Beiträge von linar

    Zitat

    Original von Edel Man


    Nur nb.:
    Habe meine Calls auf Gold und Silber vorgestern stark erhöht. :)


    Grüsse
    Edel Man


    Buenas Dias :) hocke hier in der heissen Sonne - Hirn mit leichtem Sonnenbrand :rolleyes: :D und einem Internet welches laaaaaaaaaaaaaaahmt :( bitte kannst Du mir vielleicht einen Gold-Call "vermitteln" etwas längerfristig - habe was von 675 11-07 gelesen - muchas gracias - wenn's geht ;) falls nicht - no pasa nada :) mit SilberCall bin ich eingedeckt ;)


    sol - vino y amor :D......muchos recuerdos y mucha suerte a todo !!! :)


    Adios - linar :)

    Silver and COMEX Update


    .........



    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.321gold.com/editori…/watson053106/silver2.jpg]


    .....Is there a relationship here between the sudden drop in the COMEX stocks and a similar drop in the spot price of silver? Shouldn't an evident drop in visible above ground supplies suggest to investors that silver supplies are tightening and hence encourage a price rise rather than a price fall?


    Or is something more mysterious at work? Did the shorts that were facing ever-increasing losses open the warehouse doors and dump millions of ounces of silver on the markets? It's an interesting theory and a look at silver lease rates suggests that something desperate was going on.....


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/watson/watson053106/3.gif]


    ......We note that lease rates began to rise sharply on the 2nd May. The total silver COMEX stocks on that day were 123,627,373 ounces and then stayed in a tight range for 10 days before silver prices plunged. Did the shorts rent out nearly 19 million ounces of silver with the express purpose of dumping it on the market and then buying it back at a cheaper price? If you are going to borrow 19 million ounces of silver, lease rates have to jump and jump they did!


    Or is there a more benign explanation? How much of these 19 million ounces of outgoing silver ended up in the hands of the Barclays Silver ETF destined for their London vaults? The ETF started trading on April 28th this year and has so far accumulated nearly 70 million ounces and 19 million ounces goes some way to building that stockpile.


    However, the fact that this sudden and sharp drop in the COMEX silver stocks almost exactly coincides with a 21% drop in the price of silver does make one wonder. If the silver was merely being shifted to another vault, it should not have caused a sudden price drop........



    full story: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/watson/watson053106.html


    ...meine Enkel halten mich zwar schwer auf Trab, zwischen zwei Galoppsprüngen - finde diesen Artikel interessant. Falls doppelt gemoppelt - exgüsi, hab nicht so viel Zeit alles zu lesen :rolleyes: :D


    linar :)

    Zitat

    Original von LuckyFriday
    Hallo linar,


    mittels Metallkonto bei Kitco könntest du in Rhodium investieren. Wäre bei 500 $ vor nicht allzu langer Zeit interesant gewesen........


    L.


    ...merci Lucky :) jetzt ist es wohl etwas spät, habe auch keine Erfahrung mit Kitco, Metallkonto usw. ist $5oo nicht schon ein Weilchen her ?(
    jetzt erst mal Sonne tanken - adios ;)


    linar :)

    HOLA !....morgen geht's für einen Monat nach Espana - wünsche allen viel Glück und Freude an und mit Gold und Silber, fette Gewinne auf allen Ebenen ;) werde manchmal ein Auge riskieren, sofern es die wirren Drähte im Dorf zulassen :D und auch ein merci an alle für Rat und Unterstützung =)


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.herzog-fenster.ch/grafik/sonne.gif]


    ...und bald linar so [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.wunderground.com/data/wximagenew/i/islandjoe/1-thumb.gif;)

    Zitat

    Original von Edel Man
    Zeit eilt -- teilt -- weilt -- heilt


    Grüsse
    Edel Man


    Zeit heilt nicht - sie legt den Mantel des vergessen - "sich damit abfinden" - beiseite schieben - drüber. Täte sie heilen, wir machten nicht immer wieder die gleichen Fehler - da sind die Tiere viel "gescheiter" :) na ja, einige wenige von hier vielleicht auch ;):D


    linar :) der zum x-ten mal auf die Schnauze fällt :O mit schiefer Nase :D

    .....ob YZC noch rein darf ?( in den Himmel :rolleyes: :D


    aus dem StockhouseBoard - einfach mal als Info:



    Conference Call on Revised Feasibility Study
    Released May 16, 2006



    Date: Thursday May 18, 2006


    Time: 10:30AM Pacific Time


    On May 16, 2006, Yukon Zinc Corporation (YZC.TSX.V) announced results of a feasibility study on its
    Wolverine Property on May 9, 2006. In the normal course of preparation of the 43-101 report on the
    feasibility study a computational error was discovered in the mining portion of the operating costs that
    were estimated by Yukon Zinc. The result of amending this error is to increase the mining cost from
    $24.93 to $35.18 per tonne and overall operating costs per tonne mined increased from $90.26/tonne to $100.51/tonne.


