Beiträge von Dallas

    Heute zufällig diesen Bericht auf NTV im Netz gesehen...

    Immer mehr Deutsche setzen auf Immobilien in Kapstadt
    Der Immobilienmarkt in Kapstadt boomt, viele Ausländer kaufen Häuser und Wohnungen zu verhältnismäßig günstigen Preisen. Darunter auch auffällig viele Deutsche…
    www.n-tv.de

    25.10.2025 16:44 Uhr – 03:01 min

    Kaufrausch in SüdafrikaImmer mehr Deutsche setzen auf Immobilien in Kapstadt

    Der Immobilienmarkt in Kapstadt boomt, viele Ausländer kaufen Häuser und Wohnungen zu verhältnismäßig günstigen Preisen. Darunter auch auffällig viele Deutsche - vor allem seit Jahresbeginn. Ein zweites Standbein, für den Fall, dass das Leben in Deutschland komplizierter wird.


    Selten so gelacht... Fake News vom Feinsten...

    Superbillig ....das war einmal....seit 2011 sind wir nicht mehr dort gewesen...obwohl wir bei Freunden wohnen könnten...Es ist ausgesprochen teuer geworden in Capetown und SA

    das letzte mal 2010 hab ich nur noch Bilder gemacht, wie dort versucht wird, mit messerscharfen Objekten auf den Mauern ums Haus , zu verhindern, dass eingebrochen wird...

    Abends zu Essen ausgehen...Fehlanzeige...zu gefährlich...die N2 zu befahren nachts ist mehr als nur gefährlich ...und die Polizei kommt nicht... [smilie_happy]


    Jetzt versuchen sie , die N2 sicherer zu machen...wers glaubt...

    Leider kommt man nur über diese N2 zum Flughafen und zurück ...und das wissen die natürlich


    Cape Town boosts safety along N2 and airport precinct
    A major new safety initiative is rolling out along one of Cape Town’s busiest routes. Here’s what’s changing...
    www.thesouthafrican.com

    The City of Cape Town has stepped up its fight against crime on one of its busiest highways. Forty new Metro Police Officers have been deployed to patrol the N2, as well as the nearby Airport and Borcherd’s Quarry precincts.

    This rollout marks the single biggest safety investment in over a decade and forms part of a citywide plan to deploy 700 new police officers, including dedicated neighbourhood policing in every ward, a historic first for Cape Town.

    Low Oil Prices: Saudi Gift to Trump or Ticking Bomb? | OilPrice.com
    OPEC+ production increases are creating a complex geopolitical landscape, impacting global oil prices, US energy policy, and the rivalry between major oil…
    oilprice.com

    Low Oil Prices: Saudi Gift to Trump or Ticking Bomb?

    By Irina Slav - Oct 06, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT

    • OPEC+ has agreed to modest monthly production boosts, keeping oil prices range-bound around $65 per barrel, which benefits consumer countries like the US but creates challenges for producer nations.
    • Saudi Arabia's strategy of unwinding production cuts has been seen as a gift to President Trump, aiming to keep fuel prices low and potentially impacting Russian energy revenues, but also causing worry in the US shale industry.
    • The global oil market is a battlefield, particularly in Asia where demand is growing most strongly, with countries like Guyana and Brazil increasing exports, and even Europe continuing to import Russian crude despite sanctions.

    OPEC+ yesterday agreed to yet another monthly boost in production, this time for a modest 137,000 barrels daily. Oil prices inched up, yet they remain tightly range-bound, with Brent at just over $65 per barrel following the news. On the one hand, this is good news for consumer countries—including the U.S. On the other hand, it’s bad news for producer countries—including, again, the U.S.

    The Wall Street Journal called Saudi Arabia’s strategy of leading the production cut unwinding a gift to President Trump. It would keep prices at the pump low, the publication said, and cushion the blow from tariffs. It would also hurt Russian energy export revenues, making Trump’s job in mediating an end to the war in Ukraine easier, the argument went.

    In some respects, the Saudi-led return to production growth in OPEC+ has indeed been positive for the U.S. with regard to retail fuel prices. The national average per AAA stood at $3.133 per gallon on Sunday. That’s down on the year, but, in all honesty, not much: a year ago, a gallon of fuel cost an average of $3.176. This is only a snapshot of gas prices in the United States, and it does not make much sense as an informative piece of data given state-based price differences stemming from taxation. California comes to mind as the place with the highest gas prices, regardless of OPEC+ policy.

