Beiträge von ThaiGuru

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.russiajournal.com/images/animag/top_005_02.jpg]


    http://www.russiajournal.com/n…ws-article.shtml?nd=43620


    Potanin mystery deepens


    By John Helmer


    April 30, 2004 Posted: 15:54 Moscow time (11:54 GMT)


    MOSCOW - The mystery of what Russian prosecutors have been doing, looking into the affairs of Norilski Nickel controlling shareholder Vladimir Potanin, deepened on Friday with refusals by Potanin's spokesmen to explain what is happening; and a carefully worded, but highly ambiguous statement from a federal prosecutor in Moscow.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.russiajournal.com/wpics/2003.3.7.12potaninba.jpg]Vladimir Potanin (AP)


    According to sources close to Potanin, he is currently in Spain. This is said to be certain. An earlier Moscow media report that he was in Israel has been denied. The sources also claim that on Thursday Mikhail Prokhorov, CEO of Norilsk Nickel and Potanin's shareholding partner in the company, was in Moscow. The sources said they did not know his whereabouts on Friday.


    Yelena Scherbinina, spokesman for Norilsk Nickel, said she could not respond to questions about Potanin's or Prokhorov's whereabouts, or whether Potanin had met with prosecutors. A high-ranking source inside Norilsk Nickel said "nobbody here believes that Potanin or Prokhorov has been to the prosecutor's office."


    Sergei Polikarpov, investment relations spokesman for Norilsk Nickel, refused a repeated request to answer questions about Potanin and Prokhorov, and to say whether either executive had received a request from the prosecutors to answer questions. Mikhail Barkovets, spokesman for Interros, the holding company through which Potanin controls Norilsk Nickel, refused to answer also.


    A carefully worded statement by Tatiana Matyunina, a federal prosecutor to whom the General Prosecutor's press office referred questions, skirted the question of whether Potanin and Prokhorov are under investigation. "Currently, we don't have information that Potanin has been in our office," Matyunina said by telephone. Asked if she meant that Potanin has been questioned by prosecutors or not, she added: "we don't have that information." When the questions were repeated about Prokhorov, she responded identically.


    From the cryptic replies, it now appears that the federal prosecutors want to encourage the widespread Moscow rumour that Potanin is under investigation, and may have been questioned already. All the prosecutors will say for certain is that the questioning, if it took place, did not occur at the prosecutor's office. The informal denial from sources inside Norilsk Nickel amount to the same thing. The refusal of Potanin himself, Norilsk Nickel, and Interros to clarify what is going on have thus led to a deepening suspicion that the federal government is considering action against Potanin.


    Russian government sources have already confirmed that they are investigating the recently announced Norilsk Nickel purchase of a 20 percent stake in South African miner, Gold Fields, for $1.16 billion. Potanin's dealmaker, and deputy chairman of Norilsk Nickel, Leonid Rozhetskin, said last week that he intends to increase that stake. Gold Fields executives were in Moscow this week, and reportedly met Potanin and Prokhorov.


    Several weeks ago, Vladimir Litvinenko, the Rector of the St.Petersburg State Mining Institute, called publicly for a restructuring of Norilsk Nickel's shareholding, and the introduction of a "golden share" for the government in Norilsk Nickel. He also said he is opposed to foreign takeovers of Russian resource companies. Litvinenko is an influential advisor to President Vladimir Putin.


    The Russia Journal

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.bday.co.za/bday/pix/masthead/bdlogo01.gif]


    AngloGold to optimize Ashanti

    By Justin Brown


    World number two gold miner AngloGold Ashanti (ANG) is to optimize former Ashanti mines, reduce costs and continue seeking more gold ounces, with mergers and acquisitions (M&A) very much on the cards, AngloGold Ashanti CEO Bobby Godsell said.


    weiter...


    http://www.bday.co.za/bday/con…23,1604526-6080-0,00.html

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.bday.co.za/bday/pix/masthead/bdlogo01.gif]


    http://www.bday.co.za/bday/con…23,1605241-6080-0,00.html


    Gold Fields' investor arrest drama


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By John Helmer

    MOSCOW - Russia's stock market suffered heavy losses amid rumours that billionaire metals magnate Vladimir Potanin, controlling shareholder of Norilsk Nickel and the new part-owner of Gold Fields, had been hauled in for questioning or even arrested.


    At the centre of the drama was Potanin's role in the purchase by Norilsk last month of a 20% stake in SA's Gold Fields. To finance the deal, he borrowed $800m from Citibank in apparent contravention of Russian central bank regulations and spent $316m in Norilsk Nickel cash.


    Shortly after Norilsk's purchase of Anglo American's 20% stake in Gold Fields, rumours surfaced that the Russian central bank might intervene.


    Doubts were cast on the deal after disclosures from Citibank, financier to the deal, that flatly contradicted claims by Norilsk Nickel executives in Moscow.


    The deal, in which Norilsk Nickel is paying $1,16bn to Anglo American for the shareholding in Gold Fields, had not been submitted to the Central Bank of Russia, which must approve capital transactions of Russian companies offshore.


    The now-confirmed official Russian probe of the Norilsk-Gold Fields deal is viewed by analysts in Russia as part of President Vladimir Putin's drive to roll back the power of the "oligarchs" tycoons who have amassed spectacular wealth on the back of the post-Soviet privatisation drive.


    Potanin, who is Russia's fourth richest man with an estimated fortune of $4,9bn, controls the world's largest nickel and palladium producer, Norilsk Nickel. He also has a vast media and energy empire.


    A spokesman for the Interros holding group that owns Norilsk said that contrary to a rumour that had swept Moscow, Potanin had not been arrested, and that he was on "a planned business trip". However, Interros was unable or unwilling to say where exactly Potanin was, inside Russia or abroad; and when he was expected to return.


    Russia's general prosecutor's office declined to confirm or deny whether an arrest warrant had been issued for Potanin.


    But Ekho Moskvy, a credible news radio station in Moscow that has always been close to the oligarchs, was reporting yesterday evening that Potanin had been summoned for questioning by prosecutors, and had left the country immediately afterwards.


    The Norilsk Nickel share price has been dropping sharply in the Moscow market in part because of "growing rumours of an imminent review of the metal giant's privatisation valuation", according to one analyst. There were no further details.


    Speculation about Potanin's arrest sent shares in Interros plunging 7,05% yesterday, dragging down the Moscow stock market in its wake. The benchmark RTS index closed down 5,14%.


    Following the conclusion of the Gold Fields deal, Potanin's deal maker, Leonid Rozhetskin, said in London last week that Norilsk Nickel intended to buy more Gold Fields shares.


    It has since become clear in Moscow that Potanin intends a combination of a takeover of Gold Fields and a cash out of Norilsk


    If he succeeds, Potanin would have achieved a bigger transfer of Russian wealth offshore beyond the reach of the Russian prosecutor, courts, tax authority, or the Kremlin than Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Roman Abramovich, Boris Berezovsky, Vladimir Gusinsky, or any other Russian oligarch have been able to do so far..


    Khod orkovsky was arrested last October; Berezovsky and Gusinsky are subject to arrest and are in exile in the UK and Israel.


    Any such high-profile arrest of a Russian tycoon would deal a blow to investor confidence in Russia after the detention last October on fraud and embezzlement charges of Khodorkovsky, whose prosecution is widely believed to be a Kremlin crackdown on his political ambitions. Khodorkovsky, the main shareholder in Yukos oil giant, and Russia's richest man, had been financing opposition parties prior to his arrest.


    Potanin, like Khodorkovsky, was one of seven business barons who took part in the infamous "loans for shares" scheme in 1995 that provided them with vast chunks of key Russian industries at knock-down prices.


    Business Day

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.iii.co.uk/icons/logos/uk_logo.gif]


    http://www.iii.co.uk/shares/?t…id=4964149&action=article


    Breaking news :


    2004-04-30 19:19 GMT:

    Granite Construction, Stillwater Mining


    Anadarko Petroleum tacked on more than 2 percent after the company said it earned $392 million, or $1.55 a share, in the first quarter, compared with $418 million, or $1.63 a share, a year ago. The figure includes a $40 million after-tax charge for an operating lease settlement. Excluding special items, the company earned $1.70 a share. The average estimate of analysts polled by Thomson First Call was for earnings of $1.41. Revenue climbed to $1.46 billion from $1.26 billion a year ago. Chief executive Jim Hackett said strong volumes and higher commodity prices have placed the company on track to meet its earnings goals for 2004.


    weiter....


    http://www.iii.co.uk/shares/?t…id=4964149&action=article

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.iii.co.uk/icons/logos/uk_logo.gif]


    http://www.iii.co.uk/shares/?t…id=4963323&action=article


    Breaking news:


    2004-04-30 09:21 GMT:

    Cambrian Mining finds gold mineralisation over 12km at Subranum in Ghana.


