Beiträge von Schwabenpfeil

    The JSE closed at 1,578.26, +2.24.


    Is Nick Goodwin correct? Years ago he was one of the main men as far as South African gold analysts were concerned. I will leave that up to you. To assist let us go back to some ole MIDAS commentary:


    2/15/01 GATA's Journey to South Africa
    (with gold in the 250’s)


    That afternoon I met with Nick Goodwin, South African gold guru analyst, and Johann Blersch, Managing Director of Ing Barings Bank. That meeting went well and Nick arranged a meeting with ten of the senior gold analysts in Johannesburg the next day in his office to listen to a GATA presentation. It amazed me that Nick could corral so many of them on such short notice. Tuesday started out with a David McKay MiningWeb interview. –END-

    Posting at Gold-Eagle:


    SA gold shares to lose 30%


    Feb 02, 08:30


    David McKay
    Posted: Tue, 01 Feb 2005
    THE South African gold index would have to lose a third of its current value before it was worth buying gold shares again, said Nick Goodwin, a gold analyst for T-Sec Securities. According to his analysis, the Johannesburg Gold Index would have to fall to between 1,200 points to 1,000 points before there was value. The index is currently trading at 1,569 points.


    "Western Areas is the only share that’s underpriced relative to its current price. AngloGold is 60% overpriced, DRDGOLD is 100% overpriced; Gold Fields 46%, and Harmony about 30% overpriced," Goodwin said. "At this point in time, it [Goodwin’s gold shares model] says that the shares are overpriced and looking for an index level between 1,000 and 1,200," he said.


    Goodwin’s forecasts come amid further cash depletion in the December quarter for South African gold producers. So far, AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields have reported their financial figures in which a combined R1.35bn cash outflow, including translation losses, has been suffered. The likelihood is that the South African gold sector will lose far in excess the R1.3bn estimated by Goodwin.


    "For the first six months of this year, the industry is going to be in a lot of pain and maybe by June or so the index will be down to maybe 1,000 to 1,100 points area, and then we can probably get in," he said. However, buying gold stocks depended on where the gold price was as well as the value of the rand.


    Goodwin said the dollar gold price appeared to be in good shape but he did not believe it would burst through the $500/oz level. "Gold will struggle to get to 500 and you will probably find by the end of the year it might be back in the $440-430/oz area again," he said.


    -END-

    For newer Café members, Frank’s presentation is a must read.


    Frank had a gold demand number of approximately 4800 tonnes. That was four years ago. We know gold demand has surged since. His gold loan numbers then ranged from 10,000 tonnes to 16,000 tonnes. His studies revealed it took 1678 tonnes of central bank gold sales and loans to rectify the supply /demand deficit in 2000. That deficit has grown since that point in time.


    If central banks are net selling 500 tonnes per year, the gold loans have been running at 1278 tonnes per year. If we subtract 1500 tonnes for hedger buybacks, it mean a middle of the road estimate of the new gold loan number is 17,000 tonnes (1748 x 4 years – 1500 tonnes) and could be as high as 20,000 tonnes.


    This is what is so irksome about the World Gold Council. They say the central banks have 31,000 tonnes of gold. Yet, they never take into account these gold loans/swaps, nor do they ever seem to take into account sales by the central banks. The work of the GATA camp reveals the central banks are lucky if they have 15,000 tonnes left. Should this be understood, the price of gold would probably rise $100 per ounce.


    Think of the good it would do to your portfolio, to coin owners, to gold shareholders, to the economies of the poor sub-Saharan gold producing countries, the unemployed miners in those countries, etc.


    So what does the World Gold Council do? Nothing, that’s what, except to put out disinformation after disinformation and rah-rah high fashion gold jewelry. Their specialty is aiding and abetting The Gold Cartel. Time for them to get the hook.


    The last 12 months have been a dismal one for us gold shareholders. Few have fared worse than those who own a bevy of the South Africans, which is why the following article by David McKay (could not locate the original) should shake a few of you up:

    What does that gold demand number represent? World gold demand is double that number. This will be a MIDAS to go back in time. I have the greatest respect for the work of my former colleague Frank Veneroso. I met Frank at Drexel Burnham in 1980 and became his futures broker. In 1997/98, I worked for Frank in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.


    No one out there is better at putting numbers together than Frank. To get a handle on the supply/demand situation (consumption numbers) and the real gold loan numbers, let us go back to an easy read slide presentation Frank put together for the GATA African Gold Summit in Durban, SA on May 10, 2001:


    http://www.lemetropolecafe.com…rchParam=Frank%20Veneroso


    4/16 Frank Veneroso - Slide Presentation for GATA African Gold Summit


    PRESENTATION FOR GATA AFRICAN GOLD SUMMIT DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA



    The following is part of the presentation that Frank Veneroso of Veneroso Associates will be making at the GATA African Gold Summit in Durban, South Africa on May 10…


    -END-

    The following world gold consumption number put out by the World Gold Council makes no sense to me at all:


    2/2 Business Report in Business Day:


    Feel-good factor helps gold consumption rise for first year in four


    Johannesburg - World gold consumption grew for the first year in four in 2004 as economic growth in India, the US and China spurred demand and as investors sought to hedge against a declining dollar, the World Gold Council said yesterday.