    At the same time, lower oil prices have caused worry in the shale patch. This may or may not have been among the goals of the Saudis and their OPEC+ partners when they made the decision to start unwinding those cuts agreed in 2022. Most media reports on the topic point to OPEC trying to win back market share from the U.S., Guyana, and Brazil.

    However, there is more to this story than barrels from Brazil, the U.S., and Guyana, simply replacing barrels from Saudi Arabia and Iraq. For starters, take U.S. oil exports to China. Those plunged by almost 50% last year—before Trump started slapping tariffs left and right. The tariffs, of course, did not help. So U.S. oil had to be redirected to Europe.

    Incidentally, Guyanese crude is also going to Europe, so Guyana and the U.S. are effectively as much of a pair of rivals as the U.S. and Saudi—except Guyana’s total production currently stands at less than 700,000 barrels daily. That’s hardly a real rival to either the U.S. or Saudi Arabia. Brazil, meanwhile, is indeed boosting its own crude oil exports—and a lot of these are going to China.

    Related: Kyrgyzstan Faces Harsh Winter as Key Reservoir Hits Decade-Low Levels

    This is the battlefield of oil exporters—China and wider Asia. This is where demand is growing most strongly and where it will continue growing strongly after growth peaks elsewhere, at least according to the majority of forecasters. For now, however, demand is still growing, even in Europe—how else would one explain the fact that European countries continue importing Russian crude, despite sanctions and a recent push to end all energy imports from the country in a couple of months?

    The Wall Street Journal’s article suggested that Saudi Arabia is trying to score points with President Trump. Saudi Arabia’s actions since the Biden administration’s fiasco in maintaining a close relationship with Riyadh, however, suggest it has other priorities, such as funding all the Vision 2030 projects, amid stubbornly low prices that, per OPEC, do not reflect demand trends accurately.

    Trump, meanwhile, has an oil industry to make happy after making it angry about tariffs and those very same low oil prices that are plaguing Saudi Arabia’s economic transformation plans. The U.S. president’s energy dominance agenda will not work if drillers are not drilling because prices are too low for them to make a profit. However, this was always going to be a problem, regardless of what OPEC+ was doing with its own production. Trump’s twin goals of keeping prices at the pump low and oil drillers happy are mutually exclusive, after all.

    Incidentally, Guyanese crude is also going to Europe, so Guyana and the U.S. are effectively as much of a pair of rivals as the U.S. and Saudi—except Guyana’s total production currently stands at less than 700,000 barrels daily. That’s hardly a real rival to either the U.S. or Saudi Arabia. Brazil, meanwhile, is indeed boosting its own crude oil exports—and a lot of these are going to China.

    Related: Kyrgyzstan Faces Harsh Winter as Key Reservoir Hits Decade-Low Levels

    This is the battlefield of oil exporters—China and wider Asia. This is where demand is growing most strongly and where it will continue growing strongly after growth peaks elsewhere, at least according to the majority of forecasters. For now, however, demand is still growing, even in Europe—how else would one explain the fact that European countries continue importing Russian crude, despite sanctions and a recent push to end all energy imports from the country in a couple of months?

    The Wall Street Journal’s article suggested that Saudi Arabia is trying to score points with President Trump. Saudi Arabia’s actions since the Biden administration’s fiasco in maintaining a close relationship with Riyadh, however, suggest it has other priorities, such as funding all the Vision 2030 projects, amid stubbornly low prices that, per OPEC, do not reflect demand trends accurately.

    Trump, meanwhile, has an oil industry to make happy after making it angry about tariffs and those very same low oil prices that are plaguing Saudi Arabia’s economic transformation plans. The U.S. president’s energy dominance agenda will not work if drillers are not drilling because prices are too low for them to make a profit. However, this was always going to be a problem, regardless of what OPEC+ was doing with its own production. Trump’s twin goals of keeping prices at the pump low and oil drillers happy are mutually exclusive, after all.

    Wir haben ja dieses Jahr eine neue Ölheizung einbauen lassen, die natürlich vom Schornsteinfeger abgenommen werden musste.

