Beiträge von Ulfur

    bachalex,


    MWW hatte uns darauf vorbereitet, daß die Ergebnisse von EMP,Vatukoula "nicht fantastisch" sein würden.


    Fantastische Zahlen erwarten von MWW/DRD ohnehin die wenigsten.


    Sehr gute Zahlen hätten in Anbetracht der Marktbedingungen völlig gereicht.


    Oder wenigsten "gute Zahlen".


    Aber geliefert hat er ein katastrophales Ergebnis. [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000563.gif][Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000563.gif][Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000563.gif]



    "Die Porgera-Geschichte wird erst im Feb. entgültig festgemacht und erst ab da sprudeln die Porgera-Gewinne.."


    Die Porgera-Gewinne sprudeln natürlich schon jetzt, da braucht Placer/Barrick nicht EMP/MWW dazu. [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000285.gif]

    "I haven’t got the details yet, but the December quarter performances of Vatukoula and Tolukuma won’t be fantastic."


    Langsam scheinen MWW´s Restrukturierungsmaßnahmen zu wirken:


    Im Dezemberquartal sind die Cashkosten von EMP von 494$ auf 556 USD gestiegen.  [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.cosgan.de/images/smilie/frech/a075.gif] [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.cosgan.de/images/smilie/frech/a075.gif] [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.cosgan.de/images/smilie/frech/a075.gif]


    Total Cost dürften bei 629 USD pro Unze liegen. [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000285.gif]


    Bachalex:" EMP ist eine Weltklasse Mine" [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000285.gif]


    Den Bewertungsvorsprung von NEM sollte EMP bald aufgeholt haben. [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.smiliemania.de/smilie132/00000285.gif]

    Bachalex , das Hippo hat halt ein [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.diegotorres.com.ar/…foro/caritas/11_1_207.gif] für uns Lemminge




    Simmers könnte Jahresproduktion bis auf 600.000 Unzen steigern, bräuchte allerdings noch ein bißchen Knete:


    Simmers could move above 600,000oz with more funding
    By: Gareth Tredway
    Posted: '25-JAN-06 17:00' GMT © Mineweb 1997-2004


    JOHANNESBURG (Mineweb.com) -- While Simmer & Gold’s Gordon Miller says the gold junior is for now done with buying up new mines, the company could be a 600 000oz-a-year producer in the not too distant future, according to the CEO.
    ....
    By mid-year, the Buffelsfontein mine, acquired after it was put into liquidation last year by DRDGold, will produce 240,000oz per year according to Miller, at cash costs of about R79,000/kg.


    So far the mine is still on track to achieve this. “You can see the production build-up is tracking nicely, and we’ve got a good handle of underground grades, so moving in that direction very nicely.”


    Miller says that while the mine is still not making money, it is very close.
    December’s production was 12,000oz compared to the 20,000oz-per-month target. “December is not normally a great month, nor is January, and although January is not finished yet we will do better than that,” says Miller.
    .....


    At Ezilwini, a Randfontein Estates shaft bought from Harmony last year, Miller says work on obtaining a mining right and a technical feasibility study by SRK Consulting are under way.
    ....
    The mine should produce between 200,000oz and 300,000oz of gold per annum, according to Miller, with production peaking at a little over 300,000oz per year.


    Ezilwini also has a mothballed uranium mine that was closed in the early ’90s. Miller says this is also being looked at seeing as Simmers is already considering processing the dumps at Buffelsfontein to extract the uranium and gold inside.


    The final boost of production will come from the company’s Mpumalanga greenstone mine, which is being boosted from just over 10,000oz per annum to 50,000oz.
    ...
    http://www.mineweb.net/sections/junior_mining/855665.htm

    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.resolute-ltd.com.au/pics/logo.jpg]


    Gold No Longer Shines At Resolute
    January 25 2006 - Australasian Investment Review – (AIR)


    It is GSJB Were’s view that junior gold producer Resolute Mining (RSG) heavily disappointed with the release of its second quarter production report.

    While the analysts do acknowledge there are a few positives to take away from the report, such as that the turnaround at the company’s Ravenswood operation is coming through, on balance Resolute is one gold producer investors should shun, they think, despite the buoyant price outlook for the metal.


    In the short term, GSJBW sees major negatives in the company’s poor cash generation, the projected impact of the expected interim loss and Resolute’s poor production outlook.


    Longer term, the analysts even decided to override GSJBW’s inhouse rating rules to downgrade the stock even further. The analysts say they "recognise" the potential positive impact from the development of Syama, but they stick to the view that the negatives of further hedging (likely as part of the Syama financing) and the poor operational performance suggest there are much better opportunities available elsewhere in the gold sector.


    As a matter of fact, within the Australian small cap gold sector the broker’s top three preferences are Kingsgate Consolidated (KCN), Bendigo Mining (BDG) and Ballarat Goldfields (BGF).


