Beiträge von ThaiGuru

    Dann noch diesen Hammer von Gold bullischer Meldung!!!


    Meldungen von Gold Fields Mineral Service, GFMS, haben in der etablierten Finanzwelt einen grossen Stellenwert, und haben praktisch auch offiziellen Charakter.


    Wer danach mittel-, oder langfristig immer noch Risiken, oder Gefahren in einem physischen Engagement in Gold sehen kann, dem ist nichts mehr zu entgegnen.


    Man sollte nicht nur über Gold, oder Silber diskutieren, sonden auch etwas davon kaufen!


    Die Zeit dazu scheint langsam knapp zu werden, zumindest zu den heutigen Tiefpreisen.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.busrep.co.za/site/2…es/banner/site_header.gif]


    http://www.busrep.co.za/index.…fSectionId=613&fSetId=304


    Thursday 16th September


    INTERNATIONAL

    Gold prices may increase, says GFMS

    September 16, 2004


    By Laura Humble


    London - Gold prices in 2005 might rise close to the 15-year high of $431.05 an ounce reached in April as the dollar weakened because of record US budget and trade deficits, GFMS, a London-based precious metals research group, said yesterday.


    Gold was fixed at $404.45 (about R2 620) an ounce in London yesterday afternoon.


    GFMS forecast in a report that the average price would be $407 an ounce in the second half of this year, kept above $390 by jewellery demand and a drop in sales by central banks and other institutions. Prices would probably rise after the US presidential election in November.


    Zitat

    "We expect concerns to grow that the status quo is untenable," said Philip Klapwijk, GFMS's managing director.


    Zitat

    "This could easily trigger a surge in gold investment."


    Prices might exceed $430 as a weakening dollar prompted investors to buy gold to hedge against further declines in US assets, Klapwijk said.


    A lower dollar also makes dollar-denominated gold cheaper to buy with other currencies. Gold rose 20 percent in 2003 as the dollar fell that much against the euro. Gold has fallen 2.4 percent this year amid speculation that the Federal Reserve would boost its benchmark interest rate, bolstering the dollar.


    Gold for immediate delivery has traded at an average price of about $400 an ounce in London since June 30, down from $401.49 in the first half.


    A victory for Democratic challenger John Kerry over President George W Bush in the US presidential election might accelerate the dollar's decline, GFMS said.


    Zitat

    "A Kerry victory could act as a catalyst," GFMS said. "Either way, a market depreciation in the dollar and an expected surge in gold investment look likely to take place as both deficits have continued to balloon."



    The US current account deficit, which measures trade and investments, grew to $166.2 billion in the second quarter. And the congressional budget office forecast last week that the federal budget deficit would reach $422 billion in the year ending on September 30.


    The US needs to attract about $1.8 billion a day to finance the current account deficit and keep the value of the dollar steady.


    Official sector gold sales might fall about 30 percent in the second half of 2004 from a year earlier, the same as in the first six months, GFMS said.


    The European Central Bank and 14 other central banks, which agreed in March to cap sales until the end of 2005, might sell less than their total limit of 500 tons a year.


    Net gold sales by the banks totalled 81 tons in the second quarter, GFMS said in July.


    Demand from fabricators, including jewellers, was expected to grow faster in the second half than the 7 percent pace of the first, GFMS said. Mine production would probably drop 1 percent after a 7 percent decline in the first half.


    Implied net disinvestment, or estimated selling by speculators, would probably decline to 65 tons from 143 tons in the first half as gold prices started to rise.


    Mining companies would probably buy back about 200 tons of gold previously sold forward, close to the 209 tons repurchased in the first half.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.interfax.ru/img/e_logo.gif]


    http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/0/26.html?id_issue=10703253


    Finance & Business


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sep 16 2004 10:51AM


    Russia's gold, forex reserves at $90 bln on September 10
    MOSCOW. September 16 (Interfax) - Russia's gold and foreign currency reserves were at $90 billion on September 10, up from $89.1 billion on September 3, the Central Bank said in a press release Thursday.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/imagesv3/v4/masthead/tgam.gif]


    http://www.theglobeandmail.com…ick0916/BNStory/Business/


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://images.theglobeandmail.…esv3/headers/Business.gif]


    POSTED AT 10:48 PM EDT Wednesday, Sep 15, 2004


    Barrick Gold ratings put under review

    By WENDY STUECK


    Vancouver — Barrick Gold Corp.'s massive mine-building program has prompted one debt rating agency to put the company's ratings under review for a possible downgrade, reflecting the billions that will be poured into the projects.


    Moody's Investors Service said Tuesday that it has placed about $500-million (U.S.) of Barrick's long-term debt under review. The senior unsecured debentures currently have an A3 investment grade rating.


    In a statement, Moody's said the review would focus on Barrick's mine development plan over the next five years. Barrick is building four new mines and in July said it would also develop the Pascua-Lama deposit, which straddles the border between Chile and Argentina.


    The five projects are expected to cost about $2.6-billion over the next five years.


    Moody's said it would consider the risks of completing all five mines on time and on budget and would also look at the company's changing geographic risk profile.


    Along with Pascua-Lama, Barrick is building the Veladero mine in Argentina, Lagunas Norte in Peru, Cowal in Australia and Tulawaka in Tanzania. Currently, about 60 per cent of its production comes from North American operations.


    Moody's said it would also consider the impact of various gold-price scenarios on Barrick's revenue in the light of the company's decision to stop hedging, or selling forward, gold production.


    Once a big supporter of hedging strategies, Barrick last year said it would not enter any new hedge contracts and would reduce the amount of gold already committed under existing hedge agreements.


    There can be a cost to closing out hedge commitments if the prices set in those agreements do not reflect market conditions. In July, when Barrick announced its second-quarter results, it reported a $26-million “opportunity cost” from selling gold at prices that were below the average spot price during the period.


    The gold price has climbed over the past three years and reached 15-year highs in January. London-based consulting firm GFMS said this week it anticipates an average of $407 an ounce for the rest of the year.


    Barrick said it reduced its gold position by 850,000 ounces in the second quarter, leaving 84 per cent of its reserves unhedged.


    As well as expanding in Latin America and in Africa, Barrick is keeping an eye on Russia, where it acquired an interest last year through an investment in London-listed Highland Gold Mining Ltd. Highland has assets in Russia.


    Barrick, along with many other major gold producers, has been named as a potential bidder for the Sukhoi Log deposit in Russia.


    Reuters reported Wednesday that the Russian government had decided to put off a tender for the deposit and said the government might limit foreign participation.


    Barrick spokesman Vince Borg said Wednesday that Barrick's interest will be determined by the price and conditions set for the deposit.


    “Whenever [Russia] decides on terms of the auction or the process, we'll be there and assess it and determine whether or not we're interested.”


    Regarding the Moody's review, Mr. Borg said Barrick is embarking on an ambitious expansion program that will have an impact on the company's finances, so a review is not surprising. Barrick has the only A-rated balance sheet in the gold mining sector, he added.


    Barrick shares fell 27 cents to $25.37 (Canadian) on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Wednesday.

    Eine weitere Gold bullische Meldung!


    Ob da wohl endlich Gold Bullion Banken gemerkt haben, dass die Nachfrage nach physischem Gold wahrscheinlich schon sehr bald nicht mehr befriedigt werden kann, wenn Gold weiterhin so begeehrt ist, und immer weiger davon neu gefördert werden kann?


    Oder ist es nur ein erster Schritt, die Menschen darauf vorzubereiten, was da in Sachen Goldversorgung auf uns in riesen Schritten zukommen wird.


    Diese für Gold Bugs so bullische Meldung stammt von ABC News, doch wer der Verfasser dieser Meldung ist, danach sucht man leider bei ABC News Online vergeblich.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru



    [Blockierte Grafik: http://abc.net.au/news/img/newsbanner_left.gif]


    http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200409/s1200317.htm


    Last Update: Thursday, September 16, 2004. 10:37am (AEST)


    Gold investment hits $8billion


    A new survey has found gold industry investment has reached $8 billion for the first time in the survey's history.


    The Australian Gold Council conducted the survey and says it is a 5 per cent increase on last year's figures.


    The survey also shows regional areas will benefit from most of the investment.


    The Gold Council's Tamara Gorrie says the rise reflects a sharp increase in operational activities, with only a small portion of investment going into exploration.


    Ms Gorrie says although the outlook for gold is positive, the lack of investment in exploration is very concerning.


    "Exploration is the industry's future. Without exploration it doesn't have a future," she said.


    Zitat

    "It's the randd [research and development] of the industry and we must simply devote more resources to exploration. More money must go into the ground to find the mines that will sustain the gold sector into the future."

    Wiso nicht gleich das physische Palladium zum Kauf empfehlen, ohne Stop Loss Risiko, und ohne Laufzeitbeschränkung, und vor allem mit bedeutend weniger Verlust Risiko


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://80.239.136.196/user/wkn/logopur.png]


    http://80.239.136.196/news/columns/view.m?news_id=960885


    Palladium - das vergessene Edelmetall?

    10:16 16.09.04


    Palladium – das vergessene Edelmetall?


    Palladium ist ein Edelmetall, das sehr oft in einem Atemzug mit dem
    bekannteren Platin genannt wird. Aktuell führt es bezogen auf die
    Kursperformance der letzten Monate eher ein Schattendasein. Doch dies könnte sich schon sehr bald wieder ändern. Besonders interessant in diesem Zusammenhang sind aktuelle Berichte über die vermuteten Palladium-Bestände des russischen Edelmetallgiganten Norilsk Nickel (ISIN US46626D1081/ WKN 676683) , der auch als einer der größten Produzenten weltweit aufgeführt wird.


    Nach Kalkulationen des renommierten russischen Researchunternehmens RENAISSANCE CAPITAL dürfte Norilsk Nickel aktuell knapp 3 Millionen Feinunzen Palladium als jährliche eigene Produktion hervorbringen. Aktuelle inoffizielle Schätzungen gehen außerdem von Gesamtreserven des Unternehmens von 163 Millionen Feinunzen Palladium aus. Dagegen liegen weiterhin die noch
    vorhandenen Lagerbestände im Dunkeln. Gerüchten zufolge könnten noch bis zu 270 Millionen Feinunzen Palladium zum Jahresende 2003 im Eigentum des russischen Metallgiganten gewesen sein. Ein Unternehmenssprecher behauptet hingegen, dass die Gesellschaft keine Lagerbestände mehr besitzen würde.


    Sollte diese Aussage sich bestätigen, dürften Spekulanten erneut das lange vernachlässigte Edelmetall neu entdecken. Aufgrund der Marktenge wäre eine Kursexplosion wie vor ca. 5 Jahren denkbar. Damals erreichte Palladium einen Höchststand von weit über 1.000 US$ je Feinunze.


    Auch aus technischer Sicht befindet sich Palladium vor einem möglichen
    Ausbruch. Nachdem wir in den letzten Wochen mehrmals Intraday die 200 US$ Marke nach unten getestet haben, sollte schon sehr bald ein Sprung über die wichtige Marke bei 220 US$ unternommen werden. Mehrere technische Indikatoren befinden sich zusätzlich im überverkauften Bereich. Wir erwarten daher eine deutliche Kursbewegung innerhalb der nächsten zwei Wochen.


