Beiträge von Blue Horseshoe

    , um nicht nur am Tropf der Kazachen zu hängen

    der war gut [smilie_blume] :saint:


    nur mal ein teil der beteiligungen




    CompanyCountryMineEquity %Start production with China equity
    CNUCNigerAzelik37.2 + 24.8 ZXJOY2010 but now closed
    NigerImouraren25+, more pendingOn hold
    NamibiaLanger Heinrich25+, more pending2014
    NamibiaRössing68.62019
    KazakhstanZhalpak49?2017?
    CGN-URCNamibiaHusab902016
    KazakhstanIrkol & Semizbai492008, 2009
    UzbekistanBoztau black shales50Uncertain
    CanadaPatterson Lake19.992023




    etwas outtated, mittlerweile noch viel agressiver

    CNNC Projects
    Since the establishment of SinoU in 2006, the firm has acquired 15 uranium-prospecting permits
    in Niger, Namibia, Zimbabwe, and Mongolia; the total area prospected is 8,265 square kilome-
    ters.59 By the end of 2009, the leadership of CNNC announced that it had already secured over
    200 ktU of foreign resources. However, CNNC did not disclose further details. In the following,
    based on available information, we have tried to estimate how much foreign uranium resources
    CNNC could have locked in for the China market.


    Gurvanbulag/Mongolia: In March 2009, CNNC International, a 70% subsidiary of CNNC
    Overseas Uranium Holding Ltd. and through it, of SinoU, successfully acquired 69% of the
    ordinary shares of Western Prospector Group Ltd. (which was then listed in Canada). On June
    14, 2009, it bought out all the shares of the company and acquired the eighteen mining licenses
    previously owned by Western Prospector, including those pertaining to the Gurvanbulag uranium
    mine in Mongolia, which is very close to the Chinese border. It is estimated that there are 8,580
    tU (with an average grade of 0.18%) identified in Gurvanbulag mine, and 11,000 tU of inferred
    resources (with an average grade of 0.11%).67 This project requires extensive geological work;
    the uranium deposit is fairly large, the uranium ore is relatively high-grade, and there is a reliable
    amount of resources. It is expected to yield 600 tU/year within three years once a mining permit
    is issued. In 2010, CNNC and the Nuclear Energy Agency of Mongolia signed a memorandum
    of cooperation in the area of uranium resources and nuclear energy. On June 26, 2012, CNNC
    Mongolia Project Co. and the Nuclear Energy Agency of Mongolia signed an Agreement for
    Gurvanbulag Uranium Mine Early-Stage Mining Work. In 2014, a CNNC assessment report on
    the economic and technical feasibility of the project was approved, providing the basis for a min-
    ing rights permit.68
    Mongolia is well-endowed with uranium resources. Based on the 2014 Red Book, as of January
    1, 2013, recoverable uranium resources in Mongolia attributable to the identified resources cat-
    egory amounted to 141,521 tU. It is reported that as of 2014 China had already secured uranium
    resources in the country of up to 10 ktU.69 China hopes to lock up more uranium resources in
    Mongolia.


    Kanyeba/Zimbawe: CNNC has been actively exploring for uranium at the deposits found in the
    Kanyemba district, which is about 150 miles (241 kilometers) north of Harare, Zimbabwe. The
    Kanyemba project is operated by Afri-Sino Mining Resources Ltd., 42% of which is owned by
    CNNC. Another Chinese company owns 28%, while 30% is owned by a local company.66 CNNC
    was the partner which received a permit to conduct exploration work. Initial work has indicated a
    huge uranium potential. It is estimated that the Kanyemba deposit could hold more than 45 ktU.
    We assume China could access all of that amount.



    CGN Projects
    Since 2006, a CGN subsidiary, CGN Uranium Resources Co. Ltd. (CGN-URC), has been active-
    ly exploring for and mining uranium in countries such as Kazakhstan, Namibia, Australia, and
    Uzbekistan. Consequently, in 2013, the head of CGN stated that the firm had secured approxi-
    mately 308,000 tonnes of overseas natural uranium resources by the end of 2012.


