Thai Guru's Gold und Silber ... (Informationen und Vermutungen)

  • Edel Man, das war keine Vision, auf zwei webseiten wurde diese quote gegeben was ein technischer oder menschlicher Fehler anscheinend war. Wer weiss vielleicht war der Spotprice kurz da und ein dicker fisch hat gross eingekauft.


    Gruss


    XAX

  • Hallo,


    in Stockhouse Canada habe ich in einem Forum einen Hinweis gefunden, dass J. Turk demnächst (?) die (physische ?) Anlage von Silber in "silvermoney" plant.


    Weiß hier jemand mehr über seine Pläne ? Ist dies evtl. ein monatlicher "Sparplan", wo das Geld in Silber angelegt wird ?


    Die Realisierung würde auf jeden Fall dem physischen Markt Silber entziehen.


    Gruß


    Silbertaler

  • Le Metropole Members, ....Forum Members



    No matter what occurs between tonight and tomorrow as far as
    the price of silver and gold are concerned, The Gold Cartel,
    these big time bad guys, are in big trouble.


    GATA knows why, do you? The prices of gold and silver
    are going to explode soon. Be there.


    No matter what happens between tonite's gold and silver
    mini-pop, the title of tomorrow's MIDAS will hold true:


    "The Charge Of The GATA Light Brigade"

  • Harter Schlag für Bill Murphy und sein Verschwörungs-Café: Blanchard muß sich bei Barrick für die Preismanipulationsklage entschuldigen und einen ungenannten, aber angeblich beträchtlichen Schadensersatz leisten. Für Murphy war schon allein die Zulassung der Klage der halbe Beweis für die Richtigkeit der Manipulationsvorwürfe.



    Barrick wins apology from Blanchard for allegations of price manipulation

    Romina Maurino
    Canadian Press



    Monday, November 21, 2005



    TORONTO (CP) - Barrick Gold Corp. has won an apology from Blanchard & Co. for its allegations of gold price manipulation as all lawsuits against the company were dismissed.


    The apology came with the settlement of a libel suit that was filed by Barrick in 2003, a few months after Blanchard and gold seller Herbert Davies took the Toronto-based company to court, accusing it of manipulation of gold prices and violations of U.S. antitrust laws.


    Blanchard and Davies both alleged they were injured as a result of reduced interest in gold as an investment and sought damages - as well as an injunction terminating certain trading agreements with J.P. Morgan and other bullion banks.


    Barrick said Friday that all claims had been dismissed and it will not make any payments in connection with the antitrust accusations or class actions.


    Instead, the settlement handed Barrick an apology and a cash payment of an undisclosed amount.


    "We regret having made the statements that gave rise to the libel action filed by Barrick in Canada and any embarrassment those statements may have caused Barrick or its officers or directors," Blanchard said in a statement.


    Blanchard and Davies had filed their suit Dec. 18, 2002, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Barrick filed its counter suit in March 2003 at Ontario's Superior Court.


    Blanchard and Davies later amended their complaint to add an allegation of violating the Commodity Exchange Act in February 2005. A trial date had been set for January, in case no agreement was reached.


    Barrick could not elaborate on the other terms of the settlement or say how much money it had received. The company would only say the payment was "substantial."


    "We're just very pleased that we've been able to settle all the differences that we've had with the complainants over time," said spokesman Vincent Borg.


    "All litigation related to this matter in any way, shape, or form is all settled."


    The markets had little reaction to the news, with Barrick shares (TSX:ABX) losing 10 cents to close at $31.70 on the Toronto Stock Exchange. On the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:ABX), the shares dropped 10 cents US to $26.80 US.


    Analysts said few investors had placed much weight on the lawsuits, which amounted to "more noise than substance."


    "Many of us had kind of determined that the whole thing was a bit more contrived than it was substantial," said Barry Allan, an analyst with Research Capital Corp.


    "The whole Blanchard action . . . . I thought it was a bit outlandish, and obviously Barrick did too because they filed a libel suit and succeeded. It's just a nice thing that it's gone away."


    © The Canadian Press 2005

  • :( :( :(.... Schade, wer aber bei der Mafia ist dem wird durch die Mafia geholfen.


    ""an apology and a cash payment "" haben die nicht verdient IMO.


    Cést la vie



    XAX

    3 Mal editiert, zuletzt von Aladin ()


  • Genau Aladin


    Und wie bei den Aktien (gilt so auch für Gold und Silber) manipuliert wird, wird in einem Beitrag aus einem anderen Forum zutreffend beschrieben.


    Fazit am Ende des Beitrags:


    ...
    einziges mittel wie erwähnt: schütze deine aktien, indem du einen verkaufsauftrag mit einem hohen verkaufspreis für deine aktie reinstellst, dann sind diese aktien zum beleihen gesperrt.

    Es ist noch kein Verschwörungstheoretiker vom Himmel gefallen.
    - Altes Sprichwort, neu übersetzt

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    @Vanescsent


    Hab den Beitrag aus WO auch gelesen.