    The purpose of the call is to review the feasibility results as amended with the increased operating
    costs announced May 16, 2006. The call will include discussion on cashflows at varying metal prices and
    plans for review of the feasibility study and development of the project. It is suggested that
    participants have copies of the May 9 and May 16 releases to refer to during the teleconference
    (Available at http://www.yukonzinc.com).


    Recent events have eroded shareholder confidence in the project and the Company. Management is committed
    to rebuilding this confidence and will do so by providing timely and complete disclosure on the Wolverine
    Project and development plans. This call will resume this process.


    Management firmly believes that Wolverine is a viable project and is determined to advance this project
    to project financing at the appropriate time and progress to production.


    We will have the phone number and pass code


    sent out to you by email Thursday morning at approximately 8:00am.


    Your participation is welcomed.


    Respectfully,


    Harlan Meade X(
    President and CEO


    http://www.stockhouse.ca/bullb…55636&t=0&all=0&TableID=0


    linar :)

    ...das is dat janze Elend von bobelles posting :rolleyes:


    Canaccords Pescod Says This Tonight
    YUKON ZINC (V-YZC) $0.24 -.255
    PACIFICA RESOURCES (V-PAX) $0.85 -0.25
    Many, many years ago before grey hair, kids and other things,
    we were lucky enough to have lived in the Yukon Territory and in
    those days the North Country was a great place for having more
    than a little fun. It also has such a history of the mining industry
    that it’s almost impossible to escape it. But if you have ever lived
    in the Yukon, you are aware of one very important fact of life…it’s
    a very expensive place to live.


    When we see a lot of these potential mining projects being
    talked about in the North Country, be it the Northwest Territories
    and all its potential for gold and diamonds, or the Yukon with its
    history of gold and copper, we wonder if people are aware of just
    how expensive it can be up there. You are so far away from the
    central services and everything has to be trucked to those locations
    involved. It’s a big expense. Now with the global warming
    and concern about these roads even being open to the Northwest
    Territories, it just adds more expense.


    We’ve always suggested that anyone who wanted to invest in a
    project way up there, should find out what it costs to fill up a pick
    up truck with gas, or what a head of lettuce costs or, what it costs
    to catch a flight from Whitehorse to anyplace else.


    We never wrote up Yukon Zinc that we can recollect, because
    we always thought their project was simply too small in an area of
    the world where costs are so high. Canaccord’s Wendell Zerb
    echoed that thought today telling us that throughout its history,
    he said, “there is one thing that has always come across and that
    was how small the project was”. Yukon Zinc came out with their
    feasibility study on their Wolverine Property in the Yukon a few
    days ago and the results weren’t good. Then the stock was halted
    to announce that as bad as those results might have been to
    some, that actually, they were worse.


    They suggested they made an error in their computation and
    because of this error, the real numbers suggested increase in
    mining costs from $24.93 to $35.18 per tonne and overall operating
    costs per tonne moved from $90.26 to $100.51 per tonne. All
    in all it means a cumulative life-of-mine operating costs just got
    bounced by $54 million. Ouch!


    But that doesn’t mean we escape this whole debacle because
    some of the same people involved with Yukon Zinc are involved
    with a zinc play we did have some hope for and are speculators in
    and that’s Pacifica Resources. The difference between Yukon Zinc
    and Pacifica is that Pacifica’s resource is very big—potentially,
    eight to 20 times bigger! It’s in a more remote location, but up
    there, big counts! Because of the association with some of the
    same people, the stock gets hammered as well.


    http://www.stockhouse.ca/bullb…=LIST&navmode=1&navd=fwd&


    linar :)

    The death throes of the scumbags


    Richard Daughty
    ...the angriest guy in economics
    The Mogambo Guru


    May 17, 2006


    ...............And the reason a lot of people don't do that may be for the same reason quizzical reader Roberta R. wonders about when she writes "I am writing to you about the paradigm of cashing in gold for fiat (money). I firmly believe in holding hard assets such as gold or silver; but what I have always had a hard time with is the concept of cashing in the gold. As you stated in your editorial, the Reichmark collapsed so far down that it took 87 trillion of them to buy an oz. of Au.


    "This is where my brain begins to hurt. Now I am the proud owner of 87 trillion Reichmarks (FRN's) and maybe I can buy a couple loaves of bread. So, you cash out something with a real intrinsic value and you get fiat junk. But it just seems to me that you are back to square one the minute you sell."


    She finished with "Working on a headache, Roberta."


    I was happy to tell her that she was exactly right! She WAS back to square one! That's the beauty of gold! The answer why is contained in the problem: How much gold does it take to buy one loaf of bread, which costs $2 a loaf when gold is at $700 an ounce? Answer: 1/350th of an ounce. (You can buy 350 loaves of bread with one ounce of gold).