    Consumption grew as much as 8 percent to 2 725 tons from 2 524 tons in 2003 after three years of decline, said Moaz Barakat, the council's managing director for the Middle East, Turkey and Pakistan.


    The World Gold Council is an industry group funded by gold mining companies such as Anglo American…


    -END-

    Guys,
    This is worth a look.


    This is a spreadsheet sent to me by the UK Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC) and contains all the major Oil production infrastructure initiatives around the world over the next 6 years (and last year), their expected production level, and the rough timing of when they go on line.


    The data is collated and adjusted for the known depletion profile of existing world fields and also demand growth (currently running annually between2 and 3%).


    MegaProjectsWorksheet.xls


    As you can see despite bringing on between 2.5-2.8 mbbl/d new production for the next 3 years there is still a significant supply demand shortfall of >1% when factored for the current demand growth. (This rate is increasing in its own right due to China and India.) This >1% shortfall is maintained over the next 3 years until 2008 when we get the production CLIFF.


    It takes 4-6 years to take discovery to production subject to where the discovery is. This is the reason production increments up to 2010 are a known quantity. Significantly even minor oil field discoveries for the last 2 years have been virtually nil ensuring that this data is correct for that horizon. If in the meantime we discover another Ghawar or Cantarel (unlikely) then the outlook changes significantly. Science however shows that the probability of this is extremely


    low based on cumulative world production data and the work of Deffeyes out of Princeton. It shows with little question that we have found >95% of all the oil we will ever find. Nobody has disputed this science to date.


    Given our world financial system requires constant growth (or it implodes) the current growth trajectory of between 2-3% will likely be maintained until it breaks. This says to me that Oil is going to continue to trend up in price for the coming 3 years with little pullback until it spikes in 2008 at the CLIFF. I tend to believe that International tensions (all of which are oil driven) will explode well before 2008 due to these impending supply problems which will affect supply and take the price up well before that date.


    The supply demand shortfall for 2004 was seemingly greater than what is forecast for this year so the price appreciation in 2005 should moderate subject to international tensions. Given that we are currently loosing 100,000 bbl/day production per month across all existing world fields due to depletion the production increments for early 2005 may induce a Q1 2005 price rise that pulls back in the latter part of 2005. With the current growth in demand this pullback should not be that great. Certainly not the $35 /bbl touted by Wall Street propaganda. This has implications for all markets but most importantly Gold & Silver. With the Gold/Oil and Silver/Oil ratios at significant lows there is not much room to move on the downside in the metals markets with oil firm and on the rise for fundamental reasons.


    It is evident more and more that Oil and Silver are trading in lock step lately. Even the downside window dressing in the oil market today in the last hour of trade can be seen in the access market for silver. Yesterday’s price action shows even further correlation.
    Check it out.
    Regds
    David


    None of the bullish talk helped crude today as it fell to $46.69 per barrel.

    Oil heads-up:


    Bill;
    I have mentioned to you before that I have an acquaintance who is highly placed in the international shipping industry. He lives in London, England. I receive somewhat regular correspondence from him. The messages are usually very short - one liners. Here's a smattering of what He has been saying over the past week or so. Should give readers an idea just how volatile the shipping market is. VLCC = very large crude carrier


    Jan 25: <"THE recent bout of weakness in tanker company shares provides a buying opportunity as the industry’s fundamentals remain attractive, according to Jefferies, the US investment bank."


    Jan 27: Yesterday's oil news: FURTHER Middle East oil production cuts are unlikely this year due to stronger expected demand and lower than anticipated output from areas outside the world’s key oil suppliers.


    Jan 27: "Gulf VLCC rates weaken again as charterers maintain upper hand."


    Jan 28: "Well, it’s not World Scale 300, but owners are at last seeing VLCC rates moving in the right direction."


    Feb 2: "Owners bullish as VLCC rates double in three days, with tonnage thinning out for February loadings."


    I find all this interesting because VLCC spot rates are tied to not only oil demand but oil supply. Depressed VLCC rates in spite of elevated prices for crude oil perhaps indicates that the Middle East does not have as much oil to "ship" as we think.
    best,
    Rob

    DJ INTERVIEW: Saudi Finance Minister At Ease With $50 Crude


    DAVOS, Feb 02, 2005 (ODJ Select via COMTEX) --


    By Adam Smallman
    Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


    (Dow Jones)--Saudi Arabian Finance Minister Ibrahim Abdel Aziz Al Assaf has added his voice to the chorus from leading oil exporters that consumers can tolerate prices of $50 a barrel.


    The comments show the perception in the Saudi government that such prices are affordable doesn't stop with the kingdom's oil minister, who expressed similar views during last weekend's meeting of OPEC.


    That in turn could make Saudi Arabia, the one global producer with significant capacity to pump more crude, less likely to intervene to push prices down if it feels the market is well supplied with oil. It also signals an erosion of the historic oil-for-security bargain underpinning U.S.-Saudi relations.


    "Many analysts are no longer concerned that $50 oil is going to impact the world economy," Al Assaf said in a wide-ranging interview with Dow Jones Newswires at the World Economic Forum late last week. "They say it will have a very minimal impact. The impact is almost nonexistent."


