Beiträge von bobelle21

    73% der Indicated auf Proven and Probable Reservs hochgestuft. Im Base-Case-Szenario (Gold 765, Silber 11,65) wird von folgenden ausgegangen:


    The Base Case economics show a pre-tax Internal Rate of Return of 100% and a pre-tax cash flow of US$103.7 million. The payback period for the initial capital of US$20 million is approximately 12 months.


    Die Studie wird aber noch besser denke ich: The Company is currently completing an updated resource estimate to include the results of 51 additional drill holes (holes SE08-42 to SE08-92).


    Grüße


    http://silvercrestmines.com/up…%20SE%20PFS%20results.pdf

    Ich find PNP zum [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.comunio.de/external…ages/smiles/smileys38.gif] . Zum Glück noch nie gehabt. So jetzt braucht FIS nur noch das richtige Loch neben dem Hathor-Fund anbohren, dann können meine anderen Uraner noch länger vor sich hindümpeln. Aber vielleicht kapiert ja jmd. früher das die im Bau befindlichen Reaktoren keine Holzpellets benötigen ;).


    Uranium to Fetch $90 as Indian Reactors Drive Demand (Update1)


    June 23 (Bloomberg) -- The uranium industry's worst year is about to collide with a nuclear construction program in India and China tha rivals the ones undertaken during the oil crisis of the 1970s.


    The result is likely to be a 58 percent rebound in uranium to $90 a pound from $57 now, according to Goldman Sachs JBWere Pty and Rio Tinto Group, the third-biggest mining company. Uranium plunged 57 percent in the past year as an earthquake damaged a Japanese nuclear plant that's the world's largest and faults shut down reactors in the U.K. and Germany.


    Plans for India and China to end electricity shortages will ripple from northwest Canada to the Australian outback and the flatlands of Kazakhstan, the primary sources of uranium. India will start up three reactors this year, with another six due in 2009, in India, China, Russia, Canada and Japan. Uranium demand worldwide will rise as fast as oil this year, or 0.8 percent, Deutsche Bank AG forecasts.


    ``The first wave of growth is going to come from the emerging economies,'' said John Wong, fund manager with CQS UK LLP in London, which has $10 billion under management including $150 million of uranium investments. ``People are starting to look at coal, at gas, at oil and seeing the energy prices go up, they wonder about uranium.''


    The yearlong decline in uranium contrasts with record prices for oil and coal as Asian energy demand expands and concern mounts that emissions will cause global warming to worsen. The world needs to build 32 new nuclear plants each year as part of measures to cut emissions in half by 2050, the Paris- based International Energy Agency says.


    2007's Drop


    Because malfunctions shut reactors in Japan, the U.K. and Germany, nuclear power production and uranium use dropped 2 percent in 2007, only the third time consumption has fallen since the 1970s, according to data compiled by BP Plc, Europe's second-largest oil company by market value. Prices are so low that some uranium mines are close to being unprofitable, says Merrill Lynch & Co., the third-largest U.S. securities firm.


    ``If you look at what is necessary to sustain increased production, to make the kind of projects that everyone is talking about fly, prices better not get much lower or those projects are going to fall over,'' says Preston Chiaro, chief executive of Rio Tinto's energy unit. ``I don't think that spot price is indicative of what prices will look like through the course of the year.''


    Iran's Reactor


    In India, Nuclear Power Corp.'s 220-megawatt Kaiga plant in the southern province of Karnatka and another at Rawatbhata in the northern state of Rajasthan are due to come on line this year. China started two units in 2007 and will bring on three more through 2011, says the World Nuclear Association. Iran plans to begin generation this year at its 950-megawatt Bushehr reactor, which is at the center of the nation's conflict with the West.


    ``China is just on the verge of a second rapid phase of expansion,'' says Ian Hore-Lacy, director of public communications for the WNA in London. ``Each year China seems to raise their sights further.''