    Ist alles nicht neu,aber immer wieder ärgerlich,daß die Börsenaufsicht
    das Shorten in diesem Stil nicht schlichtweg untersagt.


    Dirty hands and fingers. X(


    Grüsse

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Nachfolgend ein gar lustiger Chart:
    Ganz offensichtlich wird ständig an Stellschrauben gedreht.


    Damit der Goldpreis nicht ausbricht,(Nach oben? )

  • General Motors kuendigt 30.000 Angestellte Weltweit war die Schlagzeile heute..... another brick in the wall !


    ENTER THE RECESSION


    by The Mogambo Guru


    Ben "Big Bonehead" Bernanke, the incoming new chairman of the Federal
    Reserve, is on record as being the champion of "inflation-targeting",
    which is the new code word for, "I'm going to kill you with inflation
    because I don't care about any of you American pigs."


    This ridiculous philosophy may not work like he figures, if we can believe
    Randy Buss, of Der Invest Informant, who quotes Professor Antony Mueller,
    an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, as saying, "The size
    of the debt level relative to the productive base at the peak of the boom
    will make monetary policy ineffective once the contraction phase takes
    hold." Well, perhaps that is why the Fed is so desperately trying to keep
    this contraction ("deflation") from taking hold in the first place, by
    creating inflation, which will kill us just as fast.


    Max Fraad Wolff, at Mises.org, has had enough of listening to me run my
    loud mouth and not making any sense. He stands up to explain, "Standard
    fiscal and monetary policy work to attack inflation by pushing economic
    activity toward recession. Likewise, fiscal and monetary policy introduces
    inflationary pressure to fight recession." Well, I gotta admit that he is
    a lot more succinct in his explanation, but without the use of screaming,
    swearing, breaking furniture or even vowing blood oaths of revenge. As
    such, it seems to lack that sense of, umm, mortal despair and homicidal
    outrage that it really calls for.


    So, in my snippy little childish way, I say, "So?" Without missing a beat,
    Mr. Wolff, with a momentary flash of exasperation at my abysmal stupidity,
    explains, "Stagflationary dynamics occur when a growth recession - or
    worse - occurs alongside upward price pressure, inflation. Policy markers
    face unique challenges and enhanced prospects of failure in such an
    environment. Given the normally poor record of policy makers, this is
    scary. As price pressures persist alongside rising trade and federal
    spending imbalances into 2006, stagflation lurks. Keep your eyes out for
    data that suggests cooling growth and rising prices. When it rains it
    pours."


    None of this is lost on Jim Puplava, which I can prove by directing your
    attention to his essay "The Two Bens." It can be found on his
    http://www.financialsense.com site. In it, he contrasts Ben Franklin and Ben
    Bernanke, which I am sure, has Mr. Franklin rolling over in his grave at
    the comparison. It is sort of like I hate it when my neighbors compare me
    to a diseased sewer rat, only not as cuddly. Some things never change, and
    you can gather that from his writing. He says, "From the birth of this
    nation to the present, the government would from time-to-time resort to
    debasement of the currency in time of war or in time of economic duress.
    We find it always ends with the same consequences: debasement of the
    currency and concomitant inflation. Despite the best efforts of government
    alchemists, the result is always the same in the end - inflation. The only
    limit to the quantity of money created is the destruction of its value."


    To prove the accuracy of his words, Mr. Puplava writes, "Through
    September, the PPI was up 6.7% year-over-year, while the CPI was up by
    4.7% over the same period. Even worse for Americans, who now import more
    of what they consume, import prices are up 9.9% over the last 12 months."
    This level of inflation should have the Federal Reserve jumping out of the
    windows in shame, or jumping out of the windows to escape the incessant
    screaming of The Mogambo about this inflation conflagration - that they
    caused - that is destroying our money.


    And now, the new report of producer prices showed that prices jumped 0.7%
    in October, which is worse than anyone (except you and me) expected. The
    so-called "core" inflation (minus the pesky volatile items like food and
    energy) was, I guess, relatively tame for finished goods. But intermediate
    goods had prices that were up a smoldering 1.2%, and intermediate goods
    were smoking red hot, up a full 3% for the month.


    And it is even worse than that in actuality, as he suggests when he says,
    "Today the true rate of inflation is running well over 7%," which one can
    see when calculating the consumer price index, "as it was originally
    constructed before the government began to tinker with the index." When
    one undertakes this exercise, we realize that the CPI, "closely relates to
    what most Americans experience daily in their lives." And I don't know
    what you are experiencing in your life, but around here, the bills are
    showing at least that much inflation!