    Wir haben eigentlich immer den gleichen. Allerdings wechselt ganz normal die Person dazu. Diesmal wieder ein Neuer.

    Die Vorgänger waren schon immer OK.

    Aber der hier war Tiefenentspannt.

    Er fand das auch vollkommen in Ordnung, dass wir uns wieder für eine Ölheizung entschieden hatten.

    Einer der Gründe war auch für ihn, unabhängig zu sein mit der Heizung.

    Und das geht nur mit Öl , Holz oder Pellets.

    Wir haben uns köstlich unterhalten und es gab auch einerlei Einschränkungen etc was unseren Kachelofen angeht , der ja schon vom Vorgänger als Grundofen eingestuft wurde.

    Es gibt sie also noch. Schornsteinfeger mir gesundem Menschenverstand :thumbsup:

    Hallo Salito ...vielleicht solltest du KI nochmal befragen...warum die Arktis nicht schmelzen will .... [smilie_happy]

    U.S. Energy Chief: EU Can Quit Russian Gas in Less Than 12 Months | OilPrice.com
    The U.S. Energy Secretary states the EU could replace all Russian natural gas imports with American LNG within 6 to 12 months, accelerating the current 2027…
    oilprice.com

    U.S. Energy Chief: EU Can Quit Russian Gas in Less Than 12 Months

    By Michael Kern - Sep 12, 2025, 11:30 AM CDT


    The EU could accelerate the phase out of natural gas imports from Russia and end purchases within six to 12 months by replacing it with American LNG, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright told Reuters on Friday, after communicating the same to EU officials in Brussels on Thursday.

    “I think this could easily be done within 12 months, maybe within six months,” Secretary Wright told Reuters, adding that “I definitely voiced the opinion we could do it faster.”

    “On the U.S. side, we could do it faster, and I think it would be good if those dates were moved up even more. I don't know that that's going to happen, but that was dialogued,” Wright said, referring to his meeting with EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jorgensen.

    The EU currently plans to phase out all imports of Russian gas by the end of 2027, under a roadmap to end dependencyon Russian energy unveiled in May this year.

    The roadmap calls for the EU to stop all imports of Russian gas by the end of 2027 by improving the transparency, monitoring, and traceability of Russian gas across the EU markets. New contracts with suppliers of Russian gas will be prevented and spot contracts (for immediate payment) will be stopped by the end of 2025.

    Related: Australia Approves North West Shelf LNG Extension to 2070

    “We are particularly looking at phasing out Russian fossil fuels faster,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in the 2025 State of the Union Address on Wednesday, without giving details how the EU could do it.

    The U.S. has increased pressure on Europe to cut off its energy dependence on Russia and stop buying Russian oil and gas to reduce revenues for the Kremlin and force Vladimir Putin to engage in genuine talks on peace in Ukraine.

    “The faster we phase out, the sooner you put pressure on Russia,” Secretary Wright told Reuters, as the United States is intensifying pressure on its EU and G7 partners to act with tariffs on India and China over their continued imports of Russian crude oil.

    By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com

    Puerto Rico Climate Case Against Oil Majors Gets Tossed | OilPrice.com
    A federal judge in Puerto Rico has tossed out a climate lawsuit against a slate of oil and gas majors, ending a challenge brought by nearly 80 municipalities…
    oilprice.com

    Puerto Rico Climate Case Against Oil Majors Gets Tossed

    By Julianne Geiger - Sep 12, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT


    A federal judge in Puerto Rico has tossed out a climate lawsuit against a slate of oil and gas majors, ending a challenge brought by nearly 80 municipalities five years after Hurricanes Irma and Maria devastated the island.

    US District Judge Silvia Carreno-Coll signed the order on Thursday, dismissing the class-action claims against ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, Motiva, Occidental, BHP, Rio Tinto, and the American Petroleum Institute (API). The municipalities alleged the companies colluded to conceal the climate risks of fossil fuels, arguing that manmade warming intensified the 2017 storms.

