Beiträge von ThaiGuru

    Silbertaler


    Ich denke Du hast völlig Recht, dass wir an einem Kreuzweg stehen.


    Die Fakten, Belege, und die Fundamentaldaten sprechen für eine solche Preis Entwicklung nach oben. Ob das Gold Kartell bereits jetzt schon am Ende ihrer Manipulations Möglichkeiten angelangt ist, kann ich noch nicht sicher erkennen. Was sich aber ganz klar abzeichnet ist dass es dem Gold Kartell nicht gelungen ist Gold wieder nachhaltig unter die 400.- Dollar zu drücken. Zudem scheint es dem Kartell immer mehr Probleme zu bereiten, die nötigen Mengen an physischen Edelmetallen verfügbar zu machen, die unbedingt benötigt werden das bestehende riesige jährliche physische Gold und Silber Produktions-Defizit von ca. 1500 Tonnen Gold, und ca. 270 Millionen Unzen Silber pro Jahr ausgleichen zu können. Da nun nach Frankreich, anscheinend, nach neuesten Zeitungsberichten (von der GATA heute gemeldet), auch Italien nichts von Gold Verkäufen wissen will, dürften das sogenannte kürzlich verlängerte Washingthoner Agreement über angekündigte Verkäufe der wichtigsten Zentralbanken, im Umfange von angeblich 500 Tonnen Gold pro Jahr, verteilt über eine Laufzeit von 5 Jahren, also total 2500 Tonnen Gold, zur totalen Farce und Gold Preis Manipulation verkommen sein.


    Die Zentralbanken wie es scheint, scheinen nicht einmal mehr in der Lage zu sein, die mit einem riesigen, in seinen Auswirkungen damals extrem goldpreisdrückenden "Werbe-Aufwand" angekündigten Gold Verkäufe zustande zu bringen.

    Damit steht als weitere Preis Etappe nach oben, mindestens die Tür beim Gold, und Silber ganz weit offen .


    Wenn die Gold, und Silber Preise von der FED, und ihren Primary Dealer Banken, etc. nicht mehr kontrolliert werden können, wird alles sehr schnell gehen. Diesen Tag sehe ich dann gegeben, wenn entweder der Gold, oder Silber Handel an der Comex, oder LBMA wegen eines konkreten Liefer Vertragsbruches, oder ganz allgemein wegen mangelder physischer Reserven eingestellt werden muss, oder die Preise beim Gold mehr als 10%, oder 20% beim Silber an einem Handels Tag ansteigen werden.


    Darum ist es so wichtig jetzt schon langfristig investiert zu sein, und nicht erst dann, wenn es schon zu spät ist.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru

    schuldenblase


    Das Du Dich auch wieder einmal zu Wort meldest finde ich schön.


    Fakten und Tatsachen zu Ignorieren die gerade jetzt ganz dringend und zwingend für ein physisches Investieren in Gold, und ebenso in physisches Silber sprechen, dafür werden sich diejenigen Leser hier im Thread, die "Warnungen" zur Vorsicht zum Anlass nehmen sollten mit physischen Investitionen in Edelmetallen zurückzuhalten, schon bald mit weit höheren Preisen bezahlen als heute.


    Die aufgeschlossenen Leser hier im Thread können sehr gut selbst entscheiden was Fakten, und Tatsachen sind, die für oder gegen ein Engagement in Gold, und Silber sprechen, welche Vorsicht beim Erwerb von Edelmetallen angebracht ist, und was nur Propaganda Argumente von Edelmetall Gegnern, aus der Schublade ihrer "Fiat Money" Nomenclatur darstellen.


    Schlussendlich spielt es keine wichtige Rolle mehr wer wann, und zu welchem Preis, dem von vor einem Jahr, oder dem von heute physisch Gold, und Silber als Langzeitanlage gekauft hat. Nur noch, dass man überhaupt Gold, und Silber physisch gekauft hat und auch wirklich real besitzt.


    Zu diesem Zeitpunkt werden Warner vor Gold, und Silber wohl nicht mehr unter dem jetzigen User Namen posten?


    Gruss


    Thaiguru

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    Let’s hear it for a free press in Canada and in the US and for our democratic ways! What a joke! The Sprott Special Report on gold has been out for over 3 weeks. It was not covered responsibly by one financial journalist in either country.


    The DOW ran out of steam, only gaining 3 to 10,316. The DOG rose again, climbing 16 to 1910.


    14:01 Treasury budget ($41.1B) in August vs consensus of ($40.0B)
    The deficit in August 2003 was ($76.6B).

    * * * * *



    From The King Report on the massaging of US economic data:


    Few people believe the August PPI. It fell 0.2% due to a 5% drop in gasoline prices. The US government bean counters would have us believe that gasoline prices fell in both July and August. Gasoline futures closed on 6/30/04 at 109.25. They closed at 113.92 on 8/31/04. But the charade is even worse than that. On 8/20/04 gasoline futures hit 133.10. They then collapsed. Normally BLS samples for gasoline prices between the 10th and 14th of the month. But it’s uncanny how BLS appears to ‘sample’ on days when prices collapse. Furthermore, this type of analysis provides faulty cost data because it does not reveal where the volume of transactions trade. During the first three weeks on the month, there could’ve been 3x or more volume of trade than in the last week to week and a half. CPI and PPI, or cost of living data, should be calculated using a ‘Volume Weighted Average’ (i.e. VWAP) like daily stock prices.


    PPI showed that pipeline inflationary pressures continue to appear as the core crude and core intermediate indices rose by 4.5% and 1.0%, respectively. However, due to some miracle, quarters of similar price pressure never manifest itself in PPI. Of course PPI could not be calculated two different times this year.


    -END-


    GATA’s Mike Bolser:


    Hi Bill:


    The Fed added $6 Billion in temporary repurchase agreements today, September 13th 2004, an action that pushed the repo pool back up to $59.814 Billion and kept the pool's 30-day moving average turning higher. The pool's ma is setting new records since I began the series. The DOW seems to be slowly responding as its own 30-day ma is inching back up from the recent low.


    The DOW is flat so far with gold dipping a bit and the dollar up a bit. A flat DIVG is apparently in the cards for the next few days affording more opportunity to acquire bullion.


    The geopolitical situation spins seemingly out of all sense of control. As the stories below indicate, our allies in the "War on Terror", Turkey and The Russian Federation are angry at US actions. And today brings the stark news that a nuke-sized explosion has occurred in Northern North Korea. The mushroom cloud was reported to be 3.5 to 4 kilometers in diameter. While denying it was a nuke, the US authorities failed to indicate what kind of explosion could deliver such a massive cloud. Moreover, the reported twin concussions are a characteristic signature of efficient nuclear detonations according to Theodore Taylor, the grandfather of the miniaturization of the bomb (The Curve of Binding Energy, John McPhee 1975).


    The latest gaffe by the US in Iraq:


    Turkey reacts with fury to massive US assault on northern Iraqi city


    By Patrick Cockburn in Baghdad


    12 September 2004


    http://news.independent.co.uk/…st/story.jsp?story=560815


    The US military assault on Tal Afar, an ethnically Turkmen city in northern Iraq, has provoked a furious reaction from the Turkish government which is demanding the US call off the attack.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    As reported last week the events surrounding the Beslan atrocity have profound implications. Vladimir Putin is very angry at the US for harboring a rebel Chechen minister and at Tony Blair for giving asylum to a Chechen terrorist envoy. He calls it what it is...a double standard in Bush's "War on Terror":


    http://asia.news.yahoo.com/040911/ap/d851ja1o0.html


    "The differences in assessing the Beslan events could lead to the most serious estrangement between Russia and the West since the Soviet times," said Fyodor Lukyanov, the editor of Russia in Global Affairs magazine.
    ++++++++++++++


    And more about China's growing SPR petroleum project:


    China to start filling oil reserves next year


    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/def...004_pg5_27


    SYDNEY: China, the world¹s second-biggest oil consumer, may begin filling a strategic oil stockpile in the next year as demand at home surges and concerns mount over global supply disruptions, a senior government official said on Monday.
    Zhou Dadi, director general of the Energy Research Institute, said China would initially store enough oil to meet demand for 20 days before increasing the stockpile further. ³We are building storage facilities right now ... Within the next year could be a starting point to fill the storage step by step,² Zhou told Reuters on the sidelines of the World Energy
    Congress in Sydney.


    +++++++++++++++++++++++


    And a snap shot of the Sudan/Darfur/oil link:


    UN Darfur vote turns scramble for Sudan's oil


    http://www.afrol.com/articles/13921?


    afrol News, 10 September -


    As the UN Security Council is debating a US draft resolution on the Sudan crisis, based on colliding views whether a genocide is or is not happening in Darfur, the issue of Sudan's oil is becoming a key factor. If an oil export embargo is approved, China and India would lose their influence over Sudan's vast oil reserves and a Khartoum regime change would open up these resources to the West. The US is in favour of sanctions, China is against.


    The population of Darfur is presently, as the UN puts it, suffering from "the world's worst humanitarian crisis." It is well documented that the Khartoum government bares much of the responsibility for this immense suffering, which the UN calls "ethnic cleansing" and the US yesterday called "genocide". It is however also well documented that the US through its closest African allies, helped train the SLA and JEM Darfuri rebels that initiated Khartoum's violent reaction, as afrol News reported on Tuesday.


    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    Required reading about the number TWO strategic commodity:


    Blood and Oil, Klare
    Oil: Anatomy of an Industry, Yeomans
    And the lucid SFGate.com review:


    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/…004/09/12/RVG488IK0Q1.DTL


    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    I follow these geopolitical and energy developments because they are a window into the Gold War cooperation status of the involved sovereigns. Any one of a number of unhappy nations (Saudi Arabia, Russia, Mexico, Venezuela, France) can decide to break the US gold position by bidding for all the remaining warehouse bullion. This is the event that the Fed dreads for it will trigger their draconian response...to halt trading of gold in order to preserve what little remains. Richard Nixon faced a similar decision in 1971 when he was forced to remove the dollar's gold guarantee and commit the largest default in financial history.


    It is only a matter of time.


    Mike


    It is not only the smaller gold stocks who are receiving scant attention from the investing public:


    Bill,


    If I can recap what I noticed today, compared to a year ago, weekly NYSE volume (as reported in Barron's) is down by an insignificant 5.8%. Small Cap volume, however, has plunged 73.9%!!! The amazing disconnect between reality and what is reported continues as Reuters has just released an article titled, "Small Stocks Lead the Way on Wall Street."

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne…=story&cid=580&e=1&u=/nm/
    20040911/bs_nm/stocks_week_dc.


    It seems to me that the Fed/Administration cannot tolerate a plunging small cap market any more than they can allow a soaring gold price before the election. How many repos would it take to support the Russell 2000 or Wilshire 5000 index to keep it from plunging?