    LONDON (AFX) - Cambrian Mining PLC said gold mineralisation has now been identified over a 12 kilometre distance at Subranum in Ghana.


    During the first quarter of 2004 line-cutting, mapping and soil sampling was completed. In total 534 soil samples were collected over 6km of strike further to the north (grid) of known gold mineralisation at Area 1.


    The Subranum Project is located in Ashanti Region in southern Ghana, West Africa and straddles a major structure, the Bibiani Shear, which is intimately associated with the significant Bibiani Gold Mine and Redback's Chirano Project to the along strike to the southwest.


    newsdesk@afxnews.com


    slm/

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.iii.co.uk/icons/logos/uk_logo.gif]


    http://www.iii.co.uk/shares/?t…id=4963350&action=article


    Breaking new :


    2004-04-30 09:51 GMT:

    Harmony Gold Mining restructures board, appoints Rick Menell deputy chairman


    LONDON (AFX) - Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd said it has restructured its board.


    Patrice Motsepe, Harmony's non-executive chairman, will now be supported by Rick Menell, the company's newly appointed deputy chairman. Harmony also appointed Dr Morley Nkosi, who to date served on the ARM board, as a non-executive director.


    Dr Manana Bakane-Tuoane, Michael King, Dr Sibusiso Sibisi, Dr Rejoice Simelane and Max Sisulu resigned as directors from Harmony effective April 21. Dan Simelane also tendered his resignation as executive as he wishes to explore other business opportunities.


    Frank Abbott, Harmony's financial director, has been nominated as financial director of ARM. He will stay with Harmony as a non-executive director. Harmony said it is anticipated that a new financial director will be appointed in the next few weeks. Johannes van Heerden, the financial director of Harmony Australia, will in the interim, act as chief financial officer.


    newsdesk@afxnews.com slm/

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.ccnmatthews.com/images/ccnlogo.gif]


    http://www2.ccnmatthews.com/sc…pl?/current/0430016n.html


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www2.cdn-news.com/datab…000/SeabridgeGoldLogo.gif]


    APRIL 30, 2004 - 08:00 ET


    Seabridge Gold Closes $5.4 Million Equity Financing


    TORONTO, ONTARIO--(CCNMatthews - Apr 30, 2004) - Seabridge reported today that it has closed its previous announced private placement financing consisting of 1,200,000 common shares at $4.50 per share for proceeds of $5,400,000. Of the shares issued, 350,000 were purchased by insiders of the company. The shares issued under this financing are subject to a four-month hold
    period expiring August 31, 2004. There were no commissions or
    finder's fees payable on this financing.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://in.rediff.com/uim/common/newlogo.gif]


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://im.rediff.com/uim/common/bus_head1.gif]


    http://in.rediff.com/money/2004/apr/30gold.htm


    Silver bounces back by Rs 345, gold rallies


    April 30, 2004 19:35 IST


    Silver prices bounced back by Rs 345 per kilo on the bullion market in Mumbai on Friday due to heavy buying after a smart rise in the global prices. Gold also recovered smartly on fresh bouts of stockists' buying.


    Ready silver (.999 fineness), after a strong start at Rs 9,370, rose further to close at Rs 9,375, showing a handsome recovery of Rs 345 over yesterday's close of Rs 9,030.


    In London, silver rose smartly to $5.95 per ounce from the previous level of $5.57, while in New York, the metal firmed up to $5.83 per ounce late on Thursday from the previous day's close of $5.55, they said.


    Standard gold (99.5 purity) resumed firm at Rs 5,725 and edged up further on persistent support, before closing at Rs 5730, showing a smart rally of Rs 70 over yesterday's close of Rs 5,660.


    Pure gold (99.9 purity) also started firm at Rs 5,770 and after rising further, closed at Rs 5,780, displaying a similar gain over the last day's close of Rs 5,710.


    © Copyright 2004 PTI. All rights reserved.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://framehosting.dowjonesne…images/djn-logo-w-bar.gif]


    http://framehosting.dowjonesne…D=2004043014320007&Take=1


    30 Apr 2004 14:32 GMT


    DJ Gold Rises To $388.50 At London Afternoon Fixing


    Copyright © 2004, Dow Jones Newswires


    LONDON (Dow Jones)--Gold was fixed this afternoon at $388.50 an ounce, up from $387.30 at the morning fixing, and up from $386.00 at yesterday afternoon's fixing.


    (END) Dow Jones Newswires


    April 30, 2004 10:32 ET (14:32 GMT)

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.silverseek.com/images/logo.PNG]


    Silver Corrects or Crashes?


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.silverseek.com/news/Zealllc/zeal.gif]


    Adam Hamilton, Zeal LLC


    Almost 25 years ago Professor Roy Jastram wrote an outstanding book on silver, which he called “Silver: The Restless Metal”. It is hard to imagine a more appropriate title for a classic study on the famous white metal, as its extreme volatility profile usually dwarfs that of every other major commodity.


    In the last few months, silver has certainly lived up to Dr. Jastram’s prescient moniker. Since the beginning of February, silver has exploded from near $6 to over $8 only to plummet back down under $6 again. To put this into perspective, a similar percentage swing in gold would have yielded a jaw-dropping spike from $400 to $545 to a subsequent swift collapse back down under $400, all since early February! Wow.


    In light of such extraordinary volatility, it is no wonder that silver investors and speculators are feeling dazed and tired these days. To be wrenched from the greatest psychological high in many years to the depths of despair after silver collapsed in only a matter of weeks in April is enough to leave one reeling. Silver never was for the faint of heart.


    Now that the recent sharp silver spike and its subsequent sudden collapse are indelibly carved in the charts, a post-mortem analysis is in order. There is a growing debate among speculators whether the events of April were a silver correction or a silver crash. This is an important distinction to make, as it greatly affects the outlook on silver’s fortunes going forward.


    If April’s carnage proves to be merely a particularly vicious silver correction, it is great news for the silver bulls going forward. All bull markets advance and retreat, carving awesome new highs before temporarily reversing away from their primary trends and consolidating. These periodic corrections are very important to help bleed off temporarily overbought conditions and they grant perfect opportunities for investors and speculators to add new long positions.


    A crash, on the other hand, is an entirely different ballgame with heavily bearish implications. Crashes usually happen from long-term secular market tops, peculiar moments in time when the public begins chasing a particular investment class and foments an unsustainable speculative mania. Think NASDAQ 2000. Since crashes utterly destroy the thundering herds of new speculators buying in right near the top, they usually herald long, ugly bear markets.


    Interestingly, at the time they happen sharp corrections and full-on crashes can be indistinguishable. If the markets head higher in the years following a price collapse, soon it fades into technical triviality due to rising prices. A $2+ drop in silver feels big now, for example, but how will April’s events look on a chart if silver breaks above $50 in the years ahead? If the silver charts scale up to challenge multi-decade highs, April’s $2 slide won’t even be noticeable anymore and will be forgotten.


    On the other hand, if silver was to grind down under $4 from here in a renewed bear market in the years ahead, April’s $2 collapse would stick out like a sore thumb on the charts for years to come. Technical analysts would look back to this month and remember it as the month silver crashed. When the NASDAQ crashed a few years ago few were willing to consider it in crash terms at the time, but in hindsight the spring 2000 collapse was indeed a crystal-clear classical index crash.


    So, the proper interpretation for April’s events really depends on what happens to the silver price in the years ahead. If silver marches higher the recent unpleasantness will be all but forgotten as just another sharp correction within a powerful bull market. But if silver flounders lower from here April 2004 will be remembered as a silver crash that ushered in a newly energized bear.


    As investors and speculators today, however, we do not have the luxury of waiting until 2005 or 2006 to decide on the correct interpretation of this silver price collapse. While we cannot know for sure yet what will unfold in the months ahead, we can analyze the clues and make a good guess on which thesis the probabilities currently favor, the bullish silver correction or the bearish silver crash. We’ll begin with a simple price chart.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.silverseek.com/news…lc/images/Zeal043004A.gif]


    The hefty magnitude of the awesome silver upleg since October is readily apparent in this year-long price chart. While last summer’s silver upleg only managed a modest 18.8% gain, the magnificent specimen that topped in April roared up a breathtaking 71.5%, almost four times as large. It was not only the scale that was different this time, but the actual technical fingerprint of these two uplegs differed dramatically.


