Gold ETF's - (Börsen gelistete Fonds)

  • Dernier Cri für den Uneingeweihten.


    Diese monströsen Ungetüme sind nichts anderes als Papier Gold. Sei es dass die Fonds physisches Gold halten, oder nicht - es wird ihnen überlassen was damit geschieht.


    Als Fonds - Zertifikat (Anteil) Halter haben sie das Recht auf einen Anteil, aber nicht auf anteiliges Gold. Mit anderen Worten und wie ich es sehe ist es nur die Verlängerung des kaputten Bretton Woods und Nachfolge Spiels.


    WGC hat seine schmutzigen Hände überdies im Spiel, was mich von von vornherein misstrauisch machte.


    Diese Konstruktion scheint der verlängerte Arm von COMEX (gg. CRIMEX) zu sein.


    ... Drum prüfe wer sich an diese Substitionen bindet ...


    ***By Patrick Hosking
    The Times, London
    Friday, January 28, 2005
    http://business.timesonline.co…e/0,,8209-1460595,00.html


    One of the largest hoards of gold ever gathered outside
    a central bank has been accumulated at a secret address
    in London over the past few months.


    Gold bars with a value of £1.55 billion are understood
    to have been collected in a single vault in an anonymous
    building owned by HSBC. If melted into a single block,
    the 212 tonnes of solid gold would take up 11 cubic
    metres -- roughly the size of a Transit Van.


    But the gold is so dense that it would require 104 Transit
    Vans to cart it away. The quantity of metal is 21 times the
    amount stolen in the Brinks-Mat robbery in 1983.


    Ironically, the reason for the accumulation of this hoard is
    the popularity of a new gold investment product that does
    away with the expense, risk, and hassle of taking delivery
    of the metal.


    People and institutions in Britain, the United States, and
    Australia have been queueing to buy gold-backed,
    exchange-traded funds (ETF) -- listed shares tradeable on
    the stock exchange but backed by actual gold.


    Gold Bullion Securities (GBS), the British and Australian
    ETF that listed in London in December 2003, has 60
    tonnes of gold in the vault -- a 30 percent increase in the
    past four months. StreetTRACKS, its sister ETF in the
    United States, which was launched in November, is now
    backed by 152 tonnes of gold deposited in the same vault.


    Both ETFs are supported by the World Gold Council, the
    marketing body for the goldmining industry.


    Simon Village, joint managing director of GBS, said:
    "Exchange-traded gold has very quickly become an
    important investment vehicle for investors seeking
    exposure to the metal or seeking to diversify their
    holdings in other assets."


    In the past 12 months, 7.5 percent of the world's
    goldmine production had gone into ETF products,
    Mr Village said.


    Barclays yesterday launched a rival gold-backed ETF
    on Wall Street using Bank of Nova Scotia as custodian.


    Gold-backed ETFs closely track the physical gold
    price, less a small commission for administration and
    gold storage costs. Additional securities are created or
    old ones redeemed so that supply matches demand.


    Most of the demand has come from institutional
    investors. Strong publicity for the streetTRACKS
    product in the US has boosted demand, as has the
    slide in the gold price during the past few weeks,
    which some investors see as a buying opportunity.


    The gold stockpile in London is said to be secure.
    But it is not clear what would happen in the unlikely
    event that the hoard was stolen.


    GBS does not insure the gold and said it is HSBC's
    responsibility to keep it safe. Investors might have to
    rely on a claim against the bank in the unlikely event
    of a robbery, GBS said.


    HSBC is under no obligation to insure the gold. But
    the bank said it would be responsible for any gold lost
    through its negligence, fraud, or willful deceit. ***


    ... Oh, sure - we don't insure, but will take responsibility in case (of bankruptcy protection), Ha! ... You've got to love these Jokers for their
    acumen.
    Das OPEC Kartell kann von den Bankern noch Einiges lernen.

  • Danke für den Artikel. Er klärt, daß die Bank für verlorengegangenes oder geklautes Gold haftbar ist.


    Wenn allerdings das Gold verschwindet und die HSCB bankrott ist, steht der ETF Besitzer bedröppelt da.

  • Einige Punkte, die mir interessant erscheinen - kurz gefasst.


    Noch einmal zu Gold ETFs - Scheint mir nicht so zu sein, dass diese Fonds ausschliesslich physisches Gold halten - sondern mehrheitlich Futures. Im Prinzip dieselbe Gaunerei, wie Crimex.
    POG scheint damit konform zu sein ...



    ***Having the privilege of holding the key to the
    GATA dispatch list, I sometimes will take the
    liberty of attaching introductory comments to
    these stories and commentaries, or just wisecracks
    and sneers, to put GATA's spin on them or to try
    to unspin them. Sometimes this may go too far,
    and sometimes the omission of comment may be
    negligent, as with yesterday's dispatch of the
    London Times story about a secret vault at an
    "anonymous" building in London occupied by Hong
    Kong Shanghai Banking Corp. The vault was said
    to hold bullion owned by the new exchange-traded
    gold bullion funds.