    The view isn't without support. Despite oil prices punching above $55 a barrel in October, the global economy grew by 5% last year and is forecast to expand by 4.3% this year….


    -END-

    CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH


    The DOW (10,596, up 44) and DOG (2075, up 6) rose again.


    0:32 API reports crude oil inventories +783K barrels
    Gasoline inventories +3.9M barrels, while distillate inventories (357K)barrels.
    * * * * *


    10:32 DOE reports crude oil inventories (300K)K barrels vs. consensus +2.0M barrels
    Gasoline inventories +1.6M barrels vs. consensus (700K). Distillate inventories (2.9M) barrels vs. consensus (2.25M) barrels.
    * * * * *


    NEW YORK, Feb 2 (Reuters) - A Federal Reserve study has found that cutting the budget deficit will not do much to shrink the gaping U.S. trade deficit, contradicting claims by many of the country's trading partners, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.


    The newspaper said the staff study finds that when the budget deficit increases by one dollar, the trade deficit increases by less than 20 cents.


    The study concludes that reducing the budget deficit "is unlikely to be instrumental in narrowing the burgeoning U.S. trade deficit, even if it might be desirable on other grounds," according to the article.


    Many economists and U.S. trading partners believe cutting the federal deficit would reduce the trade deficit and thus alleviate selling pressure on the dollar, according to the newspaper.


    Bush administration officials, however, say the trade deficit is due more to slower growth abroad than in the United States, along with the relatively more-attractive investment opportunities in the United States, the article said.


    -END-


    Bloomberg on the Fed announcement:


    "economic nirvana"


    Par for the course for Wall Street cheerleader Bloomberg.


    The big story is oil and one which is receiving little play from Wall Street. Figures. The big deal is Opec is going for it by stating they are going to demand higher oil prices from here on in. Many of the Wall Street crowd have been talking up sub $40 oil prices this year. Not going to happen unless there is a severe world-wide economic contraction.

    The John Brimelow Report


    Positive gold developments from India
    Wednesday, February 2nd 2005


    Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $7.60, PM $8.88, with world gold at $421.35 and $421.70. High: ample for legal imports. Gold’s friends got an unusual windfall today in the form of an S&P upgrade, after the open, of India’s FX debt; this set the rupee on to a rally to a 5-year high. Consequently India’s ability to bid for world gold was enhanced.


    Even before this India was evidently making itself felt. Reuters reports from Singapore early today:


    Some dealers said India, the world's largest gold consumer, was chasing gold at lower levels, boosting demand for gold bars in Singapore…"I think refineries are all fully booked until early March," said Beh Hsia Wah, a dealer at United Overseas Bank in Singapore,


    While Mitsui-London bluntly says:


    Gold continues to hold the 420 level on the downside, mostly due to excellent physical demand from India and Turkey. We expect this solid physical support to continue…


    None of this moves Japan. TOCOM volume fell to an even less important 9,044 Comex lot equivalent (-3%); the active contract closed down 1 yen, but world gold was up 60c from the NY close. Open interest rose the equivalent of 349 Comex lots. (NY yesterday traded 42,488 lots: curiously, once again 25% above the estimate; open interest fell 494 contracts.)


    Clearly the speculative community is thirsting to break down gold. Perhaps it is a case of their macrocosmic view. Indian peasants are unlikely to be impressed. Even less the Middle East.


    Their task will be difficult.


    JB

    February 2 – Gold $420.60 unchanged – Silver $6.71 unchanged


    Stalemate Everywhere


    Take chances, make mistakes. That's how you grow. Pain nourishes your courage. You have to fail in order to practice being brave...Mary Tyler Moore


    GO GATA!!!


    It’s stalemate everywhere. Those in the gold correction camp have the edge at the moment, yet gold refuses to collapse and the technical make-up of the market as far as the traditionalists are concerned has become extremely bullish. Silver continues to go sideways, while the HUI can’t take out 210 and refuses to take out 200.


    Interest rates?? Long rates are near their lows, while short rates are near the highs. Oil heads for $45 per barrel, then backs off sharply. Just when the stock market looks like it is ready to collapse, it rebounds in stellar fashion. Just when it should soar, it retreats. There are about as many dollar bulls these days as dollar bears -–with the result the dollar is doing the yo-yo thing too.


    In the geo-political sphere many are celebrating the elections in Iraq. Yet, two years ago if those same celebrants were told that over 100 US soldiers would die in January 2005 with countless hundreds more maimed and wounded, they would have shuddered with grief at those prospects.


    Yep, when you tally it all up, it adds up to one grandiose stalemate. People like me who are predicting an enormous move up in gold/silver and a big move down in the stock market are off the mark at the moment – to put it more gently and I think correctly, EARLY. We shall see.


    (Even the Fed statement today following their raising of the Fed Funds rate 25 basis points was a drag, as they worded it the same as the last one.)


    The gold open interest fell 494 contracts to 253,116, while the silver open interest dropped a sizeable 1492 contracts to 95,173.


    The dollar rose .08 to 83.55. The pound and Aussie dollar rose a bit, while the euro fell .09 to 130.47.