    Carreno-Coll rejected the case on procedural grounds, ruling that the plaintiffs blew past the statute of limitations. Under antitrust law, they had four years from the hurricanes to file. “By September 2021, the 2017 hurricanes’ four-year mark, Plaintiffs knew or should have known they had suffered considerable injury and who to sue,” she wrote. The claims against Exxon, Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, and Motiva were dismissed with prejudice, blocking any refiling. Claims against Occidental, BHP, and Rio Tinto were dismissed without prejudice, leaving the door open for a narrower return.

    The ruling is a setback for the broader wave of climate litigation targeting oil companies for allegedly misleading the public on fossil fuel risks. More than two dozen similar cases are moving through state and federal courts, with mixed outcomes. The Puerto Rico case, filed in November 2022, was among the more ambitious, tying specific storm damage to alleged industry deception.

    Industry groups hailed the dismissal. API senior vice president Ryan Meyers said the “meritless claims” amounted to a politicized distraction and a waste of taxpayer money, adding climate policy should be left to Congress rather than “a patchwork of courts.” Shell declined to comment.

    By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

    Wir haben vor 25 Jahren einen 5000 l Tank im Boden verbuddeln lassen.

    Mit Kiesfilter . Das Wasser kommt glasklar über ein Hauswasserwerk .

    Heute würde ich das doppelte an Tank im Garten einbuddeln!

    Nutzen es zum giessen , Auto waschen und Hunde abduschen... [smilie_happy]

    Ähnlich wie CO₂-Abgaben: EU erwägt, Kondensstreifen zu besteuern
    Will die EU nach dem CO₂ jetzt auch Wasserdampf besteuern? Geprüft wird ein neues System, mit dem Kondensstreifen am Himmel vermieden werden sollen. Airlines…
    www.epochtimes.de

    Längere Flugstrecken für den Klimaschutz?

    Ähnlich wie CO₂-Abgaben: EU erwägt, Kondensstreifen zu besteuern

    Will die EU nach dem CO₂ jetzt auch Wasserdampf besteuern? Geprüft wird ein neues System, mit dem Kondensstreifen am Himmel vermieden werden sollen. Airlines wie die Lufthansa testen bereits klimaoptimierte Flüge, um bestimmte Wetterzonen zu vermeiden. Sie fliegen dafür Umwege, inklusive höherem CO₂-Ausstoß.

    In Kürze

    • EU nimmt jährlich durch CO₂-Zertifikate knapp 3 Milliarden Euro ein.
    • Nicht-CO₂-Emissionen sollen mindestens genauso klimaschädlich wie CO₂-Ausstoß sein.
    • Vorbereitungen zur Besteuerung von Kondensstreifen laufen.
    • Airlines sollten klimaoptimierte Flugrouten wählen.
    • Längere Flüge bedeuten mehr Einnahmen über CO₂-Zertifikate.

    Airlines müssen seit 2012 nach dem EU-Emissionshandelssystem (EU-ETS) für jede Tonne CO₂, die sie ausstoßen, ein Zertifikat kaufen. Seit 2018 gilt das auch für alle Starts und Landungen innerhalb der EU. Dies ist zum florierenden Klimageschäft geworden. Brüssel bekommt laut einem Bericht der „Welt“ jährlich 2,9 Milliarden Euro durch den CO₂-Zertifikatehandel von Airlines.

    Einnahmen durch CO₂-Zertifikate

    Die Luftfahrt zahlt zwar weniger als große Industrie- oder Energiesektoren, unter anderem weil sie zum Schutz ihrer Wettbewerbsfähigkeit teilweise kostenlose Zertifikate erhält. Wer am Ende zahlt, sind aber nicht die Fluggesellschaften. Die Kosten, die sie haben, werden in der Regel über die Ticketpreise an Passagiere weitergegeben.
    Die Einnahmen aus dem Emissionshandel fließen überwiegend in den EU-Haushalt und werden von den Mitgliedstaaten zweckgebunden für Klimaschutzprogramme, die Förderung erneuerbarer Energien sowie für Projekte wie die Energiewende eingesetzt.