    Resolute, however, received a double whammy downgrade with GSJBW cutting its investment view on the stock to Underperform/LT Sell from Marketperform/LT Hold. The broker has a base valuation of $1.12 with potential to rise to $1.19.
    http://www.aireview.com/index.php?act=view&catid=8&id=3417

    From: Frank lucas [frank@loebaron.co.uk]
    Sent: 11 January 2006 15:09
    To: richards@loebaron.co.uk; etc etc
    Subject: IMA versus AQI a viewpoint
    ....
    We believe that the share price of AQI (trading at C$1.65, 35m shares o/s
    and probably underpinned at about C$1.20 by the Calcatreu project alone) has
    significantly greater upside leverage to the trial outcome than IMA (trading
    at C$3.60, 48m shares o/s). If we assume, for the sake of argument a
    post-trial "project value" of about C$300m that was awarded 50/50 to AQI and
    IMA, with AQI having C$1.20 of value in Calcatreu and IMA having 40c of
    other value then the respective share prices could be AQI C$5.20 and IMA
    C$6.60. The AQI upside is 225% and the IMA upside 83%. Downside in the
    event that the case is lost completely are 25% in the case of AQI (maybe
    more if costs are big) but as much as 90% in the case of IMA.



    NOTE THIS WELL - if the project is worth C$300m and gets split 50/50 between the warring houses then both shares can go up!!


    The share price of AQI is likely to go down only if they lose their case
    entirely (which we think to be very unlikely, barring a "point of law") and
    the IMA share price is only likely to decrease if they lose more than 50% of
    their deposit to AQI (again an unlikely but very real potential outcome in
    our view). Both shares remain a BUY. With Aquiline now being more of a buy
    than IMA.

    ...
    http://www.stockhouse.ca/bullb…52342&t=0&all=0&TableID=0

    Ein goldpositiver Artikel in der FAZ, der sich deutlich gegen Goldverkäufe der Buba ausspricht:


    Gold auf neuem 25-Jahreshoch


    20. Januar 2006 Der Bundesfinanzminister und viele andere Politiker würden zwar offensichtlich recht gerne das Gold der Bundesbank verkaufen, um auf diese Weise Finanzlöcher für kurze Zeit stopfen zu können, statt die strukturell völlig überzogenen Staatsausgaben zu beschneiden, wenn sie denn könnten. Gott sei Dank können sie nicht.
    ...
    Gold gilt als „Hedge” gegen den Dollar. Vielleicht sollte sich das auch der Herr Finanzminister und Konsorten einmal klar machen.
    ...
    http://www.faz.net/s/Rub58BA8E…Tpl~Ecommon~Sspezial.html

    Es ist nicht sinnvoll, die neue EMP mit Newmont zu vergleichen. Falls solche Vergleiche Sinn machen sollen, muß eine geeignete Peer-Gruppe herangezogen werden.


    Das größte Asset der umstrukturierten EMP, Porgera, ist dem Droopy-Management entzogen und insofern sind die Aussichten gar nicht so übel. Aber die Bewertung von Newmont werden sie nicht erreichen, nicht mal bei gleichem Gewinn pro Produktionsunze. Man weiß ja, wer dahintersteckt.

    Aber vom Goldpreis sind sie immer noch abhängig. DRD muß sich immer noch dem Markt anpassen, das bleibt ihnen nicht erspart



    Mal was anderes:


    Hat eigentlich schon jemand die Golddividende erhalten, die MWW 2002 avisiert hat? ?(


    "Durban Roodepoort Deep (DRD) could offer its shareholders the option of receiving their dividends in gold, DRD chairman Mark Wellesley-Wood confirmed yesterday. …"

    Strong gold price supports higher estimates. Cheap valuation!
    2006 should see Crew closing its gap to its gold peers, supporting >NOK 20, Nickel adds on top



    Our Crew estimates lag the recent gold price rally;
    Our 2007 estimate is based on USD 501/Oz,
    The current price is USD 550/Oz
    The 2007 futures price last settled at USD 582/Oz.
    The current Crew valuation is attractive;
    Our estimates yields a 2007E P/E of 7.7x, 8.9x fully diluted
    Applying the current gold price on 2007E yields a fully diluted P/E of 6.5x
    Gold producers are highly valued due to gold’s special investment characteristics, Crew’s peers typically trades at 2007E P/E’s between 25x-35x
    Crew is only expensive on its valuation relative to its resources, but a comprehensive 2006 drilling program should improve this parameter
    Crew’s valuation is set to increase during 2006;
    Delivering on its numerous milestones will substantiate production targets
    Increasing awareness among investors and analysts through field trips and conferences
    The Mindoro Nickel Project adds solid additional upside, industrial partner expected in place by mid-2006
    We re-iterate our Strong Buy and target USD 3/NOK 20
    The recommendation was not presented to the issuer before dissemination

    Zitat

    ...bis der POG explodiert oder der Rand über den Jordan geht


    Das ist Spekulation, kein seriöse Geschäftsgrundlage. Die Minengesellschaften legen in ihren Kalkulationen Goldpreise bis vielleicht etwa 450 USD zugrunde, keine Preisspitzen oder Mondpreise. Der USD ist wieder unter 6 Rand, obwohl seit Jahren über einen schwächeren Rand spekuliert wird. MWW hatte selbst zu lange auf einen schwächeren Rand gesetzt und dadurch Anpassungsmaßnahmen sträflicherweise unterlassen.
    Der durchschnittliche Goldpreis 2005 war nur 444 Dollar. Der Analyst, der den Goldpreis 2005 am besten einschätzen konnte, rechnet für 2006 mit einem durchschnittl. Preis von 522 Dollar. Da wäre noch Platz nach unten.