    Aufgrund der aufgeführten fundamentalen und technischen Gründe bietet sich ein Engagement im Palladium an.


    Als Aktie dürfte North American Palladium (ISIN CA6569121024/ WKN 858 071), der größte unabhängige nordamerikanische Palladiumproduzent in den Blickpunkt der Investoren geraten. Insgesamt steht hier aber eine sehr kleine Produktion hohen finanziellen Risiken gegenüber. Somit dürfte die Aktie, die durchaus eine gewisse Übernahmephantasie aufweist, nur für Anleger mit guten Nerven geeignet sein. Als Alternative dazu kann auch die Aktie von Norilsk Nickel als solide Depotbeimischung ausgewählt werden. Zu beachten ist hierbei, dass der Anleger in ein Konglomerat mit diversen Investments und Produktionsbereichen im Gold-, Palladium- und Nickelbereich
    investiert.


    Völlig andere Möglichkeiten eröffnen die Zertifikate und Call-
    Optionsscheine von ABN Amro die mit unterschiedlichen Basispreisen und Laufzeiten ausgestattet sind. Ein Beispiel hierzu wäre die deutsche WKN 198200. Es handelt sich hierbei um ein MINI LONG Zertifikat. Der Basispreis von 174 und die Stop-Loss Marke von 192 lassen klar auf ein
    Spekulationspapier mit sehr hohem Risiko aber auch einem fast fünffachen Hebel auf die Preisentwicklung des eher matten Edelmetalls schließen.


    Genauere Informationen finden Sie im Internet unter http://www.abn-zertifikate.de.


    Redaktion GOLDINVEST.de daily
    ......................................


    info@goldinvest.de
    http://www.goldinvest.de





    Hinweis: ARIVA.DE veröffentlicht in dieser Rubrik Analysen, Kolumnen und Nachrichten aus verschiedenen Quellen. Verantwortlich für den Inhalt ist allein der jeweilige Autor.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULTATION WATCH


    The gold shares have been trading like many of the other markets. Each time they are in position to break out, they go the other way. The XAU fell 1.25 to 93.45 and the HUI lost 2.99 to 205.35.


    There are just so many times I can point out the gold fundamentals are "10+++++." Only the increasingly desperate antics of The Gold Cartel have kept gold and silver from really taking off. Our sources told us the physical market would be very firm this week because of the buying they knew was going to hit the market. This is just what we have seen. We are getting to the point where both gold and silver should finally come in sharply higher one morning and then run!


    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    MIDAS


    Appendix


    Bill,


    Its time to vent, a healthy exercise I’m told!


    D Gartman’s sly effort to diffuse interest in Mr Embry’s (et al) fine work is simply disingenuous. In my opinion its the type of stuff that ends up on the bottom of a birdcage by the next day. His attempt to disqualify the reports conclusions by focusing the reader on words like "conspiracy" and "monitoring", while evading the responsibility of objectively evaluating the presented evidence is to embrace mediocrity as one would the return of a prodigal son!


    His supplication that we should accept his written excrement as sufficient to render the report impotent is also pathetic;


    "We've not the time to go on this morning, and although our case is perhaps not made with the same sheer volume that the Sprott report has weighed in with, we trust it is made.


    Conspiracies rarely exist, and when they do, they are far more often than not exposed."


    If Mr Gartman doesn’t have the time to do a professional job, well then, just don’t do it. John Embry et al deserve much better than this! As far as conspiracies rarely existing, he must have really bit his tongue to get that one out. 5000 years of monetary history is replete with conspiracies to dislodge the most basic human freedoms of "honest weights and measures". To quote a wise man; "there is nothing new under the sun".


    What about the tobacco industry’s debacle? Which, after much travail became the focus of billions of dollars of legal settlements etc. Finally one lone scientist came forward, risking his life, to reveal that the industries long standing agenda had been to craft an evermore addicting "nicotine delivery unit" to increase/enhance addictions and expand company profits! All to the detriment of millions of unsuspecting consumers.


    I do agree with Mr Gartman that these "hidden agendas" are eventually exposed. Sometimes it just takes awhile for enough people to risk vacating their comfort zone to apply the pressures necessary to germinate changes. John Embry and GATA have been pushing the wagon (of truth) up the hill (of media negligence/wall street complicity) for years and I believe that they will succeed in exposing one of the longest most comprehensive efforts to "frock-up fiat" as true wealth as the world has ever seen.


    Ok I feel a little better now.


    Before I go, just one more thing relating to the IR responding exploration CEO. Another industry giant, John Hathaway wrote an excellent essay several years ago entitled; "Investment case for Gold". In which he argued strongly that exploring for gold was basically, all things considered, an unprofitable economic exercise if gold continued south of $400 per ounce. The inherent industry risks associated with gold exploration demand a greater reward (price north of $425, if I remember correctly) in order to justify and attract the savvy investor. I would think that this would be a reasonable concern/issue for all exploration entrepreneurs. No one wants to waste their supporter’s capital savings on fruitless endeavours, do they?


    Wow, I’ve preached myself happy!
    Chow,
    Buena Fe


    Sept. 15/04


    Open Letter to Mr. Dennis Gartman;


    Rereading your commentary last night left me a little more than saddened. There was I time when I actually had quite a bit of respect for you. Given your comments about conspiracies, I thought it would be only fitting for you to offer your two cents worth on this - should be right up your alley. Since you to cite what you describe as a lack of "credible" references, please do tell us all if Harvard University is credible enough for you. Harvard Watch, in case you don’t know, is a group of academics who were formed ostensibly to be the conscience of the ultra secretive Harvard Corporation (whose 7 members just happen to include Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin and up until recently Pug Winokur). If you know all this Dennis, you can skip this part but excuse me, I’m just going to include the details for those who haven’t yet found the time to read up on it.


    You see, the Harvard Corporation administers the not for profit 21 billion dollar Harvard Endowment Fund. The largest such pool of capital this side of the Roman Catholic Church. This fund has been intimately linked to such financial fiascos as Bush/Harken Energy and Enron/California energy debacle. When the Harvard Watch did their own investigations, here are a few snippets of what they found. In addition to giving guidance (such as choosing outside money managers) to Harvard’s 21 billion dollar Endowment fund, Pug Winokur was the Chairman of Enron’s audit committee. At the same time one of the Endowment Fund’s biggest outside money managers happens to be Highfields Capital. This is basically a hedge fund run by John Jacobson – a former member of the seven-man Harvard Corp. He left the Corp. in 1996 with 500 million of Harvard money to start his own financial advisory/absolute return fund. According to Harvard University 1999 tax returns Highfields topped the pay list of advisories at 30 million in management fees for the year. In fact Highfields did so well making money for Harvard, the Harv[/B]ard Magazine was crowing about the job they did and they reportedly handle 2 billion or more of their funds now.


    Now Mr. Gartman, I know you don’t think too much about the existence of conspiracies, but you better get a clothes pin and plug your nose cause this story starts to stink a whole lot more. I’ll bet you will never guess how Highfields made their astonishing returns for Harvard? This long/short fund only had 3 equity shorts (put options). Enron just happened to be the biggest – and the Enron short was 47 times the size of the next biggest short. Now Mr. Gartman, revelation of facts like this by a concerned group of Harvard academic folks - scholarly reporting the actions of their University’s own money managers (who answer to nobody) probably wouldn’t make you bat an eyelash. No guilt was ever found implicating Mr. Winokur or Highfields Mr. Gartman. Highfields 5000 foot homerun simply gets chalked up to "pure brilliance".


    Also Mr. Gartman, in case you were not aware; Enron funded research centers at Harvard. This (allegedly objective) research was instrumental in legitimating energy deregulation and defending energy industry monoliths against assertions of price manipulation. Nothing stinky here eh Dennis?


    It does appear, however Dennis, that Mr. Winokur sufficiently spread an aroma about the doings of Harvard that his presence was no longer required and he resigned his post to make room for none other than Mr. Robert Rubin. Here’s a snippet of the statement the Harvard Watch published regarding the changing of the guard.


    "Winokur's departure from the Corporation, however, represents only a first step in cutting Harvard's ties to Enron. There remain multiple Harvard research initiatives funded by and effectively functioning for Enron and its executives. Notable examples include the Harvard Electric Policy Group, the Belfer Center, and the Winokur Public Policy Fund. Moreover, the Harvard Corporation's remaining members include several Enron insiders. D. Ronald Daniel, for instance, was Jeffrey Skilling's boss at McKinsey during the 1980s, when Skilling consulted with Enron to design the energy giant's unsustainable business model. Because of the work of Daniel and Skilling, McKinsey is now a defendant in the largest suit against Enron. Moreover, it is remarkably telling that just as the university prepares to bid farewell to one of the Enron club, it has already announced the entry of another one. Robert Rubin, the Corporation's latest addition, is a director of Citigroup, Enron's largest creditor. Rubin attempted to obtain a Federal bailout for Enron as it approached collapse-while its top executives cashed in on Enron's falling stock and drained the pension funds of thousands of their employees"


    So I guess, in the end, you are probably right Mr. Gartman. The notion that there "may" be improprieties occurring and the fact that there "are/is" improprieties occurring are two completely different matters. We can all rest assured knowing that there are people like you out there always ready and willing to bring acts of malfeasance and wrong doings to our attention Dennis. I’m certain Harvard Watch’s academic research is sorely lacking just like John Embry’s and Andrew Hepburn’s doesn’t meet your high standard Mr. Gartman. We certainly know that Enron, like the Fed - watched, monitored and studied the markets they operated in Mr. Gartman. If you understood the relevance and importance of scholarly research, you would have already reported all of this to us in good faith. Too bad you didn’t.


    best,
    Rob Kirby

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULTATION WATCH


    GATA’s evidence of gold price manipulation is overwhelming and conclusive. My assessment that US financial markets are in lockdown/prop up mode is only a hunch. Why the hunch:


    *Every time the dollar is about to break down, it rallies mysteriously for no apparent reason.


    *Every time the US stock market is about to be really trashed, it rallies for no apparent reason.


    *US interest rate vehicles keep flipping and flopping.


    *Gold has not been allowed to take out the $410 area all summer.


    My analysis tells me The Working Group on Financial Markets (PPT) has instructions to keep the markets quiet and copacetic until the election is over. Of course, they would like the DOW to soar, but that is easier said (wished for) than done.