    CGN-URC experts have revealed that CGN’s criteria for the selection of projects include: re-
    gional diversification (i.e., distribution across Africa, Central Asia, Australia, etc.); a stable
    and positive political and business environment (i.e., a stable government, no terrorist threat, a
    government supportive of uranium mining); rational return on investment (i.e., low costs); and
    controllable risk exposure. The firm is also cautious about involvement in grassroots projects
    with high risk.7



    Energy Metals/Australia: On September 8, 2009, through an investment vehicle, China Ura-
    nium Development Co. Ltd., CGN-URC initiated the acquisition of an Australian uranium
    exploration company, Energy Metals Ltd., spending US$72.10 million to acquire 70% of the
    shares of the firm. Energy Metals has nine uranium projects. At the moment, a key project is the
    Bigrlyi sandstone uranium deposit prospecting project in Australia’s Northern Territory. The head
    of Energy Metals states that the firm controls a total of about 18.8 kt of U3O8 (around 16 ktU)
    through five projects including the Bigrlyi project.81 Here, we assume 16 ktU would be available
    to China.



    Others[stand ende 2015!]: It has been reported that CNNC and CGN have also been interested in other countries’
    uranium resources. In November 2007, CGN signed an agreement with AREVA to take a 24.5%
    equity stake in its UraMin subsidiary (now AREVA Resources Southern Africa), In October
    2008, AREVA announced that a further 24.5% would be taken up by other “Chinese sovereign
    funds.” UraMin was proposing mines in Namibia, South Africa, and the Central African Repub-
    lic. China agreed to buy more than half of the uranium from UraMin over the lifetime of its three
    deposits–a total amount of over 40 ktU through 2022.85 If the deal comes to fruition, CGN would
    obtain around 20 ktU from these deposits. However, the future of the deal is not clear.
    Consequently, as summarized in Table 4.5, we estimate that CGN has possible foreign uranium
    resources of about 310 ktU, which is close to the 308 ktU announced in a CGN statement.86 If we
    assume all these resources are in situ, and assume a recovery rate of 80%, recoverable uranium
    resources would total 250 ktU.
    Thus, CNNC and CGN would have a total of about 400 kt recovered uranium resources available
    for the plan period through overseas exploration and mining. However, it should be noted that
    all estimates could be adjusted to acknowledge new developments and new accurate information
    as it becomes available. It is more likely to be higher than the given figure due to reserve growth
    effects – once recovery starts at a mine, more resources are usually found there. Moreover, be-
    tween now and 2050, it may well be possible for China to enter into additional agreements that
    would secure still more resources.


    auf die sinosteel project beteiligungen habe ich leider gerade keinen zugriff.



    bg bh

    DYL


    NEW POTENTIAL FOR BASEMENT
    URANIUM DISCOVERIES AT OMAHOLA


    HIGHLIGHTS
     Omahola comprises the Ongolo, MS7 and Inca deposits and provides Deep Yellow
    with another significant exploration target to unlock further value across its
    Namibian portfolio
     220-hole, 7,426m shallow exploration drilling program completed at the Omahola
    Project, a Reptile basement exploration target zone
     50ppm isopach representing 47% of holes drilled outlines a large, highly
    prospective zone for follow up
    o three priority targets identified for immediate drilling
     Omahola occurs within the highly prospective “Alaskite Alley” corridor, which
    includes the major uranium deposits of Rössing, Husab, Etango and Valencia


    https://deepyellow.com.au/wp-c…eriesAtOmahola22Dec21.pdf


    __


    https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/108301


    Fission 3.0 Commences Geophysics on Flagship Property PLN
    Kelowna, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - December 22, 2021) - FISSION 3.0 CORP (TSXV: FUU) (OTCQB: FISOF) ("Fission 3" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that on-site lake-ice preparation is underway to support a 4000-meter drill program on its 100% owned flagship Patterson Lake North "PLN" project in Canada. In addition ground geophysical surveys consisting of DC Resistivity and Time Domain electromagnetic surveys, designed to refine drill targeting, have commenced at the Broach Lake area. Located in the same area as where Fission Uranium Corp and NexGen Energy are advancing their world-class, large, high-grade uranium deposits PLN is amongst the highest ranked projects in Fission 3's extensive portfolio. Previous drill programs at PLN have identified basement hosted uranium mineralization supported by the presence of alteration, pathfinder structural disturbance supporting large-scale potential of the area.
    News Highlights:

    • Drilling in winter 2022 with two diamond drill rigs will focus on the prospective and previously untested Broach Lake and N Conductor Targets.