    It is only a matter to time now; days, weeks, months. The smoke signals are billowing, the war drums are growing louder and louder. From the Asian Times:


    Central banks dump dollar for euro
    By Emad Mekay


    WASHINGTON - Central banks around the world are getting rid of the US dollar in favor of the euro in a bid to stem losses from the declining greenback, an international survey reveals. The survey says that more than two-thirds of central banks have increased their exposure to the euro in the past two years, mainly at the expense of the dollar. The report also finds that over half the central banks surveyed now find euro-zone money and debt markets as attractive for investors as those of the United States.


    Titled "Management Trends 2005", the report was published by the London-based Central Banking Publications Ltd. It surveyed 65 central bank reserve managers who control reserve assets worth $1.7 trillion, between September and December 2004. The survey was sponsored by the Royal Bank of Scotland.


    Since early November, the dollar has hit record lows against the euro almost every week, with a brief lull last month. The greenback is now at 10-year lows against almost all other major traded currencies - the British pound, Japanese yen, Swiss franc, Australian dollar, Swedish krona, Danish krone and Canadian dollar. A euro that cost only 84 cents in June 2002, and $1.21 last September, now costs about $1.30.


    The decline is mainly powered by the US current account deficit, or the gap in trade in goods and services, investment returns and one-way financial transfers between the United States and the rest of the world. Analysts say the currency's plunge is also a sign of how negatively the world has come to view the central bank reserve managers who control reserve assets worth $1.7 trillion, between September and December 2004. The survey was sponsored by the Royal Bank of Scotland.


    Since early November, the dollar has hit record lows against the euro almost every week, with a brief lull last month. The greenback is now at 10-year lows against almost all other major traded currencies - the British pound, Japanese yen, Swiss franc, Australian dollar, Swedish krona, Danish krone and Canadian dollar. A euro that cost only 84 cents in June 2002, and $1.21 last September, now costs about $1.30.


    The decline is mainly powered by the US current account deficit, or the gap in trade in goods and services, investment returns and one-way financial transfers between the United States and the rest of the world. Analysts say the currency's plunge is also a sign of how negatively the world has come to view the debt-ridden fiscal policies of the George W Bush administration, which has drained much of the surplus it inherited from the Clinton coffers. The current administration has turned a $236.4 billion surplus into a $413 billion deficit.


    Some economists have predicted a stampede away from the dollar and to the euro. The oft-heard suggestion, which many appear to support, is that the drop could erode the dollar's 60-year role as the world's reserve currency. The report, released on Monday, is the first concrete evidence that major central banks are indeed taking that step. "It's a smart move on their part to move not just to the euro, they can also buy the yen. They can even buy gold or move to a whole mix of assets to get away from the dollar, which is overvalued," said Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. "It's going to have to fall eventually. The question is when."



    While central banks will continue to some extent to finance the US current account deficit through buying US securities, the United States cannot rely on this source of financing to the same extent as in the past, said the survey. "Diversification from dollar-denominated to euro-denominated assets appears to be taking place more rapidly than had been anticipated two years ago," it said.


    The trend is likely to continue, with some economists arguing that the dollar needs to decline by another 15-20% in order to cut the current account deficit to a reasonable level. Most of this correction should take place against Asian currencies, which will require China to revalue its exchange rate against the dollar by about 20%, according to C Fred Bergsten, director of the Institute of International Economics (IIE) in Washington.


    Because central banks have been accumulating dollars over a long period, the current decline may not look that steep. "It doesn't particularly surprise me that at least some central banks are unloading their dollar holdings," said Steve H Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University and senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington. "The expectation was that as soon as the euro currency came out, there would be some diversification in central banks' portfolios, independent of the trends in the euro value versus the dollar and things like that."


    Most of this correction should take place against Asian currencies, which will require China to revalue its exchange rate against the dollar by about 20%, according to C Fred Bergsten, director of the Institute of International Economics (IIE) in Washington.


    Because central banks have been accumulating dollars over a long period, the current decline may not look that steep. "It doesn't particularly surprise me that at least some central banks are unloading their dollar holdings," said Steve H Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University and senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington. "The expectation was that as soon as the euro currency came out, there would be some diversification in central banks' portfolios, independent of the trends in the euro value versus the dollar and things like that."


    But the fall could quickly turn into a major plunge if panic spreads among private investors and moves on to infect central banks, some economists say. If China and Japan, two countries with the biggest dollar reserves, decide even to dump some of their dollar assets, the dollar is likely to collapse completely and go down far more than just the anticipated maximum of an extra 20%. "The timing of any drastic move by big players is very hard to predict," Weisbrot said. "China and Japan for example, either one of those, can cause a complete crash, a total collapse of the dollar just by selling a small portion of their reserves. In fact, probably they won't have to sell their reserves, all they have to do is stop accumulating or slow down their rate of accumulation and it will be a dollar crash."