    To be sure, safety concerns remain the biggest risk to nuclear construction and uranium's revival. Proposed reactors were canceled in the 1970s because of environmental protests, while accidents at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979 and Chernobyl, Ukraine, in 1986 further eroded support. In Japan, new projects face delays as utilities improve earthquake resistance to restore confidence after the closure of Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Kashiwazaki Kariwa and revelations that companies falsified safety records.


    Safety Risks


    ``It is worth remembering that this is an industry that can be brought to its knees overnight by one major mishap or one well-executed terrorist action,'' Paul Hannon, an analyst at London-based commodities research company VM Group in London, wrote in a report this month. Uranium demand was 66,500 metric tons last year, according to data from Denver-based consultant TradeTech LLP. Consumption may jump 55 percent to 102,000 tons by 2020, forecasts Macquarie Group Ltd., Australia's biggest securities firm.


    Uranium use now is 69 percent greater than the 39,429 tons that was mined in 2006, the most recent data from the WNA show. The balance comes from inventories and decommissioned weapons. A Russian accord to export fuel recovered from warheads to the U.S. expiries in 2013.


    Nuclear Converts


    ``Secondary supplies are finite and rapidly being depleted,'' Deutsche Bank analysts led by Michael Lewis said in a June 20 report. ``Continual supply issues and the likelihood of increased demand from utilities should drive the spot price higher during the third quarter of this year.''
    Demand is set to increase as existing reactors are brought back on line, while nuclear energy gains converts. South Africa, which is struggling to meet electricity demand, plans to award a contract for construction of a 120 billion-rand ($15 billion) nuclear plant. In the U.K., the Labour government wants more atomic capacity to reduce its emissions.


    U.S. Republican presidential candidate John McCain said last week he will push to almost double the number of nuclear reactors to lessen the nation's dependence on foreign oil. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, also backs nuclear power. There are 104 reactors operating in the U.S., though the last to come on line was in 1990, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute.


    Production Costs


    Prices will have to increase if uranium production is to meet the rising demand, said Kevin Smith, head of uranium trading at New York-based commodities brokerage Traxys. Canada's Cameco Corp., the world's largest uranium producer, reported it spent a total of about C$45 ($44) to produce a pound of uranium in the first quarter, compared with its average realized price of C$40.85 a pound. While Cameco, which also mines gold, still posted a profit for the quarter, lower uranium prices are a problem for other companies developing new mines, according to Smith. ``There are a lot of production projects that are feeling the pain,'' Smith says.


    Uranium Participation Corp., a speculative buyer of uranium, rose as much as 5.3 percent in Toronto trading and was 15 cents higher at C$8.70 as of 11 a.m. local time. Cameco rose C$1.02, or 2.7 percent, to C$38.92.


    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/…d=axHfOcR8T81Y&refer=home


    Grüße

    @Eldo, ja BTT.V ist eine wahre Freude. Ich weiß, daß Casey sie schon lange auf der Liste hat (wg. Uran) und jetzt kamen die Coffin Brothers noch hinzu. Beide haben immer argumentiert, daß die Promotion das schwächste bei Bitterroot ist. das hat sich jetzt geändert ;)


    Grüße


    Thu May 22, 2008 Hard Rock Analyst</big> Author: David Coffin and Eric Coffin


    With the northern summer approaching we are in the process
    of updating companies that have been sidelined by seasonal realities.
    Included on that list is Bitterroot Resources (BTT-V; up 6.5 cents at $0.37 on 225 k shares)
    that has suddenly become more prominent based on two back to back news
    releases, even though neither deals with the reason we have had BTT on
    accumulate over the winter months. Yesterday's release was about
    permitting for its Michigan uranium joint venture, about which we have
    a bit more to say below. After the close today BTT announced that it
    has made coal applications on the Manitoba side of its border with
    Saskatchewan, and this we think offers a very low risk second entry
    into the area play generated by the Goldsource discovery. On the basis
    of the coal spec combined with work that should soon begin on the Linda
    high-grade gold vein we are moving BTT to the HRA list with an initial outlook of strong speculative buy.




