Beiträge von Blue Horseshoe

  • Uranaktien: Minen, Explorer, Produzenten, Anwender

    für aee wird das, wie ich schon geschrieben hatte weitreichende folgen haben.


    https://www.auraenergy.com.au/projects/#haggan-project


    HÄGGÅN VANADIUM-
    URANIUM PROECT
    HIGH GRADE VANADIUM


    • 100% owned 15.2 Billion lb Vanadium Resource (330 Mt Indicated + 14,880 Mt Inferred)6


    • Billion lb High-Grade Zone


    • 124 million tonnes @ 0.43% V2O5 (1.1 Billion lbs V2O5)


    • Shallow Mine 20 to 100m


    • Capital & Operating costs complete


    • High-Grade Vanadium Resource (HGV) defined


    • HGV Zone – 124 million tonnes @ 0.43% V2O5


    • HGV within 20 metres of surface and to 100 m depth


    • Aura to spin out Vanadis Battery Metals AB


    • Swedish Government driving Green Metal transition as a key economic plank

    mit über 800.000.000 lb u308!


    bg bh

  • Erdgas

    Zitat von be_we

    Der Traum, dass uns das Gas in dieser Heizsaison ausgehen wird, wird ein Traum bleiben...

    wer redet denn nur von heizen? :wall:


    Im Dezember 2022 ist der Output der Rohstahlproduktion in den deutschen Hüttenwerken um -14,6% zum Vorjahresmonat gesunken, auf 2,693 Millionen Tonnen.


    Im November 2022 ist der Output der Rohstahlproduktion in den deutschen Hüttenwerken um -17,9% zum Vorjahresmonat gesunken, auf 2,768 Millionen Tonnen.


    Im Oktober 2022 ist der Output der Rohstahlproduktion in den deutschen Hüttenwerken um -14,4% zum Vorjahresmonat gesunken, auf 3,142 Millionen Tonnen.


    Spannende Daten liefert das Statistische Bundesamt (Destatis) mit seinem Produktionsindex der deutschen Industrie, darunter der Subindex für die chemische Industrie. Zuletzt im November 2022 sank der Output bei der Herstellung chemischer Erzeugnisse um -20,6% zum Vorjahresmonat. Nachdem hier im Blog ausführlich der Niedergang der deutschen Autoindustrie am Standort Deutschland verfolgt wurde, nun auch der Blick auf einen der weiteren wichtigen Sektoren der deutschen Industrie, die chemische Industrie.



    ich frage für einen freund, "machst" du absichtlich weiter auf dumm ?



    gruß bh

  • Uranaktien: Minen, Explorer, Produzenten, Anwender

    Zitat von Knallsilber

    dann mit hochangereichertem Uran.

    das teller-ulam / sacharow design der kernfusionswaffen(h2 bomben) funktioniert ebenfalls auch nur mit heu(highly enriched uranium).


    zu txlfan



    das kanonendesin(gun-design) ist nur eines der möglichen. little-boy entsprach diesem(hiroshima)
    eine implosionsbombe wie fat-man(nagasaki) ist ua. auch möglich.
    andere atomwaffen haben einen schwebenden kern und gehören zur gattung der implosionsbomben.
    es werden ja auch neutronen reflektoren, aus u238 sowie beryllium zum reduzieren der kritischen masse verwendet - beryllium ist dabei sogar ein neutronen emitter.


    ich würde darum bitten, das thema a-bomben in gesondertem thread weiter zu diskutieren - danke.


    bg bh

  • Allgemeine Sachlage bei Minenaktien

    und was willst du jetzt mit diesem vollzitat ohne eigene antwort aussagen?


    Zitat von Lexus

    Und Holland den Gashahn vollends abdrehen will OT aber musste gerade sin.

    das aus von groningen ist schon lange beschlossen. die förderdaten hate ich schon vor langem mal eingestellt.
    die erdbebensituationen sind für viele nicht soooo prickelnd...
    https://northerntimes.nl/histo…earthquakes-in-groningen/
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61901033

