Beiträge von Blue Horseshoe

    @Edel Man hatte den thread bis vorhin noch gar nicht so wirklich auf dem radar ;)




    Time Runs Out on U.S. Opposition to Nordstream 2


    The Nordstream 2 pipeline represents the last stand of U.S. influence over the internal affairs of Europe.
    Once finished it will stand as a testament to the fundamental split between the European Union and the United States.
    Europe will this as its first successful defense of its newly-declared independence. And the U.S. will have to come to terms with no longer having control overseas.
    This is a theme repeating itself all around the world right now.
    Your view of Nordstream 2 depends on who you are.
    If you are the U.S. it is a massive rebuke of the post-WWII institutional order mostly paid for by the U.S. to rebuild Europe and protecting it from the scourge of the U.S.S.R.
    From Europe’s perspective it’s, “Job well done and all that but Russia isn’t a threat anymore and it is time for us to come out from underneath the U.S.’s shadow.”
    And if you are Russia Nordtream 2 is the wedge driving these two adversaries apart while improving national security on your western border.




    https://tomluongo.me/2019/03/1…position-to-nordstream-2/


    bg bh

    SIGNIFICANT HIGH-GRADE SOP RESOURCE DELINEATED AT LAKE WAYHighlights:Initial Mineral ResourceEstimate for the whole of Lake Way contains 73million tonnes of SOP, including:oMeasured Resource –Lake Way Playa 6.9Mt @ 15.4kg/m3oMeasured Resource –Williamson Pit 32Kt @ 25.5kg/m3oIndicated Resource –Paleochannel 3.7Mt @ 13.6kg/m3oInferred Resource –Lake Way Playa &Paleovalley Sediment 62Mt @ 15.2kg/m3Lake Way confirmed as very high-grade with consistentbrine chemistry both laterally andat depth, with an average grade of 14.5kgof SOPpercubic metre of brineacross the Lake Way tenements(Measured and Indicated)The Company has successfully delineatedaPaleochannel in excess of30km in length along the eastern boundary of Lake Way, which supportsthe ability and optionality toproduce brine from two separate sources(lake playa and paleochannel)Test pumping of historical bores at Lake Way has provided important data that supports efficient production by pumping from the paleochannelresourceThe Mineral Resource Estimate for the ‘whole of lake’ will enable the Company to finalise technical studies for a larger production scenario with an anticipated release date towardsthe end of Q2 2019


    https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/…18/pdf/443kst0wm0nnp3.pdf

    @vatapitta


    find ich gut :) bin selber mit ner mittleren position drin. ich glaube 17 adern sind schon erbohrt.
    und wie schon geschrieben, erstklassike geologen, ich investiere lieber in junios wenns ein gutes, erfahrenes team ist.
    soweit ich weiss wird minaurum, neben herrn huster, auch von david morgan gecovert(morgan report).


    vg bh

    @Edel Man


    • China has become self-sufficient in most aspects of the fuel cycle.
    • China aims to produce one-third of its uranium domestically, obtain one-third through foreign equity in mines and joint ventures overseas, and to purchase one-third on the open market.
    • China's two major enrichment plants were built under agreements with Russia but much current capacity is indigenous.
    • China’s R&D investment in nuclear technologies is very significant, particularly in high-temperature gas-cooled and molten salt-cooled reactors.

    http://www.world-nuclear.org/i…a-nuclear-fuel-cycle.aspx


    china, bzw cnnc, cnuc & cng hat bereits sehr gute strategische beteiligungen. siehe ua. fissions tripleR deposit im athabasca basin.