    Dollarwise, probably not much. This also satisfies the many owners of Mutual Funds (which I consider a variety of derivative since they derive their NAV from listed stock prices or index values, even if hardly any trades actually take place), who are presumably primed to vote Bush.


    In any case, for some reason liquidity has seriously dried up in the small cap sector, and that includes resource stocks.


    Best wishes,


    Peter R.


    On the lighter side:


    Anglo-Saxon gold penny could sell for £150,000


    By Tim Walker
    The Independent, London
    Saturday, September 11, 2004


    http://news.independent.co.uk/…in/story.jsp?story=560543


    A man walking his dog has discovered an Anglo-Saxon gold penny worth up to £150,000. The coin was struck during the reign of King Coenwulf between 796 and 821, on the banks of the river Ivel in Bedfordshire.


    The find is likely to provoke keen bidding when it is auctioned in London next month. Though many similar examples survive from the period, the heyday of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia, the Ivel coin is the first gold penny found with Coenwulf's portrait.


    The dog-walker, and the landowner on whose property the coin was found, are being kept secret. Richard Bishop, a coin specialist at Spink, the London auction house, said: "Even if it were silver, the penny would be very exciting due to its good condition and the quality of the portrait. In gold, it's just unbelievable."


    The record price tag for a British gold penny is £149,500 in 1996, for a coin from the reign of Henry III.


    -END-


    Feedback about The Las Vegas Gold Show from a staunch GATA supporter:


    Good evening Bill -


    I just got back from the Las Vegas Gold Conference, having left disappointed and frustrated. I thought that the Sprott Report would have made an enormous impact on the gold-bugs in attendance as well as (especially, in fact) the guest speakers.


    Turns out, of all the lectures I attended, only Jay Taylor spoke of the Sprott Report, GATA, the suppression of the POG. No attendees spoke of Sprott, at least none that I encountered. No one complained about gold being held back.


    The speakers were by and large underinformed. All of them said not to look for a great surge forward in metals for a couple of years. (In Pam Aden's defense, I missed her talk so she may have been an exception. And of course Jay Taylor was an exception, being leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of those monkeys)….


    I was thinking to myself at dinner what a waste of money the trip to this conference was, and that I wished I could express my thoughts to someone in charge. This will knock your socks off: in the elevator, a well-dressed gentleman regarded my name badge and said, "You attended the conference; good for you."


    And I answered: "Yes, well I'm very disappointed. No one even mentioned the Sprott Report and how it lent credence to GATA claims. What idiots."


    "Well," he said, "I know the price of gold has been suppressed."


    "You do? No kidding! Good for you!"


    "We organized this conference," he added, not expounding who 'we' were.


    "Ah, no wonder you're informed. So tell me, what could be more important to a room full of gold-bugs than the suppression of the price of gold?" By this time I was holding the elevator door open, as we'd stopped at his floor. "Tell those speakers for me that they're a bunch of lamebrains, except for Jay Taylor."


    "I like Jay Taylor, too," he said. And he exited the elevator. I couldn't believe my luck. Sort of in line with 'ask and you will receive.' I had the chance to vent my anger, and I believe I made an impact on the man, who spoke with a British accent and was quite gentlemanly.


    All best,


    Marilyn A. Guinnane


    To those of you who have contacted your gold companies, thanks so much and well done. For those who have done nothing, well, go ahead let life go by.


    Following is a response from a mid-tier gold producer which will give you some idea how pitiful these gold companies are about tackling the most important issue in their industry and why the price of gold is where it is as we go into the fall of 2004.


    Hello Bill. After two weeks of trying, the only response I received back regarding Embry report was from this gold company:


    I am answering your letter on behalf of our President and Chief Executive Officer. We at xyz gold corporation have known Mr. Embry personally for many years and hold him in the highest esteem. If you read his paper, you will see that he does not really accuse anyone of a conspiracy but does contend that central banks will use any means necessary to control the gold price. Although this not in the best interests of gold producers, it is entirely within their mandate. The prime function of central banks is to regulate their respective currencies. We as gold producers may not like it, but we are probably going to experience some attempts at manipulation for the foreseeable future. It is our belief, however, that the underlying fundamentals of the gold market are so strong that they are unlikely to succeed.


    Mike

    Vice President, Investor Relations

    XYZ Gold Corporation


    Repeated attempts to reach WHT, GSS, AEM, EGO, CBJ have been ignored. Keep up the good work……


    I'm even more disappointed that the only other response was from WHT saying Ian will be forwarded my message. They're all running scared for some reason. There's got to be more to it. I'm going to resend my message to them daily and become a pain in their ass!


    Just started asking them about World Gold Council involvement.

    Steve Heggy


    Some thoughts:


    That is pathetic. Central banks (plural) using any means to control the price is not a conspiracy? Is this guy who responded to Steve retarded? These central banks are going through bullion banks that have knowledge of the price manipulation which the general public does not. That is against American anti-trust laws as The Gold Cartel forces made hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars over the years on inside information the rest of us were not privy too.


    There is NO MORE IMPORTANT ISSUE to gold shareholders than what the price of gold is. What is the matter with these deadbeats? All the gold industry has to do is to START TALKING about these issues with the press; start asking for answers to the many questions posed by Sprott and GATA, and The Gold Cartel would begin to squirm big time. The pressure needs to be put on the cabal and it is the gold producers who must do it. Certainly all World Gold Council gold producer members should answer the devastating charges made against the WGC by GATA about their disingenuous presentation of the BIS numbers vis-à-vis the gold producer hedge reductions.


    Oh good grief, here is another pathetic response from a mid-tier gold producer sent to us by Steve Heggy.


    There is no comment to your question at this time Steve. Those who analyze the industry clearly have many views. ZXY Gold Corporation believes we are in a period of rising gold prices continuing into next year.
    Thank you,

    Manager, Investor Relations


    ZXY Gold Corporation


    Think of all the work GATA has done in an attempt to help these people over the years, and of all the work the Sprott people put in to make their case, and THIS is the best a gold company can come up with?? It is revolting.


    I would hope every Café member who is a Golden Star Resources shareholder has, or will contact GSS management about all of these issues presented by the Sprott/GATA camp. Whatever GSS eventually does is their business, however, we all should demand reasoned answers to our questions and requests for information. To say nothing, or respond like the twits did above, is completely unacceptable.


    Golden Star contacts:


    CFO Alan Marter at Amarter@gsr.com


    Alan or CEO Peter Bradford at 1 800 553 8435


    More evidence gold mine supply will wane next year even as world gold demand picks up:


    TORONTO, Sept 13 (Reuters) - Gold miner Cambior Inc. (CBJ.TO: Quote, Profile, Research) on Monday said it expects gold production will decrease over the next four years and said it will cut 130 jobs as part of a reorganization at its Doyon mine in Quebec.


    The Quebec-based miner, which also has operations in South America, said total production would decrease from 705,000 ounces this year to 663,000 ounces in 2005.


    In 2006, Cambior projected gold production would dip further to 570,000 ounces before picking up again in 2007 and 2008 to an estimated 660,000 ounces each of those years.


    -END-


    Some additional dirt on the Daughters of Gwalia fiasco:


    Bill,


    i said i would try and find out something about Sons of Gwalia through a local source. The source belongs to a large contracting family which is involved in alot of open cut and mine operations in W. Aust. His suggestion is that S.O.G. realised they were low on large cheaply accessable gold reserves a couple of years ago and in a rash decision paid far too much for the gold assets of a company called Pacmin. S.O.G. appears not to have followed due diligence in the decision and got very expensive to access gold assets, the cost of producing it being far greater than the $600/oz revenue they were receiving. –END-



    Before I close this MIDAS. I would like to emphasize that if The Gold Cartel was a defendant in a cirumstantial capital murder case as charged by GATA, a jury of their peers would condemn them to death by virtue of their guilt by beyond a reasonable doubt. However this one particular piece of evidence goes beyond the cirumstantial category:
    *(From the Sprott Report, page 25) "For the fourth quarter of 2001, GFMS (Gold Fields Mineral Services) reported that the delta-adjusted hedge book stood at 2924 tonnes. At this point, the notional value of gold derivatives reported to the BIS was $231 billion. However, as of December 31, 2003, the BIS reports gold derivatives of $344 billion. Producer hedging, meanwhile, declined from 2001 to reach 2166 tonnes at year-end 2003. ***


    Those FACTS reveal black and white evidence which disclosed the clandestine activities of The Gold Cartel behind the scenes. Every gold financial market reporter or gold producer CEO worth their salt should want to know how this can be? Every gold shareholder should demand that their respective CEO's answer that question!!!


    The gold shares continue to meander around. The XAU only gained .27 to 93.02, while the HUI backed off of trendline resistance once more to finish up a modest .96 to 204.03.


    Gold and silver share investments remain THE historic investments of a lifetime and few seem to notice or care.



    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    MIDAS

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    The John Brimelow Report


    Bears getting worried?


    Monday, September 13, 2004


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $7.44, PM $7.53, with world gold at $401.30 and $400.60. Very high; lavish for legal imports. The rupee reached a two-month high this afternoon, and the Bombay stock market closed at the highest level since the advent of the leftish Congress government in May. India is clearly lending powerful support to world gold at present prices.


    The other Eastern physical markets seem supportive also. Dubai premiums (as derived from Standard London’s website) were on the high side today, and the various grades of gold on the Shanghai Gold Exchange (if they are to be trusted) appear to be at $1+ premiums. (Shanghai updating has been erratic recently.)


    TOCOM is not interested. Volume fell yet again, by 24% to the equivalent of only 10,090 Comex lots, the active contract closed down 3 yen, and world gold fell 55c from the NY close. Open interest fell the equivalent of 979 Comex lots to equal only 87,752 Comex. (In NY on Friday, gold traded 39,512 contracts; open interest fell 5,660 to 242,258 lots.)


    While sufficient selling was forthcoming on Friday to hold gold down below the $401.60 spot 200-day moving average, several observers acknowledge robust physical off take. JP Morgan’s "Metals & Energy Strategist" has become sufficiently worried to cover half their short:


    "The market saw follow-through selling to 395 on the break of 401/00, but has seen a strong bounce from there. Essentially we remain trapped in a 390 to 415 channel and a break of channel support is needed to confirm our bearish outlook for a move to 365/355."


    The CFTC data indicates that the liquidation swing is well advanced. Open interest is down some 30,000 contracts since August 25 (93.3 tonnes), about half way between recent extremes. Friday’s appreciable open interest drop on a slightly firmer price might suggest shorts (beyond JP Morgan) have started to cover.


    Saturday’s Dutch announcement of further gold sales, even when combined with the strong hint of Italian sales also, does not really comprise news: only if the Washington Accords are to be exceeded will the market be impressed. But it is interesting that the Dutch intend to carry over to WA2 50 tonnes they failed to sell in the previous phase of the Washington Accord: suggesting that at least the Portuguese disposals were not planned for, and may well have been the denouement of ill judged call sales.


