per Mehrheitsentscheidung
Es geht erstmal nur um die Fortsetzung der Einfrierung.
The subject of the vote is the frozen Russian assets, on which the EU member states have so far voted every 6 months and adopted a unanimous decision. With today’s procedure, the Brusselians are abolishing the requirement of unanimity with a single stroke of the pen, which is clearly unlawful.
EU ambassadors will discuss the loan further on Friday and Sunday. The formal vote to immobilise the funds will take place around 5 pm on Friday, a spokesperson for the Danish Council presidency said.
Da nun Artikel 122 angewendet wird, ist kein einstimmiges Ergebnis mehr erforderlich.
On Wednesday, De Wever told the Belgian federal parliament that there are “many legitimate objections regarding the legality” of the Commission’s use of Article 122.
“This article is about a state of emergency,” he said. “Where is the emergency? There is an emergency in Ukraine. But Ukraine is not in the EU.”
Asked later on Thursday about Belgium’s legal concerns about invoking Article 122, EU Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis (aus Lettland) said: “We are confident that the justification for economic damages to trigger this provision of the treaty has been met above and beyond what is required.”
Nun, das hat der Belgier nicht verstanden. Das Land mit "economic damages" ist nicht Ukraine, sondern Frankreich.