    The three coal permits Bitterroot is picking up in Manitoba are within
    the same geology as the Goldsource discovery, and all have either rail
    links or existing road access crossing through them; the road
    accessibility on the two southern blocks should allow some drilling of
    this ground during summer if permitting can get done in time. BTT
    president Mike Carr does have a coal background, so these areas have
    been chosen as knowledgably as current understandings of the play
    allows. One thing that distinguishes Manitoba from Saskatchewan is a
    significantly higher upfront entry cost in the former, largely
    refundable as work is done on the ground, which may explain in part why
    there has been less noise about applications there even though
    geological considerations would indicate this should be a cross
    boundary play. The relative lack of "rush" in Manitoba also means that
    permitting should be simpler since the government offices won't be
    overstressed as they are in Saskatchewan. Manitoba's mining culture,
    though more focused on hard-rock situations than soft-rock, is as
    strong as that in Saskatchewan and we see no reason at this point to
    favour applications in the overstressed Saskatchewan play over these
    well considered applications next door. We expect the market to have a
    similar view, but we are as interested in BTT for its other holdings
    and view the coal spec as a free punt on top of them at today's closing
    price.




    The Bitterroot holding that is simplest to grasp hold of is the Mineral
    Creek -Linda (very high-grade) gold joint venture on Vancouver Island.
    BTT's private partner is the operator and will be gearing up for an
    initial bulk sample from the vein as quickly as snow conditions allow.
    We have laid out our thoughts on this in the past, but to quickly recap
    the essential point is that the 5,000 tonne bulk sample to be done here
    on a vein segment that has returned up to 50 oz/ton in recent sampling
    could very quickly generate a strong cash position for the company. The
    point of the bulk test is to determine whether there is enough gold
    distributed through this shoot to generate a small very high-grade
    operation and to get a better handle on how to treat results from
    further drill testing that will be done to test its extensions and
    several other targets on the property. This is however a situation in
    which a program with further upfront costs in the $100,000s might
    actually generate enough gold to supply a one-off 8 figures ($10
    million+) revenue stream to BTT and outline a fairly simple route to
    revenue generation that quickly exceeds the company's current $21
    million valuation. While we emphasise this is a test, we also have to
    say we would be surprised if this program did not generate sufficient
    revenue to at least pay for itself, and that is a rare enough
    occurrence on its own. We will have more to say on Mineral Creek as the
    program gets into operation and further exploration work is laid out,
    and we will have more to say on gold exploration programs the company
    is planning for later in the summer on its central British Columbia
    projects as they approach drill stage.




    The third leg Bitterroot is standing on, and the one that has actually
    sustained much of its market interest over the past few years, is the
    uranium exploration joint venture in Michigan on which Cameco Corp
    (CCO-T) is earning in. Last year's work indicated this new exploration
    district has the right parts without having generated results of ore
    quality. Some further targeting work is planned here before the drill
    actually starts turning, but the permitting may generate some more lift
    for the stock before that. Again we will have more to say on this work
    as targeting is completed, but we think the combination of the coal
    acquisitions in Manitoba and the gold projects in British Columbia may
    supersede the uranium exploration for the time being at any rate.
    Bitterroot has about $3 million in cash. Warrants and options exercise
    would bring in a further $5 million and add a further 8+ million shares
    to the current 58 million on issue, but most of that dilution is at
    prices between 50 and 80 cents and therefore not an immediate issue.
    There could be selling from recent 35 cent placements as the share
    price moves up, but if the coal leases garner the same kind of
    attention seen in other companies these placements would not be a large
    issue. We think Bitterroot has a much better underlying asset base and
    asset to valuation base then other players we have noted in the coal
    play other then GXS, and hence our decision to move it the HRA list and
    strengthen its outlook.


    http://www.bitterrootresources…&_Title=Hard-Rock-Analyst

    So, übermorgen wissen wir bescheid über KRI und WNP. Man sollte eigentlich beide Aktien haben. Wenn wir schon Mal bei den Mongolen sind, würd ich mir unbedingt auch Redhill Energy anschauen RH.V. Die haben neben Uran ganz schön viel Kohle und sind noch nicht wie alle anderen Kohleaktien gehypt worden. In vier Monaten gibts ne neue Studie.