    Initiative is steadily passing out of the paws of the Bears; although Barclays is quite right to wonder if


    "Friday’s rebound is sufficient to stave off recent selling pressure."


    JB

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    September 13 - Gold $403.90 up $2.40 – Silver $6.17 up 4 cents


    Physical Market Buying Spurs Gold/The Dutch And The Real Gold Story/Italy Says No


    Zitat

    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I... I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference...Robert Frost


    GO GATA!!!!


    Physical market buying spilled over into the futures pits to propel gold off $2+ early losses into a healthy gain for the day. This action was of note since the dollar traded on the firm side all session long, closing at 88.82, up .31. The euro rallied late to finish at 122.50 down .09. Dresdner Bank and Deutsche Bank were two of the featured cash buyers on the Comex. This is was no surprise to MIDAS as our Cafe sources told us to expect the STALKER to show up in a big way this week.


    From MIDAS commentaries last week:


    9/7


    On a more positive note, our STALKER source has a hunch the mother STALKER (Chinese) could represent something like the major gold trading exchange in Shanghai and the new mini-STALKERS might represent smaller exchanges being set up in Nanking, Peking, etc. As you will see below, the Chinese are going all out to open up their gold market to the Chinese public. All of these exchanges will need bullion on hand to get their businesses started. Our source believes part of this $1.5 billion dollar tranche of gold they will soon be in the market to buy will go for this purpose.


    9/9


    Another positive is that these liquidations aren’t getting the bad guys very far. The cash market is just too strong. Years ago The Gold Cartel would take gold down $30 off its highs on a break like this. Not happening these days.


    Look for strong physical market buying to come out of Hong Kong any day now.


    9/10


    My bet is the physical market is going to give them fits and overpower them as September rolls on.


    ***


    The STALKER knows The Gold Cartel’s routine full well. It makes no sense for them to bid up gold in size during thinner market conditions in Asia when they know the cabal is going to do all they can to take gold down during the Comex trading hours. It makes sense to place various orders with their buyers in New York to take advantage of cabal predictability and the heavier trading volume. I confirmed this with my STALKER source who agreed, adding only the orders were coming out of Shanghai, not Hong Kong as previously mentioned by me.


    Do we know for sure it was The STALKER out there? No, won’t know that for a period of time to come, however, it fits the script perfectly.


    The gold open interest fell a sizeable 5,660 contracts to 242,258. Not only was the cabal capping gold above $402 on Friday, the specs were continuing to run for the hills, taking advantage of the rally to exit their positions.


    Silver led today’s turnaround, actually reversing before gold did. The past couple of sessions I mentioned that silver was SOLD OUT. That was 95% on the money - thus far. However, this morning the Mann Fund continued what liquidation it had left to do and silver dropped 8 cents in the early going. Morgan Stanley, staunch silver bulls at these prices, was the featured buyer once again.


    The silver open interest also shrank, dropping 350 contracts to 82,263.


    The gold base continues to build and build:


    December gold
    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/GD/C4


    Sold out December silver
    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/SV/C4


    Now to some bigger picture stuff - most of this commentary was written on Saturday.


    What we know about the gold market is that it is the least transparent market in the world. Little about it is honest and forthright. For example, the IMF instructs its central banking members to record gold loans/swaps (bullion which has left their vaults) as gold reserves to deceive the public. GATA’s work reveals those loans and swaps to be around 16,000 tonnes. Therefore, the gold reserve statistics are meaningless as the central banks only have half the gold they say they have. The official gold stats are a ruse. The world’s largest gold holder, the United States, has not allowed an independent audit of its gold reserves in 50 years. No one really knows how much gold the US still has and where it is located. It is widely rumored (by people who have been on the premises) that there isn’t any gold left in Fort Knox, for example.


    In recent years the Germans and others have been called on to publicly talk about selling gold as prices were beginning to bubble. Since there is little transparency in the gold market, just talk of central banks selling gold has adversely affected the price in the past. After all, anyone who knows this market understands it has been central bank selling the past 8 years which has been the main price suppressant.


    The following Reuters report was circulated on Saturday, which fits right in with The Gold Cartel’s pattern of attempting to talk down the price:


    11 Sep 2004 14:16


    Dutch to sell 150 tonnes of gold in coming years


    SCHEVENINGEN, Netherlands, Sept 11 (Reuters) - The Dutch central bank plans to sell 100 tonnes of gold under the new five-year gold sale agreement that takes effect in September plus sell 50 tonnes left from the previous agreement, the bank's governor Nout Wellink said on Saturday.


    "The sale will be slotted into (the schedule). There is an annual tonnage for all countries in the gold agreement, and we talk about it together how to sell it, so there is some flexibility there," he told Reuters on the sidelines of the informal meetings of finance ministers and central bankers here.


    "Under the old (gold sales) agreement we still have 50 tonnes to go, and that is the first thing we will do. It doesn't really matter to us when we do it. We are flexible, and so are the others."


    Central banks have been shedding gold, once a mainstay of their reserve assets, in favour of hard currencies as gold's status as a store of value has declined.


    European central banks in March announced a new agreement to sell 500 metric tonnes of gold per year over the next five years, up from the expiring pact to limit their sales to 400 tonnes. But financial markets have been anxious to know how much each central bank would sell and when.


    Separately, Italy's central bank chief Antonio Fazio said he would make his position known soon. The Bank of Italy has not sold gold from its reserves since the fascist period.


    "We will say something in Washington," he said. Italy will be attending the IMF annual meeting in Washington in early October where central bankers are planning to provide more details on gold sales.


    ((Reporting by Wendel Broere; Editing by Peter Nielsen; wendel.broere@reuters.com; Reuters Messaging: wendel.broere.reuters.com@reuters.net; +31 20 504-5012))


    -END-


    With the Argentina central bank buying news and the UBS report suggesting central banks might only sale 250 tonnes per year, not 500 tonnes, the central banks were losing their perception war; i.e. that they can’t keep the gold price down much longer via their dumping. Thus, the Dutch were trotted out this weekend, as the Germans have been used the past couple of years to do a little influence peddling.


    Is this important news and should it affect the gold price in the weeks to come? Not the way I see it. The Dutch gold sale talk is much ado about nothing, while the real gold story remains untold. If anything, this sort of announcement reveals a degree of desperation from The Gold Cartel and mainstream banking world allies. Why:


    *As stated, the Dutch gold sales will be slotted under the terms of the new Washington Agreement for various European banks to sell no more than 500 tonnes per year. Their sale is already accounted for by market participants.


    *Curiously, the Dutch say they still have 50 tonnes to go under the old agreement. The most likely reason why is the signatories to the agreement were surprised when Portugal had 35 tonnes called away due to prior options commitments in May of this year. Under the terms of the agreement, somebody had to back off on their selling, leaving the Dutch as the ones to hold back.


    *The following link shows official central bank gold disbursements over the past few years:


    http://www.thebulliondesk.com/…ChangeslatestJuly2004.pdf


    What stands out is the Swiss selling of around 25 tonnes per month over this entire period. This totals approximately 300 tonnes per year. Years ago the Swiss announced they were going to sell half their gold holdings, or 1200 tonnes. The Swiss now have very little left to sell and their sales program will end in the very near future. Somebody else is urgently needed to take their place, just to have enough gold for sale to meet the 400 tonne per year amount under the old agreement. The Dutch announcement of a 100 tonne sale will only replace 4 months of Swiss selling when it ends. It is a trifle compared with the 1500 tonnes of central bank selling/lending/swapping needed per year to keep the gold price from rising.


    *Italy says it will announce its intentions upon the official signing of the new Washington Agreement. If no one else announces plans for future gold sales, the Italians had better come up with a whopping number of 1,000 or 1,500 tonnes for planned gold sales. Either that, or we should hear from some other country intending to do so. The real question regarding Italy’s gold is how much has already been lent out, and is in effect ALREADY gone.


    *The real gold story is still not being told and is kept behind closed doors in the central banking world. Gold demand exceeds supply by some 1500 tonnes per year. The new central bank agreement will only account for enough gold to meet 1/3 of this deficit. Therefore, central banks must deceptively lend, or swap out, 1,000 tonnes of gold to keep the gold price from rising. They desperately need THAT supply to ration demand.


    *It is this surreptitiously mobilized gold which GATA has identified The Gold Cartel has been using to suppress the price. Portugal is a prime example. When you look up their official gold holdings, it shows a 482.3 tonne number. However, this is false as revealed in the Sprott Special Report and in prior MIDAS commentaries. The Portuguese only have a maximum of 173 tonnes left in their vaults.


    The rest has been lent out, GONE!


    Official gold holdings


    http://www.thebulliondesk.com/…ldHoldingsJuly%202004.pdf


    We say gone because the supply/demand deficit is already so severe that if the Portuguese were to attempt to retrieve 300 plus tonnes of gold to replenish their "official" amount of reserves, it would send the gold price soaring. 300 tonnes represents 12% of gold mine supply and 60% of the new Washington Agreement yearly total.


    *The most important question to be answered by the gold world is who is doing all this lending in addition to the Portuguese? Unfortunately, it is a question they will never answer – that is until the gold market blows up and answers are demanded by various authorities.


    One other point. We are fairly sure the Portuguese had gold "called" away from them due to long-term written call agreements. If other signatories to the Washington Agreement suffer the same fate, it will restrict the amount of gold others may sell as occurred with the Portuguese/Dutch this year.


    ***


    This brings us back to the recent UBS gold report which states these signatories may only sell 250 tonnes per year, not 500 as previously expected. When you realize it was the Swiss selling 60% of the allotted Washington Agreement gold the past few years, you can understand why UBS said what they did. Then, of course, we are very likely to learn there are other central banks out there, like the Argentineans, who want to build their gold reserves in the years to come.


    Bottom line:


    The key to the gold market is the undisclosed gold/lending swapping pool, NOT the 500 tonnes per year slated to be sold under the terms of the new Washington Agreement. If this number is 16,000+ tonnes plus as GATA suspects, the nefarious Gold Cartel scheme to keep gold prices down is about to end. They will be hitting the wall soon and just won’t have enough supply available to carry on. To appreciate the magnitude of the problem The Gold Cartel is facing, subtract 16,000 tonnes of official gold holdings from the 31,000+ tonnes listed from various specific countries. You will then appreciate how little wiggle room the bad guys have left and how enormous their problem is since there is a 1500 tonne YEARLY supply/demand deficit. What banks are going to lend another 1,000 tonnes next year to keep the price suppressed? How long can The Gold Cartel carry on with this deception? The longer The Gold Cartel shies away from a massive retreat, the more grandiose their eventual problem will be. The longer they wait, the higher the price of gold will need to go to ration what supply is left in the years to come.


