Ich kenne diese Quelle auch nicht, aber Argumente gegen GORO hat er vielleicht hier entnommen:
http://seekingalpha.com/articl…rp-the-power-of-dividends
Der Artikel von Anfang September ist von einem GORO-Fan, aber unter den Leserkommentaren findet sich ein herber Kritiker:
"looks interesting, but not a single person has raised the obvious red flags here in GORO:
1. not a single ounce of proven/probable/inferred reserves/resources, etc... I don't think there are many other $1bln+ miners that have zero in the ground.
2. They have an auditor that nobody has ever heard of.
3. They talk only about mineralizations - this is a meaningless word that they can't be held liable for if there turns out to be nothing in the ground.
4. they just filed a proxy to double the number of shares outstanding and double the number options/RSU's in the compensation plan.
5. They have lost $93mm since they started
6. The risk section of their recent financials effectively says that they likely will never find any gold on the property. It's right there in black and white.
7. They have been burning $6mm per quarter and funding themselves via private placements. Hochschild has recently told investors that they are not likely to fund outside investments anymore - they are going to fund organic projects instead.
8. Mgmt (Reid family) owns 20% of the stock at a near-zero cost basis.
9. GORO doesn't have a single sell-side analyst who covers them - most $1bln miners have 5-15 analysts.
10. GORO doesn't hold conference calls to report results, nor do they put out any press release to talk about results.
11. They have never sold a single dollar of gold or anything else. They have never produced anything, despite now saying that they are shipping concentrates from their open pit mine.
12. They only have $22mm of assets as of 6/30/10.
I'm reluctant to buy this stock until these issues are addressed. Perhaps my intuition is wrong here. "
Ein paar Kritikpunkte treffen nicht zu, andere sind fragwürdig, aber es gibt auch ein paar Punkte zum Nachdenken.