    This was too much for GATA Chairman Bill Murphy,
    who replied:


    "This is really bugging me. I know I am
    prejudiced, but how can it be that we have had
    this supposedly massive buying of gold for the
    EFTs and the gold price has gone nowhere over
    the past couple of months? It makes no sense.


    "How can it be that the speculators are leaving
    the Comex in droves and yet are supposedly buying
    the ETFs like crazy?


    "How can it be that even Mitsui's Andy Smith,
    GATA's antagonist, smells a rat with the EFTs?


    "How do people explain all this gold demand with
    no rise in the gold price, on top of the documented
    demand in the Middle and East and India?


    "Why doesn't anyone else ask these questions?"


    GATA consultant James Turk, founder of GoldMoney
    and editor of the Freemarket Gold & Money Report,
    concurred:


    "I think this article in The Times is complete
    nonsense. The GLD exchange-traded fund does
    not disclose where its gold is stored. To assume
    that it sits somewhere within HSBC is pure
    speculation, just as it is pure speculation that it
    even exists at all, given that GLD's gold held by
    subcustodians and sub-subcustodians is not audited.
    And for all we know, all the gold may be stored
    with HSBC.


    "Unfortunately, like so many things concerning
    gold, we have to appeal to logic, as central banks
    make it nearly impossible for us to find the
    essential facts. Consequently, ignorance about
    gold prevails, because rather than spend some
    time thinking and working to analyze gold, the
    public swallows stories like this one hook, line,
    and sinker."


    Also dispatched to you without comment
    yesterday was a Reuters story reporting that
    a German delegate to the economic conference
    in Davos, Switzerland, expressed support for
    a vague British proposal to use gold owned by
    the International Monetary Fund to finance
    debt relief for poor countries. We've been over
    this stuff many times but perhaps not lately,
    so here goes again:


    1) Of course IMF gold sales, leasing, and
    revaluation aren't necessary to finance debt
    relief; Western governments could simply
    cancel any debts without any golden legerdemain.


    2) If the IMF and central banks tire of holding
    assets in gold, they can sell them or lease
    them at any time; they hardly need to relieve
    themselves of their gold under the supposed
    pressure of developing-world debt.


    3) Most likely the recurring talk by the IMF
    and central banks about gold sales is, like
    the sales themselves, simply a disguise
    for writing off as sold the massive amounts
    of gold that already have been leased and have
    left central bank vaults and cannot be recovered
    in any practical way without triggering a short
    squeeze that would collapse the bullion banks
    that have been the central banks' eager agents
    in the gold carry trade, which is also the
    currency support trade.


    4) As Turk implied, the whole world financial
    system has come to be based on the concealment
    of the amount and location of gold held by


    central banks and governments. That is, gold
    is the secret knowledge of the universe, and
    the control of its price is the foremost lever
    of political power.


    5) While remaining central bank gold reserves
    are not known exactly, because of gold leasing
    they are vastly smaller than reported reserves.
    That is probably why the central banks seem to
    be staging a controlled retreat with the gold
    price -- allowing it to rise steadily but
    gradually lest they exhaust their reserves and
    lose their grip on political power.


    6) If they have enough gold left and want to
    spend enough of it, central banks can drive
    the gold price down $50, $100, $200, or all the
    way back to $35 per ounce -- for a while, but
    not for long. Indeed, the lower they drive it,
    the faster they will exhaust their reserves, not
    just because of their own spending of gold but
    also because their lower gold price will cause
    a curtailment in gold production by mines. This
    curtailment is already well under way, since an
    equilibrium price for gold -- a price that matches
    production costs (including exploration costs) with
    demand -- is likely to be above $600 per ounce. A
    price that restored any sort of realistic ratio
    between gold and the volume of fiat money in
    circulation would be quite beyond that.


    7) GATA doesn't know exactly what is going to
    happen. We advocate free markets in the precious
    metals and seek to explose the rigging of the
    metals markets. We're not investment advisers.
    But when the fiat hits the fan, as it always
    does, nothing will have changed about the
    enduring value of the metals, except that they
    will be better appreciated.


    CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
    Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

  • By David Homes


    You're bound to hear about the latest craze in gold
    investing: GLD. This "exchange-traded fund," or ETF, is
    supposed to make gold investing simple and convenient.


    Each share of GLD is valued at one-tenth of an ounce of
    gold's current market price. Apparently GLD merely "tracks along" with the current spot price of gold with no real
    ability to redeem your shares for physical metal. To me
    this sounded like some kind of side-betting racket, so I contacted Merrill Lynch for some answers.


    Merrill Lynch is offering GLD, but for serious questions the local broker referred me to the powerful research department
    in New York. They raised more questions than answers.


    My next stop was the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    After the expected pinball routine, I ended up chatting with
    one of their enforcement lawyers, who indicated that I was
    not the first GLD prospect with concerns. Evidently GLD was facing the possibility of a formal investigation after just a few weeks of operation.