    (Inter Press Service)
    Jan 27
    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GA27Dj01.html

    So a year-and-a-half later, I'm doing this story. And I hear about Medlow. I called his mother up. He lived in New Goshen, Indiana. I said, "I'm coming to see you. I don't remember where I was, I think it was Washington State. I flew over there and to get there, you had to go to – I think Indianapolis and then to Terre Haute, rent a car and drive down into the Southern Indiana, this little farm. It was a scene out of Norman Rockwell's. Some of you remember the Norman Rockwell paintings. It's a chicken farm. The mother is 50, but she looks 80. Gristled, old. Way old – hard scrabble life, no man around. I said I'm here to see your son, and she said, okay. He's in there. He knows you're coming. Then she said, one of these great -- she said to me, "I gave them a good boy. And they sent me back a murderer." So you go on 35 years. I'm doing in The New Yorker, the Abu Ghraib stories. I think I did three in three weeks. If some of you know about The New Yorker, that's unbelievable. But in the middle of all of this, I get a call from a mother in the East coast, Northeast, working class, lower middle class, very religious, Catholic family. She said, I have to talk to you. I go see her. I drive somewhere, fly somewhere, and her story is simply this. She had a daughter that was in the military police unit that was at Abu Ghraib. And the whole unit had come back in March, of -- The sequence is: they get there in the fall of 2003. Their reported after doing their games in the January of 2004. In March she is sent home. Nothing is public yet. The daughter is sent home. The whole unit is sent home. She comes home a different person. She had been married. She was young. She went into the Reserves, I think it was the Army Reserves to get money, not for college or for -- you know, these -- some of these people worked as night clerks in pizza shops in West Virginia. This not -- this is not very sophisticated. She came back and she left her husband. She just had been married before. She left her husband, moved out of the house, moved out of the city, moved out to another home, another apartment in another city and began working a different job. And moved away from everybody. Then over -- as the spring went on, she would go every weekend, this daughter, and every weekend she would go to a tattoo shop and get large black tattoos put on her, over increasingly -- over her body, the back, the arms, the legs, and her mother was frantic. What's going on? Comes Abu Ghraib, and she reads the stories, and she sees it. And she says to her daughter, "Were you there?" She goes to the apartment. The daughter slams the door. The mother then goes -- the daughter had come home -- before she had gone to Iraq, the mother had given her a portable computer. One of the computers that had a DVD in it, with the idea being that when she was there, she could watch movies, you know, while she was overseas, sort of a -- I hadn't thought about it, a great idea. Turns out a lot of people do it. She had given her a portable computer, and when the kid came back she had returned it, one of the things, and the mother then said I went and looked at the computer. She knows -- she doesn't know about depression. She doesn't know about Freud. She just said, I was just -- I was just going to clean it up, she said. I had decided to use it again. She wouldn't say anything more why she went to look at it after Abu Ghraib. She opened it up, and sure enough there was a file marked "Iraq". She hit the button. Out came 100 photographs. They were photographs that became -- one of them was published. We published one, just one in The New Yorker. It was about an Arab. This is something no mother should see and daughter should see too. It was the Arab man leaning against bars, the prisoner naked, two dogs, two shepherds, remember, on each side of him. The New Yorker published it, a pretty large photograph. What we didn't publish was the sequence showed the dogs did bite the man -- pretty hard. A lot of blood. So she saw that and she called me, and away we go. There's another story.


    For me, it's just another story, but out of this comes a core of -- you know, we all deal in "macro" in Washington. On the macro, we're hopeless. We're nowhere. The press is nowhere. The congress is nowhere. The military is nowhere. Every four-star General I know is saying, "Who is going to tell them we have no clothes?" Nobody is going to do it. Everybody is afraid to tell Rumsfeld anything. That's just the way it is. It's a system built on fear. It's not lack of integrity, it's more profound than that. Because there is individual integrity. It's a system that's completely been taken over -- by cultists. Anyway, what's going to happen, I think, as the casualties mount and these stories get around, and the mothers see the cost and the fathers see the cost, as the kids come home. And the wounded ones come back, and there's wards that you will never hear about. That's wards -- you know about the terrible catastrophic injuries, but you don't know about the vegetables. There's ward after ward of vegetables because the brain injuries are so enormous. As you maybe read last week, there was a new study in one of the medical journals that the number of survivors are greater with catastrophic injuries because of their better medical treatment and the better armor they have. So you get more extreme injuries to extremities. We're going to learn more and I think you're going to see, it's going to -- it's -- I'm trying to be optimistic. We're going to see a bottom swelling from inside the ranks. You're beginning to see it. What happened with the soldiers asking those questions, you may see more of that. I'm not suggesting we're going to have mutinies, but I'm going to suggest you're going to see more dissatisfaction being expressed. Maybe that will do it. Another salvation may be the economy. It's going to go very bad, folks. You know, if you have not sold your stocks and bought property in Italy, you better do it quick. And the third thing is Europe -- Europe is not going to tolerate us much longer. The rage there is enormous. I'm talking about our old-fashioned allies. We could see something there, collective action against us. Certainly, nobody -- it's going to be an awful lot of dancing on our graves as the dollar goes bad and everybody stops buying our bonds, our credit -- our -- we're spending $2 billion a day to float the debt, and one of these days, the Japanese and the Russians, everybody is going to start buying oil in Euros instead of dollars. We're going to see enormous panic here. But he could get through that. That will be another year, and the damage he's going to do between then and now is enormous. We're going to have some very bad months ahead.