    Last summer, the bottom support zone of silver’s upleg was a single line, drawn in black above. This classical linear support zone is exactly what market technicians expect to see in a typical upleg. A price rises gradually over time, but the slope of its ascent does not continuously accelerate. There may be one slope change within the upleg, but usually not multiple slope changes.


    Contrast this conservative typical upleg with the dazzling silver action since October. As silver powered higher from its early October lows, the slope of its short-term support line shifted no less than four times. These four different support zones are also rendered above with black arrows. While prices climbing in a constantly accelerating upslope are great fun for speculators at the time, they are also unfortunately unsustainable.


    As the slope of an uptrend gets steeper and steeper, eventually a price is traveling almost vertically. Just like the physical world, however, the steeper a hill gets the more difficult the fight against technical gravity grows. While it doesn’t take a lot of buying power to start a new upleg, the amount of silver buying necessary to sustain an ascent as it approaches a vertical slope balloons tremendously.


    It is kind of like those four-wheel-drive hill-climbing contests. A driver starts on a modest upslope and has no problem accelerating up a hill. But once the driver nears the crown of the hill, his machine is pointing nearly straight up and the horsepower required to continue clawing ahead grows exponentially. All the drama unfolds near the driver’s goal when he either flips over backwards and careens down the hill or ramps into the air off the crown before landing safely on the top of the hill.


    In technical analysis these continuously accelerating upslopes are known as parabolic ascents. When a price carves a pattern on a long-term chart that looks like a parabola on the verge of shooting vertical, it is often a classical indicator of a mature bubble. The most infamous example of a major parabolic ascent in modern times is certainly the NASDAQ bubble of 2000. Once its parabola reached its vertical phase no amount of buying could push it higher and it soon collapsed under its own weight.


    Now the silver pattern above is nowhere near as extreme as the NASDAQ bubble. Great bubbles in history only happen at the climax stage of great bull markets running a decade or more. Silver’s bull market is very young and the public is certainly not involved yet, so there is no way we have just witnessed a classic silver bubble. Yet, silver’s recent upleg did exhibit telltale signs of a short-term miniature parabolic ascent.


    Silver’s four successively steeper support zones were starting to form what I call a linear parabola. This shape, which is shown above in the graph inset, has fascinated me since I was a child doodling with a pencil and paper. If you draw a series of evenly spaced straight lines with constantly increasing slopes, these straight lines quickly form the curved surface of a parabola. The small example above consists of only eight straight lines, yet its curved parabolic ascent looks just like silver’s four-support-zone linear parabola.


    Parabolic ascents in prices are always unsustainable, whether they happen over many years as in the NASDAQ or in only a relatively few months as in this silver example. The only way for the vast majority of these parabolic ascents to be resolved is by a sharp drop in prices. In silver’s case, this was a brutal 28.4% correction in only a matter of weeks. Sharp plunges following a parabolic ascent are all but inevitable.


    This resulting collapse in prices is very important as it bleeds off speculative excesses. As you recall in early April, the excitement in silver was reaching a fever pitch over the short-term. Calls for $10 silver by the end of April were everywhere and the precious-metals community was falling all over itself to praise silver. Greed was multiplying tremendously and fear was elusive. A drop in prices was necessary to temper these growing speculative imbalances.


    Thus, in light of the vertically accelerating parabolic pattern that silver had carved on its charts, it should not have surprised anyone that the silver price needed to retreat and regroup. In the April issue of our Zeal Intelligence newsletter for our subscribers, on April 1st before silver collapsed I wrote, “From a short-term speculation standpoint, silver’s chart does look rather toppy at the moment. The metal is accelerating to the upside and is on the verge of going parabolic, a telltale sign of being short-term overbought.”


    It wasn’t only price patterns that were flashing warning signals to speculators to be cautious on silver over the short-term. While silver soared from early February to early April, the major silver stocks refused to confirm its new highs. Some silver miners just consolidated sideways, while others ground modestly lower in the very same recent months when silver was soaring. When metals stocks don’t confirm metals moves, it is a sign that speculators are cautious and skeptical and are not yet convinced that a particular metals move is real and sustainable.


    While silver’s parabolic price pattern and non-confirming silver stocks did provide plenty of warning to prudent speculators that a silver correction was due, these factors alone are not sufficient enough to weigh the probabilities that silver just witnessed a bullish correction or a bearish crash. To make this determination, we really need to consider long-term fundamentals and psychology.


    April’s price collapse notwithstanding, in fundamental terms is the current case for silver bullish or bearish? If it is bullish the healthy correction interpretation has more weight, but if it is bearish the crash interpretation will take the lead. Fundamentals are everything when trying to determine whether an existing bull or bear market will continue to travel along its primary trend for some time to come.


    Price is ultimately determined by supply and demand, the most foundational of all fundamental drivers. In silver’s case, the supply and demand imbalance continues to be very favorable for this restless metal. Global industrial and investment demand for silver is soaring year after year, yet mined supply just cannot keep up. The majority of silver mined is merely a byproduct of mining for other metals including lead, copper, and gold, so most mines cannot significantly increase their silver production in response to rising prices. Growing demand and flat supply is a very bullish omen.


    In addition, the global above-ground stocks of silver have been tremendously depleted in the past decades of low silver prices. Unlike gold, there is no giant central-bank hoard of silver hanging over the markets. If mined silver cannot meet global silver demand each year, then the silver price will have to head higher. For a far deeper discussion of silver’s bullish supply and demand fundamentals, you may wish to skim a silver essay I wrote a few years ago called “Lagrimas de la Luna”.


    Fundamentally, since silver demand greatly exceeds its mined supply each year and there is no other place to get more silver in quantity besides mining, its bullish case remains rock-solid. There is no other market response possible other than rising prices in this situation, where demand growth far outstrips supply growth and there is no relief in sight for years to come.


    While nowhere near as important as supply and demand, long-term psychology is another fundamental driver of silver prices. While the dedicated precious-metals community was getting excited about silver in early April, the general public certainly was not. Silver prices didn’t make the evening news, CNBC wasn’t talking about silver every 10 minutes, and odds are your neighbor wasn’t putting a third mortgage on his house to buy silver bullion. A popular mania it was not!


    If the silver collapse in April represented a transition from bull to bear, we would expect to see some level of public involvement and excitement leading up to the silver top. As far as I can tell, outside of the commodities world silver’s spectacular upleg remained largely unknown. Without abundant popular euphoria for silver even among mainstream investors, there is no psychological evidence that this silver bull should be ending.


    Thus, in light of continuing very bullish supply and demand fundamentals and a lack of mania psychology outside of the usual precious-metals crowd, silver’s price collapse looks infinitely more like a healthy bull-market correction than a devastating crash leading into a bear market. In fact, I continue to believe that the awesome silver rally we just witnessed is the first major upleg of a glorious new bull market in silver.


    Indeed, when silver is compared with its important 200-day-moving-average major bull-market support, its overall behavior does continue to look very bullish. This next graph adds a Relative Silver (rSilver) line, which divides silver by its 200dma. Relative Silver normalizes the distance between silver and its crucial 200dma and renders it in perfectly comparable constant-percentage terms over time.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.silverseek.com/news…lc/images/Zeal043004B.gif]


    No bull market, including this young one in silver, advances in a straight line forever. Bull markets flow and ebb, advancing and retreating. Over time the bull market carves a classic series of higher highs and higher lows, but these gains are gradual. As I have discussed in gold recently, the 200dma is the key technical anchor from which these bull market advances generally launch and to which these periodic corrections generally retreat back.


    The 200dma is rendered as the heavy black line in these graphs. It is not at all surprising that silver’s awesome upleg launched in early October from its 200dma as this is textbook bull-market behavior. As the red Relative Silver line above shows, rSilver actually traded down to 1.007 before silver’s rally launched. From these low levels only 1% above its 200dma, silver powered higher into early January. It reached levels 31.4% above its 200dma before it began retreating for a few weeks.


    As Silver reached this initial interim top in January, I was closely watching silver to see how far above its 200dma it would stretch. As discussed in “Trading the Silver Bull”, it would be valuable to gain an understanding of the general rSilver trading range in a typical major silver upleg. If we can figure out about how far silver tends to run above its 200dma in an upleg before it retreats back down to its 200dma, it will help us better time silver trading entries and exits.