    On a side note, the BIS gold derivatives numbers as of July 1 of this year will be announced in the months to come. These numbers are very important as they prove the GATA camp, including Sprott Asset Management, is correct and the gold establishment world is purposely deceiving the investing public. How do we know that:


    *(From the Sprott Report, page 25) "For the fourth quarter of 2001, GFMS (Gold Fields Mineral Services) reported that the delta-adjusted hedge book stood at 2924 tonnes. At this point, the notional value of gold derivatives reported to the BIS was $231 billion. However, as of December 31, 2003, the BIS reports gold derivatives of $344 billion. Producer hedging, meanwhile, declined from 2001 to reach 2166 tonnes at year-end 2003.


    The gold establishment world (GFMA and World Gold Council) does not account for any gold lending other than to gold producers. A chimpanzee taking a quick glance at the BIS derivatives number would know this cannot be; is disingenuous; and one of intentional gross negligence. Over a two-year period the BIS gold derivatives number went up by around 50%, while the official hedging numbers dropped by around 25%. The only logical explanation is this surge in gold derivatives was related to undisclosed gold mobilization activity to suppress the price.


    The fact that GFMS and the World Gold Council refuse to deal with this blatant contradiction reveals the degree of a lack of intellectual integrity on their part. Both of these organizations have hurt gold investors, gold shareholders and the poor people of sub-Saharan gold producing countries to an incalculable degree. Both of these disgraceful operations should be disbanded. Any gold corporation or public company supporting either one of these organizations should be ashamed of themselves for contributing to a shallow hoax!


    JUST IN:


    Italy cenbank says no plans to sell gold reserves


    ROME, Sept 13 (Reuters) -


    The Bank of Italy said in a statement on Monday it had no plans to sell its gold reserves.


    Zitat

    "The Bank of Italy ... has not spoken of this matter, nor does any plan of this type exist," it said in a statement.


    Central banks have been shedding gold, once a mainstay of their reserve assets, in favour of hard currencies as gold's status as a store of value has declined.


    The Dutch central bank on Saturday said it would sell 100 tonnes of gold under the new 5-year gold sale agreement that takes effect in September plus sell 50 tonnes left from a previous agreement. ((Rome newsroom, +39 06 8522 4350, fax +39 06 854 0568))


    -END-


    That is HUGE news and HUGELY positive for the gold price. Seems more and more like the Saturday story was a plant to scare specs and give the bad guys a chance to do a little more covering.

    Spieler0815


    Warum traust Du Dich nicht?


    Seit über einer Woche schreibst Du Dir jetzt von der Seele, dass man mit Silber vorsichtig sein solle, Du ignorierst fast völlig die positiven Argumente die für eine Silber Anlage zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt sprechen.
    Du behauptest dies und das, Du befürchtest dies und das, und Du verlangst von mir, und anderen Usern die die Silber Fundamentaldaten als positiv erkennen, und auch danach gehandelt haben, sie sollen jetzt gefälligst kritischer, und wie Du selbst über ihre Anlageentscheidung unsicher werden. Den User "Skeptiker" scheinen Deine Aeusserungen bereits dazu bewogen haben seinen Silber Bestand zu verringern.


    Ist es das was Du mit Deiner Kritik bewirken willst?


    Das Du alles was nicht Deinem engen skeptischen Silber Blickwinkel entspricht, Deiner Ansicht nach nur Gelaber darstellt, zeugt davon, dass Du entweder die Risiken unseres Fiat Money Systems (Papier Geld fast ohne physische Gold Deckung) nicht erkennen kannst, oder erkennen willst, oder einfach nur Freude dabei empfindest mit den selben abgedroschenen, unzutreffenden Phrasen unserer Finanzobrigkeit zu operieren, und die an möglichst tiefen Silber Preisen interessierten Silber Bullion Banken zu befriedigen.


    Auf der anderen Seite hast Du ausdrücklich betont, dass Du selbst in Silber investiert bist. Trotzdem kritisierst und forderst Du die Ansichten, und Anlage Entscheidungen von Silber Bugs heraus, die genau wie Du selbst in Silber investiert haben, ohne auch nur ein einziges mal in einem Deiner häufigen Postings den Lesern klar zu sagen, was Du denn wirklich bezwecken willst.


    Empfiehlst Du denn nun Silber zu verkaufen, oder doch nicht?


    Fall ja, schreib es doch mal ganz klar!


    Falls nein, sehe ich keinen Sinn in Deinen ewigen Wiederholungen, in denen Du zur Vorsicht vor Silber, und Silberinvestments warnst, und Silber gegenüber positive Beiträge von Usern hier im Board, und Autoren wie dem Silber Experten Butler, die in ihren Beiträgen interessante Fakten, und Hintergrundinformationen zum Silber Geschehen veröffentlichen kritisierst, wohlwissend, dass er sich weit weg, zu Deinen Anfeindungen und Unterstellungen nicht äussern kann.



    Forderungen von Dir nach einer Diskussion über Pro, und Contra Silber Investitionen, sind sicher wünschenswert in diesem Thread, doch sollten die Fakten und Angaben die Du verwendest auch stimmen, und nicht nur aus Unterstellungen bestehen, wie zum Bsp. in Deinem absolut lächerlichen Versuch, eines Vergleiches von Silber mit Kartoffeln, in dem Du suggerierst, es gäbe Silber im Ueberfluss, ja sogar behauptest, ein Silberproduktions Defizit existiere womöglich gar nicht.


    Dass Du Siegel unterstellst er sei eine Silber gegenüber kritisch eingestellte Person, ist genau so unwahr wie Deine Aussage man könne nirgends auf der Welt die Steuern mit Gold bezahlen. Dass Du bei dieser Aussage so beiläufig den Gold Dinar, ausgeschlossen hast, ändert nichts daran dass diese Aussage von Dir falsch ist. [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.e-dinar.com/html/img/p2_dinar.jpg]


    Es gibt im vor allem im asiatischen Raum div. Länder mit kursgültigen Gold-, und Silber Münzen, zum Teil mit hohem Nennwert die zur Bezahlung von Steuern benutzt werden können, ohne vorher diese Gold Münzen in Papiergeld zu wechseln.


    Thailand, das Land in dem ich selbst lebe, hat im letzten Monat zum einen eine neue kursgültige Goldmünze mit einem Nominalwert von 9000.- THB (ca. 180.- Euro) herausgegeben (Ausgabepreis zum Nominalwert, Gold Gewicht 15 Gramm, Goldgehalt 900), und zum andern eine kursgültige Silber Münze mit 600.- THB Nominalwert (ca.12.- Euro). Thailand gibt bereits seit sehr vielen Jahren immer wieder Kursgültige Gold, und Silber Münzen heraus. Mit diesem öffentlichen Zahlungsmittel, kann ich meine Steuern bezahlen.


    In Vietnam, Laos, Kambodia, Burma, etc. kannst man Steuern mit Sicherheit ebenfalls mit Gold bezahlen. Es gibt dort auch (Fiat) Zinsen für Gold Einlagen auf der Bank.


    Ja selbst in der Schweiz ist das gesetzlich möglich, nur macht es in der Schweiz niemand mehr, weil der Sammlerwert der Kursgültigen Gold Münzen 10.-, 20.-, und 100 Franken Vreneli heute bedeutend höher liegt als der Nominalwert.


    Das selbe gilt ähnlich auch für Australien, Neuseeland, China, Russland, etc.


    Das kursgültige Gold, und Silbermünzen heute teurer sind als der aufgedruckte nominale Ausgabe Preis von damals, zeugt auf jeden Fall davon, dass auf lange Sicht gesehen Gold, und Silber Münzen eine sichere, und werterhaltende Anlageform darstellen.


    Das selbe kann man über Geld in Papierform nicht unbedingt behaupten.


    Wer ein belegtes 14 Jahre anhaltendes Silber Produktions Defizit wie Du einfach so quasi als Lapalie verniedlicht, und nicht müde wird den Lesern hier im Thread einreden zu wollen, Silber sei evtl. keine gute Investitionsentscheidung, jedoch selbst nicht bereit ist konkrete Alternativen anzubieten, Kauf, oder Verkaufs Empfehlungen zu einer Silberanlage abzugeben, wirkt zumindest sehr oberflächlich.


    Vielleicht könntest Du uns ja einmal neben Silber, und Gold ein weiteres Beispiel eines Rohstoffes, eines anderen Edelmetalles, oder irgend eines anderen X beliebigen Produktes nennen bei dem ein 14, respektive 13 Jahre langes Produktionsdefizit besteht. Falls Du ein solches Produkt finden solltest, überprüfe bitte, ob die Preise inflationsbereinigt wie beim Gold, und Silber der Fall, ebenso billiger sind als vor dem Eintreten des ersten Produktions Defizites.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.instock.de/images/Logo_silber1.gif]


    http://www.instock.de/Nachrichten/10146335.html


    Apollo Gold droht Ungemach

    (Siegel Investments)


    Die US-Minengesellschaft Apollo Gold (AMEX: AGT, Kurs 0,79 kanadische Dollar) meldet für das Juniquartal einen Einbruch der Produktion auf 24.345 Unzen, was einer Jahresrate von etwa 100.000 Unzen entspricht und das Produktionsziel von jährlich 176.000 Unzen um etwa 40 Prozent verfehlt. In der Florida Canyon Mine erreichte die Produktion 18.442 Unzen bei Nettoproduktionskosten von 361 Dollar je Feinunze.


    Im Montana Tunnels Projekt brach die Produktion auf 5.903 Unzen bei Nettoproduktionskosten von 899 Dollar je Feinunze ein. Die Zinkproduktion fiel auf 2.700 Tonnen und die auf Bleiproduktion 800 Tonnen, so daß aus diesem Bereich kein Ausgleich für die Verluste im Goldbereich erzielt werden konnte. Bei Nettoproduktionskosten von 492 Dollar je Feinunze und einem Verkaufspreis von 356 Dollar je Feinunze mußte bereits auf der Produktionsebene ein Verlust von 136 Dollar je Feinunze hingenommen werden. Ursprünglich waren Nettoproduktionskosten von 260 Dollar je Feinunze geplant worden. Der niedrige Verkaufspreis ist auf Vorwärtsverkäufe zurückzuführen, die im Jahresverlauf 2003 aufgenommen wurden. Der operative Verlust erreichte 285 Dollar je Feinunze. Auf der Basis einer jährlichen Produktion von 100.000 Unzen liegt die Lebensdauer der Reserven bei 19,3 Jahren.


    Der Cashbestand fiel im ersten Halbjahr 2004 dramatisch zurück, während die gesamte Kreditbelastung nur unmerklich reduziert werden konnte. Die Vorwärtsverkäufe wurden auf 42.000 Unzen reduziert, was einen Produktionszeitraum von 0,4 Jahren abdeckt. Die unrealisierten Verluste aus den Vorwärtsverkäufen lagen Ende Juni bei 52 Dollar je Feinunze.