    • Ground Geophysics has commenced at Broach Lake to refine the targets for the upcoming drilling in the new year. The work consists of 22 line-km of DC Resistivity and four line-km of Time Domain electromagnetic (TDEM) surveying.
    • Fission 3.0 has received proceeds of $690,500 from warrants recently exercised.

    Upcoming PLN Winter Drill Program:
    Broach Lake Targets:
    The Broach Lake conductors are ~9 km to the north, adjacent and parallel to EM conductors of the Patterson Lake Structural Corridor, host to Fission Uranium's Triple R deposit and NexGen's Arrow Deposit.
    N Conductor Targets:
    The N Conductors are interpreted as multiple parallel basement EM conductors with an overlying low resistivity zone referred to as the "Chimney" target in the lower part of the sandstone. Deep drilling is planned to test these basement conductors.
    About Patterson Lake North:
    The Patterson Lake North property (PLN) lies adjacent and immediately north of the Patterson Lake South property (PLS), owned by Fission Uranium Corp. where uranium mineralization has been traced by core drilling at PLS over ~3.18 km of east-west strike length in five separated mineralized "zones" which collectively make up the Triple R deposit, and where a Feasibility Study has commenced. Previous drilling at PLN by Fission 3 in 2014 identified a mineralized structure associated with the ~3 km long A1 conductor with strongly anomalous geochemistry, including uranium values, in addition to common pathfinder elements including boron, copper, nickel and zinc. Drill hole PLN 14-019 intercepted a 7.5 m interval (191.5 m - 199.0 m) of anomalous radioactivity with peak measurements up to 1450 cps (as measured by handheld spectrometer) over 0.5 m within a strongly clay altered and brecciated graphitic gneiss which assayed 0.5 m of 0.47% U3O8 within 6.0 m of 0.12% U3O8.

    A team of Chinese researchers has developed an ultra-absorbent material capable of extracting uranium from seawater. Inspired by the blood vessels inside our anatomy, the group’s new method is reportedly 20 times more efficient than previous techniques.
    https://whychinese.co.za/2021/…awater-extraction-method/
    __
    First criticality of the OL3 EPR plant unit was reached on Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 3.22 a.m. OL3 EPR’s electricity production starts when the unit will be connected to the national grid at the end of January 2022.
    https://www.tvo.fi/en/index/ne…prplantunitstartedup.html
    __
    Vietnam poised to resume nuclear project a decade after Fukushima
    Hanoi greenlights building small research reactor, joining hands with Russia
    https://asia.nikkei.com/Econom…CQepuUiXDTwqJ8abIss-KdVdI

    https://www.reuters.com/market…power-project-2021-12-20/



    Qatar backs UK's Rolls-Royce in small nuclear power project



    LONDON, Dec 20 (Reuters) - Qatar on Monday joined Britain's Roll-Royce in developing small nuclear power plants capable of delivering low carbon energy to around 1 million homes each.
    The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) said it would invest 85 million pounds ($112.2 million) for a 10% stake in the project, joining existing shareholders Rolls-Royce, BNF Resources UK and Exelon Generation in the British government-backed project.
    QIA Chief Executive Mansoor bin Ebrahim Al-Mahmoud said Qatar, which is the world's largest producer of LNG (liquefied natural gas), was investing in the energy transition and funding the technologies that enabled low carbon electricity generation.
    Rolls-Royce Chief Executive Warren East said the company had now raised the capital needed to establish its SMR (small modular reactors) unit.
    Britain last month agreed to invest 210 million pounds in the project, alongside 195 million pounds from Rolls-Royce and its partners, in a drive to reach net zero carbon emissions and promote new technology with export potential.
    The SMRs will not be available until the early 2030s and all new nuclear power projects need approval from Britain's Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) and its Generic Design Assessment, which can take around four years to complete for large plants.
    Rolls-Royce said it would ultimately own about 70% of the unit.


    https://www.reuters.com/market…power-project-2021-12-20/


    -----------------------





    Manchin, Barrasso Introduce Fission For The Future Act
    Bipartisan legislation supports the deployment of advanced nuclear reactors, revitalizes communities affected by the closure of coal and other fossil generating facilities


    Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV), Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and John Barrasso (R-WY), Ranking Member of the Committee, introduced the Fission for the Future Act, bipartisan legislation that would support the commercial deployment of advanced nuclear reactors.