    The US economic news of the day, which was anything but robust:


    08:30 September Empire Manufacturing reported 28.3 vs. consensus 20
    Prior reading revised to 13.22 from 12.57.
    * * * * *
    08:30 July Business Inventories reported 0.9% vs. consensus 0.8%
    Prior reading revised to 1.1% from 0.9%.
    * * * * *


    09:15 Aug. Industrial Production reported 0.1% vs. consensus 0.5%; Cap. Utilization 77.3% vs. consensus 77.4%
    Prior Indus. Production revised to 0.6% from 0.4%; prior Capacity Utilization revised to 77.3% from 77.1%.
    * * * * *


    10:31 API reports crude oil inventories (2.3M) barrels
    Distillate inventories (136K) barrels, while gasoline inventories rose 685K barrels. Oct. WTI crude at $44.90.
    * * * * *



    10:30 DOE reports crude oil inventories (7.1M) barrels vs. expectations (1.5M) barrels Gasoline inventories reported (1.6M) barrels vs. consensus (1.0M) barrels. Distillate inventories reported +1.7M barrels vs. consensus +1.0M barrels.
    * * * * *


    The oil inventory numbers were a big surprise. Between Ivan the Terrible and the sizeable inventory drops, oil bears were sent scurrying early but came back with a vengeance later on. Sort of weird, I must say, considering what the hurricane might stir up. Crude closed at $43.58 after trading as high as $45.15 per barrel.


    GATA’s Mike Bolser:


    Hi Bill:


    The Fed added $7 Billion in repos today September 15th 2004, an action that kept the repo pool extremely high and rising at $60.814 billion. The pool's red line moving average is turning even higher and slowly dragging the DOW up with it. Note the DOW data points ABOVE its green ma line. If there are more than 30 of them the ma will turn farther up with each new point above the line and than condition is what we are beginning to see, albeit slowly.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/repos0915.gif]


    Tomorrow will bring a huge $26.5 Billion expiration in repos and IF the Fed adds a load more to off set then expiration the primary dealers will have an intra-day bonus of funds that could top $80 Billion. Look for some fireworks either in the DOW or some other strategic commodity.


    The brilliant Dennis Gartmen's "review" of John Embry and Andrew Hepburn's summary report failed to mention my work. I am crestfallen! My work must be so toxic to the gold cartel that they tell their attack dog du jour to ignore I altogether. And I went to the trouble of ordering a special autograph pen made just for Dennis's copy. Oh well, maybe next time.


    DIVG


    Numerical guidance suggests that the preferred path is slightly up during this transition phase. There is good agreement between my pma models and a very low probability of any meaningful down turn in the near future. The fed has spent a load of bullion whipsawing the market since May17th with an absolute low being set on August 17th. We are now on the rebound but at a mini plateau, appearing perhaps, to be a stair step.


    Certain moving averages of the DIVG show the absence of randomness to an undeniable magnitude. It is this fact alone that demolishes gold cartel denials of intervention.. We know it is important because the Fed altered their historical MCDI data in a feeble attempt to hide the relationships in the DIVG. Oh yes...one more thing. The 93 years (1878-1971) of formal gold standard price fixing...perhaps Mr. Gartman forgot? And what about the $3.9 Billion in annual US cotton subsidies? Gartman's street genius would posit that $3.9 Billion isn't market intervention either. And then the lumber tariff...and so on. None of it is market intervention, according to the "logic" of Dennis Gartman.


    The WA looms and the Fed continues to be under interest rate pressure so the powder is loaded for some action going into the election.


    Banca D'Italia's last official gold reserve report was their 2003 Annual Report and on page 309 we see their gold tonnage was listed as 2,452 tonnes. Of that amount, we have no reliable method to determine how much has already been lent away as a "gold receivable" and is therefore, effectively unrecoverable. Time will tell if they truly opt out of the gold cartel's terminal selling frenzy.


    As mentioned yesterday the mainstream press has been silent on the obvious hurricane economic damage. Today the UK's Independent finally chimed in:


    Hurricane onslaught may blow hole in US economy


    By David Usborne in New York
    15 September 2004
    http://news.independent.co.uk/…tory=561787&host=3&dir=70


    As hurricane Ivan roared northwards yesterday through the Gulf of Mexico towards landfall in the US as early as this evening, Wall Street analysts warned that the damage could extend into the wider economy.


    It has been 40 years since three serious hurricanes struck the US in a season and the economic impact on this occasion could be marked. Most experts predict a storm-related drop-off in GDP figures in the third and fourth quarters.


    After increasing by $1.40 a barrel on Monday, oil prices were again rising yesterday, in part because of interrupted production. About a quarter of US oil and natural gas production is in the Gulf of Mexico. Most rigs and platforms have been evacuated.


    David Kotok, the chief investment adviser at Cumberland Advisors, said that if Florida was hit by a third storm it would be felt across the US. Florida is the fourth-biggest state in terms of population and economic production. "In 2004, we are going to pay for the shock," he said. Agriculture, tourism and property development were predicted to be worst hit.


    Hurricanes Charley and Frances caused up to $14bn (£8m) in insured property damage in Florida. Uninsured costs could be more than $20bn.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    The pressure is building, the markets are in lockdown mode (as Bill has accurately reported) and perceptive investors will take a bullion opportunity when it is presented.


    Mike


    Chuck checks in:


    I like very much what I see here both in the stock market and in gold. Most of the opinions from even the bears are not looking for a downside in the market with many anticipating a healthy rally as the election approaches. But the market still has a very heavy feel to it and given the ongoing deterioration in almost all of the economic measures, it is going to require an even greater feat of magic to keep this market afloat. To me that means an ever increasing money pump or many more fingers in the dike. But given the times in which we are living all things are possible. But if that occurs it can only spell good things for gold.


    We are pressing against all sorts of resistance and channel levels here, and yet the gold shares are retaining their pattern of gapping down rather than anticipating the breakout. This tells me that the market participants are yet nervous and unconvinced about an upward move. Today’s relative strength in gold, in spite of a strong dollar, is also very encouraging. I believe that the big surprise will be that gold and the shares will go up against the backdrop of a firm dollar, and this will keep the bears alive and many of the bulls puzzled and lukewarm. Given the next week or so bordered by the Jewish Days of Awe, we might have a very quiet market, but the tilt should be positive for gold and down for stocks. As Bill has pointed out the fundamentals are staring us in the face. Many of the exploration have been so beaten down that they will rise strictly from the relief of the relentless selling of the past 9 months or so. When gold starts to breakout, there is going to be a lot of competition to take positions or get back in. There is not going to be a public announcement that it’s okay to get back into the water. Finally, if you can look at the announcement by IMA Exploration today. This property might very well end up being the largest silver find in history. Chuck


    Craig Harris of http://www.harriscapitalmanagement.com puts out superb commentary. He sounded like our camp last evening:


    Citigroup was in the news today. They don't often get nailed for this sort of thing....but it's a great illustration of how they actually "make money". They sold 11 billion euros worth of euro debt in the space of 2 minutes and then proceeded to buy it all back slowly later making a profit. I suspect this is how they operate in the gold market as well. The thing is that futures are a zero sum game. So....if you hit a market hard with a big sell order....it creates havoc and a very sharp quick selloff because you overwhelm the counterparties and cause the stops to run. You can then buy back what you sold slowly without creating the same disruption in the market. In other words, you might be able to hit it for $10 on the downside, and then buy back the whole position slowly at that new lower price.


    If you look at the big picture...it's a bank. It used to even say so in the name. As in the article I linked last week, central banks and their agents (Citigroup would be one of the agents of the US central bank) are acting less and less like banks and more and more like hedge funds (except that they are huge hedge funds that can have their way in just about any market).


    Citigroup regrets Aug euro govt bond sale-memo


    The UK's market watchdog the Financial Services Authority launched an investigation into the transaction last month and other European regulators have been looking into the trade. The inquiry centres around Citigroup's sale of around 11 billion euros worth of euro-denominated government debt in the space of minutes on Aug. 2.

    http://www.reuters.com/newsArt…e=topNews&storyID=6228374


    When history is written, I think the reasons for the inevitable crisis will seem obvious in retrospect. Banks should be for the storage and maintenance of wealth. That's supposedly why they exist. What they have become is speculative entities and cohorts of a private corporation called the Federal Reserve operating with 95% leverage.


    -END-


    Citigroup was a defendant in Reg Howe’s lawsuit against The Gold Cartel in Boston Federal Court.


    The pot and the kettle:


    WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - The United States on Wednesday accused Saudi Arabia of severe violations of religious freedom in a rare official rebuke of a close ally and key oil supplier that potentially could lead to sanctions.


    "Freedom of religion does not exist" in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. State Department said in an annual report on religious freedom around the world that included the kingdom for the first time among a small list of countries "of particular concern."


    –END-


    OK, so Saudi Arabia violates religious freedoms. The US financial press violates our freedom of the press (views such as GATA’s are not allowed serious coverage is an obvious example). We then go around the world and preach democracy and free markets. Meanwhile, in clandestine fashion we rig our markets to benefit our Wall Street banking elitists. Some call that economic fascism. The US has become the most hypocritical nation in the world. Unfortunately, people all over the world have come to understand this. It is why we are hated and held in such low esteem (world-wide polls about the US continue to worsen in this regard). Back at the ranch, most Americans continue to watch one reality TV show after another, following the party line, blissfully rah-rahing on etc., with no idea about what is to hit them over the head in the years to come.


    From Rhody (lease rates can be viewed at:


    http://www.kitco.com/market/lfrate.html


    Hi Bill:


    As you can see from the included data, gold and silver lease rates in the near terms are still rising. Silver's near term rates are rising faster than gold, reflecting the higher costs of capping this metal that is in shorted supply than gold. The overall pattern is of silver being four times as expensive to lease as gold, except in the near terms where silver is two and one half to three times more expensive. But rates in the near terms are rising while those in the long terms are falling. This means that capping is increasing in intensity but hedging by mines is probably declining, both in silver and gold.


    Rhody


    Jesse brings GATA City, capital of LeMetropolis, our hangout of the future to our attention:


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/worldofgold.jpg]


    Canada’s Wendell Leythem has done a wonderful job contacting gold and silver firms in which he is a shareholder. Here is some dialogue from three of them.


    Dear Wheaton River,


    I am a shareholder in your company. I have invested in your company because I believe in the productivity of you company and because of integrity of management. As a shareholder, one of my desires is to make sure that you are being responsible with the money I have entrusted to you.


    I have 2 questions I would like to ask:


    What is your opinion about the Sprott Report, "Not Free, not Fair---The Long Term Manipulation of the Gold Price". Have you read it in full? Do you plan to promote it and even make it part of your website. Samex has done this and I applaud them for this.

    What do you believe about the World Gold Council? The WGC is a joke! Is Wheaton River a part of the World Gold Council? I believe that the WGC would do more for the cause of gold and gold companies by closing their doors rather than continue their ridiculous promotion of gold jewelry. If you are a part of the WGC, I am opposed to any continuation of the wasteful support of this hopelessly incompetent organization by our Company. Disbanding the WGC would be one of the best things that every happened for our company and it can only happen when we choose to cease supporting it.

    I do anticipate that you will reply to this email. May you have a good day.


    Sincerely,


    Wendell Leytham


    Wheaton River responds:


    From: Julia Hasiwar jhasiwar@wheatonriver.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:03 AM
    To: Wendell Leytham
    Subject: RE: questions from a shareholder


    Wheaton does not provide third party market analysis on its website and is not a member of the World Gold Council. Thank you for your interest in Wheaton River Minerals.