    And then how much gold does it take to buy a $200 million loaf of bread when gold is at $87 trillion per ounce? Answer: 1/435,000th of an ounce! You can buy 435,000 loaves of bread with one ounce of gold! Hahaha! A little tiny flake of your gold ounce ought to do it! Hahaha!


    So, Roberta, thanks to gold, your buying power has been preserved. THAT'S the beauty of the stuff! And in this particular example, you actually got wealthier, as bread became over 1,000 times cheaper in terms of gold! But notice that the bread cost 100 million times more, in terms of dollars!................



    ***Mogambo sez: The recent $22 plunge in gold and $2 plunge in silver is just the death throes of the scumbags who have engineered the huge short interest in metals futures, and are now being choked to death by it. Every dip like that is Lady Fate smiling on you, letting you buy gold and silver at a temporary bargain! Whee! Lucky you!


    http://www.321gold.com/editorials/daughty/daughty051706.html


    love him ;)


    linar :)

    Zitat

    Original von Ü-Ei
    Moin linar,
    ...... Nur wie gesagt, wenn ich sie bei annähernd +/- Null schmeißen kann......
    Grüße,
    Ü-Ei


    .....hmmm, das dürfte dauern :rolleyes: Insider haben zwar gekauft - aber wer weiss, mir stinkt's jedenfalls gewaltig X(


    http://www.canadianinsider.com…ansactions.php?ticker=YZC




    ...einen für EDEL ;) muss ich mir wohl zu Herzen nehmen


    Remember Jesse Livermore. " It was never my thinking that made me money, but my sitting, got that?"


    linar :)

    ...hab mich etwas durch das StockhouseBoard gelesen - dieser DAbramov hat bis jetzt immer vernünftig geschrieben...hoffe auch dieses mal :rolleyes: obwohl die K**** scheint arg am dampfen zu sein :(


    http://www.stockhouse.ca/bullb…=LIST&navmode=1&navd=fwd&


    To question the credibility of the posters is a natural reaction to any individual who's holding or is thinking of holding shares in this company.
    However, the same must be done to the management and associated parties of the company.
    To assume that the cost of mining the mineral is actually 41% greater than originally anticipated is astronomical. Imagine if someone would predict that their revenues were going to be 41% less than predicted?
    Indeed, it will be a bloodbath tomorrow and YZC shares will likely see a dramatic weakening in their price structure. I believe you have to take two varying viewpoints with respect to YZC, the short term and the long term. Intermediate (in my opinion) in this case is irrelevant as medium term may indicate somewhere approximately end of 2006, early 2007.
    If you're looking for a short-term entry, look for a major dip in shareprice early in the morning, I in fact care to speculate that the biggest dip will occur between 9:50 - 10:15 in the morning. Buying on the dip and selling on the impeding bounce.
    I can't help but feel disgust at the incompetence this management has shown in the past week with respect to its shareholders. I have commented before that when institutional investors are bailing the way they have after the FS release, then that is a clear sign that there is something rotting within the organization.
    I don't believe that the correction on the FS will be the end of the bad news streak for YZC. Remember, Macquarie bank was supposed to be the major lending institution on this project and the FS was supposed to be the major milestone upon which M-bank was going to base their decision with regards to financing alternatives. Should M-bank choose not to adequately fund this operation, the new fund requirements may have to come in the form of further share issuance (dilution) or invitation of a partner company into the joint venture that will take up a large position in the project as a result (thus cutting your net asset value).
    Once again I'd like to retrace back to Mr. Meade's comments:
    "We now have better shareholders than we did yesterday".
    Did he mean that synonymously with:
    "We now have more retail investors who are more willing to get a bigger beating"?
    *All replies are always welcome*
    P.S. - If I have made any errors in my post, I would appreciate clarification. Thank you.


    linar :):(


    ...das scheinen die "News" zu sein:
    http://www.stockhouse.ca/bullb…&StartDateTime=2006-05-16

    ...there is a major disconnect between commodity prices & the wider global economy - a big re-rating once a rebalancing of the Chinese economy takes place - criticises US politicians for focusing of re-election plans rather than economy - "stiff headwinds" for equity markets (commodities :rolleyes: ) now that central banks are withdrawing liqidity....


    (Stephan Roach - momentan auf CNBC)


    ...wohl eher auf die Industrie-Metalle bezogen - trotzdem, ein bisschen Vorsicht schadet nicht



    linar :)

    Hallo Ü-Ei, die Runde von Minco täte mir auch schmecken :) die Aktien habe ich jedenfalls ;) - YZC kannst nur abwarten, aber stimmt schon, Meade wäre kaum dort wenn sie ihn schassen wollten - aber die halten auch bald an jedem Baum, ziemlich mühsam. Kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass da was Sensationelles rauskommt :rolleyes: hoffentlich kein PP.


    linar :)