    While we have been blessed with excellent success using this same Relativity technique in trading gold and gold stocks, at this stage in the silver bull it is still just too early to get a good sense of the rSilver trading ranges. Since silver has had only one major upleg in its bull to date, the graph above is really all we have to work with.


    Prior to this first major upleg maturing and ending, we had been running a tentative rSilver range of interest of 1.03 to 1.20. This means that whenever rSilver trades under 1.03, or silver within 3% of its major 200dma bull-market support, a buy signal will flash indicating it is time to throw long. Whenever a bull market retreats back down near its 200dma, it is generally oversold and often bounces near there before heading higher in a new upleg. With rSilver back down near 1.007 again today, we are now looking at the most favorable silver buying opportunity since last autumn!


    The old top end of our rSilver range, 1.20, was obviously far too conservative in light of this first major upleg. I am going to raise our level of interest for future major silver rallies to 1.30 for now. This means that when silver advances more than 30% above its major 200dma bull-market support, we will consider it short-term overbought and go neutral.


    In the graph above rSilver reached 1.314 in January, retreated for a few weeks, and then blasted higher to phenomenal 1.448 rSilver heights. It is hard to believe that silver was able to climb almost 45% above its 200dma before it entered this healthy bull-market correction! To put this into perspective, in gold’s own bull market that has already witnessed several major uplegs, the highest that gold has traded above its 200dma has only been 18% or so. Silver’s parabolic ascent really was amazing!


    So if silver can stretch so incredibly far beyond its 200dma, why only use an rSilver 1.30 level to define the top of a trading range? And why call this neutral rather than an outright sell?


    The goal of trading signals is to help us recognize major turning points in advance. It is better to be conservative and start paying attention early at a lower level than holding out for a very short-term overbought extreme that may not be achieved in silver’s next major upleg. As this chart shows, it is best to get prepared for the end of an upleg in advance since silver can collapse so rapidly.


    Calling an rSilver 1.30+ level a neutral zone rather than an outright sell signal helps protect us from selling out too soon before a future silver upleg ends. Once we enter into neutral territory in rSilver terms, all we have to do is ratchet up our trailing stop losses on silver stocks and stop adding new positions. Since bull markets have the highest probability of surprising to the upside, going neutral and tightening stops keeps us exposed to the primary bull trend for as long as possible in each upleg while still providing some protection for our capital.


    If you are interested in using Silver and other indicators to trade silver and silver stocks, trying to buy near the periodic bottoms of silver corrections and go neutral and get stopped out near the interim tops of silver uplegs, you may wish to consider subscribing to our acclaimed monthly Zeal Intelligence newsletter.


    Adam Hamilton, CPA


    April 30, 2004


    weiter....


    http://news.silverseek.com/Zealllc/1083344455.php

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    Inflation, Debt, Spending, Wages and the Dollar


    By: Dan Norcini


    In light of some recent editorials dealing with certain of the above mentioned subjects, I thought that I would throw my contribution into the kettle so as to add to the mix and provide an alternative perspective to some of the opinions being expressed by various writers to the gold community. This essay is really born out of the many emails I have been receiving asking me for my thoughts on this writer and that writer’s comments and in particular the new buzz word, “synthetic short dollar position.”


    Let me begin by stating that I am going to be displaying a series of charts making some comments on each one and then attempting to tie the entire collection together in one brief summary. I will also add this disclaimer before I begin. I am not an economist nor do I pretend to be one. I approach these things from the perspective of a trader who is attempting to formulate an overall fundamental view of the U.S. economy and position myself accordingly so as to profit.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428A.gif]


    The first chart you are looking at above is the Personal Savings Rate as a percentage of income for the United States going back to 1995. It is fairly obvious that the savings rate in this nation is nothing short of abysmal and has been in steady decline for the nearly the last decade. It has rebounded a bit off the low point reached just after the September 11 tragedy where it dipped under 1% but is currently still beneath 2%. Keep in mind that a savings pool is necessary to fund future economic expansion and capital investment. Of course, Lord Keynes and his followers tend to view savings and savers as some sort of pestilential breed of parasite and would no doubt be pleased with this chart but then again Keynes and his proselytes forfeited all credibility long ago.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428B.gif]


    This above chart contains the actual CPI number from 1995 to the present. It takes only a quick glance to realize that the idea that the nonsense the Fed has been spoon feeding the public about deflation has been a convenient excuse to continue to prime the money pump. Additionally, if anyone actually believes that the CPI is an accurate reflection of true costs of goods and services in this nation I have some fairy dust for sale that can take him to never-never land where he can fly along with Peter Pan. Thanks to the wonders of hedonic indexing and the constant juggling and re-weighting of the various components that make up the index, the infernal index is basically useless for real world experience. Still, it is the only thing we really have to work with and thus it is presented as an object illustration of the inexorable rise in prices that the American consumer is faced with today.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428C.gif]


    Next we come to the Personal Consumption Expenditure data. This illustrates what is referred to as consumer spending and is an excellent indicator as to what the general public is doing with its money. Notice the steady rise with barely a hitch over the last decade. There was a brief, sharp dip after September 11, 2001 as can be seen on the chart but other than that the line basically heads straight up with an occasional steady reading with no fall-off to speak of anywhere. No doubt part of this spending is due to population growth as well as overall employment growth over the years plotted and that is to be expected. The point is that spending continues unabated and thus far shows no sign of letting up.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428D.gif]


    Now we come to the Retail and Food Service Sales data. Again, this is another gauge of consumer spending and is used to judge the general mood of the public. Notice the dip after September 2001 when the American public pulled in its reins for a season. Still, it appears that Americans continue to have a healthy appetite for dining out and loading their shopping carts with goodies galore.


    There have been some comments made by some that the Retail Sales figures are not all that strong when one considers that the numbers reported are not adjusted for inflation and thus simply reflect the rising costs of goods and services. The thought is that once adjusted for inflation, the sales number is actually disappointing. That raises a legitimate point and is worth examining in a bit more detail so the following chart is the same data when adjusted for inflation relying on the data used to compile the CPI index that we have seen in the former charts.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428E.gif]


    As you can see, even the inflation adjusted numbers still show a strong uptrend. The main difference stands out in the year 2000 when the inflation adjusted figures were trending flat to down while the unadjusted raw data was still heading up. As a matter of fact for the entire year 2000 and most of 2001, REAL retail sales were stagnant - the increase in those sales as reflected on the unadjusted chart during that time frame were related solely to price increases as reflected by the CPI. Last year however, REAL retail sales actually began an ascent that continues to the present. As a matter of fact, the rise is most impressive- consumers are indeed spending money. The question I personally have when viewed in light of the charts to follow is “where are they getting the money to spend?”


    These next two charts reveal a great deal about the current state of our economic recovery when combined with the data that has preceded them to this point. Both charts are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics data and deal with Average Weekly Earnings. I took the data back a decade just for comparison’s sake.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428F.gif]


    Notice that the average weekly earnings figure has shown a nice, slow but steady rise over the last ten years. Back in 1994, the average worker’s earnings in one week were right around $390. For each year thereafter wages have continued to rise bringing us to 2004 where the average for this year will come in somewhere near $522 (I extrapolated this figure from the first three month’s data released thus far this year). Now, if this were all we had to go on, one could make the assumption that good ol’ John Doe has seen his income increase every year for the last decade and is in terrific shape to feed any future economic expansion with continued spending on more goodies and services. However, that assumption is fatally flawed. Just as we wanted to index the Retail and Food Service Sales to inflation to get a true reading of where consumer spending is at, so we ought to index these numbers to the CPI to obtain what we will refer to as Real Wages (wages adjusted for inflation). The results of this calculation are astonishing and are included in the following chart.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428G.gif]


    Let’s put this in a bit of perspective. From 1994 to 2004, a period of ten years, the average weekly earnings has increased $131.39 from $390.73 to $522.12 for an annual increase of $6,832.22 Adjusting that same figure for inflation using the CPI wage deflator over the same period of ten years yields an average weekly increase from an inflation adjusted $254.55 to $280.26 or a mere $25.71. That translates to a pitiful annual increase after a decades worth of labor of $1,336.92 when adjusted for inflation. To put into blunt English and strip away the flowery language – the average worker makes some $1300 more a year than he did ten years ago. And to think this is the productivity miracle that Greenspan never tires of praising. The increase in property taxes alone due to inflated real estate appraisals by local governments is enough to eat that up and more. Is it any wonder that consumers are falling further and further behind and consequently being forced to go deeper and deeper into debt to maintain their current lifestyles?


