Beiträge von Eldorado

    Tschonko Lancelot


    Jetzt kommt man der Sache naeher, schade ich kann nicht zugreifen.
    Haette mich schon gereizt mehr im Cortez anzulegen. Bin nur mit NPG und XCL dabei.


    @ Ulfur


    Gogh ist hart im nehmen, hoffe er kommt wieder, meinen Zuspruch hat er jedenfalls. Man sollte hin und wieder die nackten Tatsachen auf den Tisch legen...... :D


    So hat jeder verschiedene Ansichten,ob nun Sally oder Mathilda, mit oder ohne.
    Anyway, have a nice day ;)

    Das Risiko noch weiter runter ist gering. IMHO
    Da muesste schon etwas Fundamentales passieren was ich nicht glaube. Der Rand ""schwaechelte"" ein wenig, mich wundert der immer wieder und wuerde mich freuen wenn er faellt. Wenn er das tut, dann lachen wir uns eins..... :D Geduld !


    Goldfields ist fuer mich die bessere Aktie obwohl bei Randfall Harmony schneller steigen kann.


    Unter 10 Dollar, ist sie geschenkt fuer den der Zeit hat zu warten.


    Zwar Aktien aber leider kein Moos mehr in der Handtasche :(


    Gnight


    XEX

    Hallo


    Nur eine Idee, hier koennte man kurz ueber Favoriten diskutieren die im Senior Sektor Gold/Silber sind. Entweder preiswert, teuer,oder zum verkaufen.


    Ich lege das mal so rein, habe jedoch keine zeit uber Senioren zu schreiben. Ich bin in sechs threads, dass reicht mir. :D


    Moechte eher reduzieren, nebenbei bemerkt.


    Vielleicht fuehrt diesen thread jemand von Euch ?(


    Ansonsten sollen die Mods ihn verschieben und ihr ignoriert das.


    Vielleicht sollte man auch eine Meckerecke aufmachen,dort kann man richtig Dampf ablassen. :D



    Gruss


    Eldo

    Tschonko, bravo !


    Die Bralorne war unten auf 2.11 gestern, schade hat nicht geklappt bei dir.
    Cliffie und CZN sehen heute schon besser aus.


    Wie waers mit Bravo ? :D
    BVG.V, die juckt mich auch in den fingern fuer 29 cents... Aber !, ...

    Harmony"s subsequent offer for Gold FieldsHarmony advises that the Competition Tribunal has today approved Harmony"sproposed merger with Gold Fields,



    ...subject to certain conditions regardingretrenchment of employees. The approval by the Competition Tribunal was theonly outstanding condition precedent to Harmony"s subsequent offer andaccordingly Harmony"s subsequent offer is now unconditional in all respects.Harmony will begin settling acceptances of the subsequent offer as soon asreasonably practicable, and in any event by no later than 17 May 2005.While Harmony continues to believe that a merger with Gold Fields has compellingcommercial rationale, Harmony considers that an increase in the offer ratio to alevel that reflects the current relative share prices of Harmony and Gold Fieldswould represent an unacceptably high transfer of value to Gold Fieldsshareholders.Accordingly, Harmony hereby announces that it does not intend to extend orincrease the subsequent offer, comprising 1.275 Harmony shares for each GoldFields share. The last day to acquire Gold Fields shares to participate in Harmony"s subsequent offer will be at the close of business on Friday, 13 May2005, with the subsequent offer therefore closing at 12:00 p.m. (South Africantime) on the record date being Friday, 20 May 2005.
    The Board of Harmony will continue to act in the best interests of Harmony shareholders :D, and will continue to look at opportunities and investments as they appear. ?(
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For the board of the directors, I guess !


    Gruss


    Eldo

    A fellow Aussie Cafe member was kind enough to send the
    following:


    Mezz loans or mezzanine loans are virtual second
    mortgages.


    Hedge funds and banks might swap first mortgage holdings
    and instruments for mezz holdings and instruments when
    the economy looks good - mainly for the greater yield,
    and move back into first mortgages when the economy looks
    like contracting. The trap is to be caught holding the
    wrong one, especially when such holdings are leveraged.
    And just like LTCM, the spreads can suddenly widen instead
    of being relatively predictable or narrowing.


