die aggressive art wie der ein oder andere hier sich zu wort meldet zeigt mir das die nerven blank liegen
und das sie an den bullshit den sie schreiben selbst nicht glauben!
ständig die alte story das henderson seinen vater verklagt hat.
das ist doch sowas von egal und hat doch nix mit ima zu tun
ich würde meinen vater nie verklagen - ich habe aber auch ein gutes verhältnis mit meinem vater, wofür ich sehr dankbar bin.
wer weiß wie das verhältnis zwischen den beiden war? war die klage gerechtfertigt? egal, es geht und nichts an!
aqi wird seinen weg gehen - was henderson aus aqi gemacht hat ist schon beachtlich. schaut euch mal den 5 jahreschart an, was für ein glücksgriff henderson für die aqi aktionäre ist.
ich stell noch mal einen lesenswerten arktikel rein, der verdeutlicht das beide seiten ansprüche auf navidad haben:
DJ CORRECT: IMA Geologist Viewed Info As Not Relevant
Symbol: C/AQI IMR C/IMR
Industry: PCS
Subject: DJIN DJN DJWB CNW COR DJS DJSS DJWI FCTV XCH
Market Sector: BSC NND
Geographic Region: AG BRC CN LTM NME ONT SM
The B.C. court heard earlier that Newmont project geologist Carlos Cuburu
offered IMA Exploration Inc. (IMR) consulting geologist Paul Lhotka various
information in 2002 that, in Lhotka's view, wasn't relevant to the Calcatreu
project he was evaluating at the time.
(In the "Canada Venture" story at noon EST, it wasn't cleary stated that
it
was Lhotka's opinion that the information wasn't relevant to the project.)
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
11-23-05 1307ET
Copyright (c) 2005 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
End of News
=DJ CANADA VENTURE: Navidad Information Accurate, IMA Says
Symbol: C/AQI IMR C/IMR
Industry: PCS
Subject: DJIN DJN DJWB CNW CRX DJS DJSS DJWI FCTV GEN LWS XCH
Market Sector: BSC NND
Geographic Region: AG BRC CN LTM NME ONT SM
By Lynne Olver
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
VANCOUVER (Dow Jones)--In an ongoing civil trial, IMA Exploration Inc.
(IMR)
managers and contractors have said promotional materials and other reports
IMA
distributed about its Navidad silver discovery in Argentina were generally
correct.
IMA's exploration manager, Keith Patterson, told B.C. Supreme Court this
week there were some "minor" inaccuracies in a corporate brochure about the
Navidad project, but not ones he felt were important to correct.
He also justified IMA's language in a May 2003 Securities and Exchange
Commission filing about the Navidad property, although Patterson said he
couldn't recall reviewing the technical information it contained.
In the filing, IMA stated "there was no evidence of prior prospecting or
sampling activity anywhere" on the Navidad property.
Under cross-examination by lawyers for Aquiline Resources Inc. (AQI.T),
which is suing IMA, Patterson acknowledged that earlier sampling had indeed
been done by a Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM) subsidiary. But there was no
prospecting or exploration work done specifically on the discovery outcrop
where a geologist for IMA found silver mineralization, he noted. It was also
fair to say there had been no exploration "of significance" on the Navidad
property, Patterson said.
Aquiline alleges that IMA illegally used confidential regional
stream-sampling data it didn't own to stake the Navidad property, which
hosts
several big silver deposits.
Aquiline claims IMA received the regional data from Newmont under a
confidentiality agreement covering a separate property, Calcatreu, that
Aquiline eventually bought from Newmont. Aquiline claims the regional data
therefore belong to Aquiline, and it should get the Navidad property.
IMA disagrees that the regional data were confidential or owned by
Aquiline,
but acknowledged it staked the Navidad property after seeing anomalies or
unusual readings in the regional stream-sampling data.
IMA didn't tell the market it used the Newmont data to discover Navidad.
Early Sampling Done While Land Open
IMA filed a technical report on Navidad in 2004 that stated the project
had
"no known exploration history," despite previous sampling by the Newmont
subsidiary.
Patterson said Canadian mining-disclosure rules require companies to
provide
a history of exploration work done by individuals or companies on staked
ground, but shouldn't refer to historical work done on open ground. The
Newmont subsidiary didn't own the Navidad property when it took the stream
sediment samples, never staked it, and Newmont subsequently decided to exit
Argentina altogether.
Patterson told court he thinks it's "immaterial" to tell investors how a
mineral discovery was found, and said junior companies usually don't specify
how discoveries were made. This echoes earlier evidence given by IMA
consulting geologist Paul Lhotka, who said juniors often don't disclose
details because they don't want to give their competitors an edge. In this
case, Lhotka said he also thought that revealing use of the data could be
embarrassing to Newmont.
But after Aquiline sent IMA a letter in October 2003 asking how the
Navidad
discovery was made, and there was the "threat of a lawsuit hanging over us,"
the subject became material, Patterson told court.
The trial began Oct. 11 in Vancouver, and evidence from witnesses might
conclude next week. Shareholders and speculators will then have to wait for
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Marvyn Koenigsberg to give her decision.
The B.C. court heard earlier that Newmont project geologist Carlos Cuburu
offered IMA Exploration consulting geologist Paul Lhotka various information
in 2002 that, in Lhotka's view, wasn't relevant to the Calcatreu project he
was evaluating at the time. Lhotka said he was surprised, since it wasn't
standard industry practice. He raised some concern in a November 2002 memo
to
IMA management in Vancouver, saying it was "unclear" to him whether the data
could be used to acquire land outside a two-kilometer "no-stake zone"
specified in the Calcatreu confidentiality agreement.
Despite his doubt, Lhotka said he and Patterson decided to stake the
Navidad
property, located about 40 kilometers away from Calcetreu.
To date, Navidad has an indicated resource of about 300 million ounces of
silver.