  • Uranium Energy / UEC (NYSE)

    sprott equity research 24.01
    ...
    Yesterday’s 15.6m @ 5.4% U3O8, including 3.4m @ 23.2%, at Christie Lake highlights what UEC has added
    to its portfolio in the last year: Athabasca licenses capable of delivering step change discoveries. Grades
    are better than the current 20Mlb at 3.2% Christie Lake resource so there’s promise here. Sakura’s
    proximity to exiting resources at Ken Ben is a benefit (existing lbs nearby reduces development
    requirements) but the strike length to the east has prior drilling, thus our current interpretation is a helpful
    high grade pod but not yet step change. Ultimately it’s early days for UEC in the basin, but we think the
    real potential here is to become the basin’s most aggressive explorer, backed by UEC’s strong balance
    sheet and tier I licences. The potential to leverage flow through funding, UEC’s trading liquidity, and UEC’s
    strong industry connections to fast track a new discovery means we think UEC should move through new
    targets quickly, knowing that it can both fund and derive greater value from discoveries than standalone
    explorers, or developers. We maintain our BUY rating and US$7.00/sh price target based on US$7/lb.
    Our expectation for 2023 is that UEC will accelerate Athabasca explorations plans while retaining the
    option to restart production in Wyoming for minimal capex when market conditions strengthen further.
    ...

  • Devex Resources | ASX: DEV

    More High-Grade Uranium Across Multiple Prospects
    Confirms Outstanding Growth Potential at Nabarlek
    Assay results laying the foundation for focused drilling during upcoming 2023 campaign


    HIGHLIGHTS
    • Further encouraging assays received from the 2022 drill campaign at the Nabarlek
    Uranium Project, Northern Territory (Australia), confirming previously reported1 basement-
    hosted uranium (U3O 8) mineralisation from a new area north of the historical U42 Prospect:
    • 2.0m @ 0.6% U3O 8 from 188m in hole 22NBRC14 (RC14), including:
    1.0m @ 1.0% U3O 8
    • Exciting development given the intercept is from broad-spaced RC drilling (300m apart),
    and the uranium intersected in Hole RC14 is completely open to the north.
    • At Nabarlek South, final laboratory analysis of one sample from within the previously
    reported high-grade uranium intercept in Hole 2 (22NBDD02) was received, assaying
    12.3% U3O 8 over a 0.15m interval, with the final intercept of:
    • 10.1m @ 1.1% U3O 8 from 124.1m in 22NBDD02 (Hole 2), including:
    3.3m @ 2.7% U3O 8, including: 0.3m @ 9.0% U3O 8 and 0.6m @ 5.6% U3O 8
    • Assays confirm previously reported uranium equivalent intercepts, demonstrating high-
    grade uranium hosted in numerous fractures that combine to form a broader envelope of
    lower-grade mineralization including:
    • 54.8m @ 0.09% U3O 8 (900ppm U3O 8) from 66.0m in 22NBDD21, including:
    0.5m @ 0.6% U3O 8; 0.3m @ 0.6% U3O 8; 0.3m @ 0.6% U3O 8; 0.3m @ 0.5% U3O 8
    • Drill results from both the U42 and Nabarlek South prospects show significant potential to
    expand uranium mineralisation along strike, with follow-up drilling around these results
    expected to be a priority focus for the Company’s 2023 exploration program.
    • All remaining assay results pending from uranium-bearing drill holes (see Table 1) are
    expected next month. DevEx will provide further updates as final assays are received and
    it prepares for the 2023 drill campaign.



    https://www.devexresources.com…nnouncements/61132746.pdf

  • Uran -- Märkte und Informationen

    Zitat von KROESUS

    meiner bescheidenen Meinung nach sind Thoriumbrüter die künftigen Energieerzeuger

    du übersiehst nur das die "echte" generation iv der kernkraft alles verbrennen kann. schau dir doch endlich mal den dual fluid an.


    mit einem brüter(brutfaktor über 1) brauchst du auch kaum mehr thorium aus minen wenn er als "standard" reaktor ausgerollt werden sollte.

