Noch einige Nachbetrachtungen zu Davos :
"...But being in the mix does not mean nuclear energy will shove aside fossil fuels any time soon. In a way, the revival of interest in nuclear power illustrates the lack of palatable choices to combat global warming.
Renewable energy, while growing steadily, has limitations. Windmills don’t turn when the wind isn’t blowing; solar power and geothermal energy are not yet economical enough; hydroelectric dams can be disruptive themselves.
That leaves nuclear power as a “clean” alternative to fossil fuels...."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01…w&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
".....John P. Holdren, the director of the Woods Hole Research Center, said that if current economic predictions held, nuclear energy would have to generate one-third of the world’s electricity by 2100 to curb the rise in carbon dioxide emissions. That would require a tenfold increase in the number of plants, to more than 3,000..... "?(
Beeindruckende Zahl, wenngleich Hypothese.....
Grüsse
If my limited math skills still serve me that would be a $50.96 clubbing and a return to 677.04. Assuming that were to be the case, what should one do? I would just sit on my hands and do nothing, but that's just me. The other thing I would do is add on at $680.00 instead of selling at precisely the wrong moment. I realize these aren't easy things to do, but they are the right things. The people who insist on "trading" gold are getting slaughtered coming and going...." 
![:]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/pleased.gif "Freude"){kind=small}