    It would appear that the legal structure of GLD was so
    carefully and intricately conceived that it was able to circumvent even the most basic disclosure and reporting requirements of the SEC itself. What are they trying to
    hide? No publicly traded company enjoys this kind of privacy.


    I learned that the ambiguous World Gold Council was
    involved with GLD, so I contacted them next. After many
    attempts and several days, I finally made a meaningful connection. My first question addressed the opacity of GLD.
    The WGC official's response was simply not credible. He said, "Because we are dealing with gold, the SEC requires
    that we adhere to certain security procedures."


    He told me that all gold was held in London in the HSBC
    vault. My next question was my last: "Are client funds
    backed up with 100 percent physical gold, or would you be including future-production pledges as part of the assets?"


    "Sir, I really cannot discuss this with you because of the
    way we are structured. Good day."


    Bottom line: The problem I have with the whole idea of
    ETFs is this opacity and the potential drag that it could represent to the real gold market.


    The best insurance for a strong gold bull market is, of
    course, physical ownership of the metal by the public --
    period.


    At best ETFs represent something less than 100-percent
    real-market impact. At worst ETFs are just the latest
    scheme by major gold interests and the Silver Users
    Association to maintain price and inventory controls. By creating a popular side-betting mechanism, they are able
    to divert and neutralize billions of dollars that otherwise could have a major impact on the price and supply of the
    hysical metals.


    In fact, that these ETFs are popping up could mean that
    metal inventories are getting desperately low.


    Prove me wrong. I'll give 100 ounces of silver to the
    first person who can convince me, with evidence, that GLD
    is not a Trojan horse. Until then, my money is on physical
    metal and quality mining shares.


    * * *


    David's essential gripe is that buying shares of GLD will
    not take gold off the market and reduce supplies as a normal gold purchase would, raising the price. Consequently, GLD
    will have no effect on the gold price. Perhaps GLD is useful
    as a tracking mechanism but lacks the real-world effect on price. In other words, the world could buy GLD and gold
    wouldn't budge an inch.


    -- Howard Ruff

  • Man muß sich beim ETF vor Augen halten, dass es sich um ein Papiergeldkonstrukt handelt, dass sich sehr schnell als trojanisches Pferd herausstellen kann.


    Letztendlich hat sich der Herausgeber verpflichtet den Kurs einer 1/10 Unze nachzubilden. Nach den letzten berichteten Werten lag die physische Deckung bei GLD bei ca. 30-40 %.


    Man muß sich nun doch die sehr einfache Frage stellen was sich dem Herausgeber passiert, wenn der Goldkurs nach oben geht.


    Das Ergebnis kann man doch anhand einer einfachen Rechnung sich selbst berechnen:


    Ausgabewert: 500 Mio. $


    davon 40 % gedeckt, d.h. 200 Mio. $ (Goldkurs 400 $)
    davon 60 % ungedeckt, d.h. 300 Mio. $


    Anstieg des Goldkurses auf 1000 $


    -> physischer Anteil steigt un das 2,5 fache auf 500 Mio. Wert
    -> und wie entwickelt sich der Rest ? War man hier in Gold long ?


    Meiner Ansicht schlummern genau in den restlichen 60 % enorme Risiken, da dem Anleger etwas vorgegaukelt wird, was tatsächlich nicht physisch vorhanden ist. Wenn sich die Bank hier verspekuliert und die Wertsteigerung nicht dementsprechend eintritt, gibt es sehr schnell eine Schieflage.


    In der heutigen "Schönwetterlage" mag dies zwar ein nettes Finanzkonstrukt sein. Leider haben aber viele nicht kapiert, dass in wirtschaftlich schwierigen Zeiten, in denen die Bankrisiken steigen und auch die eine oder andere Bank über den Jordan geht, solche Versprechen oft leer sind.


    Wenn ich in ein Gold-/Silberzertifikat investieren würde, dann nur (und ausschließlich nur) in den Central Fund of Canada. Sie haben sich verpflichtet das Geld zu 100 % in Gold und Silber physisch in einer kanadischen Bank zu lagern und machen dies auch schon seit vielen, vielen Jahren.


    Gruß


    Silbertaler

  • @ Silbertaler


    Warum so kompliziert?


    Durch den WGC geförderten GOLD ETF an der NYSE zu Listen - der lange gebraucht hat die behördlichen Hürden zu überwinden - ist es müssig darüber nachzudenken, ob Du physisches Gold kaufst oder Papier.


    Es ist auch müssig darüber nachzudenken, ob der ETF dem POG folgt oder gehorsam vorauseilt! Der ETF hat kein physisches Gold in welchem Verhältnis auch immer - sondern beinahe nur paper promises und ist somit WERT-los!


    Andernfalls, wäre ein ETF Zertifkat in physisches Gold einttauschbar - wozu also dieses ganze komödiantische Schmierentheater?

Schriftgröße:  A A A A A