    ...


    https://www.energy.senate.gov/…ission-for-the-future-act


    Kannst du kurz beschreiben was an Isoenergy so gut ist.

    was heisst so gut, die auswahl insgesamt ist begrenzt. gegenfrage hast du schon dd zu iso gemacht, hurricane?


    richte mal dein augenmerkt bei der dd auf location & infrastructur - merkmale?
    https://www.isoenergy.ca/_reso…orporate-presentation.pdf
    2020 Drilling Highlights:
     LE20-32A: 8.5m @ 19.6% U3O8
     LE20-34: 8.5m @ 33.9% U3O8
     LE20-51: 7.5m @ 14.5% U3O8
     LE20-52: 7.5m @ 22.7% U3O8
     LE20-53: 10.5m @ 11.7% U3O8
     LE20-54: 9.0m @ 12.8% U3O8
     LE20-57: 10.0m @ 11.7% U3O8
     LE20-62: 4.5m @ 6.2% U3O8
     LE20-64: 5.0m @ 48.8% U3O8
     LE20-68: 11.0m @ 6.9% U3O8
     LE20-72: 6.0m @ 6.2% U3O8
     LE20-76: 7.5m @ 38.8% U3O8


    nur ca 25m tiefer als tripleR(fission).
    gibt es spezifische fragen, welche ich eventuell, versuchen kann zu beantworten ?


    gruß bh

    mehr oder weniger führen bei triso fuel ist, so weit ich weiss tvel.
    https://www.neimagazine.com/ne…so-fuel-for-htgrs-7815472


    aber auch sonst rege aktivität


    https://x-energy.com/fuel/triso-x
    https://www.ge.com/news/press-…-triso-fuel-collaboration


    02 November 2021
    The preliminary design of X-energy's TRISO-X Fuel Fabrication Facility to produce tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fuel on a commercial scale has now been completed, X-energy and Centrus Energy Corp announced today. The companies have also signed a contract for nuclear fuel and services provider Centrus to continue its work as the project enters its next phase.


    DOE selected X-energy to deliver a commercial TRISO fuel fabrication facility and a four-module version of its Xe-100 reactor, which the company plans to site at Energy Northwest's Columbia nuclear power plant in Washington State. DOE will invest about USD1.23 billion in X-energy's project over the seven-year period.