    ***


    Wendell hits the nail on the head and sends a message to Ian Telfer he should hear from every single Wheaton shareholder:



    Thanks, Julia, for the reply. I'm glad to hear that Wheaton is not part of the WGC. Regarding the "third party" stuff, I assume you are referring to John Embry's report (I think). John Embry's report does Wheaton and all Precious Metals companies a GREAT service. I find it quite disappointing that few gold companies have the courage even to mention the name of it let alone make it available to their shareholders. You must be concerned that it would do some harm for Wheaton to post this in an objective way. Ian Telfer was talking about a $500 gold price by the end of this year. He mentioned this last November. If he and the Board of Wheaton would like to see this sooner rather than later, it would benefit Wheaton and your shareholders to do a little to help stop the manipulation taking place to suppress the gold price. It's costing you and me and all your shareholders a fortune.


    Your response to me indicates that Wheaton is content to do nothing in this regard. My opinion is by having this attitude, you are supporting the gold price manipulation by default. This is just the way I see it. I hope you become bombarded with emails and calls by your shareholders as to why you are taking this course.


    Sincerely,
    Wendell Leytham


    Southwestern Gold responds to the same email from Wendell:


    From: John Paterson [mailto:jpaterson@swgold.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:40 PM
    To: wendelll@gfa.org
    Subject: (no subject)


    Southwestern is not a member of the world gold council.with respect to john embrys report on gold manipulation this is nothing new. lots of analysts believe the gold market is being manipulated but pretty hard to prove.


    ***


    Wendell aptly notes:


    I wrote back to them basically saying that you don't need to see someone commit the crime if all the evidence says that they did it. I encouraged them to reconsider and put the report on their website.


    Wendell Leytham


    Compare those sort of pale responses, surely from lightweights who most likely failed to even read the report, to this one from ECU Silver:


    From: ECU Silver Mining Inc. info@ecu.ca
    Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:36 PM
    To: wendelll@gfa.org
    Subject: RE: questions from a shareholder


    Hi Wendell,


    I've just read the report. I think there are a lot of valuable points to be taken and I will probably use some of these points on the web-site.

    We are not part of the WGC. I don't foresee being part of it in the foreseeable future. That's all I'll say about that for now.


    best regards
    Richard J. Hamelin
    ECU Silver Mining Inc.


    Nice effort Wendell, just as so many others of you have made. I would hope every Café member would spend a little time contacting their gold firms and demand they let you know what executive at the company read the Sprott Special Report and if they disagreed with its contents and conclusions to give detailed responses why.


    Speaking of the Sprott Report, a veteran Cafe member who has been in the mining side of the business for many years sent the Sprott Report to various analysts all over the world. Here is only one visible reward for his efforts - from OZEQUITIES NEWSLETTER IN AUSTRALIA:


    GoldPriceManipulation.doc


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/goldpriceman.doc

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    The John Brimelow Report


    IMPORTANT! Advantage India


    Wednesday, September 15, 2004


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $8.26, PM $7.23, with world gold at $404.80 and $404.70. Huge: lavish for legal imports. This reflects the continuing surge of the rupee, which finished at the highest level since July 12.


    Short term, this is probably the most important element in the gold market right now. The world’s biggest buyer of physical is, in effect, being given a special deal. To put this in perspective, were the rupee to return to the April high (a 5.1% move), the Indians would in effect be faced with world gold at $384. Any follower of this work will realize that this would cause a buying stampede.


    The Bears got a break in the early summer because the damage done to confidence in India by the election of the leftist Congress government reversed the appreciation of the rupee, and muted Indian gold demand. That seems now to have gone away, just in time for the strongest buying season. Shippers of bullion are going to be busy.


    This is probably the most important event from outside the conventional North Atlantic price- determining arena since the Japanese bullion-buying binge of early 2002.


    Right now, Japan is not interested. TOCOM volume fell 28% to the equivalent of 15,907 Comex lots, prices were little changed – active contract up 3 yen, world gold 5c below the NY close. Open interest slipped further, down the equivalent of 505 Comex to equal only 86,132 Comex lots. Japanese liquidation/disinterest has definitely been a drag on the gold price recently – open interest is down to levels of the spring price nadir. An optimist would dream about them getting back in. (NY yesterday was estimated to have traded 55,000 contracts.)


    Today Reuters estimated volume at 22,000 by 10 am, e.g. huge. One seriously doubts that the sellers realize what they are up against.


    JB

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    September 15 - Gold $405.50 down 90 cents – Silver $6.24 up 5 cents


    Gold And Silver Show Independent Strength From Stronger Dollar


    Zitat

    Civilization can only revive when there shall come into being in a number of individuals a new tone of mind independent of the one prevalent among the crowd and in opposition to it. A new public opinion must be created privately and unobtrusively. The existing one is maintained by the press, by propaganda, by organization, and by financial influences which are at its disposal. The unnatural way of spreading ideas must be opposed by the natural one, which goes from man to man and relies solely on the truth of the thoughts and the hearer's receptiveness of new truth...Albert Schweitzer


    GO GATA!!!


    With the dollar a bit on the stronger side this morning, gold came in around $1.50 lower. Then some economic news came out which was certainly not dollar bullish. Yet, from there on in the dollar surged for no apparent reason. We have seen this over and over again the past few months. The dollar gets very weak for a period of time, then miraculously turns right around on a dime and almost always on days when the US stock market is under pressure. Coincidence? I doubt it.


    The DOW closed down 86 to 10,231 (making new lows for the day going into the close), while the DOG fell 19 to 1896.


    The dollar rose .68 to 89.40, while the euro fell 1.02 to 121.47.


    Gold fell nearly $3 early as the euro was being trampled, however, HUGE buy orders below the market cushioned the setback, eventually firming the market up as the day wore on. By the end of the Comex trading period, gold was on its highs of the day. It regained a good portion of its early losses even though the dollar remained resolutely positive.


    Early on JP Morgan Chase was pressuring gold in behalf of the cabal along with specs trading on the euro weakness. As the day wore on, those specs and the locals were forced to cover going into the close. Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley were significant buyers between $1.50 and $2 lower on the day.


    The gold open interest only rose 1723 contracts to 249,885, which was much less than I expected and should be construed as mildly constructive.


    Silver was steady right after the opening, spent most of the day higher, and then showed some late strength as it moved up going into the close. Days ago silver appeared to me to be sold out and looks much more that way as of tonight’s close. The silver open interest rose 385 contracts to 82,028.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/images/gslogo.jpg]


    http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1095269452.php


    The Federal Reserve - Its Origins, History & Current Strategy


    By: Wayne N. Krautkramer


    Few perceive the truth about the Federal Reserve. Rare are those who know its origins. It is right in front of us, but our relative ignorance of economics and history is their protection. A quick history lesson is in order.


    On October 14, 1066, AD., King William I (the Conqueror) founded the English monarchy. The Corporation was created by William in 1067 AD. to facilitate trade, and assure the continuation of the wealth of the monarchy. The City of London's legal name is The Corporation of the City of London. The City of London has unique political and economic privileges that do not apply to Greater London, or anywhere else in the British realm. The "City" even has its own police force that is sovereign.


    The Bank of England was granted a royal charter on July 27, 1694, by William III to regularize the monarchy's finances. This scheme was invented by a Scot promoter named William Paterson. The scheme was to create a bank with a "fund for perpetual interest". Fractional reserve banking was created, along with the radical monetary concept of a "monopoly" bank which would create money for loans that would never be repaid. A perpetual money machine for the monarchy was born. The permanent National Debt was born. The Bank of England would finance the emerging empire from its headquarters in the City of London. Never again would the lack of money, or liquidity, hamper the British empire under normal economic conditions. Conveniently, the monarchy also controls the City of London. This assures that the heart of the economic machine will always be protected.


    The United States fought a hard and expensive war against England in 1776 to achieve sovereignty. That included the right to have her own currency, control her own tax policies, and the avoidance of involvement in the affairs of other nations.


    HistoryCentral.com > > War of 1812> United States Declares War on Great Britain

    The United States declared War on Great Britain on June 12, 1812. The war was declared as a result of long simmering disputes with Great Britian. The central dispute surrounded the impressment of American soldiers by the British. The British had previously attacked the USS Chesapeake and nearly caused a war two year earlier. In addition, disputes continued with Great Britain over the Northwest Territories and the border with Canada. Finally, the attempts of Great Britain to impose a blockade on France during the Napoleonic Wars was a constant source of conflict with the United States.


    The US did everything in their power to remove British influence and control from this continent. Again and again we defeated all attempts to allow our money to be controlled by a National (Central) bank. When Central banks were established, we abolished them. Times changed, and Thomas Woodrow Wilson was elected. The intellectual who wanted the League of Nations (the progenitor of the United Nations) was elected. Under his leadership, we received the Federal Reserve, and the Sixteenth Amendment (Income Tax) shackling us into slavery to the British Crown forever. In 1917, Wilson made the world safe for democracy by plunging the US into World War I


    On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve Act, also known as the Glass-Owen Bill, was passed. The Republican controlled Senate rammed the bill through when many members of the US Congress were home for the holiday. The President, Dr. Thomas Woodrow Wilson, signed it into law one hour after being passed by the Congress! Somebody very powerful really wanted this law passed. The Federal Reserve System is an independent central bank. Although the President of the United States appoints the chairman of the Fed, and this appointment is approved by the United States Senate, the decisions of the Fed do not have to be ratified by the President, or anyone else in the executive branch of the United States government. Buried in the legislation was the granting of total power over the monetary policies of all US banks. A very curious statement is found in the original 1913 law. SEC. 30. The right to amend, alter, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved. Reserved expressly to whom, or what? No definition is provided. This is the entire Section 30 statement! "Curiouser and curiouser, cried Alice".


    Stock not held by member banks shall not be entitled to voting power. This clause guarantees that no outsider can justify buying shares in the Federal Reserve. "But wait! There's more!"


    Sec. 341 Second. To have succession for a period of twenty years from its organization unless it is sooner dissolved by an Act of Congress, or unless its franchise becomes forfeited by some violation of law. The Federal Reserve was only given a corporate life of 20 years! Their time was up in 1933 Who was President at that time? Franklin. D. Roosevelt, of course. Somehow, the Federal Reserve's termination did not occur. Reader, do I have your attention yet?


    My research failed to find any reauthorization of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, other than the tacit approval given by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


    No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or a director of a Federal reserve bank. No member of Congress is have access to the inner sanctum! Hello, what is this? Are they afraid that an American might come upon something untoward? 12 USC 3019 Federal reserve banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein, and the Income derived therefrom shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except taxes upon real estate. People, I think we are a roll now.