    Ansonsten: China Looks to Foreign Uranium to Meet Future Demand


    http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=43702


    Grüße

    Milly


    ich versteh Dich ja grundsätzlich und Deine Anlageargumente, aber Du verstehst anscheinend nicht die entscheidenden Gründe die für Gold- und Silberaktien sprechen. Also Dein Dividendenargument kannst Du ruhig bei Seite lassen, denn ich kaufe doch keine dieser Aktien (besonders Explorer) wegen möglichen Dividenden und langfristigen Gewinnen. Das Minengeschäft ist sehr teuer, wie Du richtig gesagt hast, und der Weg bis zum Produzenten ist sehr lang. Bei den meisten Gesellschaften kommt eine Finanzierung nach der anderen und da,hast Du auch recht, da verdienen nur die Insider, die handverlesene Auswahl an Investoren die sich die Warrants schnappen und die Aktien wieder verkaufen und die prof. Shortseller. Also der langfristige Ansatz für die allermeisten dieser Aktien ist der falsche Ansatz, da brauchst Du gar nicht weiter argumentieren ;). Da bin ich ganz klar für die Gold- und Silberbarren. Oder Münzen.


    Jetzt zu den Gründen, die für einen Kauf sprechen: Erstens die stark zunehmende Inflation, die wir tagtäglich in vielen Nachrichten aus der ganzen Welt beobachten können. Diese Tendenz wird meiner Meinung noch zunehmen und immer mehr Leute dazu veranlassen in "hard assets" zu investieren. Dazu gehören in vorderster Front Gold und Silber. Und Du darfst nicht vergessen wie klein der Gold- und Silbermarkt (auch der Aktienmarkt) im Vergleich mit der gesamten Anlagewelt ist. Da braucht es nur geringe prozentuale Umschichtungen und starke Kurszuwächse auszulösen.


    Zweitens brauchst Du Dir um die Angebotsseite keine großen Sorgen machen. Fast eine ganze Generation hat die Exploraion von Metallen vernachlässigt. Zähl mir mal die zehn größten Funde auf, die bei den Metallen in den letzten Jahren zu Tage gebracht wurden. Da muss man schon länger recherchieren. Die besten und erfahrensten Jungs in Mienenbusiness stehen vor der Rente, deshalb hat man ja auch eine so hohe Misserfolgsquote in dem Geschäft. Die Begutachtung des Managements gehört an erste Stelle.


    Drittens die Risk-Reward-Ratio bei den Explorern. Wenn Du die richtigen Aktien hast machst Du aus einem relativ kleinen Einsatz ein Vermögen. Bei den Exploren werden die Funde gemacht. Ich gebe Dir Recht der Bullenmarkt für Minen hat Anfang 2000 begonnen und die einfachen Vervielfacher liegen hinter uns. Aber nach meiner Einschätzung liegt der große Hype noch vor uns. Du siehts, es geht hier eher um das "Big Picture", als um KGV-Berechnung.


    Die meisten die hier reglemäßig schreiben sind sich des Risikos in diesen Aktien sehr wohl bewußt und versuchen eine bestmögliche Auswahl zu treffen. Viele gute Argumente findest Du regelmäßig in den Foren. Deshalb solltest Du nicht direkt alle schlecht machen, weil sie Dir hier keine Gegenargumente liefern.