    https://www.energy.gov/ne/arti…robust-nuclear-fuel-earth


    bg bh

    These safety phenomena and safety features of modular HTGR depend on the high quality of TRISO particle fuel, proper design of core geometry to disperse the residual heat, the selected power density in order to limit the maximum fuel temperature after accident, ceramic core structure and coolant which can withstand very high temperature, and all the measures required to mitigate the consequences of accident and to reduce the radioactive release as low as reasonably achievable. The research on the modular HTGR have many different features, compared to LWR, because of different fuel type (TRISO coated particle), different core structure (graphite), different coolant (helium), different type of components (such as helium circulator), different type of systems (such as fuel handling system for pebble fuel), different operation dynamic behavior, different accident scenario, different applications (such as process heat application and cogeneration), and so forth. This special issue provides some new information and recent progress. Understanding of the safety features of the HTGR has greatly increased especially after the design and construction of Chinese modular HTGR demonstration plant (High Temperature Reactor-Pebble-Bed Module, HTR-PM).
    There are a lot of academic achievements related to the safety features of HTGR emerging in the recent years, including, beyond design basis accident (BDBA), multiscale source term analysis, behavior of tritium in the primary and secondary circuit, and minimizing emergency response for the modular HTGR, which is essential for the future improvements in the design, operation, and maintenance of the modular HTGR. The recent progress in this field is addressed in the following:(1)performance of HTGR fuel(2)safety and accident analysis of HTGR (including reactor physics analysis, thermal-hydraulics analysis)(3)source term analysis of HTGR(4)control of multimodular HTGRs and related human factor analysis(5)optimizing radiation protection of HTGR
    The paper “Oxidation Behavior of Matrix Graphite and Its Effect on Compressive Strength” studies the oxidation behavior of newly developed A3-3 MG in the temperature range from 500 to 950°C in air and the effect of oxidation on the compressive strength of oxidized MG specimens. Microstructure images of SEM and porosity measurement indicate that the significant compressive strength loss of MG oxidized at 550°C may be attributed to both the uniform pore formation throughout the bulk and the preferential oxidation of the binder.
    The paper “Analysis of Precooling Injection Transient of Steam Generator for High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor” simulates several postulated precooling injection transients and evaluates their effects, which will provide support for the precooling design. The analysis results show that enough precooling injection must be available to satisfy the precooling requirements, and larger mass flow rate of precooling water injection will accelerate the precooling process.
    The paper “Adsorption Behaviors of Cobalt on the Graphite and SiC Surface: A First-Principles Study” presents the adsorption behavior of the activation product cobalt (Co) on graphite and SiC surfaces which have been studied with first-principle calculations, including the adsorption energy, charge density difference, density of states, and adsorption ratios. The results show that the SiC layer in a fuel element could obstruct the diffusion of Co effectively in normal and accidental operation conditions, but the graphite may become a carrier of Co nuclide radioactivity in the primary circuit of HTR-PM.
    The paper “Dynamic Modeling and Control Characteristics of the Two-Modular HTR-PM Nuclear Plant” summarizes the study of the proposed power control system for a two-modular HTR-PM plant and gives the verification results based on numerical simulation. The simulation examines the cases of plant power steps and ramps and shows that the plant control characteristics are satisfactory.
    The paper “The Optimization of Radiation Protection in the Design of the High Temperature Reactor-Pebble-Bed Module” proposes a methodology that jointly optimizes the system design and radiation protection of the High Temperature Reactor-Pebble-Bed Module (HTR-PM) within the confines of the “as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)” principle. It demonstrates that the annual collective dose of HTR-PM is reduced from 0.490 man-Sv/a before optimization to 0.445 man-Sv/a after optimization, which complies with the requirements of the Chinese regulatory guide and proves the effectiveness of the proposed routine and framework.
    The paper “A New Method to Measure Crack Extension in Nuclear Graphite Based on Digital Image Correlation” introduces a new method based on digital image correlation (DIC) for measuring crack extension in brittle materials. Cross-correlation of the displacements measured by DIC with a step function is employed to identify the advancing crack tip in a graphite beam specimen under three-point bending. The load-crack extension curve, which is required for analyzing the R-curve and tension softening behavior, is obtained for this material. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of the threshold value employed for the cross-correlation parameter in the crack identification process is conducted.
    The paper “Research on the Computed Tomography Pebble Flow Detecting System for HTR-PM” constructs a computed tomography pebble flow detecting (CT-PFD) system to study pebble dynamics in which a three-dimensional model is simulated, scaled to the ratio of 1 :  5 based on the core of HTR-PM. A multislice helical CT is utilized to acquire the reconstructed cross-sectional images of simulated pebbles, among which special tracer pebbles are used to indicate pebble flow. The proposed pebble-detecting and tracking technique described in this paper will be implemented in the near future.
    Overall, the main purpose of this special issue is to provide a platform for sharing the latest and significant research achievements on the safety features of the HTGR. We believe that this special issue will supply interesting information on the safety features of HTGR.
    Acknowledgments
    We would like to express gratitude to all those who helped us during organizing this special issue and express heartfelt gratitude to Mr. Liguo Zhang, who supplied abundant materials about HTGRs for reference in the process of writing this editorial.


    bei interesse verlinke ich dir auch gern noch research von ca 2014, müsste ich aber erst suchen.