    SEC. 25.Any national banking association possessing a capital and surplus of 1,000,000 dollars or more may file application with the Federal ReserveBoard, upon such conditions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the said board, for the purpose of securing authority to establish branches in foreign countries or dependencies of theUnited States for the furtherance of the foreign commerce of the United States, and to act, if required to do so, as fiscal agents of the United States. Such application shall specify, in addition tothe name and capital of the banking association filing it, the place or places where the bankingoperations proposed are to be carried on, and the amount of capital set aside for the conduct of its foreign business. The Federal Reserve Board shall have power to approve or to reject such application if, in its judgment, the amount of capital proposed to be set aside for the conduct of foreign business is inadequate, or if for other reasons the granting of such application is deemed inexpedient. Wow, the US government has no formal control over the foreign operations of the Federal reserve banks! The Federal reserve banks are exempt from all taxation. These people are very independent. Independent of audits, independent of congressional supervision, and independent of the American voter.


    The Federal Reserve claims that nobody owns it – that it is an "independent entity within the government." The Federal Reserve is subject to laws such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act which cover Federal agencies but not private corporations; yet Congress gave the Federal Reserve the autonomy to carry out its responsibilities insulated from political pressure. Each of the Fed's three parts – the Board of Governors, the regional Reserve banks, and the Federal Open Market Committee – operates independently of the federal government to carry out the Fed's core responsibilities. Once a member of the Board of Governors is appointed, he or she can be as independent as a U.S. Supreme Court judge, though the term is shorter. As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. (The Fed's financial independence arises because it is hugely profitable due to its ownership of government bonds. (It gives the government billions of dollars each year.) However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government.


    The only statements of ownership made by the Federal Reserve Board is an allusion to the twelve Federal district banks. This circle puts us back at the beginning, for no information is provided regarding the ownership of the twelve Federal district banks. However, a 1976 government study commissioned by the Federal Reserve Directors revealed the following:


    OWNERSHIP OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE


    Most Americans, if they know anything at all about the Federal Reserve, believe it is an agency of the United States Government. This article charts the true nature of the "National Bank." Chart 1 Source: ** Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence ** - - Published 1976 Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York.


    The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914.


    These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.


    George Bush presided over a minor change in the Federal Reserve Act. The Sarbanes-OxleyAct was passed in 2002. The American Congress failed again to deal with the Federal Reserve. Bush managed to keep all discussion and changes confined to some reporting requirements for financial institutions. Bush knows very well who he serves, and he really serves his master well. It's amazing how few grasped the significance of Alan Greenspan being knighted by the Queen of England! Greenspan was knighted on September 26, 2002. An obvious reward for preventing any real discussion, or change, of the Federal Reserve during the Sarbanes-Oxley Act debates. Had an American President been knighted, serious questions would have arisen. It was so each easier to reward her manager, Alan! Do you still believe that Alan Greenspan has the power of Dearth Vader? He is only a little man, faithfully serving his queen.


    The British Crown, or the British monarchy is the owner of the Federal Reserve. This is their real secret. The strategy of the Federal Reserve is their other secret. Again, it is right of front of us, but no one sees the obvious. The strategy of the Federal Reserve is to accumulate all the wealth through the very slow, but effective, technique of currency debasement. The monarchs of old used to shave or clip the coins as they passed through their treasuries. Now the process is more sanitary (no more clipping and scraping all those dirty coins). John Maynard Keynes clearly stated that at there is no more effective method of destroying a society than through currency debasement.


    The primary reason for its success is the inability of most people to understand that more is not necessarily better. A recent conversation highlighted Kenyes's observation. There is some agitation to raise the minimum wage in my state. I listened to a proponent of a higher minimum wage. I attempted to point out that an increase in a large number of people's income would only result in prices going up, along with the obvious tax increases. "What was I talking about?" was the response. I explained that some percentage of people might wind up dealing with tax bracket creep (increases), and all will have with the obligatory tax increases that follow from any price increase. If nothing else, the sales tax must go up because the prices have gone up. I was immediately informed that I was the most negative person they had ever talked to.


    The Federal Reserve will always debase the currency to take its cut, and guarantee that the government has a tax base available to feed its bureaucratic family. The government is a total slave of the Federal Reserve. For example, analyze the latest real estate boom. There will be a major boost in property taxes based on the new valuations. Many people will be surprised when they receive their new tax bill. This will guarantee more money for the government coffers. They know that people will do almost anything to keep their homes. What's another job or two per family? Besides, the extra job will provide more tax revenue for the government. This will require more day care, or baby-sitting services for many families, which create more income for the government. This will cause more meals to be eaten out, which creates more revenue for the government Meanwhile, prices will continue to go up, which creates more sales tax revenue for the government. Are you getting the point yet? Deflation is end of the government. The local, state, and federal government will all fail!


    This is the strategy of the Federal Reserve. The majority of the people will always believe that more is better. Knowing that, and now having a democracy ensconced in the US, it was time to feed and breed. Prices always go up, and everything is "Wunnerful, Wunnerful" Bring on the Champagne Lady. Alan runs the bubble machine. The illusion of money has destroyed most people since society (goverment) developed socialism. Democracy feeds on the illusion of something for nothing. As each demagogue promises more than his competition, the tax burden becomes oppressive. The monetary illusion serves to conceal the costs through currency debasement. This assures the complete destruction of the society that embraces this perversion. Any attempt to introduce logic into a dialogue will be defeated by claiming you're an elitist devoid of compassion. Envy, hate, and manipulated passions are the hallmark of democracies. While all this destruction is occurring, money diverted by the mechanism of currency debasement is constantly being transferred to the British Crown in the City of London.


    Any questions, gang?


    Free Markets For Free Men


    Wayne N. Krautkramer

    More commentary at http://onlypill.tripod.com/



    The Corporation of the City of London:http://www.fact-index.com/c/ci/city_of_london.html
    The Bank of England:http://www.fact-index.com/b/ba/bank_of_england.html#History
    The Sixteenth Amendment:http://www.lovetolearnplace.com/SpecialDays/IncomeTax/
    Federal Reserve Act of 1913:http://aor.cat4.net/federalreserveact1913/
    Federal Reserve: 2002 Amendment:http://www.frbdiscountwindow.org/federalreserveact.html
    Federal Reserve ownership:http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml



    -- Posted Wednesday, September 15 2004

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    Mr. Gartman is flat out wrong when he states "conspiracies rarely exist." Price-fixing cases, which are conspiracies by definition, are a dime a dozen and have become commonplace over the years. We all know about the diamond and oil cartels. Then there have been those revealed in the copper, vitamins, and drug industries, among many others. For example:


    *03 Sep 2004 10:22


    EU slaps 222 mln euro fine on copper cartel


    BRUSSELS, Sept 3 (Reuters) - The European Commission on Friday imposed a 222.3 million euro ($271.1 million) fine on a group of copper pipeline makers for conspiring to fix prices and set territories for copper plumbing pipes


    "Because of the companies' illegal behaviour, EU consumers paid more for plumbing replacement work or when buying a house than if the healthy forces of competition had been at play," EU Competition Commissioner Mario Monti said in a statement.


    Two of the companies fined were Finland's Outokumpu Oyj and privately held Wieland-Werke of Germany. Outokumpu was fined 36.14 million euros and and Wieland-Werke was fined 27.8 million euros.


    -END-


    *Ecologist, The: Vitamin Fixing - price fixing cases - Brief ...


    *Federal Courts Brace For Foreign Price-Fixing Cases

    By: Richard J. Wegener , Antitrust Litigation Group
    Do foreign purchasers injured only by the "effects" on foreign commerce of a U.S. based price-fixing conspiracy have standing to assert Sherman Act claims in U.S. courts?


    *Dechert LLP : Lawyers of Pennsylvania; - Representing defendant in the Graphite Electrode price-fixing cases, multi-district class actions (ED Pa.); - Representing defendant in the ...


    *Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
    Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP provides representation to both plaintiffs and defendants in major price-fixing cases (eg, citric acid and lysine cases ...


    *Hot Topics
    The Federal Trade Commission's preliminary investigation of Nine West Group, Inc., is the latest in a string of price-fixing cases the agency has pursued ...


    http://www.napaa.org/news/hottopics.aspx - 69k - Cached - Similar pages


    Mr. Gartman barely mentions any specifics of the Sprott Report and only comments on what he interprets fitting into his long-held opinion of the gold manipulation matter before he read this report. How could he not agree with just ONE of the findings in the report? How about this one again:

    *(From the Sprott Report, page 25) "For the fourth quarter of 2001, GFMS (Gold Fields Mineral Services) reported that the delta-adjusted hedge book stood at 2924 tonnes. At this point, the notional value of gold derivatives reported to the BIS was $231 billion. However, as of December 31, 2003, the BIS reports gold derivatives of $344 billion. Producer hedging, meanwhile, declined from 2001 to reach 2166 tonnes at year-end 2003. ***


    There is no way these numbers can be reconciled without an understanding an enormous amount of central bank gold was surreptitiously mobilized to suppress the price. In other words lent/swapped gold, which had nothing to do with hedgers and their corresponding derivatives, was put into play causing the BIS derivatives numbers to rise even as the gold producer hedgers were reducing their short positions. I challenge Mr. Gartman, or anyone else in the gold industry, to prove that is not the case.


    He fails to acknowledge the firms GATA says are manipulating the gold price are his very own clients. This lack of disclosure taints the credibility of his opinions.


    Anyway, thanks Dennis G. As long as we can get ‘em talking out there, we are making some progress.


    US Inflation input:


    Bill;

    On the "there is no inflation" theme. This article slipped in under the radar. US house prices have had the largest one year increase since the 1970's. Second quarter of 03 to second quarter of 04 - 9.36 % annualized. For the most recent quarter - 8.83 % annualized. Perhaps all the lucky homeowners should join hands and sing a big alleluia chorus to Ben Bernanke and his money laden helicopters and an extra special thanks to God that Producer Prices are falling. Story at the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight website:


    OFHEO HOUSE PRICE INDEX SHOWS LARGEST ONE YEAR INCREASE SINCE 1970’s -


    (September 01, 2004)


    best,
    Rob


    Another pathetic response from the gold producer executive world:


    Subject: Re: questions from a shareholder


    Our focus at XYZ Corp. is, and always has been, on finding and developing mineral deposits. We really haven't spent any time on matters related to gold itself, so we don't belong to any organizations such as the WGC. While many of us who work at XYZ are "gold bugs" to some extent, we don't put much time into studying the issues concerning the price of gold. John Embry is a major supporter of XYZ, and has been for some time, so we are well aware of his views but I have not read through his report, nor do I plan to put it on our web-site. I don't want to put XYZ in the position of endorsing matters over which we have no influence, such as the price of gold. I personally believe that gold could go much higher but I have been around long enough to know that anything can happen. I prefer to highlight the things that we can control, such as our properties, land position and other corporate developments.
    I hope that answers your question.


    M W
    CFO, XYZ Ltd.


    ***


    It sure does answer Café member’s questions of how The Gold Cartel has been able to pull off their gold scam as long as they have. One of the points to spreading the word out there about the Sprott Report IS to have it be put up at various gold firm’s web sites. Let the shareholders at least have the information so they can responsibly form their own opinions and make up their own minds.


    I have suggested all Café members who are gold shareholders contact their respective firms about the Sprott Report and, in certain cases, about the ineffectiveness of the World Gold Council. I could do no less.


