Bush has achieved by invading Iraq is to kill and wound thousands of people while destroying America’s reputation. The only beneficiaries are oil companies capitalizing on a good excuse to jack up the price of gasoline and Osama bin Laden’s recruitment.


    What we have is a Republican war for oil company profits while New Orleans sinks beneath the waters.
    * * * * *