Beiträge von Blue Horseshoe

    meiner bescheidenen Meinung nach sind Thoriumbrüter die künftigen Energieerzeuger

    du übersiehst nur das die "echte" generation iv der kernkraft alles verbrennen kann. schau dir doch endlich mal den dual fluid an.


    mit einem brüter(brutfaktor über 1) brauchst du auch kaum mehr thorium aus minen wenn er als "standard" reaktor ausgerollt werden sollte.

    A new gold standard
    In Golden Ruble 3.0 , his most recent paper, Glazyev makes a direct reference to two by now notorious reports by Credit Suisse strategist Zoltan Pozsar, formerly of the IMF, US Department of Treasury, and New York Federal Reserve: War and Commodity Encumbrance (December 27) and War and Currency Statecraft (December 29).
    Pozsar is a staunch supporter of a Bretton Woods III – an idea that has been getting enormous traction among the Fed-skeptical crowd.
    What’s quite intriguing is that the American Pozsar now directly quotes Russia’s Glazyev, and vice-versa, implying a fascinating convergence of their ideas.
    Let’s start with Glazyev’s emphasis on the importance of gold. He notes the current accumulation of multibillion-dollar cash balances on the accounts of Russian exporters in “soft” currencies in the banks of Russia’s main foreign economic partners: EAEU nations, China, India, Iran, Turkey, and the UAE.
    He then proceeds to explain how gold can be a unique tool to fight western sanctions if prices of oil and gas, food and fertilizers, metals and solid minerals are recalculated:
    “Fixing the price of oil in gold at the level of 2 barrels per 1g will give a second increase in the price of gold in dollars, calculated Credit Suisse strategist Zoltan Pozsar. This would be an adequate response to the ‘price ceilings’ introduced by the west – a kind of ‘floor,’ a solid foundation. And India and China can take the place of global commodity traders instead of Glencore or Trafigura.”
    [/quote]So here we see Glazyev and Pozsar converging. Quite a few major players in New York will be amazed.
    Glazyev then lays down the road toward Gold Ruble 3.0. The first gold standard was lobbied by the Rothschilds in the 19th century, which “gave them the opportunity to subordinate continental Europe to the British financial system through gold loans.” Golden Ruble 1.0, writes Glazyev, “provided the process of capitalist accumulation.”
    Golden Ruble 2.0, after Bretton Woods, “ensured a rapid economic recovery after the war.” But then the “reformer Khrushchev canceled the peg of the ruble to gold, carrying out monetary reform in 1961 with the actual devaluation of the ruble by 2.5 times, forming conditions for the subsequent transformation of the country [Russia] into a “raw material appendage of the Western financial system.”
    What Glazyev proposes now is for Russia to boost gold mining to as much as 3 percent of GDP: the basis for fast growth of the entire commodity sector (30 percent of Russian GDP). With the country becoming a world leader in gold production, it gets “a strong ruble, a strong budget and a strong economy.”
    All Global South eggs in one basket
    Meanwhile, at the heart of the EAEU discussions, Glazyev seems to be designing a new currency not only based on gold, but partly based on the oil and natural gas reserves of participating countries.
    Pozsar seems to consider this potentially inflationary: it could be if it results in some excesses, considering the new currency would be linked to such a large base.
    Off the record, New York banking sources admit the US dollar would be “wiped out, since it is a valueless fiat currency, should Sergey Glazyev link the new currency to gold. The reason is that the Bretton Woods system no longer has a gold base and has no intrinsic value, like the FTX crypto currency. Sergey’s plan also linking the currency to oil and natural gas seems to be a winner.”
    So in fact Glazyev may be creating the whole currency structure for what Pozsar called, half in jest, the “G7 of the East”: the current 5 BRICS plus the next 2 which will be the first new members of BRICS+.
    Both Glazyev and Pozsar know better than anyone that when Bretton Woods was created the US possessed most of Central Bank gold and controlled half the world’s GDP. This was the basis for the US to take over the whole global financial system.
    Now vast swathes of the non-western world are paying close attention to Glazyev and the drive towards a new non-US dollar currency, complete with a new gold standard which would in time totally replace the US dollar.
    Pozsar completely understood how Glazyev is pursuing a formula featuring a basket of currencies (as Lissovolik suggested). As much as he understood the groundbreaking drive towards the petroyuan. He describes the industrial ramifications thus:
    “Since as we have just said Russia, Iran, and Venezuela account for about 40 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves, and each of them are currently selling oil to China for renminbi at a steep discount, we find BASF’s decision to permanently downsize its operations at its main plant in Ludwigshafen and instead shift its chemical operations to China was motivated by the fact that China is securing energy at discounts, not markups like Europe.”
    [/quote]The race to replace the dollar
    One key takeaway is that energy-intensive major industries are going to be moving to China. Beijing has become a big exporter of Russian liquified natural gas (LNG) to Europe, while India has become a big exporter of Russian oil and refined products such as diesel – also to Europe. Both China and India – BRICS members – buy below market price from fellow BRICS member Russia and resell to Europe with a hefty profit. Sanctions? What sanctions?
    Meanwhile, the race to constitute the new currency basket for a new monetary unit is on. This long-distance dialogue between Glazyev and Pozsar will become even more fascinating, as Glazyev will be trying to find a solution to what Pozsar has stated: tapping of natural resources for the creation of the new currency could be inflationary if money supply is increased too quickly.
    All that is happening as Ukraine – a huge chasm at a critical junction of the New Silk Road blocking off Europe from Russia/China – slowly but surely disappears into a black void. The Empire may have gobbled up Europe for now, but what really matters geoeconomically, is how the absolute majority of the Global South is deciding to commit to the Russia/China-led block.
    Economic dominance of BRICS+ may be no more than 7 years away – whatever toxicities may be concocted by that large, dysfunctional nuclear rogue state on the other side of the Atlantic. But first, let’s get that new currency going.