    -END-

    We have a President that -- and a Secretary of State that, when a trooper -- when a reporter or journalist asked -- actually a trooper, a soldier, asked about lack of equipment, stumbled through an answer and the President then gets up and says, "Yes, they should all have good equipment and we're going to do it," as if somehow he wasn't involved in the process. Words mean nothing -- nothing to George Bush. They are just utterances. They have no meaning. Bush can say again and again, "well, we don't do torture." We know what happened. We know about Abu Ghraib. We know, we see anecdotally. We all understand in some profound way because so much has come out in the last few weeks, the I.C.R.C. The ACLU put out more papers, this is not an isolated incident what's happened with the seven kids and the horrible photographs, Lynndie England. That's into the not the issue is. They're fall guys. Of course, they did wrong. But you know, when we send kids to fight, one of the things that we do when we send our children to war is the officers become in loco parentis. That means their job in the military is to protect these kids, not only from getting bullets and being blown up, but also there is nothing as stupid as a 20 or 22-year-old kid with a weapon in a war zone. Protect them from themselves. The spectacle of these people doing those antics night after night, for three and a half months only stopped when one of their own soldiers turned them in tells you all you need to know, how many officers knew. I can just give you a timeline that will tell you all you need to know. Abu Ghraib was reported in January of 2004 this year. In May, I and CBS earlier also wrote an awful lot about what was going on there. At that point, between January and May, our government did nothing. Although Rumsfeld later acknowledged that he was briefed by the middle of January on it and told the President. In those three-and-a-half months before it became public, was there any systematic effort to do anything other than to prosecute seven "bad seeds", enlisted kids, reservists from West Virginia and the unit they were in, by the way, Military Police. The answer is, Ha! They were basically a bunch of kids who were taught on traffic control, sent to Iraq, put in charge of a prison. They knew nothing. It doesn't excuse them from doing dumb things. But there is another framework. We're not seeing it. They've gotten away with it.


    So here's the upside of the horrible story, if there is an upside. I can tell you the upside in a funny way, in an indirect way. It comes from a Washington Post piece this week. A young boy, a Marine, 25-year-old from somewhere in Maryland died. There was a funeral in the Post, a funeral in Washington, and the Post did a little story about it. They quoted -- his name was Hodak. His father was quoted. He had written to a letter in the local newspaper in Southern Virginia. He had said about his son, he wrote a letter just describing what it was like after his son died. He said, "Today everything seems strange. Laundry is getting done. I walked my dog. I ate breakfast. Somehow I'm still breathing and my heart is still beating. My son lies in a casket half a world away." There's going to be -- you know, when I did My Lai -- I tell this story a lot. When I did the My Lai story, more than a generation ago, it was 35 years ago, so almost two. When I did My Lai, one of the things that I discovered was that they had -- for some of you, most of you remember, but basically a group of American soldiers -- the analogy is so much like today. Then as now, our soldiers don't see enemies in a battlefield, they just walk on mines or they get shot by snipers, because It's always hidden. There's inevitable anger and rage and you dehumanize the people. We have done that with enormous success in Iraq. They're "rag-heads". They're less than human. The casualty count -- as in Sudan, equally as bad. Staggering numbers that we're killing. In any case, you know, it's -- in this case, these -- a group of soldiers in 1968 went into a village. They had been in Vietnam for three months and lost about 10% of their people, maybe 10 or 15 to accidents, killings and bombings, and they ended up -- they thought they would meet the enemy and there were 550 women, children and old men and they executed them all. It took a day. They stopped in the middle and they had lunch. One of the kids who had done a lot of shooting. The Black and Hispanic soldiers, about 40 of them, there were about 90 men in the unit -- the Blacks and Hispanics shot in the air. They wouldn't shoot into the ditch. They collected people in three ditches and just began to shoot them. The Blacks and Hispanics shot up in the air, but the mostly White, lower middle class, the kids who join the Army Reserve today and National Guard looking for extra dollars, those kind of kids did the killing. One of them was a man named Paul Medlow, who did an awful lot of shooting. The next day, there was a moment -- one of the things that everybody remembered, the kids who were there, one of the mothers at the bottom of a ditch had taken a child, a boy, about two, and got him under her stomach in such a way that he wasn't killed. When they were sitting having the K rations -- that's what they called them -- MRE's now -- the kid somehow crawled up through the [inaudible] screaming louder and he began -- and Calley, the famous Lieutenant Calley, the Lynndie England of that tragedy, told Medlow: Kill him, "Plug him," he said. And Medlow somehow, who had done an awful lot as I say, 200 bullets, couldn't do it so Calley ran up as everybody watched, with his carbine. Officers had a smaller weapon, a rifle, and shot him in the back of the head. The next morning, Medlow stepped on a mine and he had his foot blown off. He was being medevac'd out. As he was being medevac'd out, he cursed and everybody remembered, one of the chilling lines, he said, "God has punished me, and he's going to punish you, too."

    Appendix


    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/26/1450204


    Wednesday, January 26th, 2005
    Seymour Hersh: "We've Been Taken Over by a Cult"



    We turn now to Pulitzer prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh. Hersh first exposed the Abu Ghraib torture scandal in the New Yorker magazine in April 2004 and is author of "Chain of Command: The Road From 9/11 to Abu Ghraib."