    Hoffe hier kann das nicht passieren?

    robert fang, robert murris, fu li - veröffentlicht 09-11-2017


    Safety Features of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor



    Most of current operating nuclear power plants (NPPs) are light-water reactors (LWR). LWR features, as ceramic fuel, metallic fuel cladding, and core structure, use water as coolant and moderator. The safety of NPPs relies on three basic methodologies: reactivity control, residual heat removal, radioactive retention. For NPP, high safety is achieved by proper design, good quality components, different types of safety systems, and engineering safety features, such as reactor trip, emergency core cooling system, safety injection, decay heat removal system, and containment. In the case of LWR, all accidents, even the design extension condition with core melt (before being named as severe accident), can be controlled and mitigated. For this purpose, reliable cooling of the core and removal of residual decay heat are crucial to preventing core melt, and additional measures must be provided to mitigate the consequences of core melt. In this case, containment plays very important roles. Containment provide many functions, such as radiation shielding, physical protection, radioactive retention, maintaining of coolant inventory (which is crucial to cooling the core and removing the decay heat).
    High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR) provides another solution. HTGR uses TRISO coated particle fuel, full ceramic core structure, and helium as coolant. The fuel, core structure, and coolant in HTGR can all withstand high temperature. Therefore HTGR can provide high temperature output for high efficiency electricity generation and wide range of process heat applications, including hydrogen production. Furthermore, modular HTGR can provide inherent safety features.
    Although it is based on the same safety function requirements, such as reactivity control, residual heat removal, and radioactive retention, modular HTGR achieved the safety in different way.
    The reactivity control is very simple for HTGR. Although reactor trip with control rod drop is equipped, the trip of helium circulator is enough for trip reactor, because the negative temperature feedback provides enough reactivity compensation even for large reactivity insertion accident, taking into account the following fact of residual decay removal mechanism.
    For the residual heat removal in modular HTGR, after accident, no forced cooling for the core is required; residual heat is removed from core through the core, reflector, and core barrel and then out of pressure vessel, by means of heat conductivity, radiation, and convection, along the temperature gradient. In this case, availability of coolant is not necessary and external power is not required. Of course, the core will be heated up to some degree to provide the temperature gradient for heat transfer and provide the negative temperature feedback for automatic reactor trip for reactivity control. The maximum core temperature after accident is limited by the accumulation of residual heat, which is proportional to the power density during normal operation and to the temperature limit that the integrity of TRISO fuel is ensured to retain all fission products in all accident conditions, with enough margin. Therefore it is a very simple solution. Neither massive fuel degradation nor core melt will be possible. Therefore it provides a very good foundation for radioactive retention.
    For radioactive retention, it is also very straightforward for modular HTGR. Because the possibility of massive fuel degradation is physically eliminated, almost all the fission products are retained inside the coating of TRISO particle in normal operation and accident condition. The failure rate of TRISO particle is very low for all accident conditions. Then the maximum plausible radioactive release into environment for all accidents is limited to the extent that no off-site emergency action is needed. The goal of catastrophe-free can be achieved by modular HTGR. For modular HTGR, the most important barrier to radioactive retention is TRISO particle, compared to the containment in LWR, although next barriers of primary pressure boundary and containment (usually named as vented lower pressure containment) are also provided in modular HTGR to reduce the radioactive release as low as reasonably achievable.

    es passt n icht ganz, betrifft aber auch nicht nur pm miner..
    werde es gleich beim sport vollständig anhören, kann also leider noch nicht viel dazu sagen, ausser das ich das thema nicht unwichtig finde



    Mining in a Post-pandemic World, Decarbonisation and the Role that Mining Plays in a Green Economy

    Mark Cutifani, Chief Executive of Anglo American presented the 'Keynote Mining Address: Mining in a Post-pandemic World, Decarbonisation and the Role that Mining Plays in a Green Economy' at Mines and Money London in person event on 1-2 December 2021.

    Externer Inhalt www.youtube.com
    Inhalte von externen Seiten werden ohne Ihre Zustimmung nicht automatisch geladen und angezeigt.
    Durch die Aktivierung der externen Inhalte erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt werden. Mehr Informationen dazu haben wir in unserer Datenschutzerklärung zur Verfügung gestellt.

