Was mich wundert, dass die alle öffentlich zugängliche Dienste nutzen.
ich verweise nur mal eben auf clintons eigenen emails server
1. What happened?
While serving as secretary of state under President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton used multiple private email servers to communicate regarding government business, according to the State Department. Additionally, it was revealed that Clinton never had a government (.gov) email address while she was serving in her post–we’ll talk about which email address she used in a moment–and her aides did not take any actions to preserve the emails sent through her personal account. This prompted an investigation by the FBI to determine if Clinton intentionally put classified information at risk.
2. Why does it matter?
Clinton handed over 30,000 emails to the State Department, of which 110 contained classified information at the time they either were sent or received, according to the FBI’s findings. During the investigation, though, Clinton asserted that none of the emails she sent or received were classified at the time. The biggest implication has been the potential threat to national security. While the contents of the emails have not fully been released, if they had contained sensitive information it could have possibly fallen into the wrong hands. As noted by the New York Times, Comey said it was “possible” that enemy foreign governments had accessed Clinton’s personal email account.
The second biggest implication is that of transparency. The Federal Records Act requires that all communication in certain branches of government be recorded on government servers, and it forbids the use of a personal email account for government business, unless those emails are then copied and archived. However, there are a lot of technicalities involved, and there is evidence that other government officials had violated the act. As Alex Howard wrote for the Sunlight Foundation, there is also evidence that Clinton tried to control the discoverability of the emails under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which could set a precedent for limiting public access to government records. It is also believed that Clinton deleted 31,000 emails deemed personal in nature before turning the emails over to the State Department.
Wenn man aber solche öffentlichen Dienste nutzt muss einem klar sein, dass alles was darin gesagt wird, so öffentlich ist als ob man es auf dem Marktplatz herumposaunt.
ich gebe dir recht, eigene systeme sind pflicht. ich verstehe auch nicht wie die mehrheit mit whatsapp umgeht und wenn ich sehe welche sensiblen informationen geteilt werden.
generell gilt, die awareness/sensitivität der menschen zum thema ist viel zu gering(siehe zb. auch social engeneering... ich sag mal kevin mitnick).
welche relevante information wurde denn in diesem chat wirklich geteilt?
"Those Are Some Really Sh*tty War Plans": Hegseth Ridicules Atlantic 'Bombshell' After Signal Chats Released | ZeroHedge
![[smilie_denk]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/smilie_denk_44.gif "smilie_denk"){kind=small}
![[smilie_love]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/smilie_love_004.gif "smilie_love"){kind=small}
![[smilie_blume]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/smilie_blume1.gif "smilie_blume"){kind=small}
![[smilie_happy]](https://goldseiten-forum.com/wcf/images/smilies/smilie_happy_058.gif "smilie_happy"){kind=small}