    Seymour Hersh


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TRANSCRIPT


    AMY GOODMAN: We turn now to Seymour Hersh, Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, author of the book, Chain Of Command: The Road From 9-11 to Abu Ghraib. He spoke recently at the Stephen Wise Free Synagogue in New York.


    SEYMOUR HERSH: About what's going on in terms of the President is that as virtuous as I feel, you know, at The New Yorker, writing an alternative history more or less of what's been going on in the last three years, George Bush feels just as virtuous in what he is doing. He is absolutely committed -- I don't know whether he thinks he's doing God's will or what his father didn't do, or whether it's some mandate from -- you know, I just don't know, but George Bush thinks this is the right thing. He is going to continue doing what he has been doing in Iraq. He's going to expand it, I think, if he can. I think that the number of body bags that come back will make no difference to him. The body bags are rolling in. It makes no difference to him, because he will see it as a price he has to pay to put America where he thinks it should be. So, he's inured in a very strange way to people like me, to the politicians, most of them who are too cowardly anyway to do much. So, the day-to-day anxiety that all of us have, and believe me, though he got 58 million votes, many of people who voted for him weren't voting for continued warfare, but I think that's what we're going to have.


    It's hard to predict the future. And it's sort of silly to, but the question is: How do you go to him? How do you get at him? What can you do to maybe move him off the course that he sees as virtuous and he sees as absolutely appropriate? All of us -- you have to -- I can't begin to exaggerate how frightening the position is -- we're in right now, because most of you don't understand, because the press has not done a very good job. The Senate Intelligence Committee, the new bill that was just passed, provoked by the 9/11 committee actually, is a little bit of a kabuki dance, I guess is what I want to say, in that what it really does is it consolidates an awful lot of power in the Pentagon -- by statute now. It gives Rumsfeld the right to do an awful lot of things he has been wanting to do, and that is basically man hunting and killing them before they kill us, as Peter said. "They did it to us. We've got to do it to them." That is the attitude that -- at the very top of our government exists. And so, I'll just tell you a couple of things that drive me nuts. We can -- you know, there's not much more to go on with.


    I think there's a way out of it, maybe. I can tell you one thing. Let's all forget this word "insurgency". It's one of the most misleading words of all. Insurgency assumes that we had gone to Iraq and won the war and a group of disgruntled people began to operate against us and we then had to do counter-action against them. That would be an insurgency. We are fighting the people we started the war against. We are fighting the Ba'athists plus nationalists. We are fighting the very people that started -- they only choose to fight in different time spans than we want them to, in different places. We took Baghdad easily. It wasn't because be won. We took Baghdad because they pulled back and let us take it and decided to fight a war that had been pre-planned that they're very actively fighting. The frightening thing about it is, we have no intelligence. Maybe it's -- it's -- it is frightening, we have no intelligence about what they're doing. A year-and-a-half ago, we're up against two and three-man teams. We estimated the cells operating against us were two and three people, that we could not penetrate. As of now, we still don't know what's coming next. There are 10, 15-man groups. They have terrific communications. Somebody told me, it's -- somebody in the system, an officer -- and by the way, the good part of it is, more and more people are available to somebody like me.


    There's a lot of anxiety inside the -- you know, our professional military and our intelligence people. Many of them respect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as much as anybody here, and individual freedom. So, they do -- there's a tremendous sense of fear. These are punitive people. One of the ways -- one of the things that you could say is, the amazing thing is we are been taken over basically by a cult, eight or nine neo-conservatives have somehow grabbed the government. Just how and why and how they did it so efficiently, will have to wait for much later historians and better documentation than we have now, but they managed to overcome the bureaucracy and the Congress, and the press, with the greatest of ease. It does say something about how fragile our Democracy is. You do have to wonder what a Democracy is when it comes down to a few men in the Pentagon and a few men in the White House having their way. What they have done is neutralize the C.I.A. because there were people there inside -- the real goal of what Goss has done was not attack the operational people, but the intelligence people. There were people -- serious senior analysts who disagree with the White House, with Cheney, basically, that's what I mean by White House, and Rumsfeld on a lot of issues, as somebody said, the goal in the last month has been to separate the apostates from the true believers. That's what's happening. The real target has been "diminish the agency." I'm writing about all of this soon, so I don't want to overdo it, but there's been a tremendous sea change in the government. A concentration of power.