    NuScale Power Signs Memorandum of Understanding with KNPP to Explore SMR Deployment in Kazakhstan


    PORTLAND, Ore.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- NuScale Power and Kazakhstan Nuclear Power Plants LLP (KNPP) announced today that the two organizations have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to explore the deployment of NuScale VOYGR™ power plants in Kazakhstan. The agreement advances the rapidly growing global consensus that small modular reactors (SMRs) will play a critical role in delivering safe, reliable, and emissions-free energy.


    KNPP specializes in the development of nuclear power plant construction in Kazakhstan. The agreement calls for a sharing of nuclear and technical expertise between NuScale and KNPP as they examine the value NuScale’s SMR technology could bring to the country. Under the MOU, NuScale will support KNPP’s evaluation of NuScale’s SMR technology, including nuclear power plant engineering, construction, commissioning, operation and maintenance, and project-specific studies and design work.


    KNPP has been actively studying the prospects for further nuclear energy development, and NuScale’s technology continues to prove itself as a best-fit, climate contender. The MOU builds on the existing relationship between NuScale and KNPP, as NuScale previously submitted a Technical and Price Offer (TPO) to KNPP in 2019.


    “NuScale is excited to partner with KNPP on the potential deployment of a NuScale power plant,” said John Hopkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of NuScale Power. “NuScale is continuing to gain impressive momentum in international interest around the globe. We look forward to continuing our collaboration with KNPP and demonstrating the immense benefits of our technology to the people of Kazakhstan as they seek safe, emissions free, and reliable methods of decarbonization.”


    “Kazakhstan has set the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. To solve this difficult task, carbon-free sources such as nuclear power along with renewable energy are to be considered,” said Timur Zhantikin, Chief Executive Officer of KNPP. “Small modular reactors are the most promising for Kazakhstan, and we consider the cooperation of KNPP with NuScale Power as a real opportunity to develop this direction and achieve the set goal of the country's transition to a green economy.”


    This announcement follows a string of previous MOUs signed earlier this year with customers in countries such as Poland and Bulgaria, signaling the global interest in NuScale’s SMRs as a critical means to reach countries’ climate goals. Additionally, NuScale signed a teaming agreement with Romania’s Nuclearelectrica at the United Nations Conference on Climate Change (COP26), as the organizations begin taking steps toward deploying the first NuScale 6-module, 462 MWe, VOYGR-6 power plant in Romania as early as 2027/2028. This latest agreement with KNPP is another step forward in continuing NuScale’s momentum to commercialize its technology and showcase the variety of applications of NuScale Power Modules™.


    In August 2020, NuScale made history as the first and only SMR to receive design approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and in July of 2021, the Commission published the proposed rule that would certify the NuScale design – a crucial step towards the construction and deployment of this SMR technology. The company maintains strong program momentum toward commercialization of its SMR technology, including supply chain development, standard plant design, planning of plant delivery activities, and startup and commissioning plans.


    About NuScale Power


    NuScale Power is poised to meet the diverse energy needs of customers across the world. It has developed a new modular light water reactor nuclear power plant to supply energy for electrical generation, district heating, desalination, hydrogen production and other process heat applications. The groundbreaking NuScale Power Module™ (NPM), a small, safe pressurized water reactor, can generate 77 MWe of electricity and can be scaled to meet customer needs. The VOYGR™-12 power plant is capable of generating 924 MWe, and NuScale also offers the four-module VOYGR-4 (308 MWe) and six-module VOYGR-6 (462 MWe) and other configurations based on customer needs. The majority investor in NuScale is Fluor Corporation, a global engineering, procurement, and construction company with a 70-year history in commercial nuclear power.


    https://newsroom.nuscalepower.…n-Kazakhstan/default.aspx


    _______


    smrs & nuscale nun im forbes
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/j…MlIWwS2TVeGAYCQNCw5IGTHds


