Uranaktien: Minen, Explorer, Produzenten, Anwender

I think the fundamentals are extremely strong for at least the next five to seven years, if not longer, and that we will see prices from 90 to 120 dollars per pound :(....throughout that period.

Also, ich war dann heut mal mit der Einkaufstüte unterwegs:

Crosshair 1,03
Sterling 1,86
Sally 2,85
DWS0G8 Uranzerti auch noch

Mal sehn, ob mir sonst noch was in die Tasche fällt.

PS: Yamana zu 8,41 auch noch zurückgekauft

PS II: Sterling hat die Fallgeschwindigkeit beschleunigt Noch heute Nacht müßte die Aktie unter Null handeln

Hat hier jemand Ahnung von Wealth Minerals? - auch schön billig heute

Gruß vom Bottomfischer (hoffentlich )

Milly, keine Ahnung ob Frau Holle bei dir war und hat ploetzlich Cash abgeworfen oder war es Ben mit dem Hubschrauber ?.

Die Wealth musst du kaufen, der Name sagt es schon.

Gruss vom Fussboden, wer es glaubt wird seelig.

XEX

PS... nix wird verkauft !

@FedMilly

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fM1ujosaDTE

Zitat

Original von Milly
.....verkaufe öfters mal was, aber das traut man sich hier immer nicht so laut zu sagen, weil dann wird man gelyncht

Gruß Milly

...sag's das nächst Mal ich werde Dich nicht lynchen - grosses Ehrenwort

linar

....übrigens Dines hat 5 Minuten vor Schluss noch ein wenig angeschoben PNP MGA ASX CHX TYC URC BAY

so trübe hier  [Blockierte Grafik: http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/1540/christmasknht3.gif] bisschen Stimmung

Ja flüssig sein ist immer gut! Haben wir mit unseren kleinen Infusionen die Patienten nochmal zum Zappeln bekommen ;). Bin gespannt auf nächste Jahr und hoffe wir kommen nun gut und in Ruhe rüber.

Grüße

...sollte man lesen, ich stell's hier rein drüben zu viel

http://www.stock-channel.net/s…?p=1103942&postcount=2232

linar

Ich gehe davon aus, dass bei den Uranium Stock nun der Boden erreicht ist....habe daher die letzten Tage zugekauft.....

Milly

Was wer von wem glaubt ist doch völlig wursch......was zählt ist das was man hat......

Liebäugle mit Uranium One, ein Uranwert dürfte ja nicht schaden.
Allerdings Projekte in "schwierigen Ländern", v. a. Kasachstan.
Andererseits bereits produzierende Minen und noch recht günstig bewertet.

Gibt es Meinungen dazu?

Gruß,
Liberty

Hallo Liberty,

ich bevorzuge bei den Produzenten Denison (hervorragende Aufstellung in den USA, sehr gutes Management) und bei den fortgeschrittenen Explorern Ur-Energy (Übernahmekandidat). Uranium One sollte sich aber auch unter normalen Umständen gut entwickeln.

Grüße

2008: A Year for Investing in Uranium Equities
Thursday, January 3, 2008

Uranium equities have stabilized in recent days with the uranium average bouncing back to the
mid-180 level and only recently crossing back over the 190+ level . Investors have begun to test the
waters and wade back into some of these issues rather than jump in blindly. It appears that we may
have experienced the worst of the tax selling in both Canada and the United States, so the table seems
set for 2008.

With drill results rolling in for the industry in the next few months we will have a news flow to trade
on, and a few companies will be reporting NI 43-101 compliant resources. Not sure at all how any of
these results will come in, however we will be investing our money in companies which have proven that
they either have something solid in the ground, or are very close to something substantial based on their
current results.

We cannot help but notice these days some of the full page advertisements endorsing nuclear
power plants which keep popping up in some of our favorite financial publications (i.e. Barron's and The
Wall Street Journal). It seems that Corporate America has fully embraced what is 'The Nuclear
Renaissance' and have begun to put their money behind it. The utilities are behind these ads and are
painting the picture that nuclear power is green power, and rightfully so. If you were to measure the
electrical output of say coal (a truly dirty source of power at all stages of its cycle- from mining to the
power plant) versus that of uranium there would be no other conclusion to draw from the facts. Truth be
told, one kg of coal contains only three times more electrical output than fire wood and produces less
than 1/16,600 of that of uranium. One question I would love to have answered is if you measured the
coal ash which goes into the atmosphere, as a result of coal being burnt at a coal fired plant, and
condensed it to the volume of its energy equivalent in uranium terms...how lethal and deadly would that
substance be? Sad thing is this is all dumped into the atmosphere and greens seem to prefer that over
storing the waste on the surface. In the future nuclear power may find more support as people become
aware of the hazards of the chemicals dumped into the atmosphere and want to account for this. As
laughable as this may sound, even today oil companies are looking at the fact of pumping CO2s into the
ground in order to pump oil out and in the process keep greenhouse gasses out of the atmosphere. It is
also being said that this process could help with meeting CO2 emission quotas under Kyoto.