    Grüße

    @Eldo


    Rusoro hab ich schon genug, aber diese Art von Finanzierung freut mich. Rusoro ist spottbillig gemessen an der Ressourcen-MC- Bewertung von aktuell ca. 34 USD/Unze. Und die neue Ressourcenschätzungen, die dieses Jahr kommen werden, werdenhöchstwahrscheinlich eine starke Steigerung bringen bei dem Bohrpogramm und den bisherigen Resultaten. Schaun mer mal, ich hab noch Zeit ;). Was mich beim letrzten QR gestört hat, war der erzielte Goldpreis von ca. 702 USD (16659 verkaufte Unzen und Erlöse von 11,7 Mio. USD). Gerade in Q1, wo das Gold von 800 bis 1000 USD gehandelt wurde. ich weiß allerdings das Rusoro 15% seiner Produktion der venez. Zentralbank anbieten muss und der Rest an lokale Händler verkauft wird. Daher wahrscheinlich der Abschlag.



    @ Lucky


    Danke für die Infos!


    Grüße

    sehr vielseitige und interessante Projekte. MC 32,5 Mio. CAD. Auf der Empfehlungsliste von Barry Allan (Kursziel 1,80 CAD) und Greg McCoach (Strong Buy).


    Besonders hervorzuheben ist das Moly-Rhenium-Projekt Playter Moly .
    W. David Sinclair, a geologist with the Geological Survey of Canada recently stated "Based on the reported Mo and Re assays - averaging about 0.1% Mo and 1.0 g/t Re - the rhenium content of the molybdenite should be about 600.0 g/t Re. This would make it potentially the largest vein-type deposit in Canada ......... and possibly one of the largest in the world of this type. It is a remarkable deposit."


    hier noch ein paar Infos zu Rhenium


    Grüße


    In their Uranium Industry Report published Thursday, Haywood Securities forecasts primary uranium production at 113.5 million pounds this year, which is well below reactor demand as secondary uranium sources dwindle.Haywood predicts that the second half of 2008 will see a rejuvenation of the spot price.


    Meanwhile, demand continues to outstrip primary supply, while a sustained injection of capital is needed to meet required primary production increases, according to Haywood. In the report, Haywood analyst Geordie Mark noted that production costs have increased across the sector with the uranium price representing only a small fraction of operating costs.
    The World Nuclear Association had earlier forecast uranium production of 124.8 million pounds of U3O8 this year, which had been projected to be a 16.5% increase on 2007 production. However, Mark said that, "based on the stilted flow of supply to venture on stream thus far due to various technical and infrastructural impediments, it is anticipated that 2008 production
    will rise only moderately above 2007 production."
    Mark attributed the drop in production to: 1. ongoing production pressure within the sector; 2. Uncertainty of power and acid supply; and, 3. Technical nuances of bringing new production on-stream. "Consequently, these factors provide greater potential for upward pressure on the spotprice."


    Haywood asserted that 2008 primary production "will continue to fall short of future reactor demand. Thus, the entire sector will be ever more reliant on dwindling secondary supplies that progressively become more expensive, as well as technically, and
    politically difficult to extract." "These factors will continue to support uranium prices into the future, where geopolitical interests will become ever more focused on security of domestic supply," Mark suggested. "This is particularly pertinent given that the major
    producers (Canada, Australia, and Kazakhstan) have little domestic demand."
    "Primary uranium production has failed to deliver at estimated forecast rates over the last few years, and 2008 appears to be no except with Q1 production data being lower than either the forecast estimates and/or the previous quarter for a range of
    operations owned by Cameco, BHP Billiton, Denison Mines, Energy Resources, Australia, Paladin Energy, AngloGold Ashanti, Uranium One and Uranium Resources.


    LONGER TERM OUTLOOK


    Haywood asserts that the public's quest for a cheap, cleaner alternative to hydrocarbon-based energy production is being met "with a measurable change in view and broader acceptance of nuclear power generation by the general populace.
    "Popular acceptance equates to a shifting political outlook on nuclear policy leading to potential changes in nuclear power production policy in both: countries ramping down future production (e.g., Sweden and Germany, as well as those countries
    considering a nuclear future. These motions are leading to a shift, a rebalance in sources used for future energy supply leading inexorably to a greater role for nuclear energy; and a sustained nuclear renaissance."
    Nevertheless, Mark acknowledged that "future growth is at a bottleneck that continues to narrow and lengthen due to infrastructural impediments, political and NGO engagement, and an over reliance on second source material."