    The last chart is included as a further confirmation that no serious concerted effort is being made by consumers to reduce their overall levels of indebtedness.


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/Norcini0428H.gif]


    The financial obligations debt ratio is the ratio of household debt payments to disposable income and includes mortgage payments, loans, car lease payments, credit card payments, homeowner’s insurance, and property tax payments etc. as a percentage of disposable income. Note carefully that this is not the actual amount of total indebtedness as a percentage of disposable income but rather the PAYMENTS ON THAT DEBT as a percentage of disposable income. The data subset also assumes the MINIMUM payment permitted by the creditors in regards to the outstanding consumer debt and loans. Unfortunately I have vainly attempted to locate more current data that is inclusive of this year but the data stops in July 2003. Still it is helpful as to determining a change in trend even if it is incomplete at this point.


    Notice that as the economy went into recession back during the last two years of the first President Bush’s term, consumers retrenched and began scaling back and made an effort to reduce their overall level of indebtedness. The low point was reached just as the economy was coming out of recession when Clinton took office in early 1993. From that point forward, it has trended higher with occasional periods of mostly insignificant decline. It appears to have peaked in later 2001 or early 2002 and has tailed down somewhat from there although it was still near 18.5% in the summer of 2003, a good 2.5% higher than the trough in late 1992. My explanation for this slight decrease evidenced on the charts is the massive wave of mortgage refinancing that has taken place as a result of the Fed’s reduction in interest rates to 45+ year lows. Consumers have not paid down outstanding debt – they have simply rolled credit card payments, outstanding loans, student loans, etc., into home mortgage loans at ultra low rates and reduced their monthly payments commensurately. The total amount of principal is still the same – just the interest payments have been reduced and subsequently the monthly payments and that is what the chart is reflecting.


    Dan Norcini


    April 27, 2004


    Dan is a professional off-the-floor commodity trader residing in Texas and can be reached at dnorcini@earthlink.net with comments.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    Teil II


    This crash was painful for many indeed but those brave investors who simply had the courage to buy during these extremely oversold conditions had a buy of a life time. Don’t believe me ? Well, just take a look at the chart below, it will tell you exactly what happened next !


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/EH3.gif]


    So what happened ? Golden Star shares doubled in just 6 weeks ! Why ? Simple ! The Gold Bull hadn’t ended yet and just shook out all weak hands before resuming its upward trend !


    Today we see a very similar pattern as in July 2002. Golden Star crashing through its 200 dma and lots of panicking investors who wants to get out because they fear that the bull-run in gold is over, ! Déjà vu again ! Just take a look at GSS today :


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/EH4.gif]


    As I said, a very similar pattern as we saw in July 2002 !


    So the question remains, is the current bull run in Gold over yet ? Or has it hardly begun ?


    Fundamentals (CA deficit, $ decline, negative real interest rates, declining gold supply, increase of investor demand etc..) tell us that this bull market in gold is very well alive !


    Therefore I would suggest that it isn’t very likely that this extreme oversold condition in Gold shares is going to hold much longer. If the July 2002 pattern repeats itself, we could witness a spectacular run in Gold shares within the next two month. Again, those brave investors who had the courage to invest in Golden Star at 73 cents when everyone else was panicking were rewarded tremendously ! Now’s your chance to do the same !


    Best,


    Eric


    The gold shares selling has been extraordinary. We should have seen the worst of it.


    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    Appendix


    The following was written by Lawrence of Arabia circa 1919 and appeared in The Times in London. It is about the British Occupation of Iraq (then called Mesopotamia) after WW I.


    Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose!


    This comment by Lawrence, presumably about 1919, is truly spectacular, given current events...


    A Report on Mesopotamia by T.E. Lawrence


    Sunday Times


    Mr. Lawrence, whose organization and direction of the Hedjaz against the Turks was one of the outstanding romances of the war, has written this article at our request in order that the public may be fully informed of our Mesopotamian commitments.


    The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiques are belated, insincere, incomplete. Things have been far worse than we have been told, our administration more bloody and inefficient than the public knows. It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure. We are to-day not far from a disaster. The sins of commission are those of the British civil authorities in Mesopotamia (especially of three 'colonels') who were given a free hand by London. They are controlled from no Department of State, but from the empty space which divides the Foreign Office from te India Office. They availed themselves of the necessary discretion of war-time to carry over their dangerous independence into times of peace. They contest every suggestion of real self-government sent them from home. A recent proclamation about autonomy circulated with unction from Baghdad was drafted and published out there in a hurry, to forestall a more liberal statement in preparation in London, 'Self-determination papers' favourable to England were extorted in Mesopotamia in 1919 by official pressure, by aeroplane demonstrations, by deportations to India. The Cabinet cannot disclaim all responsibility. They receive little more news than the public: they should have insisted on more, and better. They have sent draft after draft of reinforcements, without enquiry. When conditions became too bad to endure longer, they decided to send out as High commissioner the original author of the present system, with a conciliatory message to the Arabs that his heart and policy have completely changed.


    Yet our published policy has not changed, and does not need changing. It is that there has been a deplorable contrast between our profession and our practice. We said we went to Mesopotamia to defeat Turkey. We said we stayed to deliver the Arabs from the oppression of the Turkish Government, and to make available for the world its resources of corn and oil. We spent nearly a million men and nearly a thousand million of money to these ends. This year we are spending ninety-two thousand men and fifty millions of money on the same objects. Our government is worse than the old Turkish system. They kept fourteen thousand local conscripts embodied, and killed a yearly average of two hundred Arabs in maintaining peace. We keep ninety thousand men, with aeroplanes, armoured cars, gunboats, and armoured trains. We have killed about ten thousand Arabs in this rising this summer. We cannot hope to maintain such an average: it is a poor country, sparsely peopled; but Abd el Hamid would applaud his masters, if he saw us working. We are told the object of the rising was political, we are not told what the local people want. It may be what the Cabinet has promised them. A Minister in the House of Lords said that we must have so many troops because the local people will not enlist.


    On Friday the Government announced the death of some local levies defending their British officers, and say that the services of these men have not yet been sufficiently recognized because they are too few (adding the characteristic Baghdad touch that they are men of bad character). There are seven thousand of them, just half the old Turkish force of occupation. Properly officered and distributed, they would relieve half our army there. Cromer controlled Egypt's six million people with five thousand British troops; Colonel Wilson fails to control Mesopotamia's three million people with ninety thousand troops. We have not reached the limit of our military commitments. Four weeks ago the staff in Mesopotamia drew up a memorandum asking for four more divisions. I believe it was forwarded to the War Office, which has now sent three brigades from India. If the North-West Frontier cannot be further denuded, where is the balance to come from? Meanwhile, our unfortunate troops, Indian and British, under hard conditions of climate and supply, are policing an immense area, paying dearly every day in lives for the willfully wrong policy of the civil administration in Baghdad. General Dyer was relieved of his command in India for a much smaller error, but the responsibility in this case is not on the Army, which has acted only at the request of the civil authorities. The War Office has made every effort to reduce our forces, but the decisions of the Cabinet have been against them. The Government in Baghdad have been hanging Arabs in that town for political offences, which they call rebellion. The Arabs are not at war with us. Are these illegal executions to provoke the Arabs to reprisals on the three hundred British prisoners they hold? And, if so, is it that their punishment may be more severe, or is it to persuade our other troops to fight to the last? We say we are in Mesopotamia to develop it for the benefit of the world. All experts say that the labour supply is the ruling factor in its development. How far will the killing of ten thousand villagers and townspeople this summer hinder the production of wheat, cotton, and oil? How long will we permit millions of pounds, thousands of Imperial troops, and tens of thousands of Arabs to be sacrificed on behalf of colonial administration which can benefit nobody but its administrators?


    -END-

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    The WSJ reports: U.S. trucking co's haul their highest prices in years -- WSJ : The WSJ reports many trucking co's are imposing their steepest price increases in years spurred by a strengthening economy and rising diesel-fuel prices. For example, Schneider National says customer demand exceeds its supply of 14,000 tractors and 40,000 trailers by as much as 10%.


    GATA’s Mike Bolser:


    Hi Bill:


    The Fed added $22.8 Billion in repos including another permanent Open Market Operation. Therepo pool actually fell to $40.68 Billion due to a very large expiration.


    The pool's moving average continues up, signaling a steady increase in DOW support and the DOW's 30-day ma is also trending back up towards its linear track to 11,750 by Labor Day 2004.