    Kondensstreifen am Himmel als Klimakiller

    Nach dem CO₂ hat die EU jetzt einen neuen Übeltäter entdeckt: Kondensstreifen, auf Englisch „contrails“ genannt. Seit Anfang 2025 müssen europäische Fluglinien Flugdaten erfassen, anhand derer sich nachvollziehen lässt, inwieweit sich bei Flügen Contrails bilden.
    Diese silbernen Streifen entstehen, wenn die heißen und feuchten Abgase von Flugzeugtriebwerken in kalter Höhenluft zu feinen Eiskristallen gefrieren. Enthalten sind dann auch Rußpartikel und andere Verbrennungsprodukte.
    Nicht gemeint sind die sogenannten Chemtrails, also das Versprühen von Partikeln in die Atmosphäre, um Geoengineering zu betreiben. Die Existenz der umstrittenen Technik, die von vielen Medien als Verschwörungstheorie abgetan wird, hat die Schweizer Bundesrätin Simonetta Sommaruga in einem Interview 2019 bestätigt und kritisiert.
    Kondensstreifen können tagsüber Sonnenlicht ins All zurückwerfen und so kühlend wirken. Sie verhindern aber auch, dass Wärmestrahlung von der Erde ins All entweicht.


    Wie man sieht, denen fallen immer neue Steuerprojekte ein. :wall:

    Irgendwie muss ja alles finanziert werden :rolleyes:

    Von + 4 % auf - 17 % in 1 Stunde ? Was ist da los ? Ich kann keine Nachricht finden. Und UEC taucht mit… =O

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/want-in-on-trumps-newest-deregulation-play-these-energy-stocks-and-etfs-could-deliver-big-gains-from-uraniums-surge-32949c64

    The U.S. is deregulating nuclear power and making it easier to build new reactors.

    By

    Charlie GarciaFollow

    Last Updated: June 25, 2025 at 5:22 p.m. ET

    First Published: June 24, 2025 at 7:50 a.m. ET


    Referenced Symbols

    On Monday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul, leader of a state where bureaucracy moves like paperwork through a glue factory, stunned everyone by announcing plans to build America’s first major nuclear-power plant in more than 15 years — 1 gigawatt of nuclear power, either in one big reactor or a herd of modular ones.

    Rest ist Bezahlversion.


    Alles eigentlich positiv ?)

    Scotland’s Wind Turbines Are Being Paid to Stand Still 37% of the Time | OilPrice.com
    Scotland’s wind farms were paid to shut down over a third of the time in early 2025 due to grid constraints, costing Britain billions in curtailment payments.
    oilprice.com

    Scotland’s Wind Turbines Are Being Paid to Stand Still 37% of the Time

    By Irina Slav - Aug 11, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT


    Operators of wind turbines in Scotland were paid to switch their turbines off 37% of the time over the first half of the year, the Financial Times has reported, an amount equal to 4 TWh that were not produced due to lack of demand and infrastructure to bring the electricity to where there was demand.

    The report noted that the amount curtailed from wind turbines in Scotland accounted for 86% of the total curtailment across Britain over the six months from January to June. It added that this represented a 15% increase on last year’s first-half curtailment.

    Curtailment is the term used when grid operators ask wind and solar operators to turn off their installations to avoid overwhelming the grid since peak wind and solar generation periods do not usually coincide with periods of peak electricity demand. To avoid these companies going bankrupt, governments pay them to turn the turbines and the inverters off, which could—and does—cost billions.

    In the financial year 2024/25, Britain’s National Energy System Operator had to pay a total of 2.7 billion pounds, or some $3.7 billion, in balancing costs. “Wind curtailment is currently a major driver of balancing costs,” NESO said in the report, adding that “This is because a large proportion of wind capacity in GB is connected in Scotland, which at present is a constrained region of the network.”

    In the 2024/25 fiscal year, wind curtailment volumes increased to 13% of hypothetical wind outturn (wind outturn if no curtailment had taken place), NESO said earlier this year.

    The problem is challenging because curtailment costs increase in tune with the growth in wind power generation capacity. To solve it, billions more would need to be spent on building new infrastructure to bring the electricity produced in the north to the consumption centers in the south.

    Das stimmt schon, aber die Pellets Heizung wäre wesentlich teurer geworden und hätte viel mehr Umbau Maßnahmen benötigt.

    Also vollkommen überflüssig für uns.

    Wir sind Beide in den 70 igern .

    Die Neue hält jetzt bis wir uns die Radieschen von unten anschauen.

    Und mehr Geld ausgeben ist vollkommen überflüssig!

    Die Neue war innerhalb von einem Tag eingebaut