Rhody earlier:
Good morning:
Lord Keynes called gold that "barbarous relic" and silver is "just a commodity", so why are their trading patterns so similar?????? Take a look at the gold and silver spot charts below that display the last three days of trading up to about 6:30 am. Notice any similarities? Central banks still admit gold is money but why does silver trade with gold? Could it be that silver is also money........? Whoever is repressing the rise of these two metals is treating them like they are alike. "They" are having difficulty getting gold below $440 and silver below $7.35 even as the CRB keeps making new highs.
Rhody
Barrick’s response to judge’s order on Blanchard case:
From Reuters
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
http://www.reuters.com/newsArt…e=topNews&storyID=7911750
VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Barrick Gold Corp. confirmed reports on Tuesday that a U.S. judge had ordered it and coin dealer Blanchard and Co. to try to settle an acrimonious antitrust suit, but the miner said this was a "normal" procedure in a such a court case.
Blanchard, a New Orleans-based coin and bullion dealer, accused Barrick in a December 2002 lawsuit of conspiring to manipulate the gold price. Barrick, the world's third largest gold producer, denies the charge… -END-
Contrary to what some of the pundits are saying, this IS a big deal. Sure this is a normal effort by a judge to have the case settled. However, this case is far from normal and different than almost any other because the ramifications are earth shaking. This is not just about Barrick, Morgan and Blanchard. It is about the world financial system.
More specifically this is mega news because of the way Barrick and its pitiful sycophants have spoken publicly about the case in the past. We need only go back a week to see what Gold Cartel stooge Tim Wood presented during the PDAC conference in Toronto:
More Intrepid Barrick Emerging from Purgatory
By Tim Wood
09 Mar 2005 at 12:06 AM EST
Barrick president and CEO, Greg Wilkins...
That's not to say Wilkins has doubts. He has clearly been the right pick by chairman Peter Munk to paddle Barrick over the rapids of operational bobbles that surprised the market and bled the income statement. That stoked internal upheavals crowned by the sudden departure of former CEO Randall Oliphant in February 2003. Thereafter came a period of confusion over the company's strategy of selling gold forward, and coinciding with heightened attacks on the company as a lead protagonist in a fanciful global conspiracy to suppress the gold price.
It still faces a lawsuit filed in New Orleans federal court by nusmimatic merchant Blanchard & Co. to prove just such a scheme. Pleadings are expected to commence in the second quarter… - END-
FANCIFUL GLOBAL CONSPIRACY, eh? Then why has the judge ordered Morgan and Barrick to try and settle the case?
To give you some idea how right GATA is and how disingenuous (to be gentle) Wilkins, Barrick and Wood are, we need only go back to Barrick’s hypocritical, lying, devious presentation as to its hedging policies during a London gold conference in November 2003:
November 21 - Gold $395.80 up $2.80 - Silver $5.27 up 3 cents
GATA 1 Barrick 0 / Goldman Sachs Stops Gold Rally
Reuters
UPDATE - Barrick changes policy, drops gold hedging
Friday November 21, 8:19 am ET
By Veronica Brown
LONDON, Nov 21 (Reuters) - Barrick Gold Corp (Toronto:ABX.TO - News) stunned bullion markets on Friday by saying it was changing its hedging policy, and is no longer committed to selling the metal on forward markets as it is now cash rich.
"The commitment to hedging is gone...Hedging to us is no longer a requirement for running our business as it no longer creates shareholder value," Barrick Chairman and founder Peter Munk told reporters on the sidelines of a gold investment summit in London… - END-
Stunned is the right word. My comments the following Monday:
November 24 Gold $391.30 down $4.50 - Silver $5.23 down 4 cents
No matter how you look at it, Barrick’s stunning reversal of their hedging policy last Friday is very bullish for the reasons discussed in Friday’s MIDAS. The buzz in the gold world is about what happened to Barrick between Thursday and Friday? There is only one explanation in my book. It has to have something to do with the Blanchard & Co. case. What we know:
*Barrick’s Peter Munk unexpectedly announced a change in Barrick’s hedging policy from one day to the next, coming across like a chairman who either can’t make up his mind, or was suddenly TOLD what to say.
*CEO Wilkins was supposed to speak in London, but left for New Orleans on "urgent business" according to MineWeb. New Orleans Federal District Court is where the gold manipulation court case has gone into the Discovery phase.
*I have been told Barrick has learned of the expert witnesses who will be called to testify against them and they were stunned. I have also been informed there is discussion about some damning emails. This is only conjecture as I received this information second-hand, but it comes from a good source and it all fits. You don’t tell the world how great hedging is one day and then do a complete about face the next day without a compelling reason.
*One of the objectives of the Blanchard case is to seek immediate injunctive relief from Barrick, which is a demand they lift their hedges. Perhaps Barrick and Blanchard are working on a settlement, with one of the stipulations being an immediate cessation of hedging.
*Barrick extolled hedging at $300, but is giving it up at $400, not just now but for the next 10 years. Very strange to say the least. Something has to be wrong.
-END-
The bottom line is the judge’s order is monumental, reveals how powerful Blanchard’s case is, and provides more concrete evidence of just how right GATA has been for so many years.