    Correlation is the "running in parallel" nature of the
    two instruments. And when they don't run parallel then
    big trouble for those that are betting on correlation.


    ***


    All the talk on CNBC is about hedge funds. Our input has
    Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan (both Gold Cartel stalwarts)
    as ones taking major hits - most likely along with various
    hedge funds.


    JP Morgan was last at $35.26, down 70 cents.


    Stay tuned!!!

    Tschonko


    ""....hab ich mich da auch getaeuscht ? :D, das frage ich mich auch hin und wieder"".


    Jetzt habe ich eben die CNZ und wir haben das Thema Indianer schon mal besprochen mit dem Umweltschutz.
    Die sind nur maechtig in den keller weil zinc gefallen, weil ein paar Locos't :D verkauften bei letzen tsunami.


    Umweltschutz und Gesetze, damit muss ich auch leben.
    Bei break-even die haelfte weg wenn keine besseren news kommen oder hype.


    Ich kenne kein US Board um da nachzuschnueffeln was die cowboys darueber reden, egal !


    Mal schaun, geduldig und froehlich bleiben heisst's.


    Gruss

    valueman


    Dachte mir schon das die Kasse leer ist, hast bestimmt gut eingekauft.
    Ich halte mehr titel als du,es nicht einfach diese zu ueberwachen.
    Da habe ich 8mal mehr zu tun wenn ich meine anschaue.
    Grossaktionaer, :D.. mit 10-500 each, bin ich auch.
    Wir sind ja cowboys und reiten gerne die Juniors :P


    Rauf und runter,... manchmal steht man so davor....siehe Chart :)
    Wir haben heute blauen Himmel ueber dem Kap der guten Hoffnung.


    Isn't nice ? :P :P :P, what a mission !!

    VEHICULAR BOND SLAUGHTER


    By Eric J. Fry


    Now that GM's credit rating clings for its life, millions
    of bond investors are holding a candle for the auto titan -
    hoping for a miraculous recovery.


    If GM's investment-grade rating sheds its mortal coil, the
    entire corporate bond market may suffer a near-death
    experience, especially that portion of the bond market that
    already faces life and death situations every day...the
    junk-bond sector.


    Now more than ever, therefore, junk bonds – known in polite
    company as "high-yield" bonds – might not be suitable for
    widows and orphans...or for married couples and their
    children...or for divorcees...or for same-sex partners...or
    for almost any other sort of investor who favors return OF
    capital over return ON capital.


    Last week, an intellectually honest credit analyst at
    Standard & Poor's named Scott Sprinzen, plunged the credit
    ratings of both General Motors and Ford into the ranks of
    junk borrowers. In so doing, he seemed to plunge many junk-
    bond investors into a state of extreme denial.


    To be sure, many GM bondholders panicked immediately upon
    learning of the downgrade and dumped their holdings.
    Likewise, many other high-yield investors reacted swiftly
    and decisively to the news by dumping an array of high-
    yield bonds.


    A few steps removed from the fray, however, the owners of
    closed-end funds that invest in high-yield securities
    steadfastly held their ground. They responded as if GM's
    travails posed no risk whatsoever to the rest of the high-
    yield market.



    RMK High Income Fund (NYSE: RMH), for example, continues to
    hold near its recent highs, even though GMs bonds are
    plummeting toward all-time lows. Are RMH shareholders
    courageous or naïve? (Or maybe they're courageous AND
    naïve). Let the reader decide.


    We would readily concede that GM bonds and the rest of the
    high-yield market are not one and the same. But neither are
    they as different as RMH's resilient share price would seem
    to imply.


    The chart below presents the recent yield histories of a GM
    bond maturing in 2015 and an index of BB-rated bonds (GM's
    new peer group). A close correlation between the two is
    readily apparent, as is the recent spike in GM's yield to
    distressed levels.



    If GM's bonds - the newest and largest members of the junk-
    bond ranks – are reflecting extreme distress, shouldn't the
    prices of closed-end funds that specialize in junk bonds be
    reflecting at least mild concern? A few of them are, but
    many are not.