    Haywood advises that, in the midterm, increased uranium production capacity is going to be largely derived by the expansion of current mines, or the exploitation of deposits in currently producing countries, such as Kazakhstan, the United States, Canada and Australia. "This is primarily due to infrastructural, regulatory and community support that is in place to expand and/or develop mines in locations with a ready draw on personnel currently engaged in mining," Mark suggested.
    New long-term nuclear capacity will be driven mainly from China, India, Russia, and the United States, Haywood suggests. The Gulf States, mainland Europe, Africa and other counties will also increase nuclear generating capacity at a smaller rate In their report, Haywood predicts that the next uranium companies to move to producer status within the next three years will originate from U.S. operations. "The rationale is that the USA was the primary producer of the world's uranium, and thus is a producer with a regulatory framework and a well established infrastructure that can be employed to bring projects into production rapidly," according to Mark.


    The U.S. uranium projects may be small at under 2 million pounds of U3O8 of annual production. The mostly likely states that will experience increased production are Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Texas, Haywood predicts. Despite this production, the U.S. will still have
    significant need for uranium. In the meantime, Haywood forecasts that primary production to 2015 will continue to rely on secondary supplies, "which is unsustainable, and particularly acute in an environment seeking to expand nuclear energy capacity."


    http://www.ibtimes.com/article…m-price-predicted-for.htm

    Hallo Eldo,


    ich würd es annehmen, habe aber nur Khan-Aktien. Wäre das Angebot von WNP gekommen, hätte ich es auf jeden Fall angenommen, weil es fast nur Vorteile durch die Fusion gibt. Das Management von WNP hat zur Nichtannahme aufgerufen. Mal schaun. Grüße

    Sieht so aus als würde das Angebot scheitern. Ich bin für eine Erghöhung des Angebots von Khan und eine friedliche Zusammenarbeit. Grüße


    Mining Company Rejects Merger


    Written by Ch.Sumiyabazar , Thursday, June 05, 2008.


    Canadian mining company Western Prospector Group last week rejected a takeover bid from a rival company, saying it “significantly undervalues” the company.


    Khan Resources’ is offering to purchase 100 percent of all common shares from shareholders, although its bid will now struggle to succeed. Both companies have interests in Mongolia’s mining resources and their merger would create a significant new player in the industry. Western’s management asked shareholders not to sell their shares to Khan, who had offered 0.685 of its own shares for each Western share.


    “Western is much further advanced toward a production decision than Khan, which is one of the reasons why Khan needs Western much more than Western needs Khan,” said Eric Bohren, the company’s chief executive. Anchorage Capital Master Offshore, a New-York based private investment fund that holds 19 percent of Western Prospector, said it does not intend to sell its 10.3 million Western shares to Khan.


    Khan owns the Dornod uranium deposit, the site of a former Russian open-pit uranium mine, while Western Prospector owns the Gurvanbulag uranium deposit. The properties sit right next to each other and Khan had estimated that joint development of the companies’ two properties would generate about US$100 million in synergies. Both companies’ shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the offer remains open for acceptance until June 20.


    Mongolia’s Prime Minister, S.Bayar, and Director General of the state-owned Russian corporation Rossatom, Sergey Kiryenko, last week (May 26) visited Khan’s Dornod uranium site. The two leaders then continued on to visit Russia’s Priargunsky uranium ore processing and mining operations in the neighboring Chita region where they went 700 meters below ground into a mine to see uranium ore production.