  • GOLD : Märkte und Informationen

    A new gold standard
    In Golden Ruble 3.0 , his most recent paper, Glazyev makes a direct reference to two by now notorious reports by Credit Suisse strategist Zoltan Pozsar, formerly of the IMF, US Department of Treasury, and New York Federal Reserve: War and Commodity Encumbrance (December 27) and War and Currency Statecraft (December 29).
    Pozsar is a staunch supporter of a Bretton Woods III – an idea that has been getting enormous traction among the Fed-skeptical crowd.
    What’s quite intriguing is that the American Pozsar now directly quotes Russia’s Glazyev, and vice-versa, implying a fascinating convergence of their ideas.
    Let’s start with Glazyev’s emphasis on the importance of gold. He notes the current accumulation of multibillion-dollar cash balances on the accounts of Russian exporters in “soft” currencies in the banks of Russia’s main foreign economic partners: EAEU nations, China, India, Iran, Turkey, and the UAE.
    He then proceeds to explain how gold can be a unique tool to fight western sanctions if prices of oil and gas, food and fertilizers, metals and solid minerals are recalculated:
    “Fixing the price of oil in gold at the level of 2 barrels per 1g will give a second increase in the price of gold in dollars, calculated Credit Suisse strategist Zoltan Pozsar. This would be an adequate response to the ‘price ceilings’ introduced by the west – a kind of ‘floor,’ a solid foundation. And India and China can take the place of global commodity traders instead of Glencore or Trafigura.”
    [/quote]So here we see Glazyev and Pozsar converging. Quite a few major players in New York will be amazed.
    Glazyev then lays down the road toward Gold Ruble 3.0. The first gold standard was lobbied by the Rothschilds in the 19th century, which “gave them the opportunity to subordinate continental Europe to the British financial system through gold loans.” Golden Ruble 1.0, writes Glazyev, “provided the process of capitalist accumulation.”
    Golden Ruble 2.0, after Bretton Woods, “ensured a rapid economic recovery after the war.” But then the “reformer Khrushchev canceled the peg of the ruble to gold, carrying out monetary reform in 1961 with the actual devaluation of the ruble by 2.5 times, forming conditions for the subsequent transformation of the country [Russia] into a “raw material appendage of the Western financial system.”
    What Glazyev proposes now is for Russia to boost gold mining to as much as 3 percent of GDP: the basis for fast growth of the entire commodity sector (30 percent of Russian GDP). With the country becoming a world leader in gold production, it gets “a strong ruble, a strong budget and a strong economy.”
    All Global South eggs in one basket
    Meanwhile, at the heart of the EAEU discussions, Glazyev seems to be designing a new currency not only based on gold, but partly based on the oil and natural gas reserves of participating countries.
    Pozsar seems to consider this potentially inflationary: it could be if it results in some excesses, considering the new currency would be linked to such a large base.
    Off the record, New York banking sources admit the US dollar would be “wiped out, since it is a valueless fiat currency, should Sergey Glazyev link the new currency to gold. The reason is that the Bretton Woods system no longer has a gold base and has no intrinsic value, like the FTX crypto currency. Sergey’s plan also linking the currency to oil and natural gas seems to be a winner.”
    So in fact Glazyev may be creating the whole currency structure for what Pozsar called, half in jest, the “G7 of the East”: the current 5 BRICS plus the next 2 which will be the first new members of BRICS+.
    Both Glazyev and Pozsar know better than anyone that when Bretton Woods was created the US possessed most of Central Bank gold and controlled half the world’s GDP. This was the basis for the US to take over the whole global financial system.
    Now vast swathes of the non-western world are paying close attention to Glazyev and the drive towards a new non-US dollar currency, complete with a new gold standard which would in time totally replace the US dollar.
    Pozsar completely understood how Glazyev is pursuing a formula featuring a basket of currencies (as Lissovolik suggested). As much as he understood the groundbreaking drive towards the petroyuan. He describes the industrial ramifications thus:
    “Since as we have just said Russia, Iran, and Venezuela account for about 40 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves, and each of them are currently selling oil to China for renminbi at a steep discount, we find BASF’s decision to permanently downsize its operations at its main plant in Ludwigshafen and instead shift its chemical operations to China was motivated by the fact that China is securing energy at discounts, not markups like Europe.”
    [/quote]The race to replace the dollar
    One key takeaway is that energy-intensive major industries are going to be moving to China. Beijing has become a big exporter of Russian liquified natural gas (LNG) to Europe, while India has become a big exporter of Russian oil and refined products such as diesel – also to Europe. Both China and India – BRICS members – buy below market price from fellow BRICS member Russia and resell to Europe with a hefty profit. Sanctions? What sanctions?
    Meanwhile, the race to constitute the new currency basket for a new monetary unit is on. This long-distance dialogue between Glazyev and Pozsar will become even more fascinating, as Glazyev will be trying to find a solution to what Pozsar has stated: tapping of natural resources for the creation of the new currency could be inflationary if money supply is increased too quickly.
    All that is happening as Ukraine – a huge chasm at a critical junction of the New Silk Road blocking off Europe from Russia/China – slowly but surely disappears into a black void. The Empire may have gobbled up Europe for now, but what really matters geoeconomically, is how the absolute majority of the Global South is deciding to commit to the Russia/China-led block.
    Economic dominance of BRICS+ may be no more than 7 years away – whatever toxicities may be concocted by that large, dysfunctional nuclear rogue state on the other side of the Atlantic. But first, let’s get that new currency going.