    Last week's twin-downgrade of Ford and GM was not an every-
    day event. To the contrary, both automakers are massive
    borrowers. "GM, with about $300 billion in notes, bonds,
    loans and asset-backed securities as of Dec. 31, and Ford,
    with about $151 billion, are the biggest companies [ever]
    cut to junk," Bloomberg News reports. "The former biggest
    so-called fallen angel was WorldCom, which had $30 billion
    of bonds cut to speculative grade on May 10, 2002. GM's cut
    affects about $200 billion of debt."

    For perspective, GM's debt alone would account for about
    15% of all U.S. high-yield bonds outstanding. In other
    words, junk-bond buyers might find themselves with much
    more junk than they wish to buy. And a dollar spent buying
    a bond issued by GM or Ford bonds would be a dollar NOT
    spent buying some other sort of junk bond. Net-net, we
    suspec t GM and Ford will be about as welcome in the junk-
    bond market as a windstorm at an origami festival...and
    just as disruptive.


    "When Standard & Poor's shunted General Motors and Ford
    into the credit junkyard on Thursday," the Times of London
    remarked, "there was no groan of bending steel, no screech
    of torn metal."


    Very true. But a car that is hurtling off a cliff makes no
    sound whatsoever...for a while.


    "The cliffhanger is whether another ratings agency, such as
    Moody's or Fitch, follows S&P's lead," the Times continues.
    Such a decision would push GM out of Lehman's Global
    Aggregate index and into the world of fixed-income
    "untouchables." Many pension funds and other institutional
    investors may not own junk-rated bonds. If/As/When these
    institutional investors must disgorge their GM and Ford
    bonds, traditional high-yield investors might choke on the
    supply.


    As for the prospect of a meaningful financial recovery at
    GM, we are dubious. Nothing short of the miraculous will
    enable GM to recover any semblance of its past glory. The
    automaker's share of the U.S. auto market during the first
    four months of the year tumbled to an 80-year low of 25.6
    percent - down from 27.3 percent in the same period of
    2004.


    "Although GM has substantial cash reserves," Sprinzen
    ominously concludes, "its ability to withstand persistent
    poor financial performance is not unlimited."


    Maybe the worst is over already for the high-yield market,
    but we doubt it. And even if we wanted to believe it, we
    would not bet on that outcome with any of our own money.
    Hold a candle for GM's credit rating if you wish, but don't
    hold your breath.


    [Ed. Note: Dan Denning has been predicting GM's demise for
    a long time. Hark! Another prediction of Dan's comes true.
    The good news is, there are still a few dominoes left to
    fall, and the fattest profits are still to come...

    ..... aufpassen Peter, dass geht wieder zuweit !
    Who are you ?.... Wer ist der Schmierfink ?


    Hier einige Zitate und ""wertvolle"" Beitraege von Dir , da kann jeder lesen und sich eine Meinung bilden:
    http://www.goldseiten-forum.de…h.php?searchid=28607&sid=


    ...Ich habe nie gesagt Appendix kann etwas dafuer,der hat nur den Thread aufgemacht. Du kannst gerne hier weiter schreiben vielleicht kriegst du die Daumen wieder rauf.
    Nachdem kein Mod einschreitet habe ich ein Wolkenbild fuer dich zum Abschluss bevor ich hier raus bin aus diesen thread.

    'Consider public interest' – G'Fields


    Allowing a hostile take-over of mining company Gold Fields by rival Harmony was not in the public interest, the Competition Tribunal heard in Pretoria on Monday.


    A merger could be to the detriment of the industry, to empowerment and to at least 1500 Gold Fields employees who stand to lose their jobs, lawyers for the company contended in closing arguments.


    'These are people'



    "These are not golf playing ornaments, they are people," Jeremy Gauntlett, SC, argued for Gold Fields. The mining company is asking the tribunal not to allow the merger, or alternatively to impose strict conditions.


    The fact that the 1500 individuals facing retrenchment because of the merger were shift bosses or higher and did not face imminent poverty, did not improve the picture, Gauntlett said.


    "They are human beings. There is no justification for it. There is no rationale."


    Gold Fields contends there is no reason for the 1500 — the figure at which Harmony has agreed to cap retrenchments — to lose their jobs. Gold Fields itself had no intention to lay off employees.


    The company urged the tribunal to consider such public interest factors when deciding on Harmony's hostile bid.


    Competition the main issue