    petrodollar endgültig ade
    bg bh

    https://thecradle.co/article-v…-to-replace-the-us-dollar



    Global South: Gold-backed currencies to replace the US dollar
    The adoption of commodity-backed currencies by the Global South could upend the US dollar’s dominance and level the playing field in international trade.



    Let’s start with three interconnected multipolar-driven facts.
    First: One of the key take aways from the World Economic Forum annual shindig in Davos, Switzerland is when Saudi Finance Minister Mohammed al-Jadaan, on a panel on “Saudi Arabia’s Transformation,” made it clear that Riyadh “will consider trading in currencies other than the US dollar.”
    So is the petroyuan finally at hand? Possibly, but Al-Jadaan wisely opted for careful hedging: “We enjoy a very strategic relationship with China and we enjoy that same strategic relationship with other nations including the US and we want to develop that with Europe and other countries.”
    Second: The Central Banks of Iran and Russia are studying the adoption of a “stable coin” for foreign trade settlements, replacing the US dollar, the ruble and the rial. The crypto crowd is already up in arms, mulling the pros and cons of a gold-backed central bank digital currency (CBDC) for trade that will be in fact impervious to the weaponized US dollar.
    A gold-backed digital currency
    The really attractive issue here is that this gold-backed digital currency would be particularly effective in the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) of Astrakhan, in the Caspian Sea.
    Astrakhan is the key Russian port participating in the International North South Transportation Corridor (INTSC), with Russia processing cargo travelling across Iran in merchant ships all the way to West Asia, Africa, the Indian Ocean and South Asia.
    The success of the INSTC – progressively tied to a gold-backed CBDC – will largely hinge on whether scores of Asian, West Asian and African nations refuse to apply US-dictated sanctions on both Russia and Iran.
    As it stands, exports are mostly energy and agricultural products; Iranian companies are the third largest importer of Russian grain. Next will be turbines, polymers, medical equipment, and car parts. Only the Russia-Iran section of the INSTC represents a $25 billion business.
    And then there’s the crucial energy angle of INSTC – whose main players are the Russia-Iran-India triad.
    India’s purchases of Russian crude have increased year-by-year by a whopping factor of 33. India is the world’s third largest importer of oil; in December, it received 1.2 million barrels from Russia, which for several months now is positioned ahead of Iraq and Saudi Arabia as Delhi’s top supplier.
    ‘A fairer payment system’
    Third: South Africa holds this year’s rotating BRICS presidency. And this year will mark the start of BRICS+ expansion, with candidates ranging from Algeria, Iran and Argentina to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
    South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor has just confirmed that the BRICS do want to find a way to bypass the US dollar and thus create “a fairer payment system not skewed toward wealthier countries.”
    For years now, Yaroslav Lissovolik, head of the analytical department of Russian Sberbank’s corporate and investment business has been a proponent of closer BRICS integration and the adoption of a BRICS reserve currency.
    Lissovolik reminds us that the first proposal “to create a new reserve currency based on a basket of currencies of BRICS countries was formulated by the Valdai Club back in 2018.”
    Are you ready for the R5?
    The original idea revolved around a currency basket similar to the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) model, composed of the national currencies of BRICS members – and then, further on down the road, other currencies of the expanded BRICS+ circle.
    Lissovolik explains that choosing BRICS national currencies made sense because “these were among the most liquid currencies across emerging markets. The name for the new reserve currency — R5 or R5+ — was based on the first letters of the BRICS currencies all of which begin with the letter R (real, ruble, rupee, renminbi, rand).”
    So BRICS already have a platform for their in-depth deliberations in 2023. As Lissovolik notes, “in the longer run, the R5 BRICS currency could start to perform the role of settlements/payments as well as the store of value/reserves for the central banks of emerging market economies.”
    It is virtually certain that the Chinese yuan will be prominent right from the start, taking advantage of its “already advanced reserve status.”
    Potential candidates that could become part of the R5+ currency basket include the Singapore dollar and the UAE’s dirham.
    Quite diplomatically, Lissovolik maintains that, “the R5 project can thus become one of the most important contributions of emerging markets to building a more secure international financial system.”
    The R5, or R5+ project does intersect with what is being designed at the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU), led by the Macro-Economics Minister of the Eurasia Economic Commission, Sergey Glazyev.