    Fission Uranium Corp.
    2016-08-26


    In January 2016, CGN Mining Company Ltd completed the major acquisition of 19.99 percent interest in Fission Uranium Corp., a Canadian uranium exploration company, and became the single largest shareholder of Fission.


    rössing in namibia von rio tinto ging an cnuc
    https://www.ft.com/content/f2f…45-11e8-ae55-df4bf40f9d0d
    http://www.mining.com/rio-tint…ssing-uranium-mine-china/


    http://www.cnncintl.com/new-site/profile.php?lang=eng


    http://www.wise-uranium.org/uccnn.html

    #ocjm: genau so sehe ich das auch!
    Solange die US-Macht nicht gebrochen ist, wird es einfach so weiter gehen.

    nun, diese bröckelt doch schon. die unipolare weltordung die aus der bipolaren des kalten krieges hervorging hat doch bereits massive risse. die welt verändert sich(unter wiederstand) momentan hin zu einer multipolaren weltordnung.


    auf die schnelle nur ein paar entwicklungen:
    1. syrien(us/nato kann nicht mehr machen was sie wollen)
    2. china / south china sea
    3. china "petro yuan", siee crude future hatte bereits 09/2018 einen marktanteil von 16%
    https://asia.nikkei.com/Busine…kes-up-global-oil-trading
    4. china sge - physical trade settlement
    5. russian china(brics) paymnets system(spfs/cips) vs swift
    6. china Obor - One belt one road / neue seidenstrasse
    7. AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
    8. erste ausenstelle der russischen zentralbank in bejing 2017!
    https://russkiymir.ru/en/news/221860/


    9. russische banken zunehmend an der sge tätig(sberbank 2017)
    https://de.reuters.com/article…-gold-china-idUKL8N1K41VS


    10. us-verschuldungskrise & handelsbilanzdefizit

    bin immer noch der selben meinung und stimme euch absolut zu.
    nicht vergessen, sämtliches u3o8 für das "pentagon" muss us sourced sein! us lagerbestände fallen.


    At the end of 2008, U.S. uranium reserves totaled 1,227 million pounds of U3O8 at a maximum forward cost (MFC) of up to $100 per pound U3O8 (Table 1). At up to $50 per pound U3O8, estimated reserves were 539 million pounds of U3O8. Based on average 1999-2008 consumption levels (uranium in fuel assemblies loaded into nuclear reactors), uranium reserves available at up to $100 per pound of U3O8 represented approximately 23 years worth of demand, while uranium reserves at up to $50 per pound of U3O8 represented about 10 years worth of demand. Domestic U.S. uranium production, however, supplies only about 10 percent, on average, of U.S. requirements for nuclear fuel, so the effective years’ supply of domestic uranium reserves is actually much higher, under current market conditions.
    https://www.eia.gov/uranium/reserves/


    diese 10% us-produktion sind nun wie wir wissen in ~ 11 jahren auf ca 1% abgesunken.



    The Office of Uranium Management and Policy (NE-54), as part of the Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies (NE-5), supports the Department of Energy (DOE) by assuring domestic supplies of fuel for nuclear power plants.


    https://www.energy.gov/ne/fuel…ium-management-and-policy


    ich denke nach wie vor das die chancen sehr gut stehen das section 232 bis zum 14.4 trump vorgelegt wird.
    und für mich ist eigentlich egal wer us präsident ist, das ist eine langfristige strategische entscheidung, eigentlich muss eine quote kommen!


    vg bh

    RSD Interview: K92 Mining (TSX-V: KNT) Advisor Bryan Slusarchuck - March 13, 2019

    Externer Inhalt www.youtube.com
    Inhalte von externen Seiten werden ohne Ihre Zustimmung nicht automatisch geladen und angezeigt.
    Durch die Aktivierung der externen Inhalte erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt werden. Mehr Informationen dazu haben wir in unserer Datenschutzerklärung zur Verfügung gestellt.

    hallo @Edel Man


    ich seh das bei mir in der sektorgewichtung(ag/au) die letzten tage. obwohl pog den dive unter 1300 gemacht hat liegt die gesamtperformance der werte nun über dem level des letzten pog anstiegs auf ca 1340.
    die stärke einiger der aktien ist enorm. denke es kommt endlich neues kapital in den sektor(zumindest in die top werte).



    vg bh

    @Severin ich bin mir auch noch nicht gänzlich sicher wie es dann im detail asusehen wird.
    allerdings alleine die tatsache das es zum kernkapital(tier1) gehört ist doch ein meilenstein.


    hier nochmal eine nette zusammenfassung:


    What is the relationship between Basel rules and gold? Basel rules are a set of recommendations on capital requirements for private banks. Bank assets are divided into several groups based on their perceived riskiness, with bonds and gold in the least risky category. Banks were required, according to Basel I rules, to cover 8% of their assets based on a special formula. The objective was that at least a part of the total banks’ assets would be backed by assets, including gold, that were perceived as safe.