    On the other hand, the facts -- there are some facts. We can't win this war. We can do what he's doing. We can bomb them into the stone ages. Here's the other horrifying, sort of spectacular fact that we don't really appreciate. Since we installed our puppet government, this man, Allawi, who was a member of the Mukabarat, the secret police of Saddam, long before he became a critic, and is basically Saddam-lite. Before we installed him, since we have installed him on June 28, July, August, September, October, November, every month, one thing happened: the number of sorties, bombing raids by one plane, and the number of tonnage dropped has grown exponentially each month. We are systematically bombing that country. There are no embedded journalists at Doha, the Air Force base I think we're operating out of. No embedded journalists at the aircraft carrier, Harry Truman. That's the aircraft carrier that I think is doing many of the operational fights. There's no air defense, It's simply a turkey shoot. They come and hit what they want. We know nothing. We don't ask. We're not told. We know nothing about the extent of bombing. So if they're going to carry out an election and if they're going to succeed, bombing is going to be key to it, which means that what happened in Fallujah, essentially Iraq -- some of you remember Vietnam -- Iraq is being turn into a "free-fire zone" right in front of us. Hit everything, kill everything. I have a friend in the Air Force, a Colonel, who had the awful task of being an urban bombing planner, planning urban bombing, to make urban bombing be as unobtrusive as possible. I think it was three weeks ago today, three weeks ago Sunday after Fallujah I called him at home. I'm one of the people -- I don't call people at work. I call them at home, and he has one of those caller I.D.'s, and he picked up the phone and he said, "Welcome to Stalingrad." We know what we're doing. This is deliberate. It's being done. They're not telling us. They're not talking about it.

    First Associates Investments Limited came out with a positive report on Golden Star Resources ($3.79, up 7 cents). They see what I see, except my price objective is much, much higher:


    Golden Star Resources.pdf (200K)


    The gold shares continue to trade in limbo. The XAU lost .43 to 92.07. The only plus of the day was the HUI bounced off 200 again, closing at 203.33, up .23.
    HUI
    http://bigcharts.marketwatch.c…&o_symb=hui&freq=1&time=8


    GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT!


    MIDAS

    China gold news:


    Gold output sets new record
    (Xinhua)
    Updated: 2005-01-27 16:49


    China produced 212.35 tons of gold in 2004, setting a new annual record, according to the China Gold Association.


    East China's Shandong Province remained the country's largest gold producing area with 64.5 tons of gold output in 2004. Other major gold producing areas include Henan, Fujian, Shaanxi, Liaoning and Hebei.


    An official with the association said China's gold production had experienced fast growth since the mid-1990s. China produced only 90 tons of gold in 1994.


    "Growth of China's gold industry faces a golden opportunity," said an official with the association. "China has a huge population of 1.3 billion and the Chinese economy grows very fast."


    According to the association, China is the world's fourth largest gold producer and consumer.


    -END-

    Rhody on leasing:


    Good morning Bill:
    Backwardation in gold lease rates continues to intensify, with yields now reversed beyond the 3 month term to the 6 month. Given that these rates are "subsidized" by the monetary interests, the surge in gold lease rates must be noted, not for its intensity, but for its amplitude. Something is really roiling the financial markets. I think it's the pending G7 meeting. The PPT is making a major effort to keep gold below $430, and preferably near $422.


    Because of the rise in near term gold rates, the silver rates near term are only 2 1/2 to 3 times that of gold, while the one year rates for silver are a more normal 5 to 6 times gold.


    Never underestimate the power of these lease markets as a manipulative tool. During the Buffett silver price spike of 1998, the spot price of silver doubled to over $8, but lease rates were in excess backwardation to over 70% in the one month term. 70%! Since the one month term is now .32%, this represents a 220 fold increase. But spot prices merely doubled! Clearly, most of the tightness in the physical silver market was absorbed into a lease rate spike, leaving little for the average silver investor or mining company.


    Don't look now, but silver prices have doubled again. Did this most recent surge in spot metal prices also generate 70% lease rates???? No. The reason for lack of a lease rate response to the most recent increase in the silver price could be two fold. One, a doubling of spot prices means nothing if the medium of exchange has been shrinking in value at almost the same rate. There has been no surge in lease rates since 2000 because the present price of silver is actually less than it was in 2000, if you adjust for inflation. Alternatively, one could say, that if lessors believe that silver is in a bull market (perception is the reality), then borrowing silver right now is a very dangerous thing to do, because one will have to buy it back to return metal to owner at a higher price, plus pay the interest (which is in metal, not paper). This could be an excruciatingly expensive thing to do, given the tightness in the physical market. So, people who would normally lease are withdrawing from the activity, which causes rates to fall. Still, leasing is a powerful tool of the establishment. Provided there are still stockpiles available to central banks, and provided they are willing to risk losing their metal, leased silver is capable of crushing any rally, particularly if combined with a futures campaign. Rhody

    Barclays' new gold security to launch on Friday


    Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:19 AM ET NEW YORK, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Barclays Global Investors said on Thursday its new gold security, iShares COMEX Gold Trust, will launch on the American Stock Exchange on Friday under the ticker symbol IAU.


    -END-


    Another GLD to aid The Gold Cartel? Barclays has been the most visible GOLD BEAR of all among world financial houses over the past 7 years. We shall see.

    Some input from Jesse on what is really going on:


    Is the US Treasury conducting open market operations independent of the Federal Reserve?


    Yes. No matter what rationale one may wish to apply, the Treasury is providing repo money in terms and duration and amounts to be directly influencing the money supply and financial assets on a par with the Federal Reserve. Most are completely unaware that this has begun. The reason given for starting this program was to provide a 'better return' on Treasury receipts from the surplus. Interesting that the repos are still being done at the same time that the Treasury is issuing new short term debt.


    http://jessel.100megsfree3.com/TreasuryOMO.gif


    -END-