    Beurteilung: Durch die katastrophale Gewinnentwicklung hat sich die finanzielle Situation der Apollo innerhalb von 6 Monaten so drastisch verschlechtert, daß die Gesellschaft ums Überleben kämpft. Sogar die Fertigstellung der Standard Mine, aus der ab November 2004 eine jährliche Produktion von 60.000 Unzen bei Nettoproduktionskosten von unter 225 Dollar je Feinunze vorgesehen war, ist gefährdet. Die Entwicklung der Black Fox Mine, aus der eine jährliche Produktion von 81.000 Unzen über einen Zeitraum von 5 Jahren geplant wurde, erscheint aussichtslos.


    Apollo benötigt zum Überleben hohe Kredite, die der Gesellschaft nach dem Desaster der letzten beiden Quartale möglicherweise nicht mehr zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Die Existenz der Gesellschaft ist daher akut gefährdet, so daß sich Apollo nur noch als Beimischung für extrem risikobereite Anleger anbietet.


    Wir stufen Apollo als Hoffnungswert zu einer Halteposition zurück.


    Empfehlung: Halten, nicht nachkaufen. Sollte die Gesellschaft überleben, ist ein Kursziel von 3 kanadische Dollar möglich. Apollo Gold wird an mehreren deutschen Börsen notiert. Die WKN lautet 691373.



    Siegel Investments ist Herausgeber der Zeitschrift "Goldmarkt". Autor Martin Siegel ist Berater des PEH Q-Goldmines-Fonds.



    [ Freitag, 10.09.2004, 11:21 ]

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.tradesignal.com/img/menu/logo.gif]


    http://www.tradesignal.com/def…l/analyse.asp&id=6905


    Der GOLD Trend ist sauber intakt


    von Harald Weygand, Godmode-Trader.de , BörseGo GmbH,


    10. September 2004 17:53


    GOLD: 401,25 $


    Tageschart (log) seit dem 02.04.2004 (1 Kerze = 1 Tag) als Kurzupdate:


    Der Aufwärtstrend seit Mai dieses Jahres ist sauber intakt. Es gibt 2 Varianten der Aufwärtstrendlinie. Wie Sie dem beigefügten Chart entnehmen können, konnte GOLD vorgestern auf der oberen der beiden Varianten bei 394,8 $ nach oben abprallen. Maximal bis 390 $ könnte GOLD noch konsolidieren, ohne daß der Aufwärtstrend verletzt wird! Insofern zeigt sich das Chart Setup bei GOLD und in den Goldminenindizes weiter formidabel. Ausgehend von den beiden Aufwärtstrendlinien, - also von 394,8 $ und 390,0 $ -, dürfte es zu einem Aufwärtsschub in Richtung 414 und 430 $ kommen. Ein Bruch der 390 $ Marke auf Tagesschluß würde hingegen ein starkes Verkaufssignal auslösen!


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.godmode-charts.de/c…subcortical/O2/ugo592.gif]


    GOLD eigentlich weiter mit Aufwärtsdrall


    30.08. 09:09


    GOLD: 402,85 $


    Tageschart (log) seit dem 29.03.2004 (1 Kerze = 1 Tag) als Kurzupdate:


    BUY Trigger ist die 407,7 $ Marke. Kurzfristig ist eine Konsolidierung wahrscheinlich, die bis 399,25 bzw. 393,7 $ verlaufen kann. Maximal kann man einer Konsolidierung Spielraum bis 390 zugestehen. Bei 390 $ verlaufen eine ganze Reihe wichtige Unterstützungstypen zusammen; neben einer wichtigen Horizontalunterstützung und einem Retracementsupport lässt sich hier eine Aufwärtstrendlinienvariante sondieren. Nach Konsolidierung dürfte GOLD aus heutiger Sicht seinen Aufwärtsdrall in Richtung 430 $ beibehalten. Insofern eine interessante Chartsituation, weil das Setup von EUR/USD seit vergangener Woche schlagartig wieder außerordentlich kritisch aussieht. Ein Abrutschen unter 390 $ sollte bei GOLD unbedingt vermieden werden, weil dies sonst ein starkes Verkaufssignal auslösen würde.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.godmode-charts.de/c…subcortical/O2/ugo487.gif]

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    Take what we can get for now. Even the RR man is suspicious of the ever present Hail Mary late rally.


    If you are a Golden Star Resources ($4.49, up 9 cents) shareholder and feel like I do about their support of the World Gold Council, I hope you have taken the time, or will, to contact the firm in some manner (phone or email) to express your disgust at their wasting our shareholder money. Here are just a couple of examples of the emails going their way:


    Dear Mr. Marter:


    Through various family member accounts I own xxxxxx common shares of Golden Star (market value $1.12 million) and have been a shareholder since 1996.


    I want to echo Bill Murphy's sentiments about the World Gold Council. The WGC is a farce. I believe that they would do more for the cause of gold by simply going out of business than by continuing their inept promotions of gold jewelry. I vigorously oppose any continuation of the wasteful support of this incompetent organization by our Company. Disbanding the WGC would be of great benefit to our industry. Bill is right. Please stop using shareholder money to support the WGC.


    Thank you.


    "Concerned shareholder"
    New York, New York


    Dear CFO and CEO

    As a shareholder of GSS with a significant holding of about (xxxxxxxxx) shares, I am compelled to inform you that I completely agree with Bill Murphy of LeMetropole concerning the wasteful payment being made in support of the useless World Gold Council. It is sickening to me that the producers of the precious metal commodities remain silent, while blatant interventions to suppress the price abound, and this financial support to the WGC adds insult to injury. I have not been able to find one positive aspect for paying a percentage of the bullion price to WGC. So if there are any, please advise me. Contrarily, there is considerable evidence that they are in fact enemies of gold, who repeatedly implement campaigns that relegate gold bullion to a non-investment status. This money would be much better spent supporting GATA, who remains the singular outspoken friend of gold investors. Your stock which was once a stellar performer, has behaved dismally during the past year, and I have resisted impulses to sell out of my position. Mostly, because Bill Murphy still believes in the company. However, you should earn his respect and begin to speak out about the manipulative interventions that exist, and stop wasting money supporting a useless organization who's agenda seems to be supportive of the cartel of manipulators. You have an opportunity to be a leader in this industry by taking up a campaign to expose the price setting, but you not only choose the path of least resistance, you aid an enemy by contributing to the WGC.

    Sincerely,
    Richard D. Caccavale


    If own shares in some exploration companies as I do, you might want to call them up and see if they still have a pulse and are alive. The interest in the sector is as abysmal as I have ever seen it. Many trade by appointment only; that is when they trade.


    The HUI ran right up against a pronounced downtrend line and backed off LATE in the session. After making a high of 205.23, it sank to 203.07, up only 1.59. The XAU could only manage a .46 gain to 88.37 with Barrick Gold closing at $19.37, down 12 cents. Barrick says gold could rally $70 from here by year-end. Sure hope they cover more of their monstrously huge hedge position around these levels. If their potential price target becomes a reality and they fail to substantially reduce their hedges, how will they explain that to shareholders as Barrick stock continues to WAY under-perform like it has for the past three years?


    HUI


    http://bigcharts.marketwatch.c…&o_symb=hui&freq=1&time=8


    No change from me. The gold fundamentals remains a "10+++++." They don’t get any better, as brought to your attention the past few weeks. PRICE ACTION MAKES MARKET COMMENTARY. When gold does make its move, many of those fundamental reasons or market developments will be cited as reasons why.


    I expect gold and silver to take off from here in the weeks ahead and will be dead wrong if that doesn’t happen. Will I be shocked? Course not, we know who is out there doing all they can to keep this from happening and why. My bet is the physical market is going to give them fits and overpower them as September rolls on.


    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    MIDAS


    Appendix


    I also hope many of you have made an effort to make sure the Sprott Report gets into the hands of as many in the media as possible. You have been handed of examples of superb letters in past MIDAS commentaries. All it will take on your part is a bit of elbow grease.


    Bill


    Here's a bunch of US media addresses which may also be of use to other subscribers. I haven't weeded out any non-performing ones but I think it's a pretty up to date list.


    bdold@tribune.com, cjletter@louisv02.gannett.com, constitution@ajc.com, dceditpage@democratandchronicle.com, DNForum@dailynews.com, editor.letters@herald-trib.com, editor@argusleader.com, editor@postandcourier.com, editor@spokane.net, editor@usatoday.com, editorial@boise.gannett.com, editpage@patriot-news.com, editpage@seattle-pi.com, edletter@coxohio.com, eletters@starledger.com, epage@bhamnews.com, fcoleman@mobileregister.com, fencepost@dailyherald.com, forum@nando.com, HeraldEd@herald.com, hleditorial@herald-leader.com, htimes@htimes.com, Inquirer.Letters@phillynews.com, insight@orlandosentinel.com, jreingold@pbdailynews.com, jsedit@onwis.com, kns@knoxnews.com, letter.editor@edit.wsj.com, letter@globe.com, letters@adn.com, letters@azstarnet.com, letters@baltsun.com, letters@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com, letters@cctimes.com, letters@courant.com, letters@denverpost.com, letters@denver-rmn.com, letters@desnews.com, letters@detnews.com, letters@dispatch.com, letters@enquirer.com, letters@express-news.net, letters@forumcomm.com, letters@freepress.com, letters@gomemphis.com, letters@honoluluadvertiser.com, letters@jackson.gannett.com, letters@kcstar.com, letters@lasvegassun.com, letters@latimes.com, letters@latimes.com, letters@lvrj.com, letters@mail.tribnet.com, letters@news.dmreg.com, letters@news.oregonian.com, letters@newsday.com, letters@nypost.com, letters@nytimes.com, letters@pbpost.com, letters@pilotonline.com, letters@pioneerpress.com, letters@plaind.com, letters@post-gazette.com, letters@postnet.com, letters@pressherald.com, letters@projo.com, letters@sfchronicle.com, letters@sjmercury.com, letters@sltrib.com, letters@sptimes.com, letters@star-telegram.com, letters@statesman.com, letters@sun-sentinel.com, letters@suntimes.com, letters@syracuse.com, letters@telegram.com, letters@tennessean.com, letters@theblade.com, letters@theunionleader.com, letters@time.com, letters@timesdispatch.com, letters@trib.com, letters@tulsaworld.com, letters@union-news.com, letters@uniontrib.com, letters@washingtontimes.com, letters@washpost.com, letters@wsjournal.com, letters@wvgazette.com, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com, LettersToTheEditor@NorthJersey.com, LetterToEditor@buffnews.com, mailbox@postherald.com, njletter@newsjournal.com, oped@csps.com, opinion@abqjournal.com, opinion@charlotte.com, opinion@missoulian.com, opinion@sacbee.com, opinion@seattletimes.com, opinion@startribune.com, opinion@tribweb.com, Opinions@pni.com, postedits@cincypost.com, pulse@gr-press.com, pulse@owh.com, redaccion@laopinion.com, speakup@billingsgazette.com, stareditor@starnews.com, stateeditor@thestate.com, tdedit@taldem.com, triblet@angnewspapers.com, tribletters@tampatrib.com, tuletters@timesunion.com, viewpoints@chron.com, Views@phillynews.com, voicers@edit.nydailynews.com, vop@thebeaconjournal.com, weedit@wichitaeagle.com, yourviews@app.com, yourviews@oklahoman.com


    Tim


    Morgan Stanley


    September 10, 2004


    Global: Spinning Its Wheels


    Stephen Roach (from Paris)


    As the US economy now enters the 34th month of the current expansion, debate over sustainability remains as intense as ever. In a recent congressional appearance, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan stated, "the expansion has regained some traction" after having gone through an energy-price-induced soft patch last spring. With all due respect to Mr. Greenspan, at this point in time, such a claim is largely an assertion based on a very creative interpretation of ever-volatile hard data. In my view, the case for traction in the US economy remains a weak one.