Unfortunately there are those out there who lack knowledge on the matter and through their
ignorance on the subject suggest that nuclear power is much more dangerous than any other power
source we have due to the plants and spent fuel. There has not been an accident in nearly 30 years
and today many of the plants basically run themselves. There is always the possibility of accidents,
however France has converted to 80% nuclear and they do not have any problems (engineering or
management) plaguing their plants.

The country will learn more about nuclear power and uranium mining as 2008 moves on. More
applications will be submitted to the DOE for permits to build nuclear power plants, and quite honestly
the Southern US is very pro-nuclear. The guaranteed subsidies will encourage this, plus USEC Inc.
issued a press release stating that these subsidies will also benefit the uranium refiners. There is $2
billion available to the front-end of the fuel cycle and $18.5 billion for the plants themselves.

We still do believe that the established miners and near production explorers will be the issues to
lead us out of the darkness, with Uranium One and Denison Mines looking attractive among the miners
and Laramide Resources, UEX and Ur-Energy among the most attractive near production explorers.
Pinetree would give one exposure to many uranium explorers, but only one, Mega Uranium, is a serious
contender right now for achieving production. They do own some of the best explorers, and last we were
told they effectively owned, through their stock ownership in Silver Spruce Resources and Universal
Uranium, about 10% of the Two Time Zone Deposit in Labrador's Central Mineral Belt.

Another reason we are still bullish on uranium for 2008 is the very fact that the big miners are not
as bullish as once seemed. BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto both seem willing to part with Rio's holdings in
Wyoming, BHP if they are able to buy Rio Tinto and Rio Tinto to get cash to pay down debt from recent
acquisitions and to increase investors' returns. It is also important to note that none of the big miners
have bought these uranium miners or explorers. Granted Cameco has made some strategic
investments, but nothing material and Areva did purchase Uramin which was arguably the only buy
among big miners. So until these uranium plays are discovered by those who specialize in mining, it is
going to be hard for casual investors to discover.

There are still many reasons to invest in uranium, and at these prices we are among the buyers.
Many of the same reasons we began investing in uranium equities still exist, and chief among them are
the supply demand ratio and build-out of nuclear plants. So long as a marketplace exists where supply
is half of demand and demand is increasing for many years out, a favorable investing opportunity will be
present.

http://www.theinvestar.com/200…inginuraniumequities.html

...tja, was soll man noch sagen ist mir jetzt wirklich zu unsympathisch geworden
brauche keinen Trost oder ähnlich - will nur meine Ansicht kundtun, auch wenn es nix bringt

linar

...noch nicht ich hock noch auf meinen "Schnäppchen" aber ich bin ihrer mehr als leid und werde sie so bald als möglich verkloppen - da bin ich eben leider emotional ich bekomm noch die Krätze von diesen Dingern

....auch wenn Grandich immer wieder......

http://www.grandich.com/docs/GL_01-09-08.pdf

2007 REVIEW AND OUTLOOK 2008

linar

...danke Edel wenn ich nur die nötige Ruhe hätte

linar

Bei den Uranium shares geht gar nichts im Moment.....egal was passiert oder wie gut die News sind (z.B. Crosshair) die Dinger gehen gegen Süden

Mein Engagement im Uranium Bereich beschränkt sich derzeit auf DML, STM und CXX.
Werde zwar nicht weiter aufstocken aber auch nicht verkaufen......ich gehe unverändert von einer Fortsetzung der Uranium Hausse aus.....

Bei mr schaut es seit gestern so aus das ich zu 17% in Uranaktien investiert bin und -17% allgemein unten bin.

Unglaublich das sich das Rad nicht drehen will,mehr stecke ich jetzt auch nicht mehr rein,verstrahlt genug.

Cheers

XEX

Rumblings about Xemplar Energy

How can a uranium stock that’s yet to receive its first drill core assays already be valued at $786m?
Author: Barry Sergeant
Posted: Monday , 14 Jan 2008

JOHANNESBURG -

Xemplar Energy (XE CN, C$6.53), a uranium exploration company, is still waiting for assay results from drill cores submitted in December 2007.

The samples, from 13 holes at Xemplar's Warmblad prospect in Namibia, were dispatched to Set Point Labs in Johannesburg , South Africa , an ISO 17025-accredited laboratory.

Investors have fallen over each other on the Xemplar story, no matter how delicate it might be. On 18 December 2007, Xemplar announced that it "believes it has effectively discovered a new uranium province in the Warmbad area, with the identification and delineation of over 14 large mineralized alaskitic bodies that outcrop in an area of approximately 40 kilometers by 28 kilometers".....
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb…age67?oid=44371&sn=Detail

ich hab die nicht

linar