    In Basel II rules, bank assets were divided into three categories: Tier 1 included assets perceived as least risky, and Tier 3 included assets perceived as risky. Gold under Basel II rules was treated as either Tier 1 or Tier 3 capital, since the BCBS stipulated that “at national discretion, gold bullion held in own vaults or on an allocated basis to the extent backed by bullion liabilities can be treated as cash and therefore risk-weighted at 0%.”


    Basel III rules abolished the Tier 3 capital class, and all assets fell under either Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital. In Basel III, gold's liquidity haircut is increasing to 85% from 50%. This percentage is used to help calculate a so-called liquidity buffer known as the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) that all banks must hold from 2018. The higher NSFR, the more funding is needed to meet the overall NSFR requirement.


    However, the announcement of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) made on June 18, 2012 and adopted on August 30, 2012 states that “A zero percent risk weight to cash owned and held in all of a banking organization’s offices or in transit; gold bullion held in the banking organization’s own vaults, or held in another depository institution’s vaults on an allocated basis to the extent gold bullion assets are offset by gold bullion liabilities.” So gold was considered riskless in the US under Basel II rules and recommendations, and it will remain this way under Basel III provisions. The announcement also states that “the final rule defines financial collateral as collateral in the form of: (1) Cash on deposit with the banking organization (including cash held for the banking organization by a third-party custodian or trustee); (2) gold bullion; …”.


    The European Commission did not automatically consider gold a riskless asset, but charged the European Banking Authority (EBA) with the task of identifying which assets are to be legally deemed riskless. However, the European Parliament expressly pointed to gold as a highly liquid asset that should be taken into consideration by the EBA. The EBA, in its report of December 2013 on appropriate uniform definitions of extremely high quality liquid assets (Extremely HQLA) and high quality liquid assets (HQLA) and on operational requirements for liquid assets, states that “neither equities or gold were found to qualify as assets of high liquidity and credit quality as they failed on the price volatility criteria.”


    The London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) asked the EBA to reconsider gold as a “high quality, liquid asset.” An analysis for the World Gold Council by Europe Economics in 2013, “The liquidity of gold under proposed EBA liquidity tests,” found that “Out of the five dimensions of liquidity that we identify in this paper, namely scale, diversity, correlation of price with need, transactions costs and price impact, gold performs well in four of these (scale, correlation of price with need, transaction costs, and price impact) under various measures.”


    Today, in Basel III's language, gold's liquidity haircut has increased to 85% from 50%. However, a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis, but on a larger scale, would in our view change things in favour of considering gold a 0% risk asset, as it was considered by the world’s central banks during the 2008 financial crisis. We hear also of an increasing acceptance of gold as part of the international monetary system both in academia and in the central bank sector. A substantial increase of world official gold reserves since the 2008 financial crisis confirms it.


    http://privatewealthcanada.ca/…o-risk-monetary-asset.php

    danke, volumen das ist klar. mit den lagerstellen, da müsste ich mich mal vermehrt damit beschäftigen bei welchen aktien es tatsächlich unterschiedliche celaring/verwahrstellen gibt. hab auch schonmal werte verlegen lassen, wenn ich mich recht erinnere war das nichtmal so teuer.
    so gesehen ist ne international gehandelte aktie eine recht gute "währung" da in viele währungen konvertierbar, natürlich abhänging von den börsen an denen der wert gelistet ist.

    @Edel Man ich denke ebenfalls es wird einen grossen sekundären trend geben auch mit kleineren smr typen. das thema smr ist absolut interresant(auch für thorium https://www.sciencedirect.com/…cle/pii/S0306454918303153).


    bill gates ist hier u.a. heftig investiert.
    https://terrapower.com/


    http://www.world-nuclear.org/i…clear-power-reactors.aspx



    ein paar russische smr


    https://www.neimagazine.com/fe…sian-smr-designs-6939130/



    vg bh