    With gold gyrating today, having touched $377 for a time, we much keep in mind that the dollar was tracking at 87 in past weeks and now is up over 91. Thus, gold ought to be down in absolute terms. This is the hard thing to appreciate when considering the DIVG.


    In extremis, if the dollar index doubled to 180 gold would "plunge" to ONLY $192 per ounce! The issue most overlooked is that the "depressed gold price" actually buys the same amount of goods and services so nothing will have changed with gold at $192.


    Last night's DIVG was 348.79, about where it has been (350) during this latest Fed-engineered down phase. The DIVG 200-day ma is still tracking up and THAT'S the most important issue to keep one's eye on. The DIVG 200-day ma is tracking up because the gold cartel has been forced to ordain it. Moreover, if the cartel were engaged in a simple trick to lure in unsuspecting gold bugs they would have set up a quick spike as they have in the past. This time it has been a steady four-month rise in the DIVG, which is the absolute value of gold expressed in terms of the major currencies.


    A separate issue of concern are the gold share jitters as they can be shorted by the big Wall Street houses. Jim Sinclair has opined on this topic in the past urging holders to eliminate margin accounts so as to prevent others from shorting the very sector an investor wishes to protect. Indeed, some of the Fed's primary dealers downgraded Gold Corp last week. Did they have advance warning about the Fed's current gold attack? Draw your own conclusions.


    Tonight's DIVG will tell a tale if this is a serious Fed policy change or just a brief counter-attack.


    Mike


    Houston’s Dan Norcini:


    Hey Bill:

    Volume looks pretty strong in gold today. Yesterday's was massive; over 100,000. Looks like we might come in somewhere near 75,000- 80,000 today when the count is finished. Will have to wait to the sesson's end to know for sure.


    Open interest was another shocker in gold. It went up again! This is simply amazing.It would not surprise me a bit to learn that the goon squad, who clocked it yesterday with those big offers to get the ball rolling to the downside, covered in the mid 380's leaving the new fund and small spec shorts to take their place. I am expecting another sizeable reduction in COT's short position with the release of tomorrow's Commitments Data. Sadly, it will not contain what happened on Wednesday or today since the data is only inclusive thru Tuesday.


    Either way, all the longs who bailed yesterday were replaced by new ones as well as new shorts, a lot of whom sold gold down near 384-386. As of the close today - they are sitting on losing postions (Smile here). The guys who sold the 377 level early today in London must be reeling by now. The move up from 380 during the first hour after the GDP was on strong volume. No doubt there was panic buying by those newcomers. Nice to see some fear and panic grip the other side for a change.


    We have a nice bullish hammer formation on the daily charts with today's action on heavy volume which adds some credibility to the thought that we might be sold out for the time being. We will need to see a confirmation of that however as we will want to see if the market will hold above today's low. A successful retest of that level and a bounce back away from it, should do the trick.


    About time our side gets some sort of moral victory.


    check with you later, Dan

    Derek Van Artsdalen from San Antonio on the big picture:


    Good morning, Bill:


    Well, this was the day we've been waiting for, I think. You recall my research that showed that each double-digit (10% or greater) decline in the gold price back in the late 70s gold bull resulted in AT LEAST a 27% increase in the price of gold over the following months. No exceptions. In fact, most of the increases were far greater.


    So, today was the day. From the most recent peak on the first of this month at $427.25 (London fix), we've now fallen 10.41% to this morning's London fix of 382.75. If we get only the minimum increase from the 70s pattern, that takes gold to $486.09. Naturally, we know the price will likely go much higher than that in the months following the election. But for now, if we're near the bottom, we're headed to nearly five hundred bucks—minimum.


    It's become clear to me that the gold crowd needs to begin thinking of these cycles in terms of several months rather than paying so much attention to the daily or even the hourly price fluctuations. Manipulations or not, big runups are followed by relatively big corrections, and I have the feeling that we'd better get used to more, rather than less, volatility. We need to remember, as I've shown from other research of the late 70s market, that volatility is, in the end, our greatest ally, for in a secular bull market it portends much higher prices ahead.


    Don't stop laying it all on the table, Bill. Sooner or later, "the fundamental things apply... as time goes by."


    Trying to hang on for the requisite eight seconds,


    Derek


    The view from Australia:


    All the wheels fell off the markets last night - all at the same time. Stocks and bonds, commodities, the euro and the major currencies, gold, silver, palladium, platinum - all were given a savage beating by "investors''. Markets are said to run on two emotions, fear and greed, and it was the former that reigned last night, but why? If you listen to the talking heads on CNBC you'd have to think that the US is booming. The Q1 earnings reports have been almost universally above expectations, Big Al tells us the inflation genie is still firmly stoppered in its bottle, the jobs picture is a beauty, and even Japan is going gangbusters. Surely a piddling 25 bp rate hike couldn't do much harm to such a robust recovery. So what's all the panic about?


    The Chinese premier announced that changes to financing business expenditure will be introduced to put a damper on a dangerously overheated economy. Sounds like a wise move to me, and one that should have been applauded by the markets. A lot of commentators have been saying that China's economy is about to implode because of unrestrained credit growth and rising inflation. Making a pre-emptive strike against mounting pressures might stave off disaster and mean that China can grow at a sustainable rate for the foreseeable future, which is to everyone's advantage - especially Japan's which relies heavily on exports to the Middle Kingdom. But base metals were hammered, with copper and nickel suffering particularly badly. Nickel has now fallen 40% since hitting a multi-year high in January.


    While the fundamentals for precious metals have been at their best in decades, the funds and the major trading banks took the opportunity to trash gold and silver along with just about everything else. As long as Big Al and the Fed keep mouthing their ludicrous assertions that inflation is low and not a problem, gold and silver will have to be kept in check. It's the accepted mantra that gold is a barometer of impending inflation, so Al and the boys would look pretty damn silly if they said there's no inflation while gold was soaring. The fly in their increasingly sticky oinment on this scam is that the physical demand from China, India, and the Middle East is very strong, so it's taking increasing quantities of Fed gold dumped on the market to keep the price down. Someday soon they'll run out, and then...........................If you want to get the lowdown on precious metals and how we are still in a bull market despite all the shenanigans, drop Bill Murphy a line at LePatron@leMetropolecafe.com and get a free two week trial of his daily newsletter on gold and the markets. And yes, I know I said last week that it was a great time to buy gold and gold shares, and it still is. There is really no way of knowing when the bottom of this brutal correction will be reached, but make no mistake, this is just a correction in a long, long bull market. Buying now will ensure you don't miss the boat when the reversal comes. And that is likely to be a sudden and very strong reversal.


    If you accept the mainstream view that the US is undergoing a sustained and strong economic boom, ask yourself a couple of questions:- if tomorrow's GDP figure comes in at around 5% or more for the 1st quarter as expected, and consumers' balance sheets are "in good shape" as Big Al said a few weeks ago, then why are rates at a pitiful 1%, and why are personal bankruptcies at an all time high? Why is Greenspan in no hurry to raise rates as he should? And IF he does (not a foregone conclusion by any means) what will happen to that bankruptcy rate then? If, for arguments sake, you are paying 4% on your mortgage, and rates were to rise by a modest 1% over 12 months, your interest bill would rise by 25%! If you're in debt up to your eyeballs, and your wages haven't risen - and they're unlikely to while there is high unemployment and excess business capacity - how will you be able to pay such an impost?


    The answer is you won't, and Greenspan knows it. And deep, deep, deep down, the markets know it too. That's why there was mayhem on Wall Street last night, and it's my bet that the bear market rally is just about over. The spectre of the Iraqi quagmire is looming ever larger, and it seems only Bush and Blair have any confidence in a successful conclusion. Mobs of British and American ex-diplomats have written to their respective leaders saying their policies on Iraq and Palestine will lead to disaster, and Kofi Annan and special envoy to the UN Brahimi have said that the US actions in Fallujah will lead to very serious ramifications. All that's needed now is a revolution in Saudi Arabia and we'll see oil at $90 a barrel. Notice how there's been major civil disturbances in Syria, Jordan, and Thailand in the past few days, all the work of Islamic fundamentalists. That's just a small measure of how much hatred is being directed at the US and its allies, and how many more moderate Muslims are going over to the fundamentalists' camp.


    None of this does anything but bode badly for the American budget deficit which may actually reach $700 billion this year (after the social security fund has been raided to keep the 'frontline' number within the bounds of decency) and with the greenback climbing, be it temporarily, the current account deficit is also likely to keep growing. More debt to add the ocean in which America swims.