    deep yellow
    CRITICAL MINERALS ASSESSMENT OF MULGA ROCK PROJECT
    HIGHLIGHTS
    • Completion of 63-hole, 4,099m aircore drilling program to support a geo-metallurgical study
    at the Mulga Rock Project (MRP).
    • Geo-metallurgical test work will commence in Q1 2023 and inform an updated assessment
    of critical minerals and recovery options.
    • Test work results will form the basis for the planned revised MRP Definitive Feasibility Study
    (DFS), to include potential uplift in project value due to recovery of critical minerals.
    • A 600 to 800-hole aircore drill program is planned for H1 2023, to:
    o Better define reserve/resource variability and distribution of critical minerals
    o Upgrade resource classification for uranium and critical minerals
    o Provide additional material for metallurgical analysis
    https://deepyellow.com.au/wp-c…lgaRockProject20Jan23.pdf



    haywood uranium weekly 19.01
    SMR Traction Growing as Frequency of New Initiatives Increases – Fission Publishes FS on PLS
    https://clients.haywood.com/up…d_reports/UxJan192023.pdf



    bg bh

    Wasser aus einer Gegenstrom-Anlage wäre wohl ok (vergleichbar mit bidest) ?

    gegenstromanlage kenn ich nur aus unserem pool :hae:
    meinst du eine osmose-anlage?
    ich persönlich nehme nur echtes destilltes... auch für die herstellung von kolloidalen medikamenten sowie tinkturen, dekot.. etc. wenn ich kaufe dann nur das von braun... dreifach desti...


    zum runter verdünnen zum trinken langt mir dann ein gutes osmosewasser mit uvc filtrierung aus(2-5 ppm)..
    fast vergleichbar mit sehr gutem arteser wasser wie plose.


    dazu zb. die studien des hydrologen louis-claude vincent lesen! wasserqualität ist extrem wichtig in der gesundheit.



    optimales tinkwasser sollte einen wiederstand von mindestens 6.000 ohm aufweisen.
    plose zb. hat 35.000 ohm und 36 µS/cm.
    https://www.acquaplose.com/de/news-eventi/wasserlexikon/



    die anschaffung einer guten osmoseanlage ist allemal empfehlenswert, ersetzt aber für mich keinesfalls echtes destilliertes wasser im herstellungsprozess diverser mittel.


    bg bh

    Mixt man es selbst an, gibts den Allrounder nahezu zum Nulltarif.

    ich hatte zu cdl vor langem auch schon geschrieben und kann nur nochmal unterschreiben was du zusammengefasst hast. beim "ansetzten" sollte aber doppelt vorgegangen werden, im ersten durchgang erreichst du selten mehr als
    500ppm... wenn du die chemie nach ca zwei tagen erneuerst kommst du auf 2000 bis 3000 ppm, also die max konzentration von 0,3% - die konzentrationen habe ich auch nachgemessen.


    und bitte nur immer in echtem destilliertem wasser.
    müsste mal im cdl/mms thread suchen und in den covid threads, dank forensuche find ich die beiträge auf die schnelle nicht.


    bg bh

    Ein Foraner machte mich aber auf heutige zum Teil häßliche Beiträge aufmerksam, die ich sonst garnicht gesehen hätte, weil ich tagsüber selten ins Forum schaue...da ist mir die Lust vergangen und so unterhalte ich mich
    lieber sachlich weiter im Bereich Konversation , ohne Anfeindungen in gepflegtem Ton...

    also eher wie die letzten male immer eine schöne ausrede parat...


    heutige Käufe und Verkäufe darlegen und neue eingegangene shorts aufzeigen...

    das machst du sonst ja auch immer so akribisch, hab mich schon gewundert warum diesmal nicht und dachte du hast bei deinem mittagsschlaf ein wenig verschlafen.