    This morning I spoke with Golden Star Resources management at length on these issues as well as on some company specific ones. Needless to say, they have been bombarded with emails and phone calls on these issues. They are formulating a response to many of you and the one I heard was very satisfactory for the time being for various reasons. Most importantly, they have taken your concerns to heart and are responding, unlike so many other gold companies which won’t deal with these significant subjects at all. One point as far as the WGC is concerned, Golden Star is a junior member paying 45 cents per production ounce (still a lot) versus the $3 a Newmont is paying.


    I also took the time to discuss Golden Star’s lackluster share price action these past months. This morning they announced $600 worth of shelf registrations which disturbed some as they feared more immediate share dilution. However, this is not a near-term issue in the sense this filing was done in case Golden Star wants to maneuver in the future to make acquisitions, or expand their exploration efforts when the gold price takes off. If the registration is approved (and their quiet period ends), they will be free to operate in an expeditious manner down the road without waiting for SEC approvals which could slow up development and potential deals.


    Golden Star ($4.48, up 5 cents) should produce 300,000 ounces of gold next near and 410,000/450,000 in 2006. Their exploration projects are extremely promising. CEO Peter Bradford has always delivered and is a stand-up guy. Yesterday in a round-table discussion with Jim Puplava, John Embry and James Turk, I referred to GSS as my number one gold producer pick. Still think that way. For the moment, GSS has no momentum, unlike last year when it was flying. No reason the " BIG MO" won’t come back again, sending the share price of Golden Star Resources flying in 2006.


    The gold shares were firm all day long until the close when they sold off. The XAU rose 1.68 to 94.70 and the HUI leaped 4.71 to 208.74.


    http://bigcharts.marketwatch.c…&o_symb=hui&freq=1&time=8


    The HUI closed right on its long-term downtrend line. Both indexes are close to blowing through resistance and breaking out, which could lead to significant advances. The reasons to be in the gold and silver shares have never been better, yet, very few are paying attention.


    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    MIDAS


    Appendix


    Dear Bill,

    Having been a subscriber & a very keen follower of the Café for quite a few years now, I did contact you about 18 months ago with the details of our 40 years experience in the Gold Bullion & Rare Coin market in Australia, and the services which Jaggards offer, and in turn which you very kindly published for the advice of your readers. Having been the Official Agent for The Perth Mint in Australia since 1986 for all their products we would like now to inform your readers also that we have been offering the Perth Mint Certificates Program since it commenced, at the best possible daily prices for precious metals, which can suit the many buyers who don’t need to take physical possession, and also without any storage charges.Since the commencement of this program we have processed many orders for clients both large and small from all over the world in the Gold & Silver Certificates. This program seems to be growing in popularity and the purchasing process can be done very simply through our website. Having 40 years experience in Gold Bullion & the Gold Coin market, helps us to give quality service and look after the requirements of investors from any country in the world .


    Keep up your great work at the Cafe, which we have recommended to many of our customers both local & international to help them get a better understanding of these markets.


    Robert Jaggard


    http://www.jaggards.com.au
    Email: info@jaggards.com.au
    Level 8/ 74 Pitt Street, SYDNEY
    NEW SOUTH WALES 2000. AUSTRALIA
    Mail: PO Box 345, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 AUSTRALIA
    Telephone (61 2) 9230 0886. Fax (61 2) 9230 0996


    Jaggard's est 1963


    The Leaders in Rare Coin and Banknote Investments.
    Showroom: Level 8/74 Pitt street,
    Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    PO Box 345, Royal Exchange,
    NSW, 1225, Australia.
    Phone- (02) 9230 0886
    Fax (02) 9230 0996.
    info@jaggards.com.au

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    The US financial markets remain in lockdown/prop up mode. Serious volatility has disappeared. Treasury bonds were up 5, the DOW rose 3 to 10,318, the DOG gained 5 to 1915, gold was capped and the dollar was little changed. You can almost hear the PPT counting down the days until the November US elections.


    The geopolitical/financial market news stinks:


    08:30 Aug. Retail Sales reported (0.3%) vs. consensus (0.1%); ex-Autos reported 0.2% vs. consensus 0.2%
    Prior Retail sales revised to 0.8% from 0.7%; ex-Autos revised to 0.3% from 0.2%.

    * * * * *


    NEW YORK, Sept 14 (Reuters) - Confidence in the U.S. economy weakened slightly, according to a survey on Tuesday that also indicated some consumers are beginning to question whether the government's economic policies are working,


    Investor's Business Daily and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence said their economic optimism index fell in September to 54.3 from 57.7 in August. A reading above 50 indicates optimism. –END-


    The situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate in almost every way imaginable. No one seems to care what is really going on in our economy, or in their country.


    9/14 KIRKUK, Iraq - Saboteurs blew up a junction where multiple oil pipelines cross the Tigris River in northern Iraq (news - web sites) on Tuesday, setting off a chain reaction in power generation systems that left the entire country without power, officials said.


    http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne…4/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_oil


    -END-


    Crude oil is all over the place, due to Hurricane Ivan and the Iraq mess. After being crushed on Friday, it rallied back to finish the day at $44.65 per barrel.


    GATA’s Mike Bolser:


    Hi Bill:


    The Fed added $6.75 Billion in temps today Sept 13th 2004, an action that pushed the repo pool up to $60.564Billion. The pool keeps setting new highs and the DOW is being dragged kicking and screaming up with it. If we look closely at the DOW 30-day ma we can see it turning up from a recent low. Look back to the last time the pool was at a peak high (Dec 2003). The DOW was running at 10, 300 and the red pool ma was $40B, but today the pool's moving average is far higher at $50 and the DOW still hasn't reacted well. This shows us that the DOW is sluggish and unresponsive to support mechanisms that produced results in the past.


    A savvy observer who called yesterday thinks that the DOW (with its repo support) may make it back up to 10,750 but run into HEAVY selling at that level which will prevent any further rises. Time will tell but this view may be the one to watch. A DOW launch to its previous high (11,750) would have to be fuelled by some kind of HUGELY positive event and I don't yet see one on the horizon.


    Washington Agreement Shrimpfest


    Make no mistake about the Italian Central Bank "NO GOLD SALE" development, it is VERY big and IF it holds through the WA formal announcement, the Fed will be hard-pressed (as Bill M has so faithfully reported) to replace the lost Swiss bullion WA contribution. It seems that Italy has been infected by the Bundesbank's gold retention disease. The Fed wants the world to believe that only diseased madmen would want to keep their gold. We ALL should be so afflicted. Watch closely in the coming days for signs of Fed frustration, a stray comment here...an angry reaction there. They will be detected...but


    only by the very observant, closely watching the primary dealers and their media marionettes.


    DIVG


    My metric has turned temporarily flat as noted last week from its August 17th low but may be running higher. I'll get a better look at NOON but so far things are steady with a very low probability of a turn back down for gold. More later...


    Ivan and His Departed Friends


    The effects of Hurricanes on tourism in Florida have been devastating. The now moribund cruise season, the theme park desertion and the European no-shows at Florida's beaches have contributed to a bleak economic "soft spot". Draconian security barriers and surly customs officials serve to inhibit visitors here and everywhere else in the US. On the other hand, plywood and generator sales are booming. Even with the storm raging on a forecast track to the West of Tampa, resting easy is VERY difficult until the monster is well NORTH of us.


    Offshore Banking


    Cayman Island was crushed with sustained 120MPH winds and there are many international banks there with huge offshore daily transaction capacity that is idle at the moment. Even if their generators are running the bank operators live in dwellings away from their offices and the damage to those dwellings must be severe. We can only guess as to the effect on Cayman-based derivatives operations. In the aftermath of 911 the banking system was badly hurt by the lack of aircraft cancelled check deliveries. The Fed's repo machine was on high output to compensate. Will they do it again? So far today the repo add was predictable and not too large.


    Finally the oil and gas platform operations are all but 100% curtailed in the Gulf of Mexico with no gas or oil flowing as of the close yesterday. This WILL have an effect on the oil and gas inventories going forward. We can estimate that a minimum of one week's energy losses will be recorded.


    Ivan and his evil ancestors have already dented the US economy. A BIG clue to the seriousness of the impact is the ABSENCE of commentary on it in the mainstream Wall Street press.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    The Russian preparations for Beslan retaliations continue and they remain livid over the West's harboring of Chechen terrorists. Expect a bombing and or commando run into Georgia soon.


    Tuesday, September 14, 2004


    By Any Means Necessary
    By Pavel Felgenhauer


    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/…2004/09/14/008-print.html


    After a meeting in Moscow last week with NATO's supreme commander in Europe, General James Jones, chief of the General Staff General Yury Baluyevsky said that Russia was ready to carry out preemptive strikes against terrorist bases "anywhere in the world."


    But Ivanov and Baluyevsky are clearly contemplating a different scenario. In the past, Russia has frequently bombed Georgia without admitting responsibility, meanwhile accusing Georgia of harboring Chechen terrorists.


    END
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    The outlook for gold is very bullish looking only at my metrics and factoring in the Washington Agreement apparent developments. Things can change and we must always be ready for ambushes but the time to make a move is now.


    Mike


    From a fellow Café member:


    "I also attended the LV Gold show. While it's true that the Sprott Report (and the Blanchard suit!) were not the hot topics one would hope, the Sprott report did come up in more than one conversation. Oddly enough, it seemed like the geologist, techie types were the best informed."


    Actually, I am not surprised. When GATA was first formed, many geologists were without work because of the price suppression scheme. Exploration was a no-no back then because of the low gold prices. A few of the early members of the Café were geologists who wanted to understand what was really going on and why they were out of work. Most were quick studies and realized in short order that GATA was correct. This also gave them hope they wouldn’t be unemployed forever, as we explained why we were all so bullish and why.


    Chuck checked in last evening:


    Sorry for my lack of input. My job has taken up so much energy that I haven't had a chance to really think things out and convey them to you. I really admire your perseverance day in and out. It takes a real Don Quixote to stay so focused. And you are a modern day Don.


    Just read your Midas. Contrarily, I found the report from Las Vegas very encouraging. If everyone is so complacent, we must be here. I am not at all surprised by the lack of interest in the Sprott work. Remember, as far as I know, there is only Ron Paul who has an interest among the lawmakers in DC. We are living in comatose times just as in 1929 when no one saw it coming. The autopsies were performed much later. Today, many are being done beforehand as in Midas.


    The notable thing is that this time it's much more obvious and there is so much more evidence. But everyone wants the party to continue and the music never to end, so they refuse to consider anything other than the banal take on the economy and everything related to it. That is why even the gold people don't consider the GATA and Sprott position. It's easier being fed through a tube. We're America! How can anything ever go wrong? It will happen and it will change the world's landscape forever. Thanks for your zeal for truth and justice. Your friend, Chuck


    Canada’s Wall Street Journal came out with a front page business section article on John Embry and the Sprott Special Report, "NOT FREE, NOT FAIR: The Long-Term Manipulation of the Gold Price", which was circulated in toto this morning by email to Café members:


    Price of Gold Manipulated, Embry Says;
    Central Banks Dumping; Sprott Manager
    Ruffling Feathers on Bay Street Again


    Drew Hasselback
    Financial Post (National Post), Toronto
    Tuesday, September 14, 2004



    John Embry, one of Canada's best known gold bugs, is ruffling some feathers again in the otherwise staid corridors of Bay Street.