    One day, all the effort of fighting the tide will become too much. You can guess what will happen next.


    The Idle Fellow.


    Some sound technical analysis follows which should be very useful:


    Dear Bill,

    At the risk of embarrassing myself on the subject of Technical Analysis, when you have the greats in the business are reading your work, just the same, I thought I would enclose a chart of the XAU that I sent to clients during one of the many corrections, we have had along the way. This chart shows the correction in early 2003. Many people were frightened and some called me a kook, but Gold and the XAU recovered and went on to new highs, as we all know.


    This massive accumulation bottom, called a head and shoulder pattern, is why I have invested in gold, and the neckline was give or take around 80 with some spikes a little higher, which we all know now, we broke out from there.


    As I have told you in the past I started in the brokerage business in 1980 and in the late summer of 1982 when the Dow broke 1000, I went to all my clients and stated that the stock market landscape had changed and we made a new all time ever new high.


    Armed with charts and graphs I took from the best of the day (stole them I guess as I was learning, still am) and Mr. Yale Hirsch's chart famous long term chart, but much to my surprise few bought. Soon after when the Dow was at 1500 investors started to put their toes in the water. The Dow promptly corrected back to the neckline and investors bailed then it was ready to start the famous Bull Market.


    I view this market in much the same way. You break resistance, like a plane going through the sound barrier with a bang, and then you get the hush of no resistance. Like the Dow in 1980 and the XAU at 80ish they were powerful breakouts. We have pulled back to powerful support. Will it hold, I think it will given the fundamentals behind the initial move, but then as you have stated, these guys are powerful. This is not a short term prediction, but longer term view, what has changed except the shares prices and as Mr. Hamilton stated last week (assuming nothing changed in his work) Gold Shares and Gold are well priced at these levels. Someone sold 3M in 1982 and missed a bull market that lasted along time. Investors today could be selling the Gold at bargain prices today, when we look in the rearview mirror 5 years from now.


    This move is a blow no doubt especially, when I was already to send some unrealized gains on a new stereo, but the longer term still could hold a lot of promise for the long term Gold Bull.


    Kindest Regards


    John C. Newell - Investment Advisor
    First Associates Investments Limited
    Bentall V, 5th Floor, 550 Burrard St.
    Vancouver, BC. V6C-2B5
    T:604-640-0318
    http: http://www. firstassociates.com


    Then from my brother Tim:


    Brother Bill, Gold took out its one year uptrend line at 395 and the breakdown was confirmed when it took out the double bottom at 390. The breakdown of the one year uptrend channel and the double top at 430 gives gold a price objective of 353-358. This price objective coincides with the three year uptrend line at 355.


    The good news is gold showed hints of a reversal today. Gold above 390, especially if it happens quickly, would indicate a sold out market. Gold above 400 would indicate a complete reversal with the possibility of taking out 430 quickly. Today's 'reversal' brings us to the moment of truth. If gold starts drifting back to today’s lows, we have
    problems. If gold works its way higher from today’s close, we have the potential for a massive rally. I haven't gotten the usual angry phone calls from several old girlfriends who are long gold stocks and have a knack for calling me at the bottom, but my guess is gold is sold out and will start working its way higher from here. Brother Tim


    Tim Murphy
    Swiss America Trading Corp
    800-289-2646 x1019
    trmurphy@swissamerica.com


    More evidence gold supply is on the wane even as gold demand is rising:


    Shine taken off AngloGold Ashanti results April 29, 2004


    London - The newly merged South African gold giant AngloGold Ashanti reported Thursday a fall in quarterly profits at its core AngloGold business as weaker production offset a strong gold price….


    The company said gold production fell by 11 percent to 1.235 million ounces because of a slow production start to the first quarter in South Africa and marked decreases in output at the Geita, Morila and Cerro Vanguardia mines. –END-


    A Heads Up from Sargendra:


    Did you happen to notice the following:


    5 APR – HUI down 7 points


    then trades sideways for the next 4 days at 230.


    Then down 15 points on 13 APR


    then trades sideways for the next 4 days at 210.


    Then down 14 points on 20 APR


    then trades sideways for the next 5 day at 195.


    Then down 16 points on 28 APR.


    What happens next? Sideways for another 3 days then down another 15 points??


    This is called systematic bait-and-clobber. Take the market down, let the people think it’s OK to jump back in the pool with 4 days of sideways "bottom-like" trading, then toss another shark in the pool.


    Then do it again. Then do it again. . .


    Any bets they do it again next week?


    This is what "ROLLO TAPE" (aka Richard Wyckoff) described in his 1910 book called "Studies In Tape Reading." This is known as a CAMPAIGN. Yes he used those exact words. NEM has gone from 47 to 37. Campaigns on Fall Street are usually a minimum $10 move. It isn’t worth it to the big-money boys to play a 1 or 2 dollar move. It’s 10 or nothing.


    This is a professional "mark-down" according to ROLLO TAPE. It isn’t free-market trading. Well, maybe it is. If you have enough money to do this, then I guess you are free to do whatever you want with the market.


    It will be over soon. They are almost done with this campaign. Couple more days to go. . .


    Sheesh.


    The gold shares were mostly on the plus side after their horrendous beating of late.


    The XAU rose .86 to 82.06, while the HUI gained 2.10 to 178.79. Both closed well off their highs after coming out of the gait strongly. The notable exception was Golden Star Resources, which was battered falling to $4.44, down 29 cents. Most of the selling was due to Golden Star falling below $5, which means it is not marginable at many major Wall Street firms anymore. This is my number one holding and many Café members have picked it up along the way. One is the astute Eric Hommelberg who was kind enough to put out the following:


    Hi Bill,


    For those gold investors who are panicking, maybe this review of the July 2002 sell-off will help.


    I think this example of Golden Star says it all !


    Golden Star broke its 200 dma support (like so many others) of $5.31 and fell like a stone to less than $4.60 . Investors fear that the current bull-run in Gold shares is over ! Panic selling is the tune of the day !


    Just take a look at this chart of Golden Star below, does it look familiar ?


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/EH1.gif]


    What do we see ? Well. Golden Star breaking its 200 dma and crashing like hell !


    Like I said, panic selling, but does a break of the 200 dma automatically means the end of a bull-market ? Well, panicking investors do think so, I don’t ! Why not ? Well, because the fundamentals simply tell us otherwise (CA deficit, $ decline, negative interest rates, decreasing gold supply, increase of investor demand etc..). Again, take a look at the chart above. This is Golden Star crashing through it’s 200 dma ! End of Bull run? This was July 2002. Many investors threw in the towel because they didn’t believe in the Gold bull anymore. Yes, in July 2002 investors were so desperate that they sold Golden Star at 73 cents ! (see chart below)


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2004/EH2.gif]

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    The John Brimelow Report


    Open interest data confirms large scale short selling


    Thursday, April 29, 2004


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $12.32, PM $15.26, with world gold at $383.40 and $377.65. Enormous: far above legal import point. In fact the latter is the highest I can remember seeing. It was no doubt distorted by the 3 hour V-shaped nose dive with world gold greeted the approach of the NY opening: on the other hand, it is basis Bombay: Madras, based on Reuters data, was $2.10 higher.


    An interesting insight into India’s gold appetite appeared yesterday in the "Times of India" newspaper. Two parliamentary candidates for a particular constituency disclosed their financial data. One man and his wife reported owning 71 ozs of gold jewelry; the other couple and their children owned 497 ozs. Only the latter could be described as actually rich. See


    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/645209.cms .


    Japan was closed today. The Shanghai Gold Exchange did report higher premiums over world gold, but only by less than $1, and on low volume. Since world gold was down over $13, this was a feeble response. However, given the financial news from China, perhaps it was understandable – maybe even lending some credibility to this far from proven source.


    Yesterday in NY was amongst the most alarming gold has seen in some years. Mitsui-Sydney responded sensibly:


    Zitat

    "…the metals took a pasting overnight…(seeing) gold break through the 200 day moving average &…closing on the lows with knowledge that Tocom is closed for the start of Golden week, so the normal buying support wont be around. There has been good physical demand on the way down, but not enough to narrow the exit door for the speculators. The question now is, are we just seeing long liquidation or are shorts being established? Technically gold looks like it’s on its knees…However what these volatile markets have taught me of late, as when it looks terrible, buy it."