    The concept of "economic traction" is not well understood. As I see it, traction comes when a cyclical recovery can truly stand its own. It is, first and foremost, a matter for the consumer -- the heart and soul of any sustainable economic recovery. Traction reaches a critical mass only when the internal dynamics of the business cycle push the wage income portion of personal income generation above trend. Then, and only then, can autonomous growth in consumer demand be sustained on its own. Consumer traction is also the linchpin in providing ancillary support to the "derived demands" of business capital spending and inventory investment. Without consumer traction, the case for sustainability remains a real stretch.


    The issue of traction is key to the current debate because this recovery has yet to stand on its own. Since the last recession ended in late 2001, the US economy has drawn unusual support from several artificial factors -- namely, massive policy stimulus (monetary and fiscal), saving depletion, the levering of assets, and the costless funding of domestic growth by foreign central banks. Hooked on the high-powered "steroids" of such extraordinary life-support measures, America hasn’t had to rely on the internal fuel of accelerating wage income generation that normally facilitates a transition from recovery to expansion. And that’s for good reason -- there has been an extraordinary and enduring shortfall in wage income generation since the inception of the current recovery. Based on data over the first 32 months of this upturn, real wage and salary disbursements have recorded a cumulative increase of just 2.2%. By contrast, by this same juncture in the previous six business cycles, real wage income had recorded a 10.6% average increase. Had wage income generation during this expansion matched the composite profile of past cycles, American consumers would have had an additional $339 billion of discretionary purchasing power at their disposal. That’s the equivalent of 4.3% of total real disposable personal income -- hardly a trivial sum by any standards.


    The income shortfall of this expansion hardly comes out of thin air. It is a by-product of America’s notorious jobless recovery and a concomitant compression of real wages. Again, the numbers speak for themselves: On the job front, private nonfarm payrolls are now up only 0.3% over the first 33 months of this expansion. By contrast, at similar junctures of the past six cycles, the increase averaged 7.8%. The gap between the hiring trajectory of this expansion and the composite profile of these earlier recoveries works out to an employment shortfall of 8.2 million workers in the private economy. A similar pattern shows up in real wages -- comparisons in the current cycle are running an astonishing 0.3% below year-earlier levels (as measured by CPI-deflated average hourly earnings). It is the interplay between job creation and the real wage cycle that shapes the internal dynamics of wage income generation. And in that context, the record over the broad scope of this expansion remains woefully deficient.


    Yet the soft-patch crowd argues that this is an old story -- that the numbers have turned for the better in recent months. Once again, Fed Chairman Greenspan has led the optimistic charge. And once again, I find myself on the other side of this positive spin. Yes, consumer demand rebounded in July, but that came after a terrible June; the average change in real consumption expenditures over the two months was only +0.2% -- actually a shade below an already subdued pace in the first five months of 2004. Moreover, major retailers reported disappointing back-to-school sales in August and there was renewed softness in motor vehicle sales as well. Meanwhile there are signs of mounting inventory backups -- a classic warning sign of production adjustments to come. Unfortunately, the inventory data lag other statistics, but it now looks as if total business stocks rose by at least 0.9% in July following a 1.0% increase in June -- marking the sharpest back-to-back monthly gains since before the last recession. The recent back-up in stocks has been especially noticeable in the motor vehicles sector -- both for domestically-located producers and for America’s new China-based supply chain. Detroit has already announced significant production cutbacks in 4Q04 that will probably knock at least 0.5 percentage point off annualized real GDP growth. This certainly doesn’t sound like consumer-inspired traction to me.


    Nor is Corporate America stepping up and delivering any autonomous traction of its own. Sure, hiring rebounded a bit in August after a couple of crummy months. But the three-month average increase of 104,000 for nonfarm payrolls remains decidedly subpar by any standards -- about one-third slower than the typical recovery pace and equally short of gains required to keep the unemployment rate stable. And, as noted above, US businesses remain equally frugal on the pay front. Recent trends on the wage income generation front have taken a modest turn for the better. However, in the 12 months ending this July, real wage and salary disbursements still rose just 2.8% -- better than the stagnation in the first 20 months of this recovery but far short of the solid income growth that would support renewed vigor in consumer demand.


    But the most fascinating insight of all into business attitudes may be the $38.7 billion spike in corporate stock buyback announcements that occurred in July -- the strongest such surge in 20 years and fully four times the average monthly pace of the past year. This, perhaps more than anything, puts Corporate America’s cards squarely on the table. Awash in newfound earnings and cash flow, companies would rather buy their own shares than embark on growth oriented strategies of hiring, boosting compensation, and adding to productive capacity. This is not as shocking as it may seem at first blush. I have long believed that capital investment and hiring are driven far more by future demand expectations than by the oft-volatile ups and downs of the profits cycle. Given the stresses and strains still bearing down on the American consumer, Corporate America has remained justifiably cautious in these uncertain times. With consumers lacking in traction, businesses are in no hurry to go out on the risk curve and fill the void.


    The spin-doctors see it very differently, of course. Hope is widespread that the recent soft patch was nothing more than a temporary detour for a US economy that finally displayed some vigor -- 5.1% real GDP growth over the four quarters ending 1Q04. But in the end, traction cannot be verified by a one-month data blip. Yes, July was better than June but the jury is still out on August -- to say nothing of the months ahead when the US economy is finally taken off the special life support measures that have been so critical to this recovery. For America, that will be the ultimate moment of truth -- when the economy then comes face-to-face with the lingering imbalances of subpar income generation, sharply reduced saving, an ever-widening current-account imbalances, and a record overhang of household indebtedness.


    Notwithstanding this looming reality check, financial markets have deep conviction that a reacceleration of economic growth is imminent. If that were not the case, why else would fixed income markets still be pricing in another 50 bp of Fed tightening by year end and another 100 bp of rate hikes over the four quarters of next year? Why would equity markets still be looking for sustained corporate earnings growth? Or why would the dollar continue to defy the gravity of a looming current-account adjustment? Make no mistake, the traction bet is on -- by policy makers, financial markets, and incumbent Republican politicians. Yet this could well be a losing bet. For an income-short American consumer, traction remains as elusive as ever. A structurally-impaired US economy might only be spinning its wheels

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    The past many weeks we saw the DOW drag up the DOG. The past two days it has been the reverse. While the DOW didn’t exactly put in a full Hail Mary rally, it was down 20 to 30 points in the early/mid-day going and yet managed to close up 24 to 10,313. The DOG was very firm all day long, rising 25 to 1894.


    As a group, the US financial market continue to be held in lockdown mode, or support up mode. Seems The Working Group on Financial Markets wants a Stepford Wives or Matrix Market scene as we go into the Presidential election with the DOW to be held up at all costs. A money manager told me today he wondered why they had morning meetings on the markets? He said when it comes to the stock market, let us just find out what Bolser is saying about the repo action to prop it up.


    The US bond market, trading around the tactical, yet massive, Tinsley put operation, rallied 1/8 after falling sharply yesterday.


    The economic news out of Japan was disappointing, seems to be the trend all over the world:


    Sept. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Japanese stocks fell after the government unexpectedly cut its second-quarter growth estimate, signaling an economic recovery is faltering. Banks such as Mizuho Financial Group Inc. and retailers including Ito-Yokado Co. slid.
    ``There was much optimism in the market for an upgrade of growth so the knee-jerk reaction to the GDP report is to sell,' said Shigeharu Shiraishi, who oversees the equivalent of $15 billion in assets as a managing director at Societe Generale Asset Management (Japan) Co. in Tokyo.


    The Nikkei 225 Stock Average lost 0.8 percent to 11,083.23 at the 3 p.m. close in Tokyo. The Topix index slid 0.6 percent to 1126.26. Banks and retailers accounted for 17 percent of the drop.


    -END-


    CNBC: ECONOMIC NEWS IS GOOD?


    So said most of their commentators this morning, reading from their prepared scripts. HUH?


    Alcoa warned as did GM’s parts suppliers. Meanwhile no less than 3 major firms announced coming layoffs, led by EDS’s 20,000 number, which will be extended over the next couple of years.


    Maybe CNBC was referring to the coming increase in phone rates as good news?


    06:00 SBC Wholesale SBC rate hikes likely, says the LA Times
    The Times indicates the California Public Utilities Commission is poised to raise wholesale phone rates by 20%-54% after three of the PUC's five commissioners released proposals Thursday to increase what rivals pay SBC to lease lines and equipment. The PUC will hold a meeting on 9/23 at which point a nearly 22% rate hike is expected to be approved. SBC will be free to raise rates shortly thereafter.
    * * * * *
    AHH, phone rates are like food and energy....they don’t really count. After all, the PPI was less than expected. Not one guest commentator failed to point to this number as proof inflation is not a problem in the US. The good news:


    08:30 Aug PPI reported (0.1%) vs. consensus 0.2%; ex-Food & Energy (0.1%) vs. consensus 0.1%
    July PPI unch. 0.1%; ex-Food & Energy 0.1%.
    * * * * *


    streetacct's slant on nums:


    08:33 PPI falls, Trade Deficit narrows
    Both total and core PPI fell 0.1% in August, confirming that the early-year uptick in the price indexes was an energy story that has run its course. These readings will help reduce market concerns that the Fed will have to act aggressively to rein in inflation.
    * * * * *


    This seems to be a classic case of "can’t see the forest through the trees." Over the past many months and years, I can’t recall the Bush Administration, Fed or Wall Street ever citing inflation as a problem in the US, even though health costs, education costs, housing prices, etc., have all soared. Rising commodity prices, like oil, are always referred to as a blip and temporary. Oh really? Take a gander at the CRB weekly and monthly and tell me we have not had sustained commodity inflation anyway you measure it:


    CRB weekly


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/CR/W


    CRB monthly


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/CR/M


    Now that we have seen we have had nothing but commodity inflation in this country the past few years, let us look at the other good news of the day. The trade deficit narrowed more than expected. So what if was the second largest on record and an unthinkable one when the Republicans took office in Washington.