    A couple of weeks ago he started circulating a report that details his belief the gold market is manipulated. It's a remarkable paper, given that it's rare to see any veteran member of Canada's investing establishment go public with such a potentially controversial position….


    -END-


    For the entire article:


    http://www.canada.com/national…inancialpost/investing/st
    ory.html?id=b7c0524a-f822-4d75-a02f-4edf7c80daba&page=1


    -END-


    While this article was a pleasant one, I was looking for something like the Wall Street Journal might do on something so significant and groundbreaking – like 10 times more extensive than this story and a review which covered the features of the report in great detail, including those with opposite points of view, accompanied with their reasoning and supporting facts.


    Dennis Gartman, who is widely followed by many financial institutions, returned from the LBMA Conference held in Shanghai. His latest this morning in regards to the Sprott Report and GATA:


    ON GOLD BUGS AND NET
    SHORTS:


    The gold bugs are a strange lot, really.


    They see conspiracies everywhere and at all times. If the government is not conspiring against the public, then business is conspiring against the government, or business AND the government are conspiring against the public, and if not that, then all three are conspiring against ghostly, foreign forces that are set to wage some sort of economic war against the country. We see this as a wondrous waste of time and money as they try to prove the merits of gold ownership based upon conspiracies, far and near, visible and invisible. However, as long as they do no damage and stay within their small sphere of influence, they have the absolute right to make their case and move on [Ed. Note: That having been said, we are always concerned when we write about the gold bugs because in the past we have gotten some of the most disconcerting threats from them... including phone calls at odd hours; e-mails threatening harm; name calling, et al. We trust today's article will draw nothing more.].


    Having been taken to task rather often by the gold bugs, we thought we'd take the time to read a report put out by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario, that has been much in the news amongst the gold bugs of late for having "proved" the case that GATA puts forth. GATA, as our clients should know, argues that there is a vast conspiracy amongst the gold bullion dealers, the Wall Street trading houses and the various governments of the West to keep gold prices down.


    The Sprott paper is rather weighty, and we decided to take it with us on our long flight to Shanghai recently in order to read it cover-to-cover. We did, and we took notes at length.


    We disagree with this report in its entirety, although we do admire the sheer volume of the work done. Under normal circumstances we would call this yeoman's work and applaud the endeavour, but this is not a normal circumstance. We could, time permitting, site passage after passage with which we disagree. However, our major point of contention is simply this: it is odd that the major analysts supporting GATA's thesis are really rather few, and they include Mr. Frank Veneroso, Mr. Reg Howe, Mr. James Turk and Mr. Bill Murphy, GATA's founder and guiding spirit. These are fine, educated, deeply intelligent men who have done stunning amounts of work on the details of the gold market. We are especially fond of the work done by Mr. Veneroso and we do indeed rather like Mr. Murphy, for he is a wonderful conversationalist and Renaissance man. What we find odd is that Sprott, having taken GATA's position that there is indeed a conspiracy amongst the leading central banks, broking and trading firms, relies almost solely upon these other analysts who hold to the same thesis to prove the thesis. Page after page, footnote after footnote, textual citing after textual citing is done ontologically; each cites the other; each uses the other's facts and figures; each believes the other is right and each "proves" each others proof by the proofs of the other. We had hoped to see independence amongst the citations used in Sprott's paper, for in using independent sources we might well have been willing to listen and to accept their analysis. However, in 68 pages of text, Mr. Veneroso, Mr. Howe, GATA and Mr. Turk are cited a total of 87 times [Ed. Note: Due to some minor printing errors in the text we used, some of the notations were garbled and so we may be off perhaps 2-3 citations in either direction... a variance which we think shall make little if any difference to our case.] .


    Further, we take issue with the manner in which this report always seems to use the terms "may" or "might" while making its case. For instance, on p. 58, the report notes that


    As James Turk suggested in Behind Closed Doors,
    the leasing of gold by another nation may in fact
    be directed by the United States [Ed. Note:
    emphasis ours.]


    "May... be" and "is" are materially different of course (unless you are William Jefferson Clinton) and the Sprott report seems always to pile on the references to possible machinations taken by the US government, the sheer weight of which it hopes shall make its case. It does not. Further, the Report consistently tries to make the case that the US Government has lied regarding the use of the Exchange Stabilisation Fund, where it believes that the government hid gold and used it for market manipulation. It cites a statement by US Treasury Sec'y O'Neill that the Treasury Department


    intensively monitors foreign exchange markets
    and maintains continuing monitoring of gold
    markets and related developments.


    GATA and Sprott will argue that "monitoring" equates to manipulation. We shall maintain that "monitoring" is precisely that: monitoring... watching... learning from the markets what the market is saying to Treasury and the Fed concerning policies that are either in place, or may be put into place. But "monitoring" need not be real action, and likely is not.


    We've not the time to go on this morning, and although our case is perhaps not made with the same sheer volume that the Sprott report has weighed in with, we trust it is made. Conspiracies rarely exist, and when they do, they are far more often than not exposed. GATA's followers are legion and very often they are wise. Would that they spent their collective wisdom on worthier efforts. There are times when it is appropriate to be bullish of gold; there are times when it is not. To GATA and the gold bugs, it is always time to be so. To us, gold is merely another asset bidding for our capital, and it is there that they fail.


    -END-


    Dennis Gartman is to be commended for reading the report, which is more than most gold producer CEO’s have done as far as I can tell from the feedback I am receiving. And, also to his credit, he is willing to put his thoughts down in writing. However, the content of his response to John Embry and Andrew Hepburn’s brilliant report is sorely lacking. I am sure he would expect nothing less than this sort of response from me:

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    The John Brimelow Report


    Rupee rising? Barclays propagandising?


    Tuesday, September 14, 2004


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $6.54, PM $5.14, with world gold at $403.30 both times. Ample, and a bit thin, for legal imports. This is basis Bombay, and the PM data might have been anomalous; the other Indian cities carried by Reuters maintained high premiums throughout the day.


    Both the Bombay stock market and the rupee closed at multi week highs again – the former being up 4.6% so far this month. Apparently "virtuous circle" of rising consumer confidence and rupee-appreciation-facilitated buying power is developing again in India, as previously occurred in weeks preceding the May election. Reuters carries the conventional story of Indian importers grumbling (not very seriously) about $400+ world gold, but more importantly several reports that the authorities are minded to let the Indian currency appreciate, to moderate inflation. (Many manufacturers around the world long for the Chinese would adopt the same policy to deal with a similar, but far more pronounced problem!) A rising rupee would, of course, sharpen the gold appetite of the world’s biggest buyer and be bad news for bears.


    Reuter’s weekly comment on Far Eastern premiums reports dealers moaning about poor volume, but that premiums are, curiously, unchanged. Shanghai indications are that modest premiums obtain there, and the Gulf seems to accepted the move above $400 unhesitatingly.


    Tokyo futures traders responded to the rise in gold by selling. Open interest slipped dropped the equivalent of 1,458 Comex lots on volume 118% higher than yesterday – equal to 22,093 Comex contracts; Mitsubishi remarks "Yen gold was capped by Public long liquidation" and indicates its’ proxy for the public’s long fell by 13.1 tonnes. Someone was buying in the Far East, however; not only did the active contract rise by 14 yen, but world gold stood 40c higher than the NY close at the end of the TOCOM day. (NY yesterday traded 40,005 contracts, with open interest rising an ominous 5,904 contracts.)


    Yesterday, in ScotiaMocatta’s words:


    "Gold was down about $2.00 …during the European trading session. Follow through offering by locals forced gold to a session low of 398.90/399.40…New York dealers changed to the bid side and quickly took the price back above 400.00 as locals rushed to cover their short positions…then…funds came into the market on the bid side giving the metal a boost. Gold went into a steady climb topping out at 404.80/405.30, as dealer selling was evident. The dealer offering continued right till the close forcing gold back to 403.80/404.30."


    In other words, unexpected buying squeezed the shorts until a large seller stepped in. The size of the open interest increase suggests significant selling had to be done: and it is not surprising to see a modest $2.30 rise in NY today has apparently required volumes 50% above yesterday.


    Kamal Naqvi, the gold commentator at the perennially bearish UK bank dealer Barclays has given an interview forecasting $370 gold in six months. He bases this on a view that the dollar may appreciate somewhat, and on


    Zitat

    " a poor physical market…Naqvi said supplies were also abundant, adding the surplus in 2003 was the largest in many years as miners held many years of inventories."


    Even presuming the peculiar last phrase to be a misquote, this assessment of the physical market is curious. Quite establishment commentators agree that trade has been robust this year. HSBC for instance. In a report also out today, says


    Zitat

    "…the latest statistics from the World Gold Council and GFMS show that the physical market has adjusted to the higher price level, with the market in deficit in the first half of this year by around 140t…the physical market looks set to be in deficit for the year as a whole, and will probably remain short through 2005."


    There is a view on the sell side that research should be classified as client entertainment. As a useful column by Caroline Baum today details, there is hard statistical evidence that economic news headlines could be considered propaganda.


    http://quote.bloomberg.com/app…ist_baum&sid=aWChP7NsVIrs)


    Maybe this is where Barclays work belongs.


    Propaganda, of course, can work.


    JB

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    September 14 - Gold $405.50 up $1.60 – Silver $6.19 up 2 cents


    Major Gold Shares Close To Making Significant Breakouts!


    Zitat

    With the exception only of the period of the gold standard, practically all governments of history have used their exclusive power to issue money to defraud and plunder the people...F.A. von Hayek


    GO GATA!!!


    Gold firmed up in early European trading, then sold off as we came into the Comex opening. Coming in slightly lower in New York, gold rallied on the following news:


    08:30 Q2 Current Account Deficit widens to $166.2B, a record; vs. expectations $158.3B
    Prior deficit revised to $147.2B from $144.9B.

    * * * * *


    WASHINGTON, Sept 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. current account gap widened again in the second quarter, growing to a record $166.18 billion, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday.


    The gap -- the broadest measure of trade and investment flows between the United States and the rest of the world -- came in well above analysts' expectations for a $159.35 billion shortfall and could fan concerns about the U.S. dollar and the nation's ability to continue to fund the deficit.


    The gap in the first three months of the year was also revised upward, to $147.16 billion from the previously reported $144.88 billion.


    -END-


    While few on Wall Street seem to be paying attention to monstrous US deficits of all sorts, the ramifications of the current account and trade deficits are ominous for the future. At some point, all of these dollars circulating in ever-increasing amounts will be pecunia non grata to some degree and the dollar index is going to tank.


    Gold actually rallied first this morning with the dollar falling a bit later. By day’s end the dollar closed at 88.72, down .10, while the euro only gained .03 to 122.54.


