Mehr wollte ich ja gar nicht anmerken. Ich kann aber diese "backwardation soon", "short squeeze imminent" und "gold to the moon" Beiträge, die es dort auch öfters gibt, nicht mehr sehen.
Mich verwundert es immer wieder, dass man eine solche Haltung (z.B. das notorische "short squeeze imminent" etc.) endlos öffentlich wiederholen kann, ohne dass mal jemand kommt und darauf hinweist, wie falsch diese Aussagen sich nun schon seit Jahr und Tag erwiesen haben. Auch ist es unmöglich, etwas Fundiertes zum Gold zu sagen, wenn man die anderen Märkte nicht kennt oder kommentieren möchte. Apple z.B. "goes to the moon" seit Jahren, nicht Gold.
Deshalb z.B. als Alternativlektüre geeignet von 2013 - Martin Armstrong
Gold Backwardation – The Real Story
The story told is by definition assumes that gold delivered to the market must be in short supply. Therefore, they argue that such a situation is resolved only by higher prices. The assumption is that gold will rise in price because of this backwardation that took place for the first recent time in December 2008. They argue that Gold was $750 on December 5, but it rocketed to $920 – a gain of 23% – by the end of January. This was simply a flight to quality that saw money also pour into government paper. It was not a collapse in the faith of money or government. It was uncertainty.
Now let’s talk reality. The Gold backwardation is simply nothing more than the collapse in interest rates as capital lost faith in banks and then the Sovereign Debt Crisis began with Greece in 2010.
Backwardation in gold is a money issue and it is simply the yield curve – nothing more.
(...) Gold is a tangible store of wealth to make the transition from the present to the future monetary system. It is not going to $30,000 creating false images of getting rich quick. It is not that “fiat” money always collapses – it does not. If you were waiting for the end of the dollar since 1971, that is more than half your lifetime.
http://armstrongeconomics.com/…wardation-the-real-story/
Grüße
auratico