    Then he unleashes the bombshell: "Deflationists and inflationists do agree
    on one thing: the U.S. is headed for another recession
    . Given the
    under-reporting of inflation, which overstates GDP, we may already be
    entering one. The only difference between the two camps is how it unfolds.
    As the U.S. enters into recession, tax revenues will decline and
    government spending will increase as a result of rising entitlements.
    Deficits will get bigger and the U.S. will have to borrow and monetize
    more of its debt. War, entitlements, and lack of fiscal restraint mean
    more debt, more borrowing and debt monetization. Eventually the dollar is
    going to collapse through the weight of the twin deficits. Inflation - not
    deflation - will be the result."


    John Hussman, PhD, of the Hussman Funds, has a slightly different take on
    all this. Oh, he agrees with everyone else that I am a big stupid idiot,
    but where he takes exception is, "It seems to be taken as an article of
    faith that the Fed determines inflation, but in fact inflation is not so
    much a monetary phenomenon as a fiscal one. It is essentially a reflection
    of unproductive government spending. Moreover, the belief that you should
    respond to inflation by tightening monetary policy is in some cases very
    dangerous. If you look closely at the data, you'll find that economic
    growth and inflation over the same period actually have a negative
    correlation." So, as the Federal Reserve starts trying to foment more and
    more inflation, they are actually hurting growth? Hahahaha! I was right!
    We are freaking doomed!


    So, what does one do? With the agility of a lithe jungle cat, I instantly
    leap to my Stinky Mogambo Feet (SMF) and exclaim, "Buy gold!" And if you
    think gold is a great investment and that you ought to be out buying some
    more gold right now instead of sitting there reading the stupid Mogambo
    Guru while saying hurtful things like, "This guy's an idiot!" then Bud
    Conrad had an interesting article on the DailyReckoning.com site,
    entitled, "Measuring Gold's Link to Inflation." He notes, "PPI and gold
    move together. You can also see that the trend is currently in place for
    both higher inflation and higher gold prices."


    Although the PPI has been going up, he cautions, "Of course, forecasting
    PPI inflation is no easy matter. But the chart does tell us emphatically
    that when we see growing forces for inflation - rapid expansion in the
    money supply engineered by the Federal Reserve, artificially low interest
    rates, growing government deficits, unsustainable trade imbalances and
    currency competition - we should expect rising gold prices."


    And since we are speaking of commodities, the "commodities expert" at the
    DailyReckoning.com site, Kevin Kerr, says, "So while bonds and once
    coveted shares sink, commodity prices continue to explode with growth.
    Many analysts predict they will continue to rise, because of growth in
    demand and dwindling supplies." And not only that, but all the inputs into
    growing or mining commodities (energy, tools, materials, wages,
    governmental fees, taxes, etc) are all rising, too! The Computer-Like Mind
    Of The Mogambo (CLMOTM) instantaneously concludes that (to use the precise
    economic terminology) there is no freaking way in hell that commodity
    prices cannot go up.


    Regards,


    The Mogambo Guru

    3 Mal editiert, zuletzt von Aladin ()

  • So sieht´s der Resouceinvestor:


    Blanchard Says "I'm Sorry" to Barrick
    By Jon A. Nones, 21 Nov 2005 12:08 PM


    After the lawsuit filed against Barrick was thrown out, Blanchard apologized for "embarrassment" it may have caused Barrick - but Blanchard was the only one left with egg on its face.

  • Hallo Aladin,


    danke für den link zu Silver versus Gold von Saville.
    Insgesamt ist der Artikel, wie ich meine etwas silberkritisch. (Was ich grundsätzlich gut finde, weil man dann seine Meinung überprüfen kann) Saville meint, daß Silber eher in "guten Zeiten" läuft, während Gold in schlechten besser performt.


    Als die beiden Ausnahmen nennt er die Hunt-Spekulation und den Warren Kauf. Meiner Meinung nach bringt er damit (unfreiwillig) das schlagende und uns allen bekannte Argument für Silber auf den Punkt, das Angebotsdefizit. Es muß nur einer kommen und mit einigermaßen Geld etwas Silber vom Markt nehmen, schon ist der Teufel los.


    Zur Aufheiterung meines Arbeitstages werde ich mir heute jedenfalls ab und zu den Silber- und Goldchart ansehen.


    Viele Grüße


    liberty

    Es kommt nicht darauf an, die Zukunft vorauszusagen, sondern darauf auf die Zukunft vorbereitet zu sein. - Perikles

  • liberty


    "". Es muß nur einer kommen und mit einigermaßen Geld etwas Silber vom Markt nehmen, schon ist der Teufel los.""


    Keine Sorge es wird jemand kommen. ;)....soon !


    Have a nice day


    XAX

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von Aladin ()

    • Offizieller Beitrag
    Zitat

    Original von Aladin


    Keine Sorge es wird jemand kommen. ;)....soon !
    XAX


    Noch so ein paar feste Tage bei den PM,kann da einer aus Minga in RSA anfangen.... :D


    Grüsse


    NS: Ist nicht so ganz ernst gemeint. ;)

Schriftgröße:  A A A A A