    https://www.segracapital.com/c…zatomprom-golden-slumbers


    ...
    ..
    .
    KAP today is trading sub 10x earnings at market spot prices (KAP LI ~ $36, Spot U ~ $42)… on their curtailed production base. As a reminder, in 2018 the Kazakhs cut production to 20% below their Subsoil Use Agreement targets in an effort to balance supply and demand. This was part of a well-articulated (and today, well executed) strategy of prioritizing “value over volume” thereby creating significant shareholder value. At the time, sell-side consensus was that while a Kazakh cut made sense in the low $20 range, any significant move higher in price would result in a resumption of target production. Fast forward three years and you have actually witnessed the Kazakhs extend production cuts, as recently as this past August, despite prices well into the $30s. While a Kazakh ramp remains a boogeyman for this market, we would argue that actions to date - as well as messaging - indicate that any ramp will be dependent not only on prices meeting the company’s view of value, but also a solid forward contract book (meaning they’ve learned that ramping to sell into the spot market is a self-defeating exercise). Valuing Kazatomprom on fully ramped production (which should be expected in a strong market with the right contract book) the company trades at just 6-7x earnings. For a duopolistic, lowest cost producer (they make up just about the entire lowest quartile of the cost curve) in a structurally undersupplied commodity market – that’s a juicy discount, even when adjusting for any jurisdictional discount.
    Cheap is not always good enough, so we’ll shine a spotlight on a few points we think are outside of the purview of the average investor. Maybe they help contextualize the opportunity today.
    ...
    ..
    .

    gab es sogar eine Meinung, dass der Beweis, dass ein AKW in seiner nützlichen Lebensdauer MEHR Energie produziere als für Bau und Rückbau aufgewendet werden müsse, nicht erbracht sei

    sei mir nicht böse, aber mehr als eine meinung und obendrein grundfalsch ist das nicht. ansich ist mir das thema co2 egal, da es aber zum politikum gemacht wurde, darf es mir nicht egal sein.


    bg bh

    foratom:



    Importance of long-term operation of the existing EU nuclear fleet




    https://www.foratom.org/downlo…2021-Final-LTO-Update.pdf


    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


    An increasing number of experts recognise that decarbonising the power sector cannot be achieved with re-
    newables alone - nuclear must play a role if the world is to reach its carbon neutrality goal by 2050. This paper
    aims to outline the opportunities provided by the long-term operation (LTO) of the existing fleet of nuclear reac-
    tors. Furthermore, it gives an overview of some of the challenges which will need to be tackled and provides a
    series of EU policy recommendations.
    In a nutshell:
    • The revised intermediate decarbonisation targets in the transition towards a 2050 carbon neutral eco -
    nomy are more ambitious than before and cannot be achieved without the LTO of existing nuclear power
    plants (NPPs).
    • The costs of electricity produced by nuclear power plants performing LTO are unarguably lower than the
    cost of electricity coming from the other sources (RES, gas, etc.). This is because LTO of the existing nuclear
    fleet has clear economic advantages: it requires a much lower capital investment cost, it is a mature solu-
    tion which leads to low investment risks for investors and capital markets, and it triggers lower and more
    stable customer costs.
    • From a technical point of view, the LTO of nuclear reactors provides a great advantage thanks to the “...
    timely implementation of reasonably practicable safety improvements to existing nuclear installations”
    which brings older generation reactors to a level of safety which complies with the amended Nuclear
    Safety Directive.
    • Nuclear operations can improve during LTO. This can be explained by
    I. plant enhancements implemented by operators during LTO refurbishments
    II. growing operational capabilities
    III. governing frameworks that enable best practice sharing and
    IV. maintaining workforce skills across the nuclear value chain / ecosystem.
    • LTO will reduce the EU’s energy import dependency – mainly fossil fuels – and will also provide reliability
    and security to the grid and contain electricity prices.
    • Low-carbon nuclear generation provides firm capacity to the electricity system and supports the integra-
    tion of higher shares of variable renewables (VRE) at a lower cost.


    kann es nur empfehlen einen blick zu riskieren!


    bg bh


    Die hohe Beteiligung von Fluor gefällt mir nicht so ganz.

    naja irgendwer musste das ja bisher auch finanzieren... ;)


    Ich habe mir daher eine kleine Position Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: SV / KYG8377A1085) geholt.
    Die bekommt man aktuell für 10 $ und ist bis zum SPAC-Merger nahezu risikolos, da es derzeit noch eine leere Hülle ist, die nur aus Cash besteht.

    ja das hatte ich mir als eine der möglichkeiten überlegt, allerdings habe ich mir noch keine position angelacht.
    habe mal ein paar mails rausgeschickt, mal sehen welche möglichkeiten sich bieten.


    grüße bh