The New Golden Bull: Ready to Charge or Ready for Pasture?
Here’s a brief update on my view of the metals market from a historical perspective. This is the first such update in about a year, but until recently there hasn't been much to write about.
This past week seems significant for several reasons. First, the London PM (Gold Cartel-adjusted) fix on the gold price Friday was $525.50. That was the highest fix since April 6, 1981 and thus a 24-year high. Also, silver's Friday London PM fix was $8.97, the highest close since May 22, 1987—an 18-year high. Additionally, the HUI "Gold Bugs" index closed in new high ground on Thursday at 264.86 and closed just a few points under that on Friday.
Obviously something big is happening. Ironically, there's little to no excitement in the mainstream world, nor apparently the least concern by Joe Sixpack about the stability (much less the likely endurance) of the world's fiat currencies. It seems the clueless market analysts are tripping over themselves to call a top in the metals.
But is it likely the metals have topped out? Of course, some of us laugh at the idea, but many others seem to be in a serious quandary about it. Here are some facts about the Great Gold Bull market of the late seventies and early eighties that might be of interest, as well as their modern-day counterparts. I think they'll help put things in perspective...
First, it’s important to realize that serious bull markets nearly always end with big-time price volatility. Case in point: The average monthly fluctuation in the price of gold during its great advance from August 1976 to January 1980 was 7.56%. The average for the final six months was 17.33%. The average for the final three months (during the blowoff stage) was 20.4%, and the last month, January 1980, the price fluctuated an incredible 52% (even more if you count intra-day peaks). Now, that's what you call volatility!
So how do we compare in our modern-day gold bull? Well, to continue the analogy, our bull is still a calf; it hasn't even found its legs yet. Our average monthly price fluctuation to date (starting from the commencement of this gold bull in April 2001) has been a mild 5.04%.
But here's what's even more amazing: since April 2004 when gold topped out on the London PM fix at $427.25 and then fell to a low of $375.00 in May, our average monthly volatility has been a puny 4.66%, which is well below even the overall average since this bull began.
To me, it's downright astounding that gold could be making multi-decade highs while logging some of the lowest volatility in recent years. Does this sound like a market that's topping out? Hardly. In fact, it sounds like a market that hasn't even gotten out of first gear.
Here's another bit of evidence that things are just now heating up. In the 42 months of the Great Gold Bull of the seventies, the average monthly gain in the gold price was 3.01%, which is impressive by just about any standard (except perhaps Hillary Clinton's masterful play of the cattle futures market some years back; but that’s another story). However, since this modern gold bull's inception, the average monthly gain has been only 1.31%.
That kind of return is respectable, especially when compared with deposits in CDs (AKA certificates of depreciation), but it’s paltry by comparison to the bull of the late seventies. Along these lines, this month has been notable for gold in another respect. With Wednesday's London fix of $515.40, those who purchased the barbarous relic at its lows in April 2001 have now officially doubled their money. We could compute the last 56 months' difference between returns on CDs and returns on gold, which "pays no interest," but I'm afraid it would embarrass the bankers among you. By comparison, though, it would be clear which of the two investment vehicles is the real loser.
I continue to be amazed by the advisor contingent and its constant readiness to proclaim a "top" in the metals markets. As Bill Murphy has pointed out many times, where were these bozos when the NASDAQ was making new high after new high? Where were they at Nazzie 3000, 4000 or at least—"It's a new era!"—at NASDAQ 5000!!???
In conclusion, here’s a bit of free holiday advice for those of you who still pay for gold advisory services that continually declare tops in the metals: drop your subscriptions immediately—they obviously pay no interest... ![]()
Derek K. Van Artsdalen
San Antonio, Texas