    However, The Gold Cartel knew full well that if gold shot up too much on the day, it would focus attention on the soaring current account deficit. PRICE ACTION MAKES MARKET COMMENTARY. Thus, each time gold looked like it was going to fly, the bad guys came in with "not so fast" sell orders. Our floor contacts were extremely bullish all session long, noting the buying was eating through the selling. If DEC gold went through $410, they felt gold would explode.


    Forget about it! The Gold Cartel would have none of it. Not only did gold not take off as it should have, the cabal added insult to injury by knocking it down $1 on the close as they do so often.


    Yesterday’s open interest rose a sizeable 5904 contracts as The Gold Cartel kicked in the next leg of its price-capping maneuvers. Each time gold begins to make a concerted effort to take out $410, the bad guys go into action to prevent it from doing so. This is what is so pitiful about those who refuse to acknowledge the price manipulation. Free markets DO NOT TRADE LIKE THIS. In free markets, sellers would back off, let gold fly and gradually sell into a sharp rally. In managed markets the agenda of the sellers is to do just the opposite. These sellers want to minimize excitement and prevent gold from taking out certain price points. To achieve their objectives, the price-cappers act in concert, which is where the violation of US anti-trust laws comes into play.


    Seems like silver was toyed with. After coming in lower, rose steadily, yet was taken back late in the trading session. The good news here is there are few spec longs. The open interest fell another 603 contracts to 81,660.

    midas


    Zitat

    1. warum sollen die Zentralbanken an einem niedrigen Goldpreis interesssiert sein ??


    DARUM!


    Hier wurden ab 2001 massiv Dollars abgezogen, und der Dollar beginnt zu fallen!


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_04/images/norcini091104a.gif]


    Nun werden die unglaublich riesigen Dollar Ströme von der FED umgeleitet, und der Dollar kann sich, für sehr viele überraschend, und fundamental nicht gerechtfertigt wieder stabilisieren, und das trotz einem weiter wachsenden riesigen Handelsbilanzdefizit, und immer noch grösserer und wahnwitziger Verschuldung der USA!


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_04/images/norcini091104c.gif]


    Was denkst würde passieren, wenn sich z.Bsp. die Japanische Zentral Bank, oder andere Zentralbanken, durch stark steigende Gold Preise gezwungen würden sich für Gold als Alternative zu entscheiden?


    Solange sich die grosse Masse der Anleger jedoch nicht für Gold als Anlageform ihrer Vermögen zu interessieren beginnt, ich denke da jetzt im Wesentlichen an die westlichen Industrienationen, und sich mit ungedecktem Papiergeld, oder elektronisch aus dem Nichts geschaffenen Zahlen begnügen, solange werden die meisten Zentralbanken nichts gutes an Gold finden, weil Gold als DAS Geld schlechthin, von ihnen nicht "gemangt" und "vermehrt" werden kann, wie sie es mit *Fiat Money* praktisch ohne Limits bewerkstelligen können. Aber wie schon so oft gesagt nur so lange, wie die Preise von Gold kontrolliert und die Nachfrage, physisch gedeckt werden können.


    Es gibt noch viele weitere Aspekte warum hohe Gold Preise nicht im Interesse der Zentralbanken, und der Gold Bullion Banken liegen. Viele User hier im Board bei Goldseiten.de, ich selbst, und natürlich die GATA tragen täglich weitere Gründe, Belege, Analysen, Kommentare, und Zeitzeugnisse zusammen, um die von Dir gewünschten Antworten zu finden.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru


    PS: Gestern hat ein interessierter, und zum Wirtschafts-, und Edelmetall Geschehen gut informierter User, in einem Nachbar Thread einen sehr wichtigen Grund dafür geliefert, warum die Banken Gold nicht mögen. Er hat ausgerechnet, dass die gesammten Schulden Deutschlands, wenn man sie in 500.- Euro Scheinen eng gebündelt, und gestappelt nebeneinander umlegen würde, einen Autofahrer 1000 Kilometer lang, etwa auf der Fahrt von Basel nacht Hamburg begleiten würden.


    Wäre toll, falls der besagte User diesen Beitrag, wegen seiner Eindrücklichkeit, hier nochmals posten könnte!

    Es muss schon einige einseitig farbenblinde User geben die in diesem Thread, über ihrer Ansicht nach negative Aspekte eines Gold, oder Silber Engagement diskutieren.


    Ulfur hat heute bereits ein Posting reingestellt, das beweist, nicht etwa nur vermutet, dass die Nachfrage nach physischem Gold in Indien trotz der in Dollar, und ebenso in der lokalen Währung Rupia stark gestiegenen Goldpreise, nicht nur ungebrochen ist, sondern zudem noch stark ansteigt. Indien ist auch nicht nur irgend ein Land ohne Bedeutung für den Gold Markt, sondern der grösste Gold Konsument der Welt, mit einem Goldbedarf der wie man lesen konnte, im ersten Halbjahr 04, um gewaltige 10% gestiegen ist.


    Diese Meldung ist nicht nur bullisch für den Goldpreis anzusehen, diese Meldung ist geradezu explosiv.


    Sie beweist ganz klar, dass im Gegensatz zu anderslautenden "Falschmeldungen" in der Presse, dass die Nachfrage nach physischem Gold gerade munter weiter stark ansteigt. Das alles bei einem bewiesenen, und nicht nur vermuteten Gold Produktions Defizit von ca. 1500 Tonnen Gold pro Jahr, bei einer gesammten Gold Weltproduktion von bestenfalls gerade einmal 2500 Tonnen Gold pro Jahr.


    Letze Woche hatte ich eine absolut bullische Gold Meldung aus China mit der Meldung des World Gold Council *WGC* in den Thread gestellt, die besagt, dass sich der private physische Goldverbrauch in China in den nächsten 5 Jahren auf 200 Tonnen verdreifachen wird. Das die geplanten offiziellen, oder vermuteten stillen Zukäufe der Chinesischen Zentralbank nicht in diesen 200 Tonnen mit enthalten sind, sei nur nebenbei noch erwähnt.


    Gestern die Meldung, dass Italien nicht daran denkt Gold zu verkaufen, und die einfache Rechnung, dass die gross angekündigten angeblich über die nächsten 5 Jahre geplanten Verkäufe von 500 Tonnen Gold pro Jahr, technisch gar nicht zu realisieren sind, also blos eine Lüge, und einen Goldpreis Manipulationsversuch darstellen.


    Einige Gold, und Silber Pessimisten, möchten gerne über positive, und negative Aspekte eines Investments in Gold, oder Silber diskutieren, wogegen ich überhaupt nichts einzuwenden habe. Dabei sollten aber diese drei extrem positiven Meldungen nicht einfach ignoriert werden, sondern diskutiert werden.


    Da dies jedoch nicht der Fall zu sein scheint, nehme ich an, es geht einigen gerade in der letzten Zeit sehr aktiv gewordenen Postern in diesem Thread gar nicht darum eine Diskusion pro, oder contra Gold, und Silber zu führen, sondern nur eine Diskusion mit negativen Inhalten ohne Fakten, und Belege zu Gold, und Silber zu artikulieren, oder sie sind ganz einfach nur farbenblind.


    Für Diskussionen, nur der Diskussion wegen, bin ich in diesem Thread nicht zu haben, dazu müsste ich erst einen neuen Thread eröffnen, doch dazu fehlt mir leider die Zeit.


    Gruss


    ThaiGuru





    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.hindustantimes.com/on/img/headers/Business.gif]


    http://www.hindustantimes.com/on/img/headers/Business.gif


    India's gold consumption rises 10% during first-half


    Press Trust of India


    Chennai, September 14


    Consumption of gold in India increased by 10 per cent to 343 tonne during the first half of 2004 as compared to 312 tonne during the same period last year.


    Demand for jewellery was higher by seven per cent in tonnage terms and 17 per cent in rupee terms in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003, a Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council release said, quoting a World Gold Council report.


    India is by far the largest market for gold jewellery and among the top five global markets for diamond. Jewellery is one of the largest consumer categories in the country, with an estimated market size in excess of Rs 45,000 crore, according to the report.


    The jewellery industry is one of the most fragmented and unorganised sectors in India. The market is dominated by over 300,000 independent jewellery retailers; most of them are small, one-store operations.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://wwwi.reuters.com/comX/images/reuters.gif][Blockierte Grafik: http://wwwi.reuters.com/comX/images/yahoo.gif]


    http://yahoo.reuters.com/finan…10-32-40_l14618276_newsml


    1-Union plans strike at Harmony Gold over sackings


    Tue Sep 14, 2004 06:32 AM ET


    By Eric Onstad


    JOHANNESBURG, Sept 14 (Reuters) - South Africa's National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) said on Tuesday 20,000 workers plan to start an indefinite strike at Harmony Gold (HARJ.J: Quote, Profile, Research) on Oct. 6 due to planned retrenchments of thousands of miners in the Free State.


    Zitat

    "The strike will affect all of the Harmony Free State operations and not only those earmarked for closure and retrenchments," a statement said.


    The NUM put the number of total retrenchments at around 4,000 but the Solidary union said another closure notice had been released, bringing the figure to 5,061 at four operations.


    "We just got another (closure) notice yesterday afternoon," said Solidarity spokesman Reint Dykema, who added that four shafts were involved in the restructuring exercise.


    Harmony marketing director Ferdi Dippenaar said the company had received a strike notice but hoped to resolve the situation before Oct. 6.


    "Negotiations are continuing," Dippenaar said.


    Harmony, South Africa's biggest domestic gold producer and the world's sixth biggest gold miner, has been struggling for months to improve profitability without shedding too many jobs.


    It signed a deal with unions in July to scale down activities at mines where costs were too high amid a strengthening rand that cuts income from exports.


    The deal stipulated that workers at closed mines would be deployed where possible at other operations or retrained.



    WORKING HOURS


    Longer working hours would be implemented at mines that remained open, which would increase the number of employees needed at those operations.


    Solidarity's Dykema said that when the agreement was signed in July, Harmony had indicated forced retrenchments would be limited to around 2,000.


    "Out of the blue they have given us notices of intention to implement forced retrenchments...it's a big disappointment, the jump from 2,000 to 5,000."


    He said Harmony issued notices to close Merriespruit 3 and Welkom 1 shafts, retrenching 951 and 540 workers respectively, and to partially close the Bambanani mine and Elands shaft, with job losses of 2,937 and 633 respectively.


    When Harmony released results in August, it identified six shafts that would be shut or partially closed, which had total production of 220,000 ounces per year out of the firm's total output of 3.3 million. The Bambanani mine was not on that original list.


    The costs at the six shafts are all over 100,000 rand per kg, with one nearly 180,000 rand/kg, compared to the current domestic gold price of around 85,000 rand/kg.


    Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd went deeper into the red in the fourth quarter, posting a headline loss per share of 131 cents in the three months to end-June compared to a loss of 16 cents in the third quarter.


    Harmony shares, which have shed a quarter of their value this year, fell 1.1 percent to 79.70 rand by 0954 GMT, compared to a 0.4 percent fall in the gold mining index .