    Hoffentlich überlesen diese Info die ganzen Negativdenker dieses Forums und alle die meinen Europa wird aufgrund des Gaspreises untergehen nicht.

    erkläre mir doch bitte nochmal warum am langen ende die preise fallen?


    ach sorry ich vergaß, du willst es nicht vestehen :whistling: , wie kannst du es da erklären.

    WOW... Südafrika...
    Was für ein wichtiges Land :

    zusätzlich zu salorius post/rohstoffen...
    die rohstoffreichen länder der brics+ und opec, bri, eaeu verkehren gerade die regeln
    früher hieß es "unsere währung(us-d) euer problem..."
    heute heißt es "unsere rohstoffe(vor allem auch energie) euer problem"


    wer meinst du wird denn die geopolitische neuausrichtung unipolar/rule based order vs multipolar/law based order eher gewinnen
    a. die länder die den primärenergieüberschuss des globus und die größere resourcen- sowie produktions basis innehaben oder
    b. wallstreet, city of london und co.


    selbst der ehemaligen österreichischen außenministerin karin kneissl ist das aufgefallen
    Global finance vs global energy: who will come out on top?
    ..


    Financial market versus the energy market
    To really understand the core of the conflict in Ukraine – where a proxy war rages – one must break down the confrontation thus: The US and its European allies, who represent and back the global financial sector, are essentially engaged in a battle against the world’s energy sector.
    In the past 22 years, we have seen how easy it is for governments to print paper currency. In just 2022, the US dollar has printed more paper money than in its combined history. Energy, on the other hand, cannot be printed. And therein lies a fundamental problem for Washington: The commodity sector can outbid the financial industry.
    ..
    https://thecradle.co/article-view/16825


    bg bh

    Die Apache sind schon gut, können aber nicht besser sein als der Pilot:
    Wenn man da irgendwelche Drittwelt-Krieger reinsetzt, kann schon sein, dass man die vom Himmel wegputzen kann.
    Wenn da aber erfahrene und trainierte Piloten drinsitzen, sieht das völlig anders aus.

    die verluste zb im irak sind sehr wohl real und das gegen den irak... was meinst du was hier ernsthaft passiert
    gegen einen der großen "player" der mitunter über die modernste luftabwehrtechnik und radarsysteme verfügt?


    ich halte daher die zeitungsaussage für sagen wir mal "äußerst verwegen".

    Vier Apache seien in der Lage, ein ganzes Regiment von 70 Panzern im Nu zu vernichten, schrieb die Zeitung.

    :wall: :whistling: :thumbup: [smilie_happy] [smilie_happy] [smilie_happy] [smilie_happy] [smilie_happy] [smilie_happy]


    ohne absolute luftüberlegenheit wohl eher nicht.


    bereits isis hatte eine genaue instruktion zum abschuss mit hellfires oder SA-16/SA-18


    ISIS Guide Explains How To Shoot Down US Apache Helicopters


    https://www.ibtimes.com/isis-g…pache-helicopters-1700768


    schon während der us invasion im irak 2003 wurden aus dem apache battalion 1-227 als sie die medina division der iraqi republican guard angriffen einer abgeschossen und 31 schwer beschädigt.


    selbst die houthis haben über 4 maschinen saudi arabiens abgeschossen(saudi arabien dementiert).


    mal sehen wie die verlustquote dann gegen russlands kapazitäten unter den realen gefechtsbedingungen aussehen wird....


    ich halte nach wie vor nichts von dieser "patchwork" armee..... wer soll das warten, ausbildungszeiten... munitionstypen...


    wenn die nato eine "möglichkeit" auf einen "sieg" in diesem konflikt haben will.. bleibt ihnen doch nichts weiter mehr als rel. zeitnah ausgebildete truppenkontingente und material aus nato mitgliedstaaten einzusetzen?