    08:31 July Trade deficit narrows to $50.1B vs. consensus $51.5B
    Prior deficit revised to $55B from $55.8B.
    * * * * *


    Oops, not so fast here either. Jesse points out:


    Its always nice to be able to see the data before adjustments, especially in an election year:


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/tradedeficitnsa.gif]


    Nowhere did I hear, or read, from Wall Street or Washington the trade number was seasonally adjusted!


    Facts, facts, facts, please dispose of them. There is an election coming. There is no inflation, except if you have to buy health insurance:


    U.S. Health-Insurance Premiums Rise 11%, Study Says


    Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Health-insurance premiums paid by U.S. employers rose 11.2 percent this year, five times as fast as wages, according to a study that may reinforce voters' worries over rising medical costs.


    Rates have soared 59 percent since President George W. Bush took office in 2001, researchers at the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust said. Health insurance now costs an average of $9,950 for families and $3,695 for individuals, the survey showed. –END-


    More minor details of the manner in which the conservatives are running our government. Barry Goldwater has to be churning in his grave:


    by Walter Williams


    Federal Deficit Reality


    September 8, 2004


    U.S. Treasury Shows Actual 2003 Federal Deficit at $3.7 Trillion
    Deficit Moves Beyond Any Possible Tax Remedy
    Could U.S. Treasuries Face a Rating Downgrade?


    The U.S. government's fiscal ills have spun wildly out of control and no longer are containable within the existing system. As detailed in this article, the actual annual shortfall in U.S. government operations for fiscal year 2003 (September 30) was $3.7 trillion. Put in perspective, that means if the U.S. Treasury had seized all wages and salaries in 2003 with a 100% income tax, there still would have been a deficit! The outlook for fiscal 2004 numbers is even worse.


    ***


    For the full article by Walter Williams, go to:


    http://www.prudentbear.com/arc…mentary&content_idx=35770


    GATA’s Mike Bolser:


    Hi Bill:


    The Federal Reserve added $3 Billion in temporary open market operations and $.799 Billion in permanent open market operations today, September 10th 2004. These actions kept the repo pool well up at $56.814 Billion and still extending its gap above its all-important 30-day ma. The arrival of a permanent omo is telling. Combined with the widening distance upward from the pool's own red line moving average we can say unequivocally that this up move in the repo pool is substantive and a very strong indicator that the Fed wants the DOW to move up. Recall that just before the "Iraq War Rally" we saw a blizzard of perms (orange spheres on the lower chart scale line)...we may have seen the first of many more today. Shorting the DOW now would be financial suicide, indeed a long position is recommended especially for the October "Diamonds". Forget about a plunging DOW.



    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Repos0910.gif]



    I'm getting indications pointing to late September for a possible market moving event. This is reliable as to time but non-specific as to what is involved. So my recommendation stands to be IN your gold vehicle by early next week. The cartel is expending huge quantities of metal in what cannot be a sustainable tactic thus they are in a preparatory mode, just as we see in the repo pool. Bill calls it a market "lock-down" before the election. I think there may be more to these market preparation antics than meets the eye.


    MCDI


    The proprietary pma line for the MCDI is a straight upward tilting slope with a high R^2 value. Indeed, this R^2 value is getting higher over time as we can see by the increasing closeness of the data to a line through it. This result tells us that the Fed has set up a rising MCDI target goal and has kept to it. Forget about a plunging dollar.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/MCDI_pma.gif]



    So...IF there is to be a rising DOW and dollar how can the Fed keep gold down? In a single phrase....they can't. The rising MCDI predictor tells us that in order to keep the DIVG flat, gold would have to be continually forced down in dollar terms and this is an impossibility due to rising physical demand. Forget about falling gold. I speak always in long term view
    points and the day-to-day movement are expected to deviate (sometime by allot) but the trend goal is tightly controlled and it returns to its target.


    That leaves as the only other possibility either flat or rising gold in terms of the PM Fix. Either one of these outcomes delivers a rising DIVG, something that cartel members would adamantly demand in their inflationary or stagflationary futures.


    I continue to prefer bullion to futures and small un-hedged precious metals equities. My other position is a small Canadian natural gas firm in a special, maturing situation.


    Ivan and Ivanov


    The monster hurricane broods in the Caribbean with 160MPH winds and a whipsawing forecast path that both elates and dashes hopes. Mandatory evacs have commenced in the Keys and all of Florida is still reeling with rivers many feet above flood stage, stores out of perishables and my bank (on an 8-lane business highway) still with no power. Their huge generator roars with hot employees sweltering because they can't run their a/c for unexplained reasons, only the computers. Meanwhile, campaign photo ops pop with the political paparazzi. Local hurricane relief support has been far superior to that from the govies.


    I said yesterday to observe the coming actions of Sergei Ivanov, Russia's Defense Minister. Although the agreement announced below is significant in that it shows new Russian encroachment into Latin America just as Argentina thumbs its nose at the IMF, the real Ivanov event is yet to be seen. If the Russians act in character, Ivanov's appearance in my view, will affect the US at its weakest point.


    Russia, Chile about to sign agreement on military-tech coop.


    09.09.2004, 20.41


    http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/l…?NewsID=1232376&PageNum=0


    MOSCOW, September 9 (Itar-Tass) - Russia and Chile will sign these days an intergovernmental agreement on military-technical cooperation, Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said at the talks with his Chilean counterpart Michelle Bachelet. END


    [/B]And Russia's foreign minister is predictably on full diplomatic attack:


    West shouldn't interfere in Russia's internal affairs - Lavrov


    09.09.2004, 20.04


    http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/l…?NewsID=1232138&PageNum=0


    MOSCOW, September 9 (Itar-Tass) - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Western partners should not interfere with Russia's handling its internal affairs.


    Some countries make things difficult for Russia, "granting political asylum to terrorists, who are directly guilty of the death of people," Lavrov told reporters on Thursday. END


    Russian generals have this morning issued what must be considered as an eminent warning of assault on terrorist bases:


    http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/l…?NewsID=1235360&PageNum=0


    They have suggested that these bases are inside Georgia.


    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    For further study of the simmering Georgia/Russian conflict, the following map links to the Caucasus Region may be helpful:


    http://chechen.8m.com/cgi-bin/i/maps/caucasus_zoom_map.gif>\


    And the language distribution map which tells a great deal about the ethnic mix:


    http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/karten/kauk/kaukasm.htm



    Mike


    A reminder GATA will be throwing a luncheon at the New Orleans Investment Conference on Sunday, November 14. From GATA’s Chris Powell:


    The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee will hold a fund-raising lunch at the conclusion of the New Orleans Investment Conference: 12:30 p.m. Sunday, November 14, 2004, in the Armstrong Ballroom on the eighth floor of the New Orleans Sheraton Hotel.


    GATA's officers and researchers -- including Bill Murphy, Chris Powell, Frank Veneroso, Reginald H. Howe, Michael Bolser, James Turk, Robert K. Landis, Ed Steer, and Catherine Austin Fitts -- will attend and take questions from guests.


    Each guest will receive a bound copy of Sprott Asset Management's August 2004 report confirming GATA's work, "Not Free or Fair: The Long-Term Manipulation of the Gold Price."


    Admission will be $50, there will be a cash bar, and reservations are required.


    To reserve a place, contact GATA Secretary/Treasurer Chris Powell by e-mail at GATAComm@aol.com or by U.S. mail at 7 Villa Louisa Road, Manchester,
    CT 06043-7541 USA.


    Some feedback on Dan Norcini’s latest and on that of so many other superb Café contributors:


    Hi, Bill!


    Are you as incredulous as I am at the quality of work being produced in the past couple weeks by commentators on the financial system, especially as it relates to gold and the dollar? It seems that a number of people are finding a way to consolidate all they have learned over the past years into essays that are simply brilliant. And I sense that the work is being produced out of a sense of urgency. That the authors believe it is now or never to get the ideas down in a way that teaches, informs, clarifies, before you-know-what really hits the fan.


    I'm not trying to get my name published again by here including my response to Dan Norcini's latest!!! Its just my way of letting you know that this vehicle you have created for dialogue (the Cafe) is simply the best, and a way to say thank you for having had the idea and bringing it to life.
    Terry


    Could we possibly making a dent with the venerable Mr. Richard Russell and his views on market manipulation? From his commentary this evening:


    Just a thought -- Wall Street and the Republicans have a huge stake in what the stock market does between now and election time. I've noticed that every time the Dow begins to weaken, buying comes into the S&P futures, and then the Dow firms up as does the rest of the market.


    Is it possible that large interests via buying through Morgan Stanley or Goldman or Merrill or some banks are moving to keep the market from falling? I've never been a big believer in market manipulation, but I must say I'm becoming suspicious as I watch the action day after day.


    Also, with volume running low it's becoming very easy to buy a batch of S&P futures and thereby keep the stock market on the plus side. Damn, it just happened again near the close. Just a thought, dear subscribers, just a thought.


    But in the end, I'm better off just trusting my PTI, rather than having nasty manipulation thoughts.


    -END-

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    The John Brimelow Report


    Friday, September 10, 2004


    Surprise! A seller around


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $6.83, PM $6.53, with world gold at $$400.10 and $400.40. Ample for legal imports. Commercial confidence seems to rebuilding in India. The stock market closed at a 4-month high, and industrial output was reported today to be running 6.6% above last year. India is lending powerful support to world gold at these prices.


    TOCOM is little interested. Volume slipped 23% to equal only 13,357 Comex lots. The active contract closed up 6 yen, and open interest edged up the equivalent of 110 Comex contracts to equal 80,133 Comex. World gold stood 90c higher than the NY close at the end. (NY yesterday traded 31,980 contracts. Open interest rose 1,331 to 247,918 lots.)


    As Refco Research gloomily predicted when opting to try a silver long yesterday, the resurfacing of "bank selling" in gold combined with the rough time Western longs have had in recent weeks has intimidated speculators. Barclays acknowledged this today:


    "The market is going to be wary today ahead of the US trade deficit and producer prices data releases... Given the current selling pressure, we expect dollar positive data to have a more marked (negative) impact on the gold price than a dollar negative (and hence gold positive) set of data." (JB italics)



    And indeed gold is up only half of what the dollar’s move implies.


    This will make the consistent buyers in the Middle East and India very happy.


    JB

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com



    September 10 - Gold $401.50 up $3.60 – Silver $6.13 down 1 cent


    Euro Roars On Statements By Fed's Yellin; Cartel Caps Gold Rally As Usual


    Zitat

    Start buying gold now, regardless of the price. By acting now, you will not have to react when it's too late. Too late will be when the majority of the public finally figures out what is happening to paper money and frantically tries to get aboard. Remember, if you're one of the ones holding paper in the end, you will have given away your products and services for nothing...Robert Ringer


    GO GATA!!!!