    UBS is also up beat:


    Zitat

    "Metals were hit by wide-spread speculative selling yesterday after the Chinese credit control scare… weakness of FX carry-trades also indicates that there is probably an interest rate element to the sell-off in metals…Our commodities and mining equity analysts believe… the move lower represents a buying opportunity"


    adding, quite reasonably:


    Zitat

    "Although there is no fundamental reason why slowing demand for base metals from China should affect gold, liquidation of basket products have kept gold on the back foot. We are looking for opportunities to buy gold retain our one-month forecast of $390/oz and $410 in three months"


    Perhaps the calmness of these dealer commentators reflects trading desk assessments of the type of selling seen yesterday. This morning’s open interest and volume data appear to validate this view: Open interest actually rose 1,213 contracts (to 247,717) on a heavier than estimated 103,393 lot volume. Since there must have been considerable stop loss liquidation on such a big and technically significant fall, the implication was that there was a lot of fresh short selling. At the expense of repeating oneself, with these kind of physical premiums this is not wise.


    JB

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.goldseek.com/news/LemetropoleCafe/lmpc.jpg]


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com


    April 29 - Gold $386.70 up $1.20 - Silver $5.80 down 7 cents


    Massive Panic Selling Sets Up Sharp Gold, Silver Price Recovery


    Zitat

    "Whoever has or is given the authority to create credit has the authority to extract wealth from the economy by that same mechanism." Vladimir Nuri, Fractional Reserve Banking as Economic Parasitism


    Zitat

    "The one aim of these financiers is world control by the creation of inextinguishable debts." Henry Ford


    If today wasn’t rough enough, an electrical boom of some sort knocked out my commentary for the day, so here we go again.


    Yesterday’s savage and orchestrated assault on the precious metals by The Gold Cartel was felt all over the investment world. However, many of those investors in the Asian world were asleep. When they awoke, many of them panicked and began to dump their positions. The selling continued into the Comex opening. At one point last evening/this early morning, gold was down another $7+ and silver dropped another 32 cents lower.


    Gold and silver recovered somewhat from those drastic levels and then moved higher for most of the session. Trading was extremely choppy. Gold closed higher as the market appears to be very short, however, silver continued to liquidate. As evidence of this, the gold open interest went up 1213 contracts to 247,717, while the silver open interest fell 3639 contracts to 102,877 (see Dan Norcini below for analysis).


    How much evidence of massive gold/silver market intervention does anyone need to realize the mainstream central banking world is petrified of sharply rising precious metals prices at this time, or any time? Weeks ago there was the planted, unsigned FT story and repetitive newspaper commentary of French and German central bank gold sales. Who can forget the postponement of the PPI report on some flimsy excuse to keep the true inflation picture from the US public? Yesterday, a story surfaced about the Chinese pulling back on lending. The Gold Cartel let into gold and silver, realizing they could spook the hedge funds, which they did. Today, the Chinese debunked the story. This is not an isolated occurrence. Remember when a troubled US stock market needed a lift with gold on a roll and a story was floated that Osama bin Laden’s number two man was surrounded in the Afghan mountains. It turned out to be bogus also. What a sick crew we have manipulating these markets! The Chinese denial:


    BEIJING, April 29 (Reuters) - China's banking regulator and central bank denied on Thursday reports that they had issued a ban on new lending. "We have never asked them (banks) to stop making loans. We have never issued any document, internal or open," a spokesman for the China Banking Regulatory Commission said.


    The spokesman had been asked about Hong Kong media reports saying China's "Big Four" state banks had received an official directive to suspend new loans until May 1. Smaller commercial banks had also reportedly halted new lending in anticipation of a tighter loan policy from the government.


    A People's Bank of China spokesman also said it had not issued such an order. "We have never made a such a requirement. We have absolutely have not done that," the spokesman said. –END-


    Meanwhile, the news which should affect the price of gold continues to become more bullish, which is probably why The Gold Cartel has orchestrated this massive assault on the precious metals.


    The economic news continues to reveal far greater inflation than previously acknowledged (no surprise to Café members though):


    http://www.thestreet.com


    08:34 GDP deflator, ECI might add to inflation concerns;
    Taken together, the GDP and deflator numbers show that market expectations for nominal GDP were close to the market consensus. Yet the breakdown between real growth and inflation will be a disappointment, as real growth was 4.2% vs the expected 5%, and the deflator rose 2.5% instead of the expected 2.0%. Furthermore, the Employment Cost Index rose 1.1% in Q1, stronger than the 0.9% consensus and the 0.8% increase in Q4. Both of these reports will exacerbate the market's fears of inflation and Fed rate hikes. –END-


    Ten more dead US soldier in Iraq today. What a nightmare, one which has no end in sight. The economic and geopolitical ramifications of this blunder will have profound effects on US financial markets in the months to come. How can they not?


    The US leaders who got us into this continue to talk of a few rebels and minor skirmishes, but is that all it is? (See Appendix for Lawrence of Arabia comments on this sort of thing many years ago). How can so few kill so many of us? Alarm bells are quietly going off all over the place. RETIRED ARMY GENERAL WILLIAM ODOM, directed the National Security Agency under former President Reagan, and served on Carter's National Security Council staff, is urging an IMMEDIATE PULL-OUT FROM IRAQ. His words:


    It would be delusional, asserts Gen. Odom, to "stay the course" in Iraq; keeping troops in would increase hatred of the U.S., likely threatening to destabilize the region and jeopardizing international relations as the U.S. becomes more isolated.


    The U.S. should withdraw troops from Iraq as rapidly as possible, he says, for the sake of American security and economic interests.


    "We have failed," he declares.


    -END-


    If all of those items were not bullish enough, the dollar was hit hard today and fell to 90.80, down .63, while the euro rose sharply to 119.68, up 1.47, moving solidly back above its 200-day moving average.


    Based on all the news, the US stock and bond markets are doing just what they should be doing under the circumstances. The DOW closed down 70 to 10,272 even after one of its patented Hail Mary rallies. The DOG was smashed again, down 31 to 1959. The US bond market continues to reel as investors react to increasing awareness of US inflation and to the ramifications of US fiscal and Fed policies. The June 30-year closed at 106 21/32, down 22/32.


    Growing inflation numbers are rightfully scaring the fixed income world. But, there is no inflation, the June bond chart


    http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/TR/64


    This week has been a brutal one for the gold/silver investor world. Certainly, it was not forecasted in my commentary, but understanding the heinous Gold Cartel as I do, nothing surprises me anymore. They will do whatever it takes to protect their interests and that includes lying, cheating and stealing. They are very consistent.


    Many in our camp believed The Gold Cartel was setting up a price trashing the past few weeks because of the gold related news items hitting the mainstream press. Few of us thought they would take it this far. More and more it appears they needed to take out $390 gold to turn more specs short. This last breakdown has demoralized millions of gold/silver investors. Gold and silver took out their last vestiges of technical support. Gold had held $390 on a closing basis so often, most of us thought it would do so again. The last two days shook up confident long-term bulls who are now not so sure of themselves anymore.


    No change the way I see it. This too shall pass. This is why it is so important to keep in mind we are dealing with a rigged market. It has been this way for many years. What is changing is the crooks are running out of physical gold to continue to play their scheme. They still have enough firepower and paper market capability to win battles, but they are on their way to losing the war. I am surprised they pulled this one off to this extent, but will be more surprised if gold and silver don’t turn right around and go right back up in the weeks to come. On that note, the Comex floor gives an immediate V-bottom rebound a zero possibility. Not one person down there believes this will occur. NOT ONE!


    Silver finally filled its breakaway gap right below $5.80.

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.mineweb.net/pics/logo.gif]


    http://www.mineweb.net/sections/gold_silver/319155.htm


    London Gold Fixing ritual to end


    By: Tim Wood


    Posted: '29-APR-04 11:52' GMT © Mineweb 1997-2004


    NEW YORK (Mineweb.com) -- As expected, the London Gold Fixing has announced that it will in future rotate the chairmanship of the arrangement and end a tradition of meeting in person to set bellwether gold prices twice a day.


    Starting in May, each member bank will assume the chairmanship of the fixing for a one year period starting with ScotiaBank division ScotiaMocatta.


    "As of the same date, the Fixing will take place by telephone and the five member firms will no longer meet face-to-face as has previously been the case. As part of this change, it is intended that a web-based commentary of the Fixing will be introduced later this year", the Fixing said in a statement.


    The decision by N.M. Rothschild & Sons to quit the gold business leaves a vacancy at the Fixing. Ongoing members are Deutsche Bank, HSBC, and Société Generale.


    Simon Weeks is the chairman-elect of the London Gold Fixing.