    During the one-day visit, Bayar and Kiryenko agreed to cooperate in uranium production and enrichment, as well as in the construction of small or medium-capacity nuclear power plants. However, Bayar said that a final deal cannot be signed until the country sets out a clear nuclear energy policy and passes a law on uranium production. He told Russia’ RIA Novosti agency that the law was being drafted and could be approved after the Parliament reopens in this fall.
    Mongolia estimates its uranium reserves at 60,000 metric tons. Russian experts have assessed the country’s reserves at 120,000-150,000 tons.
    http://ubpost.mongolnews.mn/in…sk=view&id=1900&Itemid=40

    Hathor hat gestern extrem gute Bohrerebnisse bekannt gegeben. Ich erwarte das auch FIS weiterhin stark profitiert. HAT hatte gestern Tradinghalt, Fission allerdings nicht und sie stiegen bereits 16%. FIS bohrt aktuell direkt neben der Roughrider zone.


    VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--( Marketwire - May 21, 2008 )- Hathor Exploration Limited is pleased to announce further U3O8 assay results for uranium mineralization encountered in diamond drill holes completed on the Roughrider Zone at the Midwest NorthEast property, northern Saskatchewan.
    Highlights from these newly-reported, high-grade U3O8 assayed core intervals(i) (using a 0.05% U3O8 cutoff grade) listed in Tables 1 and 2 include:
    - 15 m grading 10.02% U3O8, including 2 m at 43.85% U3O8, in drill hole MWNE-08-20
    - 9 m grading 10.06% U3O8, including 3 m at 22.72% U3O8, and
    5 m grading 3.58% U3O8, including 1.5 m at 10.85% U3O8, in drill hole MWNE-08-21
    - 9.5 m grading 2.60% U3O8, including 2 m at 10.39% U3O8, in drill hole MWNE-08-28


    http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/080521/200805210463554001.html?.v=1


    hier noch eine sehr dateilierte Karte der Bohrungen. Das Gebiet von FIS liegt daneben (ca. 50 - 80m). http://www.hathor.ca/i/pdf/2008-04-23_RoughriderDDHCPS.pdf


    Grüße


    [Blockierte Grafik: http://www.fission-energy.com/i/projects/Claim-Sketch-April-152008.jpg]

    hallo linar, das war hoffentlich nicht nur ein aufatmen, sondern der beginn einer längerfristigen wende. ich wußte die ganze zeit, das es passieren wird, denn bei dem ölpreis, bei den fundamentaldaten und bei den zerflückten kursen war das nur eine frage der zeit.
    mein depot strahlt überwiegend - ich auch.


    brd.v +8%, cxh.v +18% , dml.to +8%, iec.v 0% ?) , jnn.v +14%, kri.to +22%, pxp.v +3%, txm.v -4% :hae: , uec +3%,, ure.to +22%, wuc.v +3%


    grüße

    hallo value. hast du taseko verkauft? hab sie immer noch (+42%). grüße



    Copper profits at Taseko (TGB)


    Wednesday, 14 May 2008


    Tom Bishop has been a buyer of Taseko (ASE: TGB) in recent years and has a nearly 400% gain on his positions. In his BI Research, he remains bullish on the mining shares.


    "Taseko operates the Gibraltar open-pit copper mine in British Columbia, which it has significantly expanded and upgraded. "The company is in the process of tweaking its Phase I Gibraltar expansion project which it has said could take about 6 months to get running smoothly. Meanwhile it is moving ahead with its Phase II expansion. "These moves will equate to over $400 million of annual revenue. Phase II also includes an in-pit crusher and conveyor system which should be completed by year end. "It also has in development one of the largest open-pit gold/copper deposits in North America, Prosperity, which has 4.5 million recoverable ounces of gold and 2 billion recoverable pounds of copper.
    "One of the big advantages of investing in Taseko is that its operations are all located in North America which removes risk and attendant valuation discount. "Analysts figure Taseko’s Net Asset Value per share at about twice the current share price. In fact, one analyst continues to call Taseko the most undervalued junior mining company in his firm’s universe. "So, the Company has just doubled its production rate, is working on another expansion, and also has the Prosperity operation in the approval process.
    "Given record high metal prices have resulted in major mining companies being awash in cash and looking to bolster reserves and production … well, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to add that all up. TGB remains a buy."


    http://www.thestockadvisors.com/content/view/2158/42/


    Grüße