    Around 5 CDT last night, the following hit the newswire tapes:


    Stable dollar may mean bigger deficit-Fed's Yellen


    SEATTLE, Sept 9 (Reuters) - If the dollar's value remains steady, the record U.S. current account deficit will widen over the long run, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Janet Yellen said on Thursday.

    "It seems to me over the very long term ... that with the dollar remaining roughly where it is relative to other currencies, this trend is likely to continue to exacerbate, to go from five percent (of gross domestic product) current account deficits to higher levels," she said.
    In June the trade deficit soared to a record high $55.82 billion, underscoring the huge U.S. demand for foreign products as well as its reliance on foreign capital to fund consumption.
    Yellen, responding to questions after a speech at a Fed-sponsored luncheon, said financing the massive deficit means borrowing from abroad, adding: "Ultimately escalating borrowing over a matter of decades is an unsustainable trend."

    While Yellen said she was discussing a 10- to 20-year horizon for the deficits and the dollar, "I believe that (the current account deficit) has to turn around and has to involve the dollar."


    -END—


    The euro immediately rose 43 points and gold followed suit rising $1 to $2 as the evening wore on. Of course what Yellen had to say was obvious to all of us, however, to see a Fed official come out like this (especially saying what she really thought in an off-the-cuff comment in response to a question) made an impact on the currency crowd.


    Coming into the Comex opening, gold firmed an extra $1 and still met its $3 higher opening call. Going into a major report such as the trade deficit, this was very unusual action for gold and most welcome. That led me to wonder what the cabal would come up with to counter surprise action such as this. It did not take long, as usual, to find out.


    The cash euro, which closed 40+ points higher last evening than the CME traded vehicle due to the Yellin comments, came in around unchanged ahead of the trade deficit number. Upon release of the number it fell about 30 points, crept back up, and then exploded. In a free traded market gold would have done the same and have run with the euro. Instead, gold dipped and then was capped $3 higher (right where it opened) as the euro took off. Later on, gold was allowed to make a marginal ho-hum 50-cent new high.


    FOR THE WEEK, the euro rallied from around 120.66 to 122.65 with a 123.10 high. Gold? It managed to gain a whopping 80 cents, thanks to the corrupt shenanigans of The Gold Cartel who continues to fleece YOU – day in, day out; week in, week out; month, month out; year in, year out; decade in, decade out; millenium in, millenium out!


    Here are the euro and gold weekly charts, which will give you some idea of the extent of the price-capping (usually updated early Friday night):


    Gold


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/GD/W


    Euro


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/EC/W


    If you are sick and tired of this nonsense (crap), contact your gold company whom you are invested in and ask them if they have read the Sprott Report. If they have not, demand they do so. If they agree with Sprott, ask them what are they going to do about it. If they disagree, then insist they you give detailed reasons WHY and in writing. If you do nothing when presented with this marvelous opportunity to shake up and wake up gold producer CEO's, you deserve to be miserable with your gold and silver investments.


    You can find The Sprott Special Report, "NOT FREE, NOT FAIR: The Long-Term Manipulation of the Gold Price," in Adobe Acrobat format at the Sprott Internet site here:


    http://www.sprott.com/


    By day’s end the dollar fell .46 to 88.46. The dollar has formed a very narrow, but massive, wedge formation. Each time it looks as if it will break out to the upside, it turns right around. Support stopped the dollar slide today right where it should have technically at 88.14. What a move we have coming once this tug-of-war is resolved! With all the dollar has going against it these days, it is hard for me seeing any lasting dollar resolution which includes a lasting breakout to the upside.


    September dollar


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/US/94


    So the Fed’s Yellen says the dollar must come down to turn around the US’s massive deficits. Yet, the Bush Administration’s parrot, Treasury Secretary Snow, still feels compelled to role out the Wall Street mandated mantra about the US strong dollar policy – a policy in which US Treasury Secretaries have never explained how it was actually implemented in the first place. Of course, GATA knows the cornerstone of the policy was the rigging of the gold price. This is what Snow must have meant in his dollar comments yesterday. Guess we wanted to assure Wall Street and the rest of the cabal the rigging of the gold price is still one of their main priorities at the ESF and Treasury.


    Still, the inane Mr. Snow sounds like a talking bird who awoke out of a sleepy hibernation like Rip Van Winkle did, as he spouts off on the mantra demanded by Wall Street of years gone by:


    U.S. Treasury chief says backs strong dollar


    WASHINGTON, Sept 9 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow on Thursday declined to comment on a two-year downtrend in the dollar against the euro and yen and reiterated his support for a strong greenback.


    "One thing that I don't do as Treasury secretary is comment on relative values of the various currencies," Snow said in an interview on the CNBC cable television network. "But I often reiterate our policy, which is the policy of a strong dollar, a policy that we've stood behind since my first days in office." –END-


    I didn’t even blink at silver’s poor performance. How could anyone? It was like watching an actor perform the same role in the same SCRIPTED play. With gold moving up along with the weaker dollar, The Gold Cartel kept to its own script of minimizing precious metals markets excitement by sitting all over silver. Seen this drill a hundred times. Besides, silver tends to act as a Lone Ranger. When it is really going to move, it will have nothing to do with the dollar. It has always been this way over the years. It was a piece of cake for cabal forces to take silver down this session with gold putting in a fair rally.


    The gold open interest fell 1321 contracts to 247,918. The silver open interest continues to really disappear as it dropped another 1144 contracts to 82,613.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/fi/main4.gif]


    http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040910/105388_1.html


    Press Release Source: Bema Gold Corporation


    Bema Arranges CDN$5 Million Non-Brokered Flow Through Private Placement


    Friday September 10, 2:06 pm ET


    VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 10, 2004--Bema Gold Corporation (AMEX: BGO - News; TSX: BGO - News; AIM: BAU) is pleased to announce that it has arranged a non-brokered flow through private placement. Subject to regulatory approval, Bema will issue 1,250,000 flow through shares at a price of $4.00 per share for gross proceeds of $5 million. The shares are priced at 27.4 % percent premium to yesterday's closing price of $3.14. Proceeds from this financing will be used for exploration at the high-grade Monument Bay gold property in northeastern Manitoba.
    All dollar figures are stated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.


    On Behalf of BEMA GOLD CORPORATION


    Clive T. Johnson, Chairman, C.E.O., & President


    Bema Gold Corporation trades on The Toronto Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange. Symbol: BGO. Bema shares also trade on the London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment Market(AIM). Symbol: BAU.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/fi/main4.gif]


    http://biz.yahoo.com/cnw/040910/river_gold_update_1.html


    Press Release Source: River Gold Mines Ltd.



    River Gold Mines Ltd. - Update


    Friday September 10, 3:39 pm ET


    TORONTO, Sept. 10 /CNW/ - River Gold Mines Ltd. has decided to restrict the scope of the underground exploration and development at the Mishi-Magnacon project and redeploy manpower and equipment to its Eagle River mine where development at depth has opened up significant lengths of above average grade ore in two new zones.
    The Mishi-Magnacon workings will remain dewatered. We will continue mine planning work and conduct underground delineation drilling on the F and G zones. The fifth level exploration drift and the test stoping component of the program have been postponed.


    Higher costs due to soaring energy, fuel and materials costs coupled with unfavourable exchange rate fluctuations seem to be here to stay. In order to cope with these realities, we have initiated a transition to conventional, selective mining methods and track mining at Eagle River. In an ever tightening manpower market, it is critical that we employ our talent and resources to effect this transition at our core asset.


    The two deepest levels developed to date at the Eagle River mine have been very encouraging. As recently announced, drifting on the 540 metre level on the new 818 zone opened a 163.4 metre length grading 12.0 gAu/tonne with an average thickness of 2.2 metres. This is a quartz-carbonate hydrothermal breccia with high assays cut to 60 gAu/tonne. On the 580 metre level, drifting on the 650 zone opened up a 127 metre length grading 20.62 gAu/tonne with an average thickness of 2.1 metres. The 650 zone is composed of a laminated quartz shear vein and sheeted quartz veinlet zones with high assays cut to 140 gAu/tonne. Both these zones remain open at depth. A track haulage drift currently being established on the 580 metre level will enable us to drill test the depth projections of these zones to at least 700 metres.


    Although exploration results to date at Magnacon have been disappointing, we continue to believe the Mishi-Magnacon complex offers excellent potential to provide significant future incremental millfeed given reasonable gold prices.


    River Gold Mines Ltd. intends to meet its production forecast of 70,000 ounces for 2004. Going forward we forecast more profitable production at similar rates and a continuing trend of reserve replacement.


    The qualified person as defined by NI-43-101 responsible for compilation and interpretation of geoscientific data released here is G.N. Mannard, P.Geo., Vice-President, Exploration. Drifting results are based on length weighted face chip sampling at 3 metre intervals along the drifts. Assays are performed in-house, employing conventional fire assay techniques on one assay ton aliquots. Cutting factors are determined from grade-frequency histograms of large, unbiased sample populations reconciled to millhead grades.


    River Gold Mines Ltd. trades on the TSX Exchange under the symbol "RIV" and has 42 million shares outstanding. Comprehensive disclosure and corporate information can be found on our website http://www.rivergoldmine.com and on sedar http://www.sedar.com


    http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/orgDisplay.cgi?okey=40931


    For further information


    Murray H. Pollitt, P. Eng., President, River Gold Mines Ltd. at Telephone (416) 360-3743, Fax (416) 360-7620

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.mineweb.net/pics/logo.gif]


    http://www.mineweb.net/sections/gold_silver/346616.htm


    DRD’s R30 million job cut


    By: Gareth Tredway


    Posted: '10-SEP-04 10:00' GMT © Mineweb 1997-2004


    JOHANNESBURG (Mineweb.com) -- Durban Roodepoort Deep, the South African and Australasian gold producer, said on Friday that as many a 2,000 jobs would be cut at its Blyvooruitzicht gold mine at a cost of about R30 million or approximately $4.5 million at present.


    The company says that agreements were concluded with unions this week in terms of a Section 189, or 60-day review notice that started at the end of June.


    “The intention is to reduce overheads immediately and return the mine to breakeven and then to, at most, R80,000/kg,” said the company in a statement. The idea is that Blyvoor’s gold production costs should be cut to no more than R80,000/kg.


    According to DRD, the unions have given a six-month undertaking not to disrupt the normal operations of the company in any way.


    One union official said he was unsure how DRD had got to the R30 million figure, because it has not been decided which workers would leave yet. “The agreement states that workers that are retrenched will get two weeks salary for each year of service,” he said.


    Blyvoor produced 51,087 ounces, or 22.4 percent of DRD’s 228,465 total ounces produced in this year’s quarter to end-June. During the June quarter gold was produced at a cash cost of R99,922/kg at the mine, way above the